The Last Judgment vs. St. George
When comparing Medieval art and Renaissance, the common distinction is the amount of shading and dimension that separate the pieces from one another. In these pieces we can see that Giotto's piece is huge and covers a lot of territory in terms of subject and content. but his composition, being from the late Medieval to early Renaissance era is almost non-existent. One sees a clear pattern of top to bottom showing a holy gradation of power, yet there is barely any negative space in the fresco. In contrast to this, we see a more experimental composition in the St. George piece, placing George on a horse in the middle of the work, but allowing for negative space in the upper corners and lower half of the piece between the horses legs, creating a continuity drawing the eyes from the bottom of the piece to the top. In terms of color, no doubt the fresco by Giotto would win, but Durer gets a break because his piece was done as a woodcut which severely restricts the use of color. Durer also gets a break for the fact that he was the first one to do art like this in the woodcut medium. When analyzing the shading in both pieces, it is clear to see that the shading on George is much more fleshed out showing dark hues on the horse's frontal region, to bright whites on the behind of the horse, giving a realistic shading to the piece. In Giotto's piece, most of the figures are fully colored, although their wraps are slightly shaded, there is not a clear origin point for the light that seems to fill up the entire space. Ultimately my preference is for the Durer woodcut, it generally has better composition and subject, while content is not quite as well defined, the name makes up for this being an obvious description of what the painting contains. While Giotto's piece is huge and masterful when considering the works of other artists of the period, Durer actually brought the art of woodcutting to light with his pieces, which I consider a higher achievement.














