Personal Advisory Boards for Everyone #BoardSeat. Back their #Kickstarter campaign today: http://thndr.me/7CTgjP
occasionally subtle
trying on a metaphor
Show & Tell

Kaledo Art
we're not kids anymore.

Kiana Khansmith

blake kathryn

No title available

oozey mess

@theartofmadeline
hello vonnie
almost home

Janaina Medeiros
tumblr dot com
No title available
Keni
Sweet Seals For You, Always
taylor price
Not today Justin
YOU ARE THE REASON
seen from Türkiye
seen from India
seen from Brazil
seen from Pakistan
seen from Bangladesh
seen from Switzerland

seen from United States

seen from United States

seen from Mexico

seen from United States
seen from Russia

seen from United Kingdom

seen from Ukraine

seen from United States

seen from Saudi Arabia
seen from Argentina

seen from Türkiye
seen from Congo - Kinshasa
seen from Iraq
seen from Jordan
@gregsilas
Personal Advisory Boards for Everyone #BoardSeat. Back their #Kickstarter campaign today: http://thndr.me/7CTgjP
I just supported Rebirth of Networking on @ThunderclapIt // @Gregory_Silas
I just supported Rebirth of Networking on @ThunderclapIt // @Gregory_Silas
Should We Use Generic Drugs?
For many years now, I do not buy brand name drugs. It turns out, I'm in the minority.
It is estimated that 46% of the people take at least one prescription drug in North America. Nearly 4 billion prescriptions per year. In the US, brand-named drugs average 2 to 3 times more than generic ones. In Canada the discrepancy is a bit less. But let's talk about over the counter goodies. While the ratio of generic purchases vs. brand name purchases varies depending on the drug category and drug itself, let's analyze the basics: headache meds - drugs that have been around for a long time. The market for headache drugs is estimated at nearly $4 billion.
In a recent study, 71% of households buy generics names whereas physicians and nurses buy generics over 90% of the time. Ok, so that doesn't seem so bad. But if we analyze those stats we see 3 things:
people 'in the know' such as nurses use generics far more
we're still talking about the most common over the counter drugs, those generics we trust most. But when we're talking about kids medicine or less common drugs, the 71% stat drops off quickly.
29% of purchases for headache medications are still brand names. That means $1.16 billion spent on brands instead of generics.
There is no mystery...everyone knows brands cost more. We pay more for a Nike t-shirt than a Walmart t-shirt, even if the quality is the same. But in this case, we're not pimping the brand, we're swallowing a pill. We can't show it off.
In the case of drugs, it comes down to trust. We care for our bodies, we care for our kids. We trust brands more than no-names. That is just as true in the supermarket. But the more trust required, the more we're willing to pay to acquire the branded label over the generic ones. Groceries are not a big deal (though I likely would not buy no-name Fruit Loops), but drugs are. Drugs can be dangerous.
Let's compare Advil to Life brand (Shopper's Drugmart in-house brand). They are identical in every way except price:
32 caplets
"Extra Strength"
400mg of ibuprofen
"Muscle & Joint"
Size of the box (though one is prettier)
"Ibuprofen" is the active ingredient
Advil is 40% more expensive. Price elasticity plays a part. If Advil was $25/box, more people would consider buying generic ibuprofen. But for $4, a lot of people simply tell themselves "why risk it for $4?"
We can trust these drugs. All drugs, regardless if generic, must pass the same government regulations and tests as the brands. Further, it is not like Shopper's Drugmart or any other large chain is going to mess around with cheap alternatives. And finally, the drug is manufactured either by the branded company (yes, you heard correct...the brands often produce white label drugs to be sold cheaper under other names), or by one of the big generic manufacturers in North America. These are tried and tested facilities.
I should mention that I have been guilty of buying brand names at times. Two examples:
If the price is identical, I'll go with the brand, why? It's like praying...what's the harm? Better to go with what you know, all things being equal. Makes no sense, I know.
When I first had kids, I put more trust into brand names. That lasted a few months after which I started comparing prices, formats and active ingredients. Then realized I was being a chump.
Next time at the pharmacy, take a few moments, read the packaging carefully and you'll convince yourself. Usually the generics are located right beside the brand names (this is no accident).
So save your money. Use it to take your better half on better dates or buy gifts for your kids. Brand name drugs, like many brand name items, make little sense to this consumer.
@Gregory_Silas
www.BoardSeat.com
Synthetic vs Regular Oil ?
I hear a lot of radio ads each winter for synthetic oil. Assuming you do in fact change your oil once in a while, your garage may try to upsell you on synthetic oil. So what's the scoop here? Is it worth it?
