I like to think humans are good

Capitalism is the real ennemy. Aroace, but i would do anything if a cute girl asked me. Still waiting for a pronoun that i like, so use whatever the fuck you want!

[magicratfingers]

i dont think i need crafts to hyperfixate on anym-

[tothechaos]

hate when people say something along the lines of "we must get along so well because you are/i am [some astrological sign]" to me. what are you fucking talking about. we get along because im fucking nice. a decision which i regret when you say shit like that

[tothechaos]

this post is a good rent lowering gunshot. in case anyone needs one of those

[vasira96]

when Ashley described Vaelus' weapon i immediately was reminded of this video i saw a while back, and i thought "someone needs to rotoscope this" but then i never saw it so i made it happen

[griancraft]

“Girls gays and theys” <- uninclusive while trying to be inclusive. Bad. Makes me uncomfortable.

“Ladies, gentlemen, and other distinguished guests” <- inclusive but far, far too formal

“Alrighty gamers” <- Incisive of everyone, informal, and fun to say.

[bird-cannibalism]

“Everypony” <== pisses everyone off.  flawless

[rougey]

"Friends, enemies, and those still under review"

[findingfeather]

“OI! THE LOT OF YOU.” <—succinct, to the point, effective. 

[1863-project]

"Attention K-Mart Shoppers" <- qualifies as vintage

[athelind]

"Team:" <- probably TOO inclusive

[sachermorte]

eternally painful that you can't socialize without people expecting you to talk. sometimes I just want to be around. like a cat

[findlight]

Hazel McNab, Last Light, linocut.

[angell-of-filth]

[iamnmbr3]

[redstonedust]

its good to acknoweldge the hollowness of revenge but sometimes you really do just need a story about someone who gets hurt and then kills and kills and kills and kills their enemies. its cathartic, babey.

[awesome-chameleon]

"there's nothing that can bring my loved one back, so there's no point in killing you" and "there's nothing that can bring my loved one back, so there's nothing that can save you" are two themes that can and should co-exist

[1five1two]

Carved ripples on granite. Shen Lieyi.

[doortotomorrow]

CLEXA The 100 / Season Three / Episode 16 / Perverse Instantiation II

[personsonable-deactivated201908]

me holding a gun to a mushroom: tell me the name of god you fungal piece of shit

mushroom: can you feel your heart burning? can you feel the struggle within? the fear within me is beyond anything your soul can make. you cannot kill me in a way that matters

me cocking the gun, tears streaming down my face: I’M NOT FUCKING SCARED OF YOU

[miaislying]

Hey OP? What the FUCK does this mean?

[personsonable-deactivated201908]

decay exists as an extant form of life

[miaislying]

That’s a terrifying answer, have a nice day

[haystarlight]

THE ORIGINAL?!?!!!!!!!!;!!!!!!!!???

[worldheritagepostorganization]

World Heritage Post

[uneclipsing]

look at Diane Morgan as a knight right now. Look

[tall]

[ontheidiotbox]

[trumpetsbyjasonderulo]

one must imagine sisyphus in margaritaville

[probablyasocialecologist]

Something odd is happening in the tech world right now: the technology that was supposed to make human labour obsolete is, at this moment, more expensive than the humans it was meant to replace. Companies are laying off workers to fund the very AI tools that cost more than the workers they just let go. The circular logic of it would be darkly comic if tens of thousands of livelihoods weren't caught in the middle.

[...]

The stated rationale is consistent: operational efficiency, reallocation toward AI. But the MIT study found that AI automation is economically viable in only about 23 percent of roles. For the remaining 77 percent, humans remain cheaper. Goldman Sachs' chief economist has stated plainly that he does not view AI investment as strongly growth-positive. Sequoia Capital partner David Cahn has put a number on the resulting gap: AI companies need roughly $600 billion in annual revenue to justify current infrastructure spending. The gap, as of mid-2026, is widening, not closing. So the present moment looks like this: companies cutting human labour to fund artificial intelligence that currently costs more than the labour it replaces, in pursuit of productivity gains that most studies cannot yet verify, at a pace that is exhausting annual budgets in weeks.

2 July 2026

[buckpussy]

hannaheinbinder