Although it was once extinct in the wild the takhi has been successfully reintroduced to its native territory in Central China and Eastern Europe. ©ChornobylWild

Jar Jar Binks Fan Club
d e v o n
Not today Justin
occasionally subtle
EXPECTATIONS
$LAYYYTER
Mike Driver
The Stonewall Inn

#extradirty
he wasn't even looking at me and he found me

ellievsbear

bliss lane
★
I'd rather be in outer space 🛸

Game Changer & Make Some Noise
Interview Vampire Daily
Cosimo Galluzzi

Andulka

if i look back, i am lost

roma★
seen from United States

seen from United States

seen from United Kingdom
seen from United States

seen from Malaysia
seen from United States

seen from Malaysia

seen from Singapore

seen from Latvia

seen from Pakistan
seen from Indonesia
seen from United States

seen from United States

seen from Sweden

seen from Germany
seen from Bangladesh

seen from United States
seen from Germany
seen from Ecuador
seen from United States
@equusandfandoms
Although it was once extinct in the wild the takhi has been successfully reintroduced to its native territory in Central China and Eastern Europe. ©ChornobylWild
reading a historical romance novel and reflecting on the way these stories often present woke nobility for the contemporary reader. a big thing is servants. you can’t not have servants in those times but many modern readers think “but I would never have servants. it would be so weird to have servants” and in order to make the protagonists of the story more relatable they are actually friends with the servants. but flip your perspective and think of it from the side of the servants. wouldn’t it be so awful if your boss was always trying to be friends with you. a really common thing you’ll see is the woke baronet having tea in the kitchen with the servants bc he’s not like other baronets. but what if your boss wanted to hang out and talk during your lunch break every day. not so charming when you think about it that way
#okay but now what is the optimal way to be a good boss in this situation i genuinely wanna know#its easy to guess what makes a bad boss or a mid boss. but what is a good boss#specifically in such a highly structured hierarchal situation (via @rainbowroach)
HELLO you are asking questions that literature and poetry THROUGHOUT the middle ages has asked, and it is from this questioning that we derive things like the Codes of Chivalry (which is not "how to treat a noble lady really nice" but is actually "how to be an ethical person when you're rich and you own a horse" and includes such things as "don't run people over with your horse")
In fact I daresay you already know instinctively just from cultural osmosis what a good boss -- a good liege lord -- is and does based on the tropes that have survived to the current day and the kinds of things that get Hugely Praised in things like legends of King Arthur.
A good boss (liege lord) is:
Merciful. He is not having his peasants killed for things like poaching rabbits during a famine. In fact, he is working to mitigate famine. During times of individual hardship, he might negotiate with a peasant for a payment plan on their annual rent.
Patient. He is not impulsive, he does not lose his temper.
Prudent. He makes choices that are thoughtful, considered, conservative (in the sense of not needlessly risky--he's not investing his entire fortune in having everyone plant an unproven crop). He is making sure local infrastructure like roads and public buildings are maintained and kept in good nick.
Gentle. He doesn't haul off and slap a servant or a tenant for breaking a dish or making a mistake. He doesn't abuse animals, his wife or children, or his employees. He doesn't rape the servants.
Generous (both in money and in spirit). He is not extorting the peasants for an amount of rent that is beyond their means, he is not raising taxes every year to cover his own lavish lifestyle. He is paying his servants a living wage (or, if wages are low, he's giving them room/board/clothing to make up the difference). If someone in a tenant's family dies, the lord is sending a gift of condolence, or helping to pay for the funeral, or possibly even ATTENDING the funeral and speaking a few kind words about the deceased, ESPECIALLY if they were a really upstanding and important member of the community. If one of his tenants is gravely sick, the lord is sending a basket of food or paying for a doctor. He is giving charitably (generally this will be, like, a bequest to the church so that they can run a hospital or an orphanage or a school for the local village children).
Pious. This classically means "goes to church, submits with humility to God" but to me this quality is subtextually standing in for "maintaining an ongoing sense of Perspective that HE'S not god, that there are higher powers he is Accountable to, that he too can be Judged, etc, so that he doesn't end up going on a weird fucked up power trip"
