Discover Top Posts Tagged with #babri mosque

Shubh Ram Navami 🏹🚩🐒🐿️🙏🏼🙇🏽‍♀️

To those, including people like Zohran Mamdani, who have demonised Hindus for reclaiming Ayodhya and rebuilding the Janmabhoomi of Shri Ram again, I don't give a damn. My own mother had to leave her homeland because bangladeshi kanglu jihadists weren't sparing Hindu girls after our Hindu brothers and sisters in India reclaimed Ayodhya. Never ever forget. To those who still don't believe that there was a temple, read this account by Tulsidas. Also, not only Hindus but also Sikhs, Jains, Buddhists, even Muslim K.K Muhammed fought for Ayodhya. This is about humanity. How can anyone accept a structure of hatred like the Babri "mosque" on top of a Hindu temple?

#desiblr #hindublr #hinduphobia #valmiki ramayan #ram mandir #ayodhya #ram navami #jai shree ram #jai siya ram #babri masjid #babri mosque

6 December marks the fall of the wretched structure that symbolised oppression and Mughal settler colonial rule

#desiblr #india #hindublr #hinduism #indiablr #history #sculpture #decolonization #Mughals colonisers #Babri Mosque #ram mandir #Sri Rama #lord ram #demolition #vishnublr #vishnu

#babri masjid #babri mosque

Today is Shaurya Divas. The remembrance day of the historical moment when Hindus fought and even gave up their lives because secular Indian leaders shot down Hindus who tried to break the invader Babur's construction his men built on top of the temple of Shri Ram. Let's see what happened today (keep reading for important info)

Look at these ghouls in Bengal who are pledging to re-construct another Babri Mosque. A reminder that no building outside of the black box Kaaba (which itself was stolen from the Arabian pagans by the caravan robber so called prophet) is holy to Muslims. In fact, holding other monuments as holy is considered as Shirk. Even Saudi Arabia broke down many historical sites associated with the caravan robber prophet to build hotels and restaurants for the Muslims who come to do their Hajj or Umrah. Read more about that here.

Babur was from today's Uzbekistan, who happened to have crossed the natural borders and looted and broken the temple and built his own ugly monument on top. What did it have to do anything with Muslims in Bengal? In fact, many may not know this but the riots, that followed the reclamation of Ayodhya, were the worst in Bangladesh. The jamaat-e-islami qawmi forces in Bangladesh orchestrated nationwide pogroms against the Hindu minority of Bangladesh. Mind you, the reclamation of Ayodhya happened in Uttar Pradesh, but that didn't matter to Bengali speaking musallis (this is for the stupidass mf bengali hindu malaun leftist liberando secularists). Let's look at some historical facts:

Now let's take a look at what happened in India's western neighbour.

Hindus were massacred at the site by secular Indian political leaders. Hindus were raped and murdered in Bangladesh. Several historical Hindu and Jain temples in Pakistan, that were older than Babur's mausoleum, got razed down. But still, Hindus lived to see the day when Shri Ram was brought back to His rightful throne. It's a story of Hindus perseverance and our history of bravery and endurance in front of tyranny. But look at Subcontinent's muslims trying to change the narrative and claim that "they were betrayed" by Hindu India.

I have no words except that I understand why subcontinent's muslims would write like this, but I'll never understand those with Hindu names who agree with this.

#desiblr #hindublr #hinduphobia #hindu genocide #india #bangladesh #pakistan #bangladesh is a jihadi state #pakistan is a terrorist state #shaurya diwas #babri masjid #babri mosque #ayodhya #ram mandir

Is there a way we can make so called seculars and leftists see what's up? Like few days ago my muslim friend and i were talking, they were like "why is our nation hung up on temples and mosques instead of schools" After I told them what actually had happened behind the ram mandir and how it was destroyed. They did sympathize like "why mughals always have to create where temple was there" Idk what her stances are tbh.