Synthetic oil is more viscous and more importantly, doesn't much change in cold temperatures. By contrast, regular oil gets thick. What's the impact? Harder for your engine to turn over in colder temperatures...thus it is advertised in winter. Colder the winter, greater the impact. When I was younger and had shit-box cars, I can tell you it made a difference, helping my car to start in -27 degree temps. Further, the molecules in synthetic oil are perfectly uniform in size, not so in regular oil and thus a big more friction for the standard stuff...but this is relatively minor since your engine will last longer than your patience in having the same car
Here's what they don't tell you in commercials..the downside:
1) Cost: standard oil change is $30 to $40 unless you own a specialize car like a porsche or Ferarri and then you pay the dealer through the nose. A synthetic oil change is $85 to $100
2) Can't flip-flop: It is not good to keep switching from regular oil to synthetic, better to stick with one. This is because they have different burn rates and second, different viscosities in the same engine ain't great. So don't forget to use synthetic all spring, summer and fall
3) Type of Winter: Toronto, where I live, is never really that bad and so the need is diminished. Once you get below -20 degrees, the impact starts becoming more noticeable. If you park inside, it's a joke, no need.
4) Only needed at Start-up: Once your car has been running for a few minutes, the oil gets heated up and viscosity differences matter little. So we're really only talking about the initial few minutes of starting your car in winter
4) Type of car: newer cars are more efficient and have smaller pistons and shorter stroke distance, thus easier to turn over than the big 8 cylinder cars I grew up with. So less of an issue with smaller or newer vehicles
5) Strength of battery: A new battery or one that puts our more amps is in a better position to crank the engine and to turn over fast enough to start.
Overall, I can tell you that switching from 10w30 in warmer seasons to 5w30 in winter is just fine (5w30 is standard oil but more viscous). Change your oil regularly (5,000kms) and your engine will last 1,000,000 kms...no joke. I have seen taxis accomplish this feat. Save your money unless you live in the great North or some awesome cold place.
gregory_Silas
What's the best part about the TV series Suits?
Photo: http://www.usanetwork.com/suits
I'm sure plenty of women swoon over the guys and plenty of guys are either envious of the powerful Harvey "the closer", or love it when he wins. This TV series does not rank as the most profound or thought provoking in history. It does not have the best character-driven style, even though plenty of characters are fun to hang out with in the evening.
It's cool to see Toronto venues and landmarks in the show. I'm happy to see that Toronto is getting some money out of this. I even spotted a doorman from 2cats on one of the shows and they filmed an episode at my buddy's restaurant called Wood.
Sometimes, while watching the show, I'll get the urge to want to buy a sharp suit then realize I can only afford TipTop or Moores, so I go back to eating my air-popped popcorn and chillax that thought.
I very much like the legal wrangling, sharp wit, body language nuances and though most guys may say Harvey is their favourite (I like him too, the best actor in my opinion is the guy playing Louis Litt. So quirky, so unexpected, good stuff.
I watch on Netflix, sans commercials and got caught up on many nights watching 5 episodes in a row until wee hours. So what's the best part of the show?
The fact that without commercial they are each roughly 43 minutes. Which is the amount of time I ideally want to spend burning calories on the stationary bike. And because the show is pure brain candy, it keeps me immersed, entertained and unaware that I'm not going anywhere and spinning a useless piece of metal below me.
Thanks guys.
GregSilas.com
@Gregory_Silas
Why does Hollywood mess around with >2 hour time for movies?
I feel like over the last decade or so, the number of movies with lengths well over 2 hours have steadily increased. In theory, I suppose the Hollywood forces think more movie = more entertainment value. Or, perhaps those temperamental directors have the final word and believe the story can't be told without all those superfluous scenes.
Movies are by far my most valued form of leisure time (get your heads out of the gutter!) I don't watch TV, I read only for my business, I don't take dancing or cooking classes and I refrain from 1-976 calls. So I know movies.
It's a simple equation, one that more financial backer sin Hollywood should use: a movie's value is measured by how much it entertains.
The more I forget about my life outside the theatre, the better the movie. If I'm captivated and immersed, big thumbs up. But the more moments that I look around, fidget, think about other things, or predict the end of a scene means the movie is failing at its job, it's failing me...the audience.
