Does anybody know what happened to Flintloc-k? It seems like he deactivated out of the blue
noise dept.
ojovivo

Love Begins

❣ Chile in a Photography ❣

roma★

titsay
official daine visual archive

No title available

ellievsbear
🪼

★
cherry valley forever
No title available
sheepfilms
RMH

Discoholic 🪩
🩵 avery cochrane 🩵

PR's Tumblrdome

tannertan36
PUT YOUR BEARD IN MY MOUTH

seen from Netherlands
seen from United States
seen from United Kingdom
seen from United States
seen from Bangladesh

seen from Türkiye
seen from Ecuador

seen from United States
seen from Russia
seen from Canada
seen from Malaysia

seen from United States

seen from Türkiye

seen from United States

seen from Russia

seen from United Kingdom
seen from Mexico

seen from Saudi Arabia

seen from China
seen from United States
@flintloc-k
Does anybody know what happened to Flintloc-k? It seems like he deactivated out of the blue
I think it's really important to realize how much of a vulnerable position sadists are putting themselves in when they participate in pain play. This is particularly important in established relationships, as opposed to casual settings, but important in both nonetheless. Also, this post is strictly addressing participants of kink who practice it responsibly and care about their partners.
When sadists do pain play they are having to grapple with the fact that they get pleasure out of causing pain to someone who has put their trust in them. This can be devastating if they feel as though they have in any way compromised that trust. Especially since even people who know about aftercare and try to do it, often overlook the aftercare that sadists, or even dominants as a whole, need. I imagine this happens a lot with pain play scenes, as so much emphasis is placed on taking care of the masochist. Obviously, that's important, but it should not be one or the other. The point I'm trying to get at is this:
Masochists/subs, please remember to give your sadists/doms aftercare. The biological and psychological functions that cause subspace and subdrop can have the same effect on doms. Doms are just as capable of experiencing that rush of adrenaline and endorphins, and just as capable of crashing, once the scene is done. Tell your sadist that you still trust them and feel safe with them. They need to hear it.
Sadists/doms, please remember that there is nothing wrong with having sadistic thoughts and feelings if you're acting them out in risk-aware and consensual settings/dynamics. I think I speak for all masochists when I say that we are so thankful for sadists who participate in responsible kink. Remember that there's more to aftercare than just caring for and comforting the sub. You deserve to be reassured and to receive the care that you need.
Indeed! There is but one person who could send la correspondance so foul. This... message anonyme. Filling the inbox of the tumblr blog of the victim with such malice.
And that posteur is... someone in this very room.
highkey, stop sorting gnc and trans people together. Especially since Trans-GNC people are somehow not apart of it...it's almost like this logic is based off of trans-gncphobia.
For example A masc woman and a GC trans man have vastly different experiences and struggles. People only mention "overlap" because they misgender trans men, and see masculine women as MEN. They can't seperate allinity vs gender.
Which is why I don't like the consolidation of transmasc/transfem to meaning both GNC and GC trans people when they've always been distinct classes of people who've always existed, the grouping of them exists as a poor understanding of GNC people, and completely ignores Trans-GNC people as a real class of people. Then slurs like "theyfab" "pooner" or "cislite" are thrown at us just for existing.
Highkey, learn about your history...!
Trans and gnc people have definitely NOT "always" been "distinct classes of people". Like I'm genuinely not sure at this point if younger trans people are actually aware that for the majority of the transgender movement all gender variant people including transsexuals have shared the same community?? You know that "trans and nonbinary" is a new thing right?? as in before we ALL used to call ourselves transgender??
I get transsexuals like to separate themselves from the "gender freaks" but like, that has never helped anybody.
Trans people are never to blame for whatever's wrong with 4channers. wtf lmao
Anyway go listen to A Life Lived Trans podcast and poke around on the Digital Transgender Archive.
Gender essentialism is still cringe if it is directed against cis people btw. Ive basically had someone say to me that cis people are biologically incapable of understanding less normalized gender identities because "their brains work differently". If anyone has this opinion please come forward now so i can block you thank you. The reason cis people dont understand gender in the same way trans people do is because trans people are naturally more exposed to the discussion about gender because we have to think about it a lot. Cis people, who have never doubted their identity, obviously dont think about it as much, if at all.
Cis people arent inherently more stupid than us, or less capable of talking about gender on a biological level. What would that even look like???
the only way mpreg should exist is when it ends in miscarriage or abortion and im serious about that get babies out of my goddamn bl so help me god
the twelve most terrifying words in the english language are: i'm from the government and i'm here to torture you to death
the idea that restrooms, locker rooms, etc need to be single-sex spaces in order for women to be safe is patriarchy's way of signalling to men & boys that society doesn't expect them to behave themselves around women. it is directly antifeminist. it would be antifeminist even if trans people did not exist. a feminist society would demand that women should be safe in all spaces even when there are men there.
btw this is maybe the single most key distinguishing feature of the terfy strains of radical feminism, the seed all the rest of it springs out of: they have absolutely no faith in the ability of feminism to actually destroy patriarchy. they do not think feminism can truly build a better world. they cannot really even imagine that possibility. they think patriarchy is an inevitable natural consequence of unchangeable biological facts, and therefore the goal of feminism can only be to mitigate the worst effects of patriarchy, not to get rid of it.