You're brave for discussing this topic with your Muslim friend. You know, my parents always taught to never discuss about political or religious matters with others, especially with Muslims, or if you do discuss, stay as neutral as possible. You really never know what they think. A lot of the times, Hindus talk with their good Muslim friends openly about religion or politics. They might not even say anything controversial. But it can prove to be fatal... In Bangladesh, many times, a Hindu has lost his life and an Islamist mob has destroyed his home for not even saying anything controversial about Islam. Bangladeshi Hindu veer Dipu Chandra Das was lynched, hanged on a tree and incinerated just because he said "all religions are equal, no one is greater than another". Anyway, I just wanted to caution you. I'm not telling you to sever your ties with your friend, just telling you to be careful.

Every time a conversation about mosques vs. temples start, one needs to remember that mosques, like the Babri mosque is not holy to any Muslims! Only mosques holy to Islam are the kaaba 🕋 (masjid al-haram) and the al-aqsa. Kaaba was robbed from the Meccan pagans after Prophet Mohammed occupied it and threw the idols of the pre-Islamic deities from the kaaba, and the al-aqsa mosque was built on top of the Jewish temple mount. In Islam, attaching holiness to a building is considered shirk, which is a great sin in Islam. This is why Muslim purists consider mazars or shrines as shirk and regularly destroy them. Saudi Arabia even destroyed the kabr (grave) of Prophet Mohammed to prevent "idolatry" (and to build hotels and public toilets for the pilgrims, whose religious obligation is to do a pilgrimage to Mecca). Not a single mosque in India is holy to any Muslim in the world. But for Hindus, temples aren't just any buildings. In the Agama Shastra, consecrated temples are an extension of the main deity's body.

When Islamic invaders came to India, they saw temples as the centre of Hindu religious and political life and the source of Hindu wealth. The attack on temples was both religious and political in nature. Of course destroying the "idolaters" temples and establishing mosques as a visual testament to "the victory of Islam" was their objective, but also, the invaders looted the material from the temple buildings and the temple gold to fill their coffers and fund their lifestyle and further military conquests. Every single mosque built on top of temples are a symbol of invaders thinking that they defeated Hindus. Subcontinent's Islamists boast about this by the way.

To be honest, I don't think that there is any way for anyone to make Indian secularists and leftists understand this. They are born as, or conditioned to be, dhimmi slaves. You simply don't plead with brainwashed dhimmis who want to drag you down to slavery too so that they can become the elites in the hierarchy and rule over you down there, under their Islamist overlords. Hindus need to understand this. You do not negotiate about your rights and dignity with people who want to actively drag you down to slavery. You stand firm because the truth is in your side. You can try to explain your side, but most people see it as you trying to wax eloquent. You stay unapologetic and defend yours. Make political choices that ensure Hindus who fight for Hindu rights stay in power. You make sure your next generation is aware about the atrocities Hindus are still going through. Build strong networks in your personal capacity. The Indian left / seculars are that way, not because they are principled or morally upright, but because they are double-crossing scoundrels who want to cozy up to power, and the Indian elite still holds the views of the global elites which is left / liberal / secular in the Indian context, which is precisely why they project Hindus as "gobar bhakt dehati gawars" instead of the highly educated, articulate, cosmopolitan people with high cultural capital. These Indian left seculars will crawl back from hijab halal iftar ass kissing once they see Hindu wield equal or even more power than Muslims. As simple as that.

#desiblr #hindublr #india #hinduphobia #babri masjid #babri mosque #ayodhya #ram janmabhoomi #anon #asks #anon ask #indian history

As I promised, I shall address the point which I mentioned in a previous post.

Today, we accept that Pakistan exists as a separate, sovereign, Islamic republic of Pakistan. Pakistan is not just a country, though, but an ideology. The proponents of Pakistan argue that the creation of Pakistan was a necessity in order to protect the Muslims' way of life. They show articles of cow vigilantism, the demolition of the Babur's Mosque*(we will come back to this), and communal riots in India as a proof of how a unified Hindu majority India would have oppressed Muslims. The actual reason for the Pakistan movement was, of course, the Two-Nation Theory. The father of the Two-Nation Theory is considered to be Ahmad Sirhindi, who opposed Akbar's syncretic religion din-e-ilahi.