Humble. One of the most admiring things you hear about a lord doing in literature and epic poetry is, "He ate off of wooden plates while his followers ate off of gold and silver." Humility isn't about being meek, it's just about not thinking so much of yourself that you turn your nose up and sneer at what "lesser" people do. In other words: Don't be a fucking diva. If your carriage gets stuck in the mud, climb out and help everybody else push, you're not gonna die from getting mud on your shoes.
Condescending. This word has changed wildly in meaning/tone over the last couple centuries -- it's now a rude thing to do (because we've done away with legal social hierarchies, so someone acting like they're lowering themselves to your level IS insulting), but in older times, a high-ranking person "condescending" to a servant was worthy of praise and admiration: it means they were setting aside rank and privilege to speak to them with the easygoing, friendly respect and compassion they'd give a peer. This is things like... Treats those beneath him with courtesy and respect (ie: listens soberly and attentively when one of his servants or tenants comes to complain about a problem). Having a sense of humor and kindness about it when the lord and a servant both come around a corner at the same time and run into each other and the servant gets knocked to the ground and starts babbling apologies--the condescending (positive) lord helps them to their feet with his own hands and cracks a joke to show them that it's ok (as opposed to just walking off without a word or insulting/scolding them). This is also things like trusting a farmer, woodcutter, or artisan to speak with expertise about their own livelihood and taking their advice into consideration if they tell the lord that one of his ideas won't work.
Good boundaries. The ethical liege lord knows that it's normal for the staff to probably be softly bitching about him in private (even with a really good boss, we all grumble from time to time). He's not eavesdropping on them, he's not going into the staff areas where they should reasonably expect to have a degree of privacy, etc.
Righteous and protective of "the weak". The "weak" here doesn't necessarily mean physically weak, this is often used in the sense of someone politically or socially weak, aka The Marginalized -- the poor, the disabled, women, children, the elderly, etc. If a lord sees someone like this being mistreated or abused, he's supposed to step in and put a stop to that.
Committed to reciprocity. In a highly hierarchical system like feudalism, every person (from the lowest peasant all the way up to the crown prince) legally OWES their liege lord certain things (taxes, labor, service, loyalty, etc). A good liege remembers and takes very seriously the idea that this should be a balanced and reciprocal relationship -- in other words, he owes something BACK. Feudalism is modeled very strongly on the family system: If children owe their parents obedience and service, then parents owe their children care and protection. This still applies when the "child" is a farmer and the "parent" is a local baron. Or when the "child" is a duke and the "parent" is the king.
Basically, we get so caught up in the aesthetics of nobility that we forget that it literally is a managerial position that comes with responsibilities that were... very similar back in the day to the same ones we have now. Humans have not changed all that much. At the end of the day, a really good boss in the 1400s versus in one from the 2020s displays most of the same qualities of personality, even if the details of execution are different.
The next question is, of course, "well, but this theoretical liege lord is HIGHLY idealized -- how often did that actually HAPPEN? Wasn't it more likely that everyone was exploited all the time?" and to that I say: Well, maybe. But again, I don't think humans have changed all that much. Just like the bosses of today, there's a SPECTRUM: A really really good boss is rare and precious and one that you tell stories about for years after you've left that job, but a truly, genuinely, homicidally nightmarish boss is also pretty rare. Most bosses are sort of meh -- they have their good moments, they have their shitty moments, but they're tolerable and you can get along with them well enough to do your job, and then you roll your eyes at them behind their back. Generally, humans don't take outright exploitation lying down. Being a bad boss in the historical period is how you get peasant uprisings and revolts, and you know that to be true because your parents raised you with that knowledge, so unless you are very stupid or inbred or an egomaniac, there is literal personal incentive to at minimum be a Tolerable liege lord. And that means hitting at least SOME of the above bullet points.
TL;DR: In the words of Honore de Balzac, "Everything I have just told you can be summarized by an old word: noblesse oblige!"
(for more discussions of the ethics of fealty and what it means to be a good boss when you are an exquisitely beautiful twink of a prince with a hot beefy bodyguard.... [fingerguns] read A Taste of Gold and Iron)
