pixel skylines
dirt enthusiast
he wasn't even looking at me and he found me
No title available
★
Stranger Things
Kaledo Art
Mike Driver
trying on a metaphor
tumblr dot com
Today's Document
oozey mess
we're not kids anymore.
#extradirty
Love Begins
Cosimo Galluzzi
JVL
if i look back, i am lost
No title available
h
seen from United Kingdom
seen from United States
seen from Malaysia
seen from India
seen from United Kingdom
seen from United States
seen from Italy
seen from United States
seen from Malaysia
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from Liechtenstein
seen from Brazil
seen from Germany
seen from United States
seen from Türkiye
seen from United States
seen from South Korea
seen from United States
seen from France
@firstlawindia
Penal Code, 1860 – Section 307 – Attempt to Murder – Anticipatory Bail – Injuries were caused by blunt object – Slight injuries were received – No prima facie case of Section 307 has been made out. https://www.instagram.com/p/CQ6lCrNpqey/?utm_medium=tumblr
*ICL 2021 (6) All. 203 | Appointment* - Once a person takes part in the process of selection and is not found fit for appointment, the said person is estopped from challenging the process of selection. https://www.instagram.com/p/CQa0OmkJeOy/?utm_medium=tumblr
*ICL 2021 (6) MP 148 | Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973* – Section 482 – Quashment of the proceedings – While considering the submission for quashment of the proceedings has to consider the un-controverted allegations and the defence of the suspect cannot be taken into consideration. https://www.instagram.com/p/CQYt3Dtpbq-/?utm_medium=tumblr
caselaw.in 14-01-2021 Irshad Hassan v. Shriram General Insurance Co. Ltd. Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 - Section 166 - Whether the quantum of compensation awarded by the Tribunal is just and reasonable ? ICL 2021 (1) Ker. 899 (at Kerala High Court) https://www.instagram.com/p/CKIdcR1pqK6/?igshid=1sp8kpbo37wok
Ayodhya Case - The aftermath of 1856-7 - Period between 1934-1949
Ayodhya Case – The aftermath of 1856-7 – Period between 1934-1949
Babri mosque – The aftermath of 1856-7 – Response to the wall – Period between 1934-1949 – Officials of the state refused to thereafter remove the surreptitiously installed idols despite orders from the State Government, further confirming their alliance with the miscreants who desecrated the mosque. (more…)
View On WordPress
Ayodhya Verdict - C. Evidence: A Bird‘s Eye View
Ayodhya Verdict – C. Evidence: A Bird‘s Eye View
The Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 – Order X Rule 2 – Statements under – Witnesses. (more…)
View On WordPress
Ayodhya Verdict - B. An overview of the Suits
Ayodhya Verdict – B. An overview of the Suits
The Waqf Act, 1936 – The Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 – Sections 80 and 91 – Notice under – Religious denomination – Res judicata, waiver and estoppel – Representative Nature of Suit – Trust – Non Joinder of Parties – Valuation – Insufficient Court Fee – Under Valuation – Special Costs – Person and period- who and when constructed the disputed building – Deities, their status, rights etc. –…
View On WordPress
Ayodhya Verdict - M Siddiq v. Mahant Suresh Das - A. Introduction
Ayodhya Verdict – M Siddiq v. Mahant Suresh Das – A. Introduction
Ayodhya Case – Disputed Property – Ram Janmabhumi or Ram Janmasthan (i.e. birth-place of Lord Ram) – Deity – Hindu worshippers. (more…)
View On WordPress
Whether Disputed Structure is the Holy Birth Place of Lord Ram ?
Whether Disputed Structure is the Holy Birth Place of Lord Ram ?
Whether disputed structure is the holy birth place of Lord Ram as per the faith, belief and trust of the Hindus ? (more…)
View On WordPress
Ayodhya Verdict | M Siddiq (D) Thr Lrs. v. Mahant Suresh Das, C.A. No. 10866 of 2010 SC
Ayodhya Verdict | M Siddiq (D) Thr Lrs. v. Mahant Suresh Das, C.A. No. 10866 of 2010 SC
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
Civil Appeal Nos 10866-10867 of 2010
M Siddiq (D) Thr Lrs …Appellants
Versus
Mahant Suresh Das & Ors …Respondents
WITH Civil Appeal Nos 4768-4771/2011 WITH Civil Appeal No 2636/2011 WITH Civil Appeal No 821/2011 WITH Civil Appeal No 4739/2011 WITH Civil Appeal Nos 4905-4908/2011 WITH Civil Appeal No 2215/2011 WITH Civil Appeal No…
View On WordPress
Judicial Officers | Hari Niwas Gupta v. State of Bihar, C.A. No. 3105 of 2017 SC
Judicial Officers | Hari Niwas Gupta v. State of Bihar, C.A. No. 3105 of 2017 SC
The Constitution of India – Article 311 – Judicial Officers – Dismissal, removal or reduction in rank of persons employed in civil capacities under the Union or a State. (more…)
View On WordPress
Goel Ganga Developers India Pvt. Ltd. v. Union of India through Secretary Ministry of Environment and Forests
Goel Ganga Developers India Pvt. Ltd. v. Union of India through Secretary Ministry of Environment and Forests
Loading…
View On WordPress
Bajarang Shyamsunder Agarwal v. Central Bank of India
Bajarang Shyamsunder Agarwal v. Central Bank of India
Loading…
View On WordPress
Raja Ram v. Jai Prakash Singh
Raja Ram v. Jai Prakash Singh
2019 (8) SCC 701
Loading…
View On WordPress
Surinder Kaur (D) Thr. Lr. Jasinderjit Singh v. Bahadur Singh
Surinder Kaur (D) Thr. Lr. Jasinderjit Singh v. Bahadur Singh
2019 (8) SCC 575
Loading…
View On WordPress
Service Law | Union of India v. Gandiba Behera, C.A. No. 8497 of 2019 SC
Service Law | Union of India v. Gandiba Behera, C.A. No. 8497 of 2019 SC
The Central Civil Services (Pension) Rules, 1972 – Gramin Dak Sevaks (Conduct and Engagement) Rules, 2011 – In the event the Central Government or the postal department has already issued any order for pension to any of the respondents, then such pension should not be disturbed. In respect of the other respondents, who have not been issued any order for pension, the concerned ministry may…
View On WordPress
Air Force Rules | Union of India v. 794898 T. Ex. Corporal Abhishek Pandey, C.A. No. 4780 of 2018 SC
Air Force Rules | Union of India v. 794898 T. Ex. Corporal Abhishek Pandey, C.A. No. 4780 of 2018 SC
The Air Force Rules, 1969 – Rule 15 (2) (g) (ii)/ Rule 15(2)(k) read in conjunction with Rule 15(2) – Interpretation of the Policy dealing with habitual offenders – Warning Letter. (more…)
View On WordPress