#11. Nature interpretation in my past, present and future.
Iâll admit, I put off writing this post for a while. It just seemed so daunting! Trying to debrief what Iâve learned and how Iâve grown (all while connecting to lecture, labs, and readings) is no easy task! But here we go.
I signed up for Nature Interpretation thinking Iâd be tasked with leading a nature hike in the Arboretum. I was happy to do this. In fact, Iâd led several nature hikes in the past as a high school co-op student at a local land trust. And up until now, thatâs really what I thought nature interpretation was â nature hikes, pond studies, and other outdoor programs. Through this course, however, Iâve learned there is much more to nature interpretation! In the sections below Iâll discuss my core beliefs and responsibilities as a nature interpreter, and what approaches I plan to use into the future.
âWhat I learned in nature interpretation isâŠblankity blankity blank!â I learned a lot and Iâll attempt to summarize key points in my post! Image from SpongeBob SquarePants, Nickelodeon⊠modified by me.Â
My Core Beliefs
Iâve spent a lot of time exploring nature and getting to know my natural neighbours. I believe my connections with nature drive me to protect nature and be sustainable. I realize that not everyone will share this mindset. This I know from our discussion of the âinvisible backpackâ. I grew up with plenty of positive experiences in nature, helping me to believe in its intrinsic value. People who have few emotions, memories, and experiences with nature may simply see it as a commodity to be exploited. But I think we can try to change that for the better by helping other people build a personal connection to nature. Hereâs why:
I believe that people care about things that are meaningful to them. For example, my photo albums mean a lot to me because they help me reconnect with emotions and stories. If my house caught fire my photo albums would be one of the first thing Iâd take. When it comes to nature, I know I am more likely to protect wildlife and land that means something to me. Think about this: if two sites were about to be bulldozed and covered with a housing development, would you rather save the woodlot that you walk your dog in each day or the woodlot a few hundred kilometers away in a city youâve never visited?
Most people, I think, will fight for nature when they have a personal connection to it. When we help people discover find meaning in nature, we inspire them to care about nature and want to protect it.
I know Iâm more likely to protect things and places that I have a connection to. Photo credits to my mother.
My Responsibility
Iâve stated my belief about creating meaningful connections with nature. So how can I accomplish this as a nature interpreter? To answer this, I looked back at what Iâve learned in the course. I canât remember if it was Chris or Aaron, but at some point in class we were reminded that we canât force people to connect with nature. We can only create the optimal conditions for people to make their own connections. One responsibility of mine is to create these optimal conditions. How might I do this? Relate the subject matter to the lives of the audience â the gift of a spark! Help the audience have positive experiences in nature â the gift of joy! And finally, let my passion for nature illuminate the lives of my audience â the gift of passion!
Another responsibility I have is to encourage people to connect with nature while minimizing harm to it. For example, people can have a lot of fun camping. They might make positive memories and feel connected to nature. But in doing so they might litter, damage habitat (e.g. by removing logs for firewood) or introduce invasive species. This is not a good way to connect with nature. So I also feel responsible for promoting âleave no traceâ (or at least low-impact) activities in nature.
For example, I usually encourage people to leave wildlife alone and not try to lure it in, chase it, or handle it. However, I recognize that allowing someone to interact with wildlife can help build a strong connection to it. Some examples would be holding a frog or helping to move a turtle across a dangerous road. In these cases, itâs my responsibility to give guidance on how to make the interaction safe for both you and the animal. For example, donât pick up animals if you have sunscreen/products on your hands; hold an animal low over the ground so they donât fall from high up if they escape; and donât hold the animal for too long. Itâs a fine balance, but I believe there are ways to enjoy nature and connect to it without wreaking havoc on it!
One part of the âLeave no Traceâ infographic from Fix.com. Click here for link.
My Approach
One of the 15 principles of nature interpretation is the gift of provocation, to inspire people to broaden their horizons (Beck and Cable 2011). I have broadened my horizons in this course. Throughout the course, weâve participated in many different approaches: music, art, history, improv, podcasts, blogs, and a traditional nature hike. Different people have different learning styles, and we can create targeted programs that work with all different styles (Beck and Cable 2011). Iâm excited to use what Iâve learned to personalize my approach to nature interpretation. I love using humour to connect to people and create a moment of joy. I also enjoy art and photography. In the past year or so Iâve created a few nature cartoons, which Iâve shared on social media. With each cartoon I also post some text to explain a bit about the species featured in the cartoon and what can be done to help protect them. I hope that my cartoons serve as the âhookâ to capture my audienceâs attention and inspire them to seek out their own connections in nature. I donât know whether I will end up with a career as a nature interpreter, but I know that these nature cartoons are a fun way to promote nature interpretation even as a hobby!
A screenshot of one tweet from a thread I did about four-toed salamanders. Link to thread.Â
In Closing
The biggest lessons Iâve learned relate to creating targeted programs that are well-suited to the audience. Combining an effective program with a passionate interpreter seems to be the best way to inspire people to care about nature! Thanks everyone for a good semester.
References:
Beck, L., & Cable, T. T. (2011). The Gifts of Interpretation: Fifteen Guiding Principles for Interpreting Nature and Culture. Urbana, IL: Sagamore Publishing.
I loved your blog post this week, and your focus on the importance of making connections to your audience! I agree that sometimes despite how much weâd like to, we canât force people to connect with nature and to take the issues associated with it seriously. However, I agree that as enthusiasts of nature ourselves, we have a responsibility to at least make sure that we use the tools available to us to encourage people to develop a positive relationship with nature. I also agree that people are absolutely more likely to care about something if they have some sort of personal attachment to it. I believe that making personal connections to an audience is so very important because it can get them to care about something that they may not have cared about before or realized was important. Even though I wonât be informing large crowds about nature, I can definitely see myself using the tips and tricks that I learned across this course to be a nature interpreter to my friends and family. The labs of this class have encouraged me to think of a nature interpreter as more than just someone who does guided walks through a forest, and the readings have helped me to think critically about what is important when addressing an audience and the process of interpretation. Through the readings, lectures and labs, I think we are all now better equipped to guide people towards making connections to nature and hopefully to be more mindful of their impact on it.


























