What, is this National Copy and Paste Day? Someone's gotta pull an Uncle Iroh and teach you the correct stance when you need to mock something. Or don't and just let what you have to say flow smoothly.
Let me start with this. It's "boohoo", not "booboo". "Booboo" can mean either one of two things, either a wound you got on the playground or (more likely, since you're using it to refer to a person) Yogi Bear's sidekick. "Boohoo" is the sound of crying (I'm not sure what heck of a language uses "boohoo" for that, but people use it that way). Rest assured, I passed the captcha to prove I'm not a bear.
Second, let me just get out of the way that whoever you blocked you can tell the people on KF and AA aren't alts of any of us who you haven't blocked. You officially have that power now. That conspiracy theory can be put to rest. I know Cat was looking for ways to determine who was who.
Third, let me get to the point.
It's not raising the required amount of evidence to point out that sharing the same three things from more than half a decade ago across multiple PSA's as if it's a gamechanger each time does make some of you sound like broken records, especially when showing words proves what the words said and not what was going on behind them.
I would not feel concerned to say this had I not been dragged into this by people who think I'm her.
It's also worth noting the two accounts which are said to be the "victim" are not even the same. They're not the same person. There's a ton of Dans in the forums. The two people don't even have the same browser fingerprint. Triagonal is friends with one of them.
What do you even call it "a loophole" based on? Do you... have proof of this? Do you have proof it was a bug and not a feature? Did the Team account ever clarify that at some point? Or are you interpreting? Because a lot of this has always been interpretive. Hence why many of you think I'm her.
But more to the point, you're taking verbal technicalities (especially the chat-related one, which I should note could've been fabricated by anyone with fonts and a blank template, if we're getting technical) across scarce moments in time and saying you know what the people were thinking. Strong speculation is still speculation. You got a whole vibe from the word "steamy", and that says something.
Meanwhile, while I'm defending her, she has actually apologized at the time because even she is more in-tune to the concept of reputation than I am. And nobody treated it with civility. Your loss. People either apologize out of guilt or to restore honor, and ever since her apologies in the past (one where she apologized for her vibes regarding you-know-who and the other that I can recall being her apology towards someone who is a current friend of hers whose forgiveness everyone tried to override despite it being between the two of them) both are arguable benefits here at best. HELL, I look at these reactions and even I don't want to apologize for shit anymore. And if you're all just going to keep attacking her for this kind of thing no matter what, what does everyone lose in coming off as stubborn? It's not like you can honor the conditions of people who, by definition, have set their stance in stone unconditionally. Learn incentives, it's not rocket science unless you're all really that blind. Maybe start there if you're going to respond next.
stormborns
areudirty
izzy806