SO I FIND OUT MY FRIENDS AND I ARE ON OUR LOCAL NEWS WEBSITE
We were asked all these questions about how long the costumes took us, how we did it, etc.
I paused the video right when we were asked how much money we spent on our cosplays and
fjdkaf;jkd;al
does that give you your answer
THIS WILL NEVER NOT BE FUNNY
här på jobbet kör vi alltså kommunikation via tejp
"You hear that? They're saying The Odyssey doesn't even have nobody!"
"They've got nobody in the Odyssey?"
"No I'm saying they don't got nobody."
"Nobody's there?"
"Nobody's not there!"
"So everyone's there?"
"Everybody but nobody!"
The 2026 Gender Census is now open!
[ survey.gendercensus.com ]
The 13th annual international gender census, collecting information about the language we use to refer to ourselves and each other, is now open until 13th August 2026.
It’s short and easy, for most participants it takes 5 minutes or less.
After the survey is closed I’ll process the results and publish a spreadsheet of the data and a report summarising the main findings. Then anyone can use them for academic or business purposes, self-advocacy, tracking the popularity of language over time, and just feeling like we’re part of a huge and diverse community.
If you think you might have friends and followers who’d be interested, please do reblog this blog post, and share the survey URL by email or at AFK social groups or on other social networks. Every share is extremely helpful!
Survey URL: https://survey.gendercensus.com
The survey is open to anyone anywhere who speaks English and feels that the gender binary doesn’t fully describe their experience of themselves and their gender(s) or lack thereof.
Thank you so much!
[ Link to survey ]
PS: You can see some regularly-updated statistics about incoming data here, with lots of demography and graphs to peruse!
PPS: Image credits, bark and grass.
Coming at you from The Past - I've scheduled this for 3am UK time, the quietest hour for the survey. This is an effort to make sure that I'm reaching as many time zones as possible!
it is funny that 3am UK time equates to 2pm NZ time - prime "awake" hour for a country where the census is very popular. makes me giggle
Beri Gerwise
Gender: Female
Sexuality: Lesbian
DOB: Born 1997
Ethnicity: Iranian, Kurdish
Nationality: Swedish
Occupation: Singer, songwriter, actress
One of my favorite bits of characterization is how Murtagh projects onto Eragon.
When Eragon is sixteen, Murtagh explodes at him after rescuing him from Gil'ead:
The narration specifically describes the venom in Murtagh's voice, but the anger isn't really about Eragon. At this point in the story, Murtagh himself feels trapped with no way out: hunted by the Empire, unable to trust the Varden, convinced every path ends in death. He's overwhelmed by his own helplessness, and instead of confronting that, he redirects it toward the one person standing in front of him.
He's not criticizing Eragon so much as attacking the part of himself he can't stand. The irony is that Murtagh's accusation falls apart almost immediately when you compare their actual circumstances.
When Murtagh was seventeen (older than Eragon, with years of formal training under Tornac, better equipment, and far more combat experience) he nearly died fighting Urgals.
During a clash on a patrol, he becomes overwhelmed and later admits he would have died if Lord Varis and his men hadn't rescued him.
So the same person calling Eragon "totally helpless" had himself needed saving against a stronger opponent.
Meanwhile Eragon, at sixteen, is expected to survive encounters with Urgals, the Ra'zac, escape Gil'ead, and eventually fight the Shade Durza with far less experience.
The "weakness" Murtagh condemns in Eragon is something he has experienced and loathes about himself.
Even in his twenties, after everything he's survived, Murtagh is still forced to confront the same lesson. During the events of Murtagh, he nearly dies again.
During a boar hunt, he's left dazed, injured, and moments away from death before being rescued. Afterward, Bachel tells him:
It's a simple observation, but it cuts to the heart of Murtagh's character. For most of his life, he equates needing help with weakness. His pride convinces him that accepting assistance is failure, that asking Eragon for help would somehow diminish him.
Eragon becomes a reflection of the vulnerability Murtagh spends his life trying to hide from. It reminds me of this Holly Black quote:
A mirror is exactly what Eragon is for Murtagh, and he acknowledges this at the end of Eldest.
Eragon rejects the idea in the heat of the moment, but Murtagh is right. They're incredibly similar, but they respond differently and have different outlooks on life. The reason they clash at times is because they're forced to look at themselves through each other.
Which is why I love how Paolini pays this off at the end of Murtagh.
When Murtagh enters the scrying chamber to speak with Eragon, the first thing described is the mirror itself:
The description feels strangely personal: a lone mirror, human, imperfect. Not accepted by either dwarves or elves.
