DipIFR Examiner Reports – Insights
The Diploma in International Financial Reporting (DipIFR) examiner reports are one of the most useful resources for understanding where students lose marks. Across multiple sittings, some recurring mistakes show up consistently.
Students preparing for the upcoming examination can strengthen their concepts and application skills through a structured DipIFR preparation course focused on exam-oriented IFRS learning and practical application technique
What the Examiner Really Wants
A professional analysis of the DipIFR Examiner’s Reports — synthesised for students and teachers preparing for the upcoming examination.
Key Findings:
Students who understand the standards but fail to apply them to the specific scenario score far below their potential. After analysing the recent examiner’s reports, the patterns are clear, consistent and mistakes can be entirely avoided.
The Examination pattern - Which does not change
The DipIFR examination has a fixed pattern. Understanding this structure is the first step to building an effective preparation strategy.QuestionMarksTopicKey FeatureQuestion 125ConsolidationAlways Consolidated SOFP or Consolidated statement of P&L. Fixed question, thus study this topic thoroughly.Question 225Mixed + EthicsTwo financial reporting issues + 5 marks for applied ethics. Always present.Question 325Computations + ExplanationSpecific transactions to account for. Both numbers and narrative required.Question 425Narrative / ExplanationAlmost entirely explanations. Specific queries must be answered directly.
The examiner reports confirm that performance on Question 1 is consistently stronger than Questions 2 to 4. The reason is straightforward: Question 1 requires only computation. However, Questions 2 to 4 require something extra, i.e. the ability to apply knowledge to a specific scenario with explanations.
The Core Issue — Application of the concept, and Not just the knowledge
The examiner’s observation and repeated verbatim across reports published in examiner’s exact words is as below:
In many cases, the explanations provided often lack depth and focus. This has been a reason for relatively poor marks in questions two, three and four.
It is not a knowledge deficit. It is an application deficit. Candidates know the standards but write as if they are answering a different question — a generic one about the standard itself, rather than the specific scenario presented in the exam.
Developing proper DipIFR answer writing techniques is essential for improving application skills and scoring better in Questions 2 to 4.
The Examiner’s Five-Point Framework for Q2 to Q4
Examiner’s reports set out identical guidance for approaching Questions 2, 3 and 4. This framework should be treated as a marking formula:
Read the scenario thoroughly - Read the relevant scenario and requirements thoroughly. This is not done in sufficient depth, leading to general answers that lack application to the scenario.
Identify the correct standard - Identify the relevant IFRS Accounting Standards. Incorrect standard numbers are not penalised, but student must be clear about which standard is being referenced. For e.g. if question / scenario is related to revenue recognition, reference must be given to revenue standard and not of the PPE standard.
Apply accounting requirements to the scenario, do not merely recite - Setting out standard accounting requirements that are not directly applicable to the scenario will not receive credit. An unstructured approach of this nature will earn candidates very few marks.
Calculate numbers and their presentation - Where the question requires financial statement extracts, candidates must both calculate the relevant numbers and state where they should be presented. Easy marks are routinely missed by failure to describe presentational requirements.
Ethics issue must be applied to the scenario - Question 2 always carries 5 marks for applied ethics. Reproducing principles of the ethical code without relating them to the specific scenario attracts no marks. Some candidates omit this section entirely.
Examiner’s warning on ethics
Many candidates simply reproduce content from the ethical guide without relating it in any way to the context of the scenario. This approach will not attract any marks. Failing to address this component is a missed opportunity to score valuable marks.
CBE Exam Technique to be used in Question 1
The report gives specific guidance on the use of the CBE spreadsheet for Question 1. This is an exam skill that must be practised separately apart from the technical knowledge.
Although examiner will look in cells for workings, an incorrect number with no formulae and no obvious reference to a working makes it very difficult to award partial marks.
Candidates are provided with a pre-populated spreadsheet, use it as the logical starting point for the consolidation.
Cross-reference all workings clearly to relevant spreadsheet cells.
Practise on the ACCA CBE specimen exam and consult the CBE guides available on the ACCA website.
Students appearing for remote examinations should also understand the technical setup, system requirements, and exam environment guidelines through this detailed guide on ACCA DipIFR remote exam setup tips.
For Question 2 to 4 - Do not type narrative responses into spreadsheet cells — use the word processing response area for all written explanations.
A recurring observation by examiners was time overrun on question 1 to 3, leaving candidates unable to complete Question 4. Time discipline is important, approximately 40 minutes per question is essential, leaving 20 minutes for reading the QP and 15 minutes for planning and checking (total 195 minutes = 180 min + 15 min).
Six Takeaways for the Next Sitting
Application of accounting standard is important than merely reciting. Every written answer must link back to the specific facts in the scenario. Generic standard summaries earn zero credit.
Presentation marks are free. Every computed number must be accompanied by a statement of where it is presented in the financial statements. These marks are routinely unclaimed.
Ethics is 5 guaranteed marks. Always in Question 2. Always scenario specific. Read the ACCA technical article and the CBE specimen. Never skip this section.
Guard your time for Question 4. Examiner’s report notes that many candidates fail to complete Question 4 due to time overrun on earlier questions.
Practise on the CBE platform, it is must. Spreadsheet proficiency is an exam skill in itself. Use the ACCA specimen exam and cross-reference all workings clearly.
Study published past questions and answers. The examiner repeatedly directs candidates to solve these past exam questions. They are the most reliable guide to what a high-scoring answer looks like.
The DipIFR is a rigorous professional qualification, however it is also an highly passable one for well-prepared candidates. The examiner’s feedback is consistent, specific, and generous in its guidance. Candidates who read these reports carefully, practise applied answers and treat ethics as guaranteed marks will have a decisive advantage in the upcoming examination.
Best wishes from Team FinPro!
Thank you for reading our blog, stay tuned for such insightful shares. Book your DipIFR study material now and prepare confidently for the June examination.
