welcome to the evil blog (18+). you can expect any of the following: shameless hornyposting, even pettier hater moments than on main, analysis posts without the self-censorship, rpf cleavage, and a lot of noncon and incest. complete tonal whiplash is the norm.
—
if you want, you can filter some of these things:
#evilryx hater moments (haterism/crit)
#incest (what it says)
#nc (noncon/abuse/anything that crosses a similar line)
blog tags and more blog info under cut yay <3
—
askbox guidelines: i'm not into piss or feet, or actual underage shit. (pyro teen pregnancy bit is a-okay.) don't stress over what you send me, if something crosses a line i'll say so and add it to this list, no big deal. but it probably won't happen. if i don't answer your ask, it's most likely because i didn't have anything interesting to say.
—
they call me the character transgenderizer. i tend to avoid specific identity labels, but here are the pronouns i use for different characters on this blog ^_^
pearl: she/they/it
pyro: they/she/it
etho: she/her
joel: he/she
owen: he/she (in au context)
cleo: they/them
avid: she/her
—
main tags:
general yapping
analysis
asks
art reblogs
my writing and fic talk
song talk
housewife au tag
family au tag
hater moments, incest, and noncon tags if you actually want to scroll them like some kind of freak
i've been talking up my owenshelby insanity for a while on this blog and i've finally finished the work that was the catalyst for it, a process that dragged me right back into it kicking and screaming a couple days ago. this chapter means more to me than i can express. so to the handful of you that still care, please enjoy my magnum opus
i invoke the name of the cycle of abuse all the time but actually putting it in action is maddening. the concept of vshelby can we all sit down with this for a second. she comes to oakhurst because she's following her dad's stories about monsters. her dad that her mother refuses to talk about. she barely mentions her mother, only her dad who's been gone for years. she comes to oakhurst and gets forcibly turned into a vampire and she calls it a family. one big happy vampire family. sorry i'm like talking around my point here but do you get what i'm saying.
like if we take shelby's backstory as it's presented to us it's clear that her dad was not the man she thinks he was, but even that isn't nearly enough to explain the way she acts. like you sit there and think about it for longer than three seconds and you come to the inevitable conclusion that shelby's wide-eyed innocence is not the result of never having experienced real hardship before, it's evidence of severe trauma. now let's give her three people who have all inflicted violence on her together and watch what she does—oh, she sees them as family members. yep that's her new family. ramifications what ramifications? why would this indicate anything about her worldview and past experiences? one big happy vampire family!!!!
i invoke the name of the cycle of abuse all the time but actually putting it in action is maddening. the concept of vshelby can we all sit down with this for a second. she comes to oakhurst because she's following her dad's stories about monsters. her dad that her mother refuses to talk about. she barely mentions her mother, only her dad who's been gone for years. she comes to oakhurst and gets forcibly turned into a vampire and she calls it a family. one big happy vampire family. sorry i'm like talking around my point here but do you get what i'm saying.
getting into the weeds with red life noncon is so much fun. so you want to write about red lives having the capacity to commit horrible acts of sexual violence that they normally would never do? in a world where this is understood as a possibility, there'd probably be some sort of stigma against red lives as a whole, like they're all monsters who can't be trusted. this red life paranoia and ostracization might reach its peak in last life, and as time goes on, people get a better understanding of what they're dealing with, though the divide never goes away.
but it brings up so many questions. are red lives all naturally predisposed to sexual violence, or does it take a certain kind of person to cross that line even under the red influence? how much blame do they deserve for their actions? would certain people intentionally take advantage of that perception to enact sexual violence, in hopes that the consequences will be minimal? there'd probably be some amount of victim blaming, once everyone comes to understand the risk—you should have known better than to linger around a red life too long, you must have done something to provoke them, you know what they're like.
is red life noncon a taboo subject, never really directly acknowledged? would anyone bother to set up preventative guidelines, or is it left as the inherent risk of participating? most likely, for the social dynamics to at all reflect that of canon, there would be a general unspoken agreement that heinous actions committed on red would be more or less overlooked. people may still hold grudges, yes, but there'd be a whole lot of apologism going on. at the same time, going down to red would get you held in contempt, treated like an animal, even if you've never even attempted to rape someone about it. how would it feel, being one of the reds who's never experienced an urge to sexually assault anyone, being told that this is what it is to be red, having that assumption weaponized against you? if you're red, you're untouchable. your default options as you understand them are to prey on greens and yellows, or find community with your own kind—which may include the kinds of reds that have no problem crossing that line.
you might start to wonder if it's all just an excuse. like a person who crosses boundaries when drunk, a red life that turns to sexual violence was probably something of a predator to begin with. but if everyone draws a line between regular players and vicious red lives and pretends it's the bloodlust that causes it, how much could someone get away with, playing nice before they get to red, reinforcing the stereotype as soon as they do? their actions would only worsen the general treatment of reds all while putting themself in a better position, since they're more likely to be capable of utilizing the social advantages of a red life that others would struggle to effectively wield. and they're just fine when they're green, so clearly they're proof of the validity of the divide. a self-fulfilling prophecy that allows flagrant abuse to occur unchecked and enables cruelty towards greens and reds alike, framed within the green/red divide but ultimately based on social power.
May I ask, what's exactly is the idgaf breaking thing that you post?
ok i wanted to be accurate so i looked back to see if i was the one who came up with it or not and the answer is kind of? it was a collab. this post is the originator of the idea, but an esteemed colleague officially coined the term in the tags of this post a month later. those two posts should give you a good proof of concept.
now the idea of idgafbreaking is not necessarily exclusive to cleo, but there's a reason i only really post about cleo in this context. idgafbreaking is only impressive when it's a challenge, and cleo simply poses the biggest challenge of anyone i post about. ideally you want to start with a character that purports to be above sexual desire, usually a stone top/pleasure-dispensing dom type, and force them to reveal their underlying interest. it's a way of breaking their control without actually switching up the dynamic, just complicating it.
you can idgafbreak anyone who pretends not to care, and it's not dominant-exclusive. you could even divorce it from a sexual context if you want. but most people simply aren't too difficult to idgafbreak if you set your mind to it. cleo's really the only one projecting cool indifference in any given social situation who's actually good at it. (scott tries very hard but isn't half as convincing, various others aspire to idgaf but are too easily distracted from it, pearl's actually very good at idgafing because it comes from an honest place but is extremely susceptible to mistreatment, so it's easy to circumvent.) for some characters, failed idgafbreaking attempts are actually more interesting because they're so easy to rile up.
you could probably find lots and lots of examples of intentional idgafbreaking in life series canon itself, because it's a social game, so people have a vested interest in doing it for a variety of reasons. all it takes is someone trying to project indifference and someone else wanting to break that facade. very simple ingredients. now go forth and eroticize all of them!
we need to start being nicer to ccs because it's literally impossible to make good minecraft content anymore. they passed a law and everything, if you start doing something interesting they kill you. they just kill you. trained snipers outside of pow mcc life series headquarters i'm serious
i don’t want to be angry anymore i’m never going to hate again unless someone says something really stupid or if i see something i don’t like at all or maybe just whenever i feel like it