Longish post on the Black Mirror—part two
Now that I have listed the differences between the Grain and the brain, we can analyze them side by side and I’d like to argue that the Grain cannot replace the brain, although it could be a good supplement. The reasons are the Grain leaves little room for human subjectivity, which can lead to unexpected inspirations. Also, the Grain cannot replace the job of brain’s unconsciousness, which is a big part of the organic memory.
As mentioned in the previous post, while the Grain is extremely precise, organic memory is just a human “scrapbook” subject to new doodles and editions. If we are talking about a memorization contest, that surely the Grain is superior. However, in reality life is not just about recalling or recognizing. Pure inspirations such as creativity also form a big part of human civilizations. Where does creativity come from? The details about creativity are described in my final paper but the main point is simply that the organic memories stored in our brain can be processed together (though we can be totally ignorant of that process going on) to “incubate” something original and new. Yes our brain alters the details of our memories every time we think about it. But it is also this kind of edition, by both consciousness (such as an attitude) and unconsciousness (such as emotion), that creates something beautiful. That is great but we must have these stored in brain in the first place. Unfortunately the Grain is no “mental hatchery” and cannot mimic the wonderful process of human “incubation”.
The fact that the Grain cannot mimic the unconscious not only obstructs creativity, but it is likely to damage our performance just in every daily task, even the simplest ones like riding a bike or swimming. The reason again lies with the unique composition of our biological brain, that it is composed not only of conscious memory, the ones we can recall and ruminate, but the unconscious memory that stores vast amount of information. The truly marvelous merit of the unconscious is that although we are not “paying attention to it” (like breathing), it functions properly and independently. It does not require our explicit instructions or anything, but it helps us in a significant way. For example, whenever we start biking, our unconscious implicit memory will instruct the muscle groups to move in tune with each other. Do we ever have to think about it? No, because the unconscious does all that for us. Now if we replace organic memory with the Grain. The same task in this scenario will be cumbersome, to say the very least, to complete. We’d have to pull up the “redo”s of when we first learnt to bike and follow what we did in that clip. But it seems we can never master such skills with only Grain. In fact, it is almost impossible to proceed with everyday living if we are forced to be in charge of the various jobs the unconscious previously performs. Moreover, since we have to pay attention to the most trivial yet essential tasks like how to hold a pencil, we can hardly concentrate and productivity will drop to approximate zero.
I’d like to end with a quote from Nicholas Carr, author of the Shallows who posed the question of whether Google is making us all stupid or not, “the richness of memory is that it exists in time, changing as the body changes”. And that is all happening within the unconscious we don’t even have to worry about. Therefore, the Grain can prove to be an excellent supplement to human memory, but it cannot replace it, because memory is not just “for living”, it is for definition and advancement of mankind.