So, by definition, the longer the movie, the greater the chance of failed entertainment moments. For the 40 years I've been watching movies and I'm sure for decades prior, movies have stayed between the 90 to 120 minute mark, with relatively few exceptions. There is a reason behind this. It is battle tested with audiences. No need to bathroom breaks. No fear of wandering minds or restlessness.
Now 10 or 15 minutes over is no big deal...again, depends on quality of the movie. But once you cross the 2:20 hour mark, the law of diminishing returns kicks in with logarithmic intent. 2:40, 2:45 are insane lengths for a movie.
I often re-watch movies. If they are good, I'll watch up to 10 times. Sometimes I may skip to the entertaining scenes. But I won't endeavour to re-watch long movies because it is too great a commitment. Even for the great ones such as Titanic and Avatar.
It boggles me why Hollywood doesn't get better feedback from test audiences, or maybe they don't listen. At the end of the day, Hollywood is controlled by Wall st. so..
Better entertainment = more trips to the theatre = more dollars in their pockets.
Exceptionally few long movies are so engaging that they can hold an audiences' attention and make me want to see them again. Some examples include:
Shawshank Redemption, Matrix, Inception, Gladiator, Green Mile, Forest Gump
Examples of good movies that are long...and thus I often won't watch them again:
Titanic, Avatar, Dances with Wolves
Examples of good movies that have no business being longer than 2 or so hours (note how often Tarantino shows up).
Inglorious Bastards, Django, Hunger games (all), Lord of the Rings & Hobbit movies (all), and most recently Fury.
Note: I could have listed many many more in those categories but you get my drift.
So cut out the fluff Hollywood, I can help show you the boring, drawn out and unnecessary scenes! My time is worth money...well to me it is. ;-)
@gregory_silas
gregsilas.com
Why is TV (and home phone) such a rip off?
Leading up to the mid 2000s, I was paying my fair share of home TV and home phone from Bell, then Rogers, then Bell...ad infinitum. Whenever I would get upset over service, or the price, or the channels, or the value...I would bark, get a discount...or leave to the competition.
Finally I had enough and found a very easy way to cheat the system which was failing me...I bought a cable box tool and got TV for free
That worked pretty well for years but with the advent of pure digital signal, I was missing out on many channels. Further, once I moved into an apartment, that magical cable box was not easy to find nor access.
For the past 5 years I have lived purely on Netflix. Yup, no TV whatsoever. Moreover, no newspaper at home so I was well insulated from the ugly world out there...ignorance is bliss after all. I was also out of touch with all the latest TV series and thus could not take lead in those ultra cool cocktail discussions about who Dexter's next victim would be. But I survived.
However, Netflix can get boring because there are only so many things on there I'm willing to watch. I was also downloading a lot of movies. Over the years, I would still bark once in a while to reduce my cell phone bill (Rogers) and my home internet + home phone (Bell). In September of this year during one of my barking sessions, I was made a decent offer to get the trio - add Bell Fibe TV.
Turns out if you get the trio, that's where the CSR at Bell have power to negotiate. Prior to Bell Fibe, my bill was around $120. With TV, it went to $150 or $160. Starting to crawl up there. I also languished with 140 channels of...well...crap. I am only interested in good movies and while I have those movie add-ons, some programmer was saving the company money. Pretty sad selection.
By month #3, it hit $200 due to some channel add-ons. That's when I called Bell (meaning today and the reason for this post). I started to bark...remember I don't care much about TV to begin with. I explained that I hardly use the TV and unless the price plummets, to just cancel it. I was transferred to the "Resolution Department"...you know, the people with power to reduce your bill in order to keep you on the hook. I waited for 12 minutes then hung up. Called back, spoke to someone else and explained similar situation but that I didn't want to wait...now I was determined to cancel my TV. That person said they cannot cancel, only the resolution department can cancel. So I waited again, 15 minutes later I spoke to a coy CSR who was trying to work me with the price discounts which were uninspiring and I told him to cancel. He said it would take some time and to warn me that there is a $150 cancellation clause. That it was embedded in some microscopic form, deep in an email or digital contract which I agreed to by calling them in the first place or some bullshit like that. I explained that I would have none of that even if he had no power to deal...my magic lies in Small Claims court. But at this point I was out of time (phone call at 30min mark) and had to pick up my kids