Shah Waliullah Dehlawi was the ideological successor of Sirhindi, who had been against the powerful emperor Akbar at the time. Dehlawi on the other hand was appointed by emperor Aurangzeb after he lost battles to the Marathas, Rajputs, Sikhs and Ahoms and the Mughal empire started declining. Dehlawi was appointed to write the Fatawa-e-Alamgiri - the Sharia based Muslim law code which still is the basis for Muslim personal law in post-colonial India, Pakistan and Bangladesh. Dehlawi wrote how a Muslim mingling with Hindu corrupts the Muslim mind.

Clearly, the primary objective of Pakistan was to create a separate state which was to be ruled by Muslims in accordance to Islamic laws, and everything else is assigned retroactively based on simplifying extremely complex issues. The subcontinent's Muslims' fear of assimilating into the surrounding Hindu environment, the fear of getting "corrupted" by the Hindu kuffar mushrikun over time was so strong that it made subcontinent's Muslims rally for a separate Islamic state with a Muslim majority and Sharia. It was a valid fear, of course. There are myriad examples of Muslims (in name) who are drawn to Hindu gods, they aren't just leaving Islam because apostasy in Islam is punishable by death.

Even if we can understand their reasoning, do Hindus have to accept it? Pakistan was imposed on us Hindus, we were never asked when Clement Attlee brought about the "Indian Independence Act 1947", which stipulated the two independent dominions, setting a precedent that Islamic separatism is acceptable and that it can be achieved through violent pogroms against non-Muslims. As if that was not enough, Hindus have no legal rights in Pakistan.

O Hindu, they have changed the demographics of Gandhara, Gosthana, Bahlika and Vanga, broken our Holy Motherland, our only Homeland, and they are attempting to change the demographics and break our Motherland even more.

Hutatma Shri Nathuram Godse assassinated Mohandas K. Gandhi for allowing the Partition of India. He was executed for that. Before his death, he expressed his wish that his ashes be sprinkled in the Sindhu nadi (Indus river) once She is freed from Pakistan occupation and flowing under the aegis of the flag of Hindustan. This is the spirit which every Hindu should harbour.

*As promised, we are coming back to the issue of Babri Mosque. It was a structure constructed by Mir Baqi on top of a temple. Here is the link for the Allahabad (Prayagraj) court papers. Adding excerpts here too, because everyone believes that oppressed and colonised people have the right to resist their oppressors with all means necessary, but when it comes to us Hindus, we should roll over and die.

Out of all the points people use to defend the mughals- the "india enjoyed the highest gdp under mughal rule!🥺 it was overflowing with wealth"- will always be the funniest. Bcs even if it was true- it does not erase the mughal attrocities! It does not erase the fact thst hindus were burdened with jizya, targetted and killed.

"Highest Gdp" MY ASS!

Also the "highest GDP under Mughals" is a myth, which, if I recall correctly, was propelled by Shashi Tharoor. The narrative that India accounted for about 23% of the world's GDP during Mughal era but after British rule the share plummeted to mere 3% is central in the book An Era of Darkness. He quotes economic historians such as Angus Maddison to support his claims about pre-colonial economic dominance. First of all, the demerit of Tharoor's claim is that focusing solely on a large share of global GDP without accounting for population size is an elementary mistake in economic reasoning. A large country can have a significant share of the world economy even with a poor populace. India had a high GDP simply because our population was much bigger thanks to our fertile soil.

Moreover, India's large share of global GDP began to decline even before British rule took full effect, because India already lagged behind in naval supremacy, hence it couldn't dominate in trading. Yes, the British did largely de-industrialise India, but it is also true that Mughals had drained India of its wealth and resources, which is why martial and scientific innovation could not reach its zenith. India was using advanced printing press in pressing patterns to textiles which were exported rather than printing books. Also, Tharoor overlooks the fact that rapid industrialisation of Britain and other European powers quickly overrode India's GDP despite having smaller populations because the industrial output of Europe beat the output of India. Lastly, the modern concept and calculation of GDP did not exist in the Mughal era, making any figures an estimation.

I also want to add that historical sources indicate that Babur transferred significant amounts of wealth out of India following his conquest, primarily to support his projects in Central Asia. He viewed India largely as a resource base to fund his original Timurid homeland. This is all recorded in Baburnama. So yeah, Fuck mughals and Fuck firangis.