★
noise dept.

❣ Chile in a Photography ❣
Phantogram Three
I'd rather be in outer space 🛸
YOU ARE THE REASON
tumblr dot com
Sweet Seals For You, Always
cherry valley forever
almost home
hello vonnie
ojovivo

bliss lane
$LAYYYTER

if i look back, i am lost
RMH
Interview Vampire Daily

Origami Around
🩵 avery cochrane 🩵
Monterey Bay Aquarium
seen from Kazakhstan
seen from United States

seen from Malaysia
seen from Malaysia
seen from Türkiye
seen from United States

seen from Tunisia

seen from United States

seen from Türkiye

seen from United States
seen from Germany

seen from Libya
seen from Türkiye
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from Morocco
seen from United States
seen from Tunisia
seen from Colombia
@frnkiebrwn
THROW ME AWAY. I’M DONE
a Carry On pattern because i am needlessly morose there aren’t actually 8 Simon Snow books
also take a version that’s phone background size & one that’s tile-able. will probably be up on society 6 by tomorrow!
If Magic Mike were a woman
BROOKE ENCE
Why do artists refuse to use references why why why.
It’s not a contest to see who can get by without them. It’s not cheating to look at a thing in order to know what the thing looks like.
You don’t get stronger or better by pretending. Nobody is impressed by the awkward whatever-it-is you just drew. Use references.
I don’t think a lot of people know that it’s not cheating. I recall seeing so many piece of art called out because they referenced a pose, someone recognized it, and then proceeded to shame them for it. There’s this belief, both by creators and the audience, that artists should just be able to translate the ideas from their head to paper, and if they don’t, it’s plagiarism, or not true originality (spoiler alert: there’s no such thing).
I myself didn’t start using references until very recently, because even I was under the impression that it was frowned upon. And that belief has seriously crippled and stalled my ability to improve as an artist.
As a restarting artist, I can confirm. I just never knew. I thought you were just supposed to know how to draw the body correctly and if you didn’t you had no talent.
(( I am going to say this again, loud and clear for everyone:
USING REFERENCES FOR ART IS NOT ‘CHEATING’!!!
If you can draw/paint without references, great! But if you need to use them, and feel that your art can be bettered by using references, please, use them! This is one of the biggest tips I can give to artists, is USE REFERENCES!
Anyone who would dare to attack someone for using references after ‘recognizing a pose’ is a dipshit, who doesn’t know a thing about art.
Do you know who else used references for their art?
Norman Rockwell
Alphonse Mucha
Gustav Klimt
Toulouse Lautrec
Vincent Van Gogh
Paul Gauguin
Edgar Degas
Gil Elvgren
Frida Kahlo
Pablo Picasso
Disney Studios
And thousands of others! So, artists! Go forth, and use references!!! ))
What do you think artists do when they ask someone to stand infron of them for 6 hours and then they draw this person. Do they cheat? Or when they place a still life and then paint it, cheating again? LOL
#literally one of the biggest fears I have #is for some douchefuck to dig out my reference #and point at it and say that I’m not a real artist #I don’t want you to dig out my references to prove that I didn’t make up a realistic picture out of fucking thin air #that’s not how art works #but especially on this site it happens CONSTANTLY #it’s so fucking scary #when people who’ve never touched a pen in their lives think they’re qualified to judge you #and ‘reveal’ how you’ve ‘scammed’ people
Soooo. I made this post originally on my personal blog (I’m eliciaforever), and it was nothing more than a little rant about a specific incident that I deleted after five minutes. But before I could delete it, it took the hell off on me, and now it has all these notes. And LOTS OF AMAZING INPUT.
And I just wanted to add in response to the above tags in particular, that shaming people for using references is something that happens to so many of us SO OFTEN. It doesn’t matter how skilled you are. People think art is supposed to be magical or whatever, and anything else is a crime. The reality of course is that art is a thousand times more deliberate than a lot of people think it is.
So yeah. Good info to pass along. Use references, kids. <3
Reblogging because I think it’s important especially for young artists to gain the confidence to use references.
Seriously, references are esssential! Use them!
I am guilty of not using references, I know I should but I cannot shake the feeling that it’s ‘cheating’. I know it’s not but I get this weird guilt
This is a thing? Really??? People think using references is cheating?? Okay, look, anyone who’s studied art in college should know that references are essential. At my college we actually had something called the “Picture Library” that we could literally check out images that were often photographs from magazines, books, etc. laminated for us to work from for reference. And this goes for any art medium! Hell, I use references for plush making. Does that make it cheating? Nope. So stop feeling guilty people, and improve your skills!
refs aren’t cheating, tracing is cheating. two totally different things.
i can’t stress this enough, using a reference is not the same as tracing. Using a reference is to help you draw, tracing is literally not even trying to draw or waning to try.
Hang on a sec.
You’re talking about lying, not tracing. There’s a big difference.
You actually CAN trace. Like. You are allowed. You won’t be struck by lightning if you do. Vermeer traced. Andy Warhol traced. I trace my own drawings all the time. The question isn’t whether or not you can trace. The question is do you have a reason for tracing? Can you own it? Will people allow it? Will they buy it? Will they accept it? Will they hate it? Is it legal? Is it moral? Will you get into trouble? Will people call you a cheater? A thief? Can you defend your decision? Why are you tracing?