I told him to call me back once I was back from the school bus stop with my kids He says he only accepts inbound calls, cannot call out and thus I must call back. That is when I decided to also cancel my home phone.
I called back, spoke with another lovely CSR, she tried to sell me, I saved her the time. We cancelled both services and she informed me that not only was there a $150 penalty fee for TV, but a 30-day cancellation fee for all services so I have to pay 1 more month of everything.
As if I'm going to let that slide. Anyone who knows me knows I enjoy this moments ;-)
Which finally brings me to the point of this post. No, it is not about Bell vs Rogers. It is why services are so expensive when they are so crap. Serving me 140 or 200 stations when I have to constantly surf to find 1 or 2 good ones doesn't count..that's just noise and headache. Further, why would home phone cost so much? I understand that TV has 3rd party costs (paying US suppliers, etc) but home phone does not!
Bell owns most of the piping and since everything is digital, there is no real variable cost to Bell. So why price home phone at $50 to $60?
Ladies and gents, I'm going pure cell phone and back to my Netflix. Keep is real, keep it simple. If I miss out on something, hopefully I have enough close friends that someone will nudge me.
@gregory_silas
gregsilas.com
Car2go or no go?
I travel to Montreal once a month and used to badger friends and family for lifts, or use taxis. Then my brother introduced me to Car2go. Pros and cons are below
Access. Although it takes time to deploy the fleet to new areas, all new technology adoption must occur in stages. Only in certain areas of Montreal can you find and complete your Car2go ride. I have usually always found a free car within 2 to 5 blocks.
The App. Both the website, phone app work very well to find and reserve a car.
Technology. The tech that underlies all this as well as the tech within the car itself is really well designed.
Damage. Make sure to have a good look around the car before you accept the condition it is in
The Car. So the good part is that it is peppy and spacious. Downside is that it drives rough due to low profile tires and sport-style suspension. Performance is actually good but you're trading off luxury. This is not a date type vehicle. My one big beef is the transmission...it sucks! Automatic switching between gears is horribly slow to the point you think the car will stall. I have found a partial workaround by using the car in tip-tronic mode (semi manual). You can rev the RPMs quite high and right before upshifting, ease off for a second from the gas.
Parking. You can leave the car in designated areas or anywhere where pay parking is not required. That part is convenient.
Economics. It is very cheap to use the car. It works out to about 1/4 the price of a taxi ride.
Overall I give Car2go a thumbs up
GregSilas.com
@Gregory_Silas
Winter Tires vs. All Seaons? 5 things to note.
Do you save money and reduce headache by going with all season tires?
Just because I'm an aggressive driver, the reasons for making this choice should be the same.
How much do you drive? Risk is a function of driving style, smarts and number of kilometers driven. All things being equal, the more you drive, the more you are at risk.
How lazy are you? It is true that going to the garage twice a year is a pain.
Economics. Cost of 2 sets of tires and the cost of changing twice a year adds up. It costs a bit more. But amortization over the roughly 3 to 6 years (depends on kilometers) means a relatively small difference
Wear & Tear. Here's a big one for me. Since driving on non-winter months is far less risky, you can allow your tire tread to drop quite low. Not so for winter tires. The same holds for all seasons. My fear here is that people want to maximize their utility of the tires they purchase and thus may allow their all seasons to go quite low before changing. If that is the case, then the decision is to move to winter tires. Low tread all seasons are very dangerous in winter. Not so when using winter tires. That is because once winter tires start getting low, you can also use them for non-winter months.
Grip. The most important point for me. Winter tires destroy all seasons when it comes to most winter conditions. And for those few serious snow days in winter, I feel great when I blasting past everyone else who are drifting or trying to get out of a parking spot.
If you move to dual tire sets, buy extra rims and put winter tires on steel rims ($25 to $50 each). This saves your nice aluminum rims for nicer weather and makes changing tires faster and cheaper.
GregSilas.com
@Gregory_Silas
To #Rustproof of not, that is the Question. And 8 things to know about it
Now and again, my friends ask me about car questions. This is because I grew up working on cars since around 5 years old. While I rarely get my hands dirty anymore, I have some tacit knowledge. The rustproofing question comes up each November/December. Here's the scoop:
Manufacturers and dealers will often advise against it, especially on more expensive cars. Sometimes they will say it is due to the galvanized steel that is used for the body.
First and foremost, ANYTHING is better than nothing. If you paint over rust, it is better than not painting over rust. So now you already know the answer to Macbeth's question.
Unless the car does not belong to you (e.g. lease), get it rustproofed at least once every 2 years. It is cheap ($90 to $160).
So why rustproofing? Simple chemistry. Rust is is formed by 2 agents...usually oxygen and water. If only 1 exists, very little rust will form. That is the reason you see less rust in very dry places on the planet. A 3rd type is electrochemical process involving chloride. It is faster and more aggressive than water/oxygen by definition of the chemical process. Chloride is found most commonly in salt. That's why winter-based cities that use salt to deal with ice and snow see a lot of rust. Similarly, ocean-bordered cities will experience more rust as salt is in the air. Winter also sees a lot more water (due to snow...duh). All you have to do is stop these chemicals or elements from touching the bar steel...that's it. Thus, any coating is better than no coating. It just happens and oil and grease are particularly good at this.
But there are a few things you should know about rustproofing and car maintenance.
1) Don't cheap out and only get the "undercoating"...that is, they spray the bottom of your car. Get the full detail (inside the doors, etc).
2) oil-based or grease-based are both fine. Accept that there will be a small amount of grimy stuff in and around your car/engine. Most rust proofing places should wash the body for you.
3) I prefer the grease-based better because it sticks and no leaking
4) Expect a day or 2 of smell coming from the engine because the rustproof chemicals got sprayed onto it and it's now burning off
5) You do not need to use the rust proofing from your dealer, any independent one will do. I use Canadian Tire or Metropolitain Rustproofing
6) Even if your car is brand new, have it rustproofed. Why? It is in fact the best time as the steel is untarnished.
7) Even if your dealer advises against it and says they have a warranty, the warranty is only for perforations in the metal which take a long time. Further, brake lines can rust plenty quickly and dealers won't tell you that.
8) Resale value is always higher when the buying knows you've taken care of your car
Want your car to last forever...literally? Change engine oil every 5,000 kms, rustproof at least every 2 years. Keep up with all other regular maintenance. That's it, not complicated.
GregSilas.com
@Gregory_Silas
6 Tips for Networking on the Holidays
As the holidays approach, we know there will be lots of toasting, bloated stomachs and chit chat…if among friends. But what about networking events? Oh, no so comfortable. Whether the in-laws, the boss, the colleague or the customer, here are some tips:
1. Don't look at it as "networking"
People don't want to be solicited and people aren't dumb. Don't play checkers because they will see it coming even if you are being nice. Play the long game, play chess. The long game creates long term relationships. The residuals are much more valuable.
2. Choose Appropriate Events
If it is something you’re going to dread and grind half the enamel off your teeth while chitchatting, there’s no way you’ll be able to deliver the real “you”. You can’t build a relationship if you’re not open.
3. Walmart vs. Brooks Brothers
Casual vs. dressy? Common sense, but think who will be there. Don’t discount that if you are not comfortable in what you wear, again, you won’t act yourself.
4. Don’t Fly Solo
Having a wingman and a place to anchor allows you to try a few conversations on for size and return to your safety net to recharge and relax. Second, it gives you a lot more confidence which shines in several ways during the event.
5. Give more than Take
Ever notice that some people stay on your mind because they are always complimenting you to your face or others? Or asking about you and your family? People who are “takers” suck the energy from a relationship so avoid pitching yourself or your wares. Instead, go for the long strategy and be genuinely helpful and complimentary. Whether a mother-in-law or a CEO, everyone is human and not above flattery and always on lookout for advice.
A note on advice: don’t talk AT them, talk TO them.
6. Why are the Holidays a Good Time for Networking?
People tend to be a lot more relaxed, their mindshare is not as preoccupied with deadlines, budgets and quotas. Most businesses know the holidays are a slower period, and so expectations are reduced, or put off until January. Therefore, people not only have more time, but are more receptive to things of interest. That being said, people's time in December gets occupied with shopping and parties. Whatever time people have gets filled. The point here is that they are more receptive to a certain kinds of networking.
