#11. Nature interpretation in my past, present and future.
I’ll admit, I put off writing this post for a while. It just seemed so daunting! Trying to debrief what I’ve learned and how I’ve grown (all while connecting to lecture, labs, and readings) is no easy task! But here we go.
I signed up for Nature Interpretation thinking I’d be tasked with leading a nature hike in the Arboretum. I was happy to do this. In fact, I’d led several nature hikes in the past as a high school co-op student at a local land trust. And up until now, that’s really what I thought nature interpretation was – nature hikes, pond studies, and other outdoor programs. Through this course, however, I’ve learned there is much more to nature interpretation! In the sections below I’ll discuss my core beliefs and responsibilities as a nature interpreter, and what approaches I plan to use into the future.
“What I learned in nature interpretation is…blankity blankity blank!” I learned a lot and I’ll attempt to summarize key points in my post! Image from SpongeBob SquarePants, Nickelodeon… modified by me.
My Core Beliefs
I’ve spent a lot of time exploring nature and getting to know my natural neighbours. I believe my connections with nature drive me to protect nature and be sustainable. I realize that not everyone will share this mindset. This I know from our discussion of the “invisible backpack”. I grew up with plenty of positive experiences in nature, helping me to believe in its intrinsic value. People who have few emotions, memories, and experiences with nature may simply see it as a commodity to be exploited. But I think we can try to change that for the better by helping other people build a personal connection to nature. Here’s why:
I believe that people care about things that are meaningful to them. For example, my photo albums mean a lot to me because they help me reconnect with emotions and stories. If my house caught fire my photo albums would be one of the first thing I’d take. When it comes to nature, I know I am more likely to protect wildlife and land that means something to me. Think about this: if two sites were about to be bulldozed and covered with a housing development, would you rather save the woodlot that you walk your dog in each day or the woodlot a few hundred kilometers away in a city you’ve never visited?
Most people, I think, will fight for nature when they have a personal connection to it. When we help people discover find meaning in nature, we inspire them to care about nature and want to protect it.
I know I’m more likely to protect things and places that I have a connection to. Photo credits to my mother.
My Responsibility
I’ve stated my belief about creating meaningful connections with nature. So how can I accomplish this as a nature interpreter? To answer this, I looked back at what I’ve learned in the course. I can’t remember if it was Chris or Aaron, but at some point in class we were reminded that we can’t force people to connect with nature. We can only create the optimal conditions for people to make their own connections. One responsibility of mine is to create these optimal conditions. How might I do this? Relate the subject matter to the lives of the audience – the gift of a spark! Help the audience have positive experiences in nature – the gift of joy! And finally, let my passion for nature illuminate the lives of my audience – the gift of passion!
Another responsibility I have is to encourage people to connect with nature while minimizing harm to it. For example, people can have a lot of fun camping. They might make positive memories and feel connected to nature. But in doing so they might litter, damage habitat (e.g. by removing logs for firewood) or introduce invasive species. This is not a good way to connect with nature. So I also feel responsible for promoting “leave no trace” (or at least low-impact) activities in nature.
For example, I usually encourage people to leave wildlife alone and not try to lure it in, chase it, or handle it. However, I recognize that allowing someone to interact with wildlife can help build a strong connection to it. Some examples would be holding a frog or helping to move a turtle across a dangerous road. In these cases, it’s my responsibility to give guidance on how to make the interaction safe for both you and the animal. For example, don’t pick up animals if you have sunscreen/products on your hands; hold an animal low over the ground so they don’t fall from high up if they escape; and don’t hold the animal for too long. It’s a fine balance, but I believe there are ways to enjoy nature and connect to it without wreaking havoc on it!
One part of the “Leave no Trace” infographic from Fix.com. Click here for link.
My Approach
One of the 15 principles of nature interpretation is the gift of provocation, to inspire people to broaden their horizons (Beck and Cable 2011). I have broadened my horizons in this course. Throughout the course, we’ve participated in many different approaches: music, art, history, improv, podcasts, blogs, and a traditional nature hike. Different people have different learning styles, and we can create targeted programs that work with all different styles (Beck and Cable 2011). I’m excited to use what I’ve learned to personalize my approach to nature interpretation. I love using humour to connect to people and create a moment of joy. I also enjoy art and photography. In the past year or so I’ve created a few nature cartoons, which I’ve shared on social media. With each cartoon I also post some text to explain a bit about the species featured in the cartoon and what can be done to help protect them. I hope that my cartoons serve as the “hook” to capture my audience’s attention and inspire them to seek out their own connections in nature. I don’t know whether I will end up with a career as a nature interpreter, but I know that these nature cartoons are a fun way to promote nature interpretation even as a hobby!
A screenshot of one tweet from a thread I did about four-toed salamanders. Link to thread.
In Closing
The biggest lessons I’ve learned relate to creating targeted programs that are well-suited to the audience. Combining an effective program with a passionate interpreter seems to be the best way to inspire people to care about nature! Thanks everyone for a good semester.
References:
Beck, L., & Cable, T. T. (2011). The Gifts of Interpretation: Fifteen Guiding Principles for Interpreting Nature and Culture. Urbana, IL: Sagamore Publishing.
Hi Kayla,
I also struggled on how to approach the blog post this week!
I relate a lot to your core beliefs of nature. I find it hard to excite and motivate people to protect nature and want to learn more about it. Especially, when we are so passionate about it! I really liked when you gave us a choice of whether we would save a woodlot near our house or a neighbourhood we know nothing about. I would definitely save the area that means the most to me. What a good way to explain the point that people need a personal connection to nature! I think interpreters do need to personalize their approach more and bring it to social media as well.
I like your responsibility of making sure people have fun in nature, but don't bring too much harm to it. I’ve never thought about this in terms of through nature interpretation. I thought your picture of “leave no trace” was awesome to add in to your blog post! I think in order to create positive memories for people we can offer that “gift of joy,” but maybe remind them to leave the area just like they found it. You’re right, we have to find the right balance! Hopefully more people are aware of this in the future.
I also love using humour in my programs! I LOVE your cartoon, what a great idea! I definitely think this is a great way to capture the audience’s attention. I do enjoy some good puns! Keep working on these, they’re great!
Kate