they can imagine a society where women get some designated safe spaces without men around. they cannot imagine a society where the presence of men is not inherently a danger to women.
“we need a word for unintentional racism” yeah bitch the word is racism. ya’ll cut tf up.
Imagining frotting against a Virago's strap 🤤🤤🤤 or grinding on them or being folded over like a beach chair fuckkkk 🤤 that's it that's the post
~ 😇
Hahaa, that's right!
Feminism and gender theory get razor sharp when you replace "men" and "women" with "people" and I vote we should because zoo wee mama. the problems in society really become crystal fucking clear all of a sudden when you cant create boys v girls infighting.
I don't consider "uterus havers" or "people who get periods" to be a good substitute for "women" when it comes to period/menstrual care
Because you can just say "people"
If you are talking about period care, people are already under the assumption that the people who need care for it are the people who get periods. You don't really need to specify further I think
People need pads and tampons. People need pain relief. People need access to medical care.
Sure its good sometimes to specify "people who get periods" when in contrast to people who don't, but when we're trying to be concise it's easier to just say "people" and move on
and it is almost as if men and women are simply just types of...?
i think maybe gnc and trans people shouldnt be competing for representation actually
yknow, considering a person can be both
the horrifying but hilarious thought of crushing a cock like a soda can.
Hehehehe. If you train kegels you can do that. I started because I read this one line in the Kama Sutra (I believe, or a Kama Sutra-style book for westerners) which said it felt literally amazinggggg you gotta try ittttt so I did. Pretty positive feedback every time. I kept at it because the ol man cave is a use-it-or-lose-it situation once youre on hormones and, it's just good for you to be strong.
Method is below the cut
There's this thing I never realized I did when I was doing it that I like to think of as "Ownership of Space"
And it's that thing where you mentally place yourself as the second, auxiliary party to someone else that you consider to be "In Charge" of whatever space or occupation or responsibility you are assigned to
And when you are IN that mindset, it *feels* like you're being responsible. It *feels* like you're being respectful, and helpful, and contributing to the load.
But what you don't SEE- because it *feels* like deference- is that the other person who you're seeing as The Authority you report to- by being assigned that role, has also been assigned the invisible load of BEING YOUR MANAGER.
This is by FAR most commonly seen in husband-and-wife relationships, where the man says, "just tell me what I can do to HELP- you don't have to do it all by yourself, but it's like you won't even tell me when you NEED help. You just do everything and then get mad at me for not doing it first. I can help clean. I can help with the kids. I can help"
But I also see it- and am guilty myself of doing it- at work, at school, in public- that mental, "this is THEIR space, and i will be respectful and helpful to THEM"- without realizing that subservience in this manner isn't actually a good thing. That it actually shifts the burden of responsibility to the other person. That aspect was totally invisible to me.
I didn't understand that when I was told, "if you see something that needs to be done, just DO it", or, "take the initiative", what they ACTUALLY meant was, "I am not above you", or "you have equal say in what kind of environment you want to live or work in", or "I do not want full control over what happens here, I do not want to order you around, I do not want to be in charge, what I WANT is to co-command WITH you"
Being in The Assigned Authority position NOW, that is all so much clearer.
I am the senior member of my team at work, and now, every time I train a newbie, every time I finish catching them up to speed and giving them a list of everything that needs to be done, my next big hurdle seems to always be, "now take pride in the space when I'm not around". "Now don't assume I'll tell you when something is due or what orders to plan things in".
Now, having been on both sides of the struggle, I can appreciate the sticking points here
TO THE PERSON "IN CHARGE": The person deferring to you doesn't understand the invisible labor you're doing. They genuinely believe you know more, you WANT more, you see things they don't, and that they are being respectful and good by staying out of your way and waiting on your orders. THAT is the bit that's not clicking.
TO THE PERSON "WANTING TO HELP": "Help" implies that you are providing assistance to a problem that belongs to somebody else. Stop thinking like that. Understand that the problem belongs to BOTH of you equally, and consider what kind of shared space you BOTH want. What is your SHARED GOAL? Not THEIR goal, but a goal that belongs to you too. Own your space.
This is not a Commander-Lieutenant problem. This is a Partnership problem.
You Are Co-Commanders On This Ship
Sharing my own tags actually
In response:
To be in love with you I gotta see you as my beloved equal and cherished friend but to be sexually attracted to you I gotta see you just below a God,nigh mythical, someone who utter being deserves my adoration and honor, to be loved wholeheartedly, your temple adorned with my gaze. And yet your gaze something I'm not worthy of, trusting you when I am the dirt beneath your feet you'll know when and how to scoop me up adding the caring waters back into me and molding me back into clay, back into someone worthy of use to you, someone who can be made into a piece of pottery, crushed, broken,misshapen, watered, remolded over and over and love every bit of it because I know I'm being touched by the hands that care and harm me with love, by someone I love being less than for.
The mythical potter, Sir, your hands would be my own undoing, returned to the dirt that I am.
~ 😇
That's beautiful angel. I really love it. I can't imagine someone actually feeling that way about me for real but that's fine.