Those are the questions you have to answer as an artist. But that doesn’t mean you can’t do it. “Do this, but don’t do that—” come on, you’re not the art cops.
If your intention is to trace, then trace. BUT OWN IT. Be honest about it. That’s the only rule. Tracing and all these other techniques that people try to shame—the techniques themselves are absolutely not shameful. What’s shameful is misrepresenting yourself and using these techniques to pretend you’re doing something you’re not.
So tracing? YES. Copying? YES. Stealing? Well, it depends. Do you have a reason? Are you prepared to be called a thief? Will you accept the consequences of your art? Can you own your choices?
“Tracing is cheating.” No, cheating is cheating. Tracing is just tracing.
Just be honest about what you do.
Today’s installment of why“but it has always been like this!” is a bullshit argument: @nitratediva lays down the law about the role of women in early Hollywood
DeRay Mckesson's Beliefs on Leadership
This guest post is written by DeRay Mckesson ’07, who took on a number of leadership roles in his time at Bowdoin, including president of Bowdoin Student Government (BSG), president of the Class of 2007, head tour guide and head proctor for Appleton Hall. After graduating from Bowdoin, Mckesson taught 6th grade math through Teach for America. Here he reflects on life after Bowdoin and the beliefs that have motivated him to lead.
Everyday, I work with and in schools that I know are failing students.
Bilal, Janelle, Nasir, Dareth, Zybriah. I wake with these students on my mind, knowing that each of them deserves to grow up in a world that is better than this. I wake every morning knowing that if they walk into a school with a strong administration, able teachers and organized resources, that they will have access to opportunities that will allow them to be their best selves.
An “equal” education, for my students, will never be enough. They came to our school behind grade level and there are countless teachers who face similar situations around the country. Our students require an education beyond equal. They require excellence.
Keep reading
Old Deray Mckesson on leadership that interview I found -- very good. “Love is the why”
sorting hat quizzes be like
How do you brush your teeth?
a) bravely
b) while making a sandwich
c) while reading a book
d) I’m a snake
'Coming from a country with only 280,000 people, we're always obsessed with the little minority groups that've been oppressed by bigger things or bigger nations. We watched cowboy-indian films when I was a kid and we always supported the indians and just fuck the cowboys!”
-björk about Tibet, 1996
No Boys Allowed: School visits as a woman writer
I’ve been doing school visits as part of my tour for PRINCESS ACADEMY: The Forgotten Sisters. All have been terrific—great kids, great librarians. But something happened at one I want to talk about. I’m not going to name the school or location because I don’t think it’s a problem with just one school; it’s just one example of a much wider problem.
This was a small-ish school, and I spoke to the 3-8 grades. It wasn’t until I was partway into my presentation that I realized that the back rows of the older grades were all girls.
Later a teacher told me, “The administration only gave permission to the middle school girls to leave class for your assembly. I have a boy student who is a huge fan of SPIRIT ANIMALS. I got special permission for him to come, but he was too embarrassed.”
"Because the administration had already shown that they believed my presentation would only be for girls?"
"Yes," she said.
I tried not to explode in front of the children.
Let’s be clear: I do not talk about “girl” stuff. I do not talk about body parts. I do not do a “Your Menstrual Cycle and You!” presentation. I talk about books and writing, reading, rejections and moving through them, how to come up with story ideas. But because I’m a woman, because some of my books have pictures of girls on the cover, because some of my books have “princess” in the title, I’m stamped as “for girls only.” However, the male writers who have boys on their covers speak to the entire school.
This has happened a few times before. I don’t believe it’s ever happened in an elementary school—just middle school or high school.
I remember one middle school 2-3 years ago that I was going to visit while on tour. I heard in advance that they planned to pull the girls out of class for my assembly but not the boys. I’d dealt with that in the past and didn’t want to be a part of perpetuating the myth that women only have things of interest to say to girls while men’s voices are universally important. I told the publicist that this was something I wasn’t comfortable with and to please ask them to invite the boys as well as girls. I thought it was taken care of. When I got there, the administration told me with shrugs that they’d heard I didn’t want a segregated audience but that’s just how it was going to be. Should I have refused? Embarrassed the bookstore, let down the girls who had been looking forward to my visit? I did the presentation. But I felt sick to my stomach. Later I asked what other authors had visited. They’d had a male writer. For his assembly, both boys and girls had been invited.
I think most people reading this will agree that leaving the boys behind is wrong. And yet—when giving books to boys, how often do we offer ones that have girls as protagonists? (Princesses even!) And if we do, do we qualify it: “Even though it’s about a girl, I think you’ll like it.” Even though. We’re telling them subtly, if not explicitly, that books about girls aren’t for them. Even if a boy would never, ever like any book about any girl (highly unlikely) if we don’t at least offer some, we’re reinforcing the ideology.
