Rape porn is okay. Two consenting partners are wiling to play the act, then who gives a fuck. BDSM couples, before any act of sexual play, talk about safety rules and the line of consent they’re willing to act out. There’s always a safety word, it’s safely practiced, and the people are consenting to it. I see nothing wrong with the people who want to participate and the people who get off to it. Why? Because both sides know that it is staged, merely a scripted fantasy. Normal, functioning adults of society find real rape disgusting, vile, and evil.
< You clearly did not see what was posted on the page. Let's have a look. Here is a little sample: http://notallmenarelikethat.tumblr.com/post/59680929595/these-images-are-a-very-small-sample-of-the-influx >
Not answering men posting rape porn = Hate speech.
That sentence was structured very weird. Are you saying that the admins of the page didn’t respond to their comments, therefore the commenters decided to flag you for hate speech? The people were already flagging the page for hate speech way before said incident (which I wasn’t aware of), and was always turned down on their requests because somehow saying that all men are rapists, scum, evil, oppressors, they should die, etc etc radfem nonsense isn’t hate speech from the start?
< Saying that men are rapists isn't hate speech. They are rapists. No one said ALL men are rapists on the page. Men like to add that word (all) every time a woman mentions ANYTHING men as a class do wrong. Radical feminists use class analysis. We discuss men as a class, not as individuals >
Hey, women against womyn, you said, “I don’t even really consider myself an egalitarian because I am a traditional woman. Just a simple person with a burning hate for feminism.”
Feminist tactic: go on profile and use information against them. What’s that called again? Ad hominem? Yeah….
< It's only an ad hominem if I attack something about your character that is completely irrelevant to the topic we are discussing, like if I said you are fat (what men love to say to women they do not agree with). If we are talking about women's rights, and you openly state that you are not even an egalitarian, let alone a feminist, mentioning this is not an ad hominen, but an acknowledgement that you openly have a political stance that is antifeminist >
So you see yourself as inferior to men and are pissed off with me because I do not think I am subhuman.
How does me being traditionalist somehow mean I think I am inferior to men. Being a traditionalist means that I want to be a stay at home mother, and depend on my husband. Which doesn’t imply inferiority in any way. I do not think of you as subhuman, because you are a human. Any man or woman deserves the same rights, and we have them here in the west, so why are you still complaining? Because you can’t have the same privileges? Do you know how privileges work? Why specific genders act a certain way? I’m sure you don’t, most radfems are anti-science and anti-biology anyway.
< First of all, traditionally, men dominate over women. So, if you're a traditionalist, like you say, please have a lok at history, because that is tradition. Traditionally, women are property of men. Read some history if you didn't know that. Second, radfems are anti-science? Are you kidding me? Did you know that many radfems are scientists? I have no clue where you get the notion that radfems are anti-science or anti-biology. Quite the contrary. >
That’s just fucking brilliant.
Applause for this amazing statement. Really, I’m astounded.
How do you work that out? You enjoy being treated like shit?
Like shit? No. No one likes being treated like shit, unless they’re some kind of crazy masochist.
Makes absolutely no sense to me.
Seriously, why do you embrace the inferior status men have given you?
Men haven’t given me shit. Women haven’t given me shit. I take the shit that the world hands to me and I make a life out of it. There is no man over woman and woman over man where I reside, so why should I spite anyone because they have a penis?
Seriously, life is what you make of it. People choose to be positive or negative, and I choose to live positive. I make my life the way I see fit, and none of you radical feminist fucknuts will ever change that.
Don’t you see the irony in what you preach. You want women to choose. You want women to be free. But the minute you see a woman choosing something you don’t like they’re suddenly not free, and are suddenly inferior because they are not what you want them to be.
That, my friend, is called fascism. Good day.
< No, our politics is absolutely NOT based on wanting women to choose. You have completely, 100% misunderstood radical feminist analysis if that is what you think. Radical feminist analysis is not about choice. It's about options and so, so much more. You do not understand radical feminist theory at all if you think radical feminism is about choice.
We are not fucknuts, but it's more comfortable to believe that we are than to listen to what we have to say or read radical theory, which you obviously have not done. Sticking your head in the sand does not make you non-nuts, it makes you in denial.
"But the minute you see a woman choosing something you don’t like they’re suddenly not free, and are suddenly inferior because they are not what you want them to be. "
No woman is inferior. All women are treated within patriarchy as inferior beings. That is not the same thing as me saying you are inferior. I said men think you are inferior. >