It's basically Murtagh.
Then Paolini has him stop and look at his own reflection before the conversation even begins.
Even Thorn is absent because the room is too small. Murtagh has no companion, no distraction, no shield. He's forced to stand alone and face himself.
Then the mirror changes, and Eragon's face appears exactly where Murtagh's reflection had been.
"...all-too-familiar." That wording is doing a lot of work.
Throughout the entire novel, Murtagh can't escape Eragon. He constantly compares himself to him, wonders what Eragon would do, hears stories about him, measures himself against him. So when Eragon finally appears, he occupies the exact place Murtagh's own reflection had been.
The mirror literally becomes another mirror.
At first, Murtagh approaches the conversation armored with resentment and defensiveness. He's prepared to be judged.
Instead, Eragon meets him with compassion, and Murtagh finally lets his guard down:
His posture softens, his emotional defenses crack. For perhaps the first time in the series, he willingly lets Eragon see him without the mask.
Later we're told:
That's the real difference between the Murtagh of Eragon and the Murtagh at the end of his own novel.
Back then, he projected and lashed out because he couldn't bear what he saw reflected back at him. Now he accepts responsibility. He doesn't make excuses or redirect his pain onto someone else.
And finally:
That line always gets me.
For years, Eragon functioned as the mirror Murtagh hated looking into because it reflected everything he feared about himself: weakness, vulnerability, loneliness, dependence.
But by the end of Murtagh, the mirror hasn't changed, but Murtagh has. Eragon accepts him without judgment, and in doing so, Murtagh is finally able to accept himself. The mirror meets its reflection and, for the first time, doesn't recoil.
I have 100,000 followers on here (i know; tumblr power user jmg) and i think it gives me, like, zero social capital? Which I think might be why it's still good.
Like, when my agents are pitching me for something, they'll be like, "Look at his facebook! Look at his tiktok!" They're never gonna say, "100,000 people follow him on tumblr. Remember tumblr?"
But the thing is, I don't actually use facebook or tiktok (except for promo). This is the only place I use, the only place where I'm interested in the community and shared creation and all that shit.
So long live tumblr. Nobody who's gonna hire me to do anything has ever heard of it. It makes for a terrible space to promote your forthcoming book tour. And that's literally why it doesn't suck.
The 2026 Gender Census is now open!
[ survey.gendercensus.com ]
The 13th annual international gender census, collecting information about the language we use to refer to ourselves and each other, is now open until 13th August 2026.
It’s short and easy, for most participants it takes 5 minutes or less.
After the survey is closed I’ll process the results and publish a spreadsheet of the data and a report summarising the main findings. Then anyone can use them for academic or business purposes, self-advocacy, tracking the popularity of language over time, and just feeling like we’re part of a huge and diverse community.
If you think you might have friends and followers who’d be interested, please do reblog this blog post, and share the survey URL by email or at AFK social groups or on other social networks. Every share is extremely helpful!
Survey URL: https://survey.gendercensus.com
The survey is open to anyone anywhere who speaks English and feels that the gender binary doesn’t fully describe their experience of themselves and their gender(s) or lack thereof.
Thank you so much!
[ Link to survey ]
PS: You can see some regularly-updated statistics about incoming data here, with lots of demography and graphs to peruse!
PPS: Image credits, bark and grass.
Day 8, Monday 20th July 2026
I am delighted to report that there have been about 21,500 responses!
As you can see, we're still way behind last year and the record-breaking response from 2024, responses are about 25% lower than usual - but honestly, I'm not sad about it because 21,500 is still a mind-boggling sample size. (That reminds me, I should repost on /r/SampleSize.)
Other cool facts:
The average participant age is the highest it's been since I started collecting age info in 2020!
At least 46% of participants are new to the survey - decent!
New Zealand is again winning the annual "participants as a percentage of country's population" rankings. How are they so reliably good at that??
The USA is hilariously dominant, as usual - literally more entries than all other countries in the entire rest of the world combined:
So as you can see, it's especially helpful to send the survey URL (https://survey.gendercensus.com) to any genderly-interesting folks you know who are outside of the USA. 👍
Oh, and - don't forget to take part yourself. ;) (I keep being too busy to close up the name survey so you've still got time to do that one as well!)