6. Best Times/Days for Business Networking?
Lunches (normally Tuesday to Friday) and happy hours (Wednesdays & Thursdays) are still the best. Think ease of location rather than the most expensive or trendy place.
GregSilas.com
@Gregory_Silas
more on TD vs RBC
I want to further clarify: it depends on price and distance.
The more expensive the ticket you purchase, the less of a deal TD will be. For the Australia example, a non-stop flight with a total cost of $2650 will mean TD has only a 7% advantage over RBC.
There is a break-even threshold that can be calculated for each travel point level threshold. Another factor is which service fees and surcharges are displayed. On many sites they are not all broken out. For example, on AC website, if you book a ticket to OZ for (total price) $2023, it says taxes and fees included of $165 and the base fare is $1863 (including surcharges) But if you call the RBC agent, they will tell you $865. That means the 'surcharges' are not covered by RBC points.
Again, my analysis was a general and based on the assumption that people look for cheap fares.
In another example of a short flight...Montreal to Toronto for total price of $649 (incl $131 in taxes & fees), RBC wins by 12%. But this is based on the assumption that Air Canada is listing ALL SURCHARGES on their site at $131. If you call the agent, it is likely more and RBC's advantage wil disappear
Here is a dropbox link to my comparison spreadsheet if you ever want to compare https://www.dropbox.com/s/ubyibymzaejivnh/RBC%20vs%20TD%20points.xlsx?dl=0
Why the TD's "Infinite First Class" card is better than RBC's Infinite Avion card
Why the TD's "Infinite First Class" card is better than RBC's Infinite Avion card
While just about all of their features are equivalent (travel and cancellation insurance, car rental, blah blah), it really comes down to the points program.
First, understand that with TD card, you must always convert points to dollars, there is no such thing as converting points directly for travel. Instead you, or the TD agent, simply buys the ticket from any source (expedia, etc) on your TD card, then you convert points into dollars on your same card. For RBC, the agent buys the ticket for you using your points.
Second, RBC gives you 1 point / $1 spent, TD gives you 3 points / $1 spent. So TD is 3x BUT not in real value because 1 RBC point <> 1 TD point.
Let's take an example: Flight to Australia....
RBC Avion requires 100,000 points and is good for a flight up to $2000. Regardless of ticket price, it will cost 100,000 points
TD First Class: you must buy the ticket. $1500 to $2200. Say $1800. Conversion is $50 for each 10,000 points...so you need ($1800/$50 = 36 x 10,000 pts) 360,000 points.
Here's the kicker:
On all RBC ticket purchases using points, point DO NOT cover the taxes and charges. On this flight, those fees = roughly $800. You can convert more RBC points to cover the taxes & fees. By contrast, since you used REAL dollars to buy the TD version, taxes are already all paid. To compare apples to apples, convert $800 taxes into RBC points you need 80,000 more points (conversion is $1/100 pts…this is a good conversion rate btw). So now we are talking $180,000 (RBC) vs. $120,000 (TD).
TD is 33% cheaper.
This will vary somewhat (up or down) depending on price and distance of flights
Other things you need to know:
(A) if you use a TD agent to book your trip, they charge $30 (you can book it yourself on any method (expedia, etc).
(B) If you use a TD agent to book your ticket, you get 9x (yes, nine times) the points, not 3x
GregSilas.com
@Gregory_Silas
Latest Book Summary - Here Comes Everybody
My latest book summary available here: Dropbox link Book: Here Comes Everybody by Clay Shirky. Good read. @cshirky
Only a 4 page summary. I found this book interesting conceptually. It does not provide pragmatic advice, rather gives broad strokes understanding. Some great quotes though and insight into graph theory.
I should note that while this book is a good read, it is for my purposes a 3.8 out of 5 due to lack of more pragmatic approaches for businesses. However, Clay Shirky remains one of my favourite speakers and he is so very often on point.
Here Comes Everybody
GregSilas.com
@Gregory_Silas
Latest Book Summary - Getting Real
My latest book summary available here: Dropbox Link Book: Getting Real by 37Signals. Excellent read. @37signals
I took the time to format. Very concise 7 page summary. I found this book very on point and useful when thinking about creating any kind of software or web interface. Definitely one of my favourites.
https://gettingreal.37signals.com/
GregSilas.com
@Gregory_Silas
Building my new #startup #venture (BoardSeat.com), read many #books. I’ll be posting book #summaries & reviews on my blog: gregsilas.tumblr.com
Blogging to begin soon
Just setting things up, creating a plan to conquer the world and plan to disseminate some tidbits along the way. Stay tuned.