[macaronniart]

pride month lesblitz day 6 - alphys & undyne (undertale/deltarune)

date night <3

[lamieboo]

GO ROCKY GO!!! 🕺🪨

[enthyrea]

love the transmasc grace hc but something abt him always referring to himself as grace and wearing a skirt in the first ten minutes of the movie… transfem realness. let her out

[muehehe33]

[isbergillustration]

They're Nearly Here

[possessedpasm]

She's a wizard of the keys

[jagalart]

Here's the guy I promised to you (and myself) ages ago, when the game released 💚 maaan, I missed him

Coming to Pyrkon as a sticker 💚

[wolfythewitch]

First | Prev | Part 10

Reminder: brackets [ ] mean internal monologue/thoughts

[plu-mo]

my single contribution to mermay- some fanart for thelostmoongazer

[aninainkwich]

Gabi, messily wrapped in pearls.

[bovid-beauty]

"Fascism"—New Federal Rule Would Require Federal Funding Recipients To Deny Trans People Exist

The rule could have heavy impacts towards trans people across society.

Last week, the Trump administration quietly released a sweeping new federal rule that would use funding threats to force institutions across the country to reject transgender people. The 400-page proposed regulation would codify the administration's anti-trans executive orders into binding federal policy, imposing a blanket prohibition on federal funds going toward "gender ideology"

The proposed rule, formally titled "Regulation for Federal Financial Assistance," rewrites the government-wide framework governing all federal grants across every agency. Among its most consequential provisions, it requires that before a federal grant recipient can receive money, the award must pass a "pre-issuance review" conducted by a political appointee—not a career expert or peer reviewer—to ensure it is "consistent with applicable law, Federal agency priorities, and the national interest." The regulation explicitly instructs these appointees to screen for "denial by the recipient of the sex binary in humans or the notion that sex is a chosen or mutable characteristic." [...] An institution that acknowledges transgender people exist—through its policies, its training, its healthcare, its bathroom access, its HR procedures, its name-change processes—could be deemed to "deny the sex binary" or to “support the notion that sex is mutable” and have its federal funding blocked.

Importantly, the gender ideology prohibition has no age limitation—hospitals could be targeted not just for providing care to minors but for providing gender-affirming care to adults, because prescribing hormone therapy to a transgender patient of any age could be deemed promoting the belief that "sex is a chosen or mutable characteristic."

[junequeer]

THIS IS OPEN TO COMMENT UNTIL JULY 13, 2026

[featherandstorm]

This is all very bad and horrible, but I want to be clear that it’s worse and more sweeping than just eliminating trans research.

This torches everything. And I do mean everything.

A very abbreviated list of its ramifications include (but are not limited to):

ending funding for ALL DEI related initiatives

allowing the government to terminate grants at any point for any reason

preventing researchers from publishing, going to conferences, and being part of academic societies

requiring that topics must support the president’s agenda.

What this means, and if anything I’m under selling it, is the death of science and research in America. It allows the government to restrict any topic they please at a whims notice, putting officials who have no background in the topic in charge of deciding funding continuity. It controls what gets researched and if/how researchers are allowed to share their discoveries. There are no books to burn if the government never allows them to be written. This is fascism plain and simple.

Please, if you only ever write one public comment, this is the one to do.

[genderkoolaid]

Bringing back this guide to writing an effective public comment. This gives you the basics you need to know, what you need to include, a basic outline you can follow, etc.

Public comments are not a vote, it is a chance for you to say "here is an issue with this law I think you need to address" and provide justification for legal challenges if it goes forward:

"Comments raise the bar that agencies have to meet when making a rule; “if an agency fails to adequately respond to significant, relevant comments in a final rule, members of the public may seek to challenge the rule in court on that basis and claim it could be struck down.ˮ"

But also, if possible, don't stop at writing a comment. Don't stop at calling your representatives. You should ideally be talking to people in your community about this and organizing resistance on-the-ground; there is a good chance people are already doing that even if you aren't hearing about it.

[maria-ruta]

killer 🤗🌸✨

[sparrowlucero]

the befouler of our crops

[yellowyani]

yet another @color-palettes monthly palette challenge! This time with Leyf! She usually only has green locs cause y'know... Leaf, but I thought she would look cute with a bunch of colors! I usually only allow myself to use black and white with the palettes, but I thought it needed something with heavy contrast, and used brown for her skin :)

[scooterplastic]

[ishie-log]

kimharry matching mugs

mugs I drew in the corner of an older fanart. still quite fond of them :)

[cyberspadeling]

i like to think that queen prefers to wear suits or pants. i LOVE all the art of her where she's fancy and regal in a stunning dress!! however in my mind her style is ... i can't explain it with words but please see my vision right here

[cheezydraws]

I had to