i’m starting a rumour:
Funderingar på vad ni ska göra i sommar? Ingen fara, har satt ihop en fin-fin Sverige roadtrip karta som går till några av de mest sevärda platserna.
by Luyao Wu
we should bring back the supernatural fandom somehow having an extremely specific gif for literally every occasion though
i know you guys are still out there. i know you still have your .gif folders. don't pretend you're not.
you. you get it.
So every year, my aquarium does a captive lobster hatchery project (hence all the loblings). The reason we’re doing it is because in the wild, loblings only have a 1 in 25,000 chance of surviving their larval phase. They’re plankton as babies and everything eats them. Additionally, as the Gulf of Maine warms, they are having even lower survival rates because the blooms of copepods they feed on as babies are happening earlier in the year, and they’re missing it.
Obviously, the goal of this experiment is to grow the lobsters until they’re big enough to settle to the seabed and then release them, because they have a much higher likelihood of surviving to adulthood when they’re able to hide. Ideally, captive lobster hatcheries can boost the wild population and keep things stable, so we don’t have a major crash in a decade or two.
The first year we tried this was pretty bad. We had a lot of eggs, but very few babies. It turned out that the CO2 levels in the building spiked as more guests visited throughout the summer, and that settled into the water and threw off the pH and caused a chemical reaction that prevented a lot of the eggs from hatching. I think we ended up releasing three baby lobsters (which is still better than their wild survival rate but not great).
The second year was a little better. We added a de-gasser to the aquarium and got a ton of larval lobsters, but right as they were settling to the bottom we had a disease outbreak that killed most of them. We ended up releasing four babies at the end of the season.
But this year? Oh boy. We have so many lobsters that we had to release the first round early (usually we wait till September or October so guests can see them). We just released a total of FIVE HUNDRED AND TWENTY FIVE baby lobsters, and we still have over a hundred who haven’t settled to the bottom yet. I genuinely don’t even have words to explain how cool this is. OVER FIVE HUNDRED. We just added hundreds of lobsters to the wild population that wouldn’t have been there otherwise.
Conservation is so fucken sick
An ultra extended flowchart for identifying dynasties! Even identifying sub-periods of each dynasty. As always, this is a general guide ther
does the makeup look sad or happy? >>> goth & sad >>> middle tang dynasty [lmao]
The 2026 Gender Census is now open!
[ survey.gendercensus.com ]
The 13th annual international gender census, collecting information about the language we use to refer to ourselves and each other, is now open until 13th August 2026.
It’s short and easy, for most participants it takes 5 minutes or less.
After the survey is closed I’ll process the results and publish a spreadsheet of the data and a report summarising the main findings. Then anyone can use them for academic or business purposes, self-advocacy, tracking the popularity of language over time, and just feeling like we’re part of a huge and diverse community.
If you think you might have friends and followers who’d be interested, please do reblog this blog post, and share the survey URL by email or at AFK social groups or on other social networks. Every share is extremely helpful!
Survey URL: https://survey.gendercensus.com
The survey is open to anyone anywhere who speaks English and feels that the gender binary doesn’t fully describe their experience of themselves and their gender(s) or lack thereof.
Thank you so much!
[ Link to survey ]
PS: You can see some regularly-updated statistics about incoming data here, with lots of demography and graphs to peruse!
PPS: Image credits, bark and grass.
Please stop excluding binary transsexuals.
Who can participate?
This survey intends to collect information from everyone who ISN'T adequately described by the "gender binary".
According to the binary model of gender, everyone fits tidily into just one of these categories:
• Woman/girl - all the time, solely, and completely ↳ (may be cisgender, transgender, intersex, etc. for the purposes of this survey)
• Man/boy - all the time, solely, and completely ↳ (may be cisgender, transgender, intersex, etc. for the purposes of this survey)
Anyone who doesn't feel like they fit into one of these two boxes is invited to participate. There are no restrictions based on location, age, or anything else.
This survey is not about or for you. This isn't persecution. You're just not in the target sample for the study and that's okay. It's just a survey of people whose genders aren't described by the M/F binary. 🤷
You can make your own survey about binary transsexuals if you want to, and nonbinary people won't be able to take part, which is also normal and okay.