WAG culture in itself is misogynistic, for its ground is recognizing women and linking their identity to their athlete husbands/boyfriends. Both WAG "fans" and WAG "snark" communities contribute to this.
WAG fans in a nearly parasocial manner (because there is no other way to connect to partner of an athlete) idolize the lifestyle, fashion and personalities of WAGs. Often, measure of a WAG is how they appeal to femininity. Traditionally feminine characteristics are appreciated and looked up to. It requires a performance that is sold and continues to be sold because there is an audience for it. This is not to say WAGs should not be respected or let live as partners, but rather glamorizing or envying or reinforcing this recognition is detrimental for young women. WAGs were and will remain a concept if we attend to it.
On the other hand, WAG snark pages are just breeding grounds for misogyny in the name of criticizing (partners of) multi-millionaires. Women are called accessories and gold diggers, body shamed, their past/present/future and relationship is speculated. All of this happens in a bizzare, hive-minded space where you are primarily present to "snark" (an euphemism for harrssement).
Unfortunately, both spaces are populated by women. Tragic.














