Economic crisis have been puzzling people for quite sometimes. Looking at the empirical data, people cannot help but wonder if there are patterns in those crises. The above figure is the logarithmic returns for the SP500 price index during the period from january 3, 1950 to September 3, 2013. Some important dates are included in the figures.
Des 6, 1974 Market Crash, Oil Crisis;
Oct 19, 1987 Black Monday;
May 21, 1998 Asian Financial Crisis;
Dec 31, 2008 USA crisis. (Data Source: Yahoo Finance).
Here, we are easily tempted to say that there are some sort of periodicities or cycles of crises being showed in that figure. But things are not that simple. In fact, the crises do not have any apparent regularity. On the other hand, It's been known for quite sometimes that
price fluctuation contains important information about the behavior of the financial market.
The simplest economics model treats the behavior of the system through a "representative agent" approach where the heterogeneous preferences of the individual agents are replaced by average preference curve. Agents determine their action in isolation, with no reference whatsoever to the decision of others. In other word, interactions between agents are neglected.
The need to account for interaction, however, is quite compelling. Imitation and social pressure effect must be responsible for the appearance of trends, fads and fashion, or mass panic, that would be difficult if agents were really insensitive to the behavior of others
In our approach, interactions between agents are very important.
The definition of a "system" actually include the interaction between
the agents. Because of that, crises, crashes, and bubbles,
are inherently the natural property of the system itself. We avoid giving one explanation for "normal" economy, and another for "anomalous" one. There is only one explanation that encompass all states of the system.
The “physics” part of the “econophysics” emphasis the correlations between models and empirical data. We, therefore, treat an economical system as if it is a physical system where any explanation should be validated by empirical data. The figure below shows the comparison of our simulations to the S&P 500 data,