I heard it a hundred times with Hunger Games: “Boys, even though this is about a girl, you’ll like it!” Even though. I never heard a single time, “Girls, even though Harry Potter is about a boy, you’ll like it!”
The belief that boys won’t like books with female protagonists, that they will refuse to read them, the shaming that happens (from peers, parents, teachers, often right in front of me) when they do, the idea that girls should read about and understand boys but that boys don’t have to read about girls, that boys aren’t expected to understand and empathize with the female population of the world….this belief directly leads to rape culture. To a culture that tells boys and men, it doesn’t matter how the girl feels, what she wants. You don’t have to wonder. She is here to please you. She is here to do what you want. No one expects you to have to empathize with girls and women. As far as you need be concerned, they have no interior life.
At this recent school visit, near the end I left time for questions. Not one student had a question. In 12 years and 200-300 presentations, I’ve never had that happen. So I filled in the last 5 minutes reading them the first few chapters of The Princess in Black, showing them slides of the illustrations. BTW I’ve never met a boy who didn’t like this book.
After the presentation, I signed books for the students who had pre-ordered my books (all girls), but one 3rd grade boy hung around.
"Did you want to ask her a question?" a teacher asked.
"Yes," he said nervously, "but not now. I’ll wait till everyone is gone."
Once the other students were gone, three adults still remained. He was still clearly uncomfortable that we weren’t alone but his question was also clearly important to him. So he leaned forward and whispered in my ear, “Do you have a copy of the black princess book?”
It broke my heart that he felt he had to whisper the question.
He wanted to read the rest of the book so badly and yet was so afraid what others would think of him. If he read a “girl” book. A book about a princess. Even a monster-fighting superhero ninja princess. He wasn’t born ashamed. We made him ashamed. Ashamed to be interested in a book about a girl. About a princess—the most “girlie” of girls.
I wish I’d had a copy of The Princess in Black to give him right then. The bookstore told him they were going to donate a copy to his library. I hope he’s brave enough to check it out. I hope he keeps reading. I hope he changes his own story. I hope all of us can change this story. I’m really rooting for a happy ending.
[x]
Guys, did you know this? Now you know this.
Exciting news!!!
IT IS TRUE!!
Here’s more info about my next book:
Simon Snow just wants to relax and savor his last year at the Watford School of Magicks, but no one will let him. His girlfriend broke up with him, his best friend is a pest, and his mentor keeps trying to hide him away in the mountains where maybe he’ll be safe. Simon can’t even enjoy the fact that his roommate and longtime nemesis is missing, because he can’t stop worrying about the evil git. Plus there are ghosts. And vampires. And actual evil things trying to shut Simon down. When you’re the most powerful magician the world has ever known, you never get to relax and savor anything. Carry On is a ghost story, a love story, a mystery and a melodrama. It has just as much kissing and talking as you’d expect from a Rainbow Rowell story — but far, far more monsters.
I AM SO EXCITED FOR THIS
Alfred Agache, Énigme, 1888 (via: french painters)
I didn’t want to sleep. I never wanted to sleep these days. Then I didn’t want to wake up. I didn’t want the leaves turning, the nights turning dark early.
Louise Glück, Radium (via feellng)
Infinite Jest, Page 203: "What Is Possible"
"What Is Possible," erasure poetry from page 203 of David Foster Wallace’s Infinite Jest
Burning the Trust Fund
1.
I’d been thinking more and more about how and whether to write something about how untrustworthy Apple’s recent software updates feel.
And then I went to Thanksgiving dinner.
Over ten minutes of the conversation around our otherwise-delightful Thanksgiving meal was spent with everyone — seriously, every member of my gathered, extended family — listing the Apple devices that “don’t work very well anymore.” It started with my aunt’s iPad 2; she said she couldn’t figure out why it was ringing every time someone called her iPad, and that anytime she started typing it would just sit there… for a long time… and then brrrrt, all the letters would flash up all at once. And that the whole thing was just slow and weird and she didn’t know what had happened. Was the thing just wearing out?
Then everyone else listed off the various problems they’ve had with their iPhones and iPads. Batteries that die all of a sudden. Slowness, crashes, and other strange behavior. My mom she keeps losing the Predictive Text bar at the top of the keyboard and has to go into Settings to turn that feature off and then on again. From the mundane to the miserable, everyone had a list of issues.
Of course, what had happened was iOS 8. Or they were problems reaching back to the iOS 7 transition. Updates Apple had not only recommended, but which they’ve made it pretty difficult to avoid.
Almost everyone has auto-updates enabled. Or they just install updates as soon as they’re prompted, without even reading the description.
Because why should they have to? The device is telling them to do it! Why should they have to spend hours and hours researching all the reasons they should avoid these updates, or else suffer the consequences? They didn’t ask for these problems, nor did they cause them. Apple did.
My family spent a decent percentage of our holiday togetherness-time just discussing and commiserating over problems caused by Apple’s relentless, near-tradition of incomplete and insufficiently-tested software updates. In fact, one of the only things everybody had in common was their Apple problems.
It sure didn’t feel like “99% customer sat.”
Read More
Jacob Robert Price Photography