via Antitheist League

oozey mess
Cosmic Funnies

Love Begins
Aqua Utopia|海の底で記憶を紡ぐ

if i look back, i am lost

⁂

❣ Chile in a Photography ❣
Stranger Things
h
Peter Solarz
TVSTRANGERTHINGS
Xuebing Du
YOU ARE THE REASON
Three Goblin Art
Mike Driver

pixel skylines
No title available
"I'm Dorothy Gale from Kansas"
ojovivo
NASA

seen from Malaysia
seen from China

seen from Iceland

seen from United States
seen from Mexico

seen from Canada

seen from United States
seen from United States

seen from United States

seen from Peru
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States

seen from United States
seen from United States

seen from United States
seen from United States

seen from United States
seen from United States
@hailthecriticalthinking
via Antitheist League
The decisions that I made in 2010 were made out of a concern for my country and the world that we live in. Since the tragic events of 9/11, our country has been at war. We’ve been at war with an enemy that chooses not to meet us on any traditional battlefield, and due to this fact we’ve had to alter our methods of combating the risks posed to us and our way of life.
I initially agreed with these methods and chose to volunteer to help defend my country. It was not until I was in Iraq and reading secret military reports on a daily basis that I started to question the morality of what we were doing. It was at this time I realized in our efforts to meet this risk posed to us by the enemy, we have forgotten our humanity. We consciously elected to devalue human life both in Iraq and Afghanistan. When we engaged those that we perceived were the enemy, we sometimes killed innocent civilians. Whenever we killed innocent civilians, instead of accepting responsibility for our conduct, we elected to hide behind the veil of national security and classified information in order to avoid any public accountability.
In our zeal to kill the enemy, we internally debated the definition of torture. We held individuals at Guantanamo for years without due process. We inexplicably turned a blind eye to torture and executions by the Iraqi government. And we stomached countless other acts in the name of our war on terror.
Patriotism is often the cry extolled when morally questionable acts are advocated by those in power. When these cries of patriotism drown our any logically based intentions [unclear], it is usually an American soldier that is ordered to carry out some ill-conceived mission.
Our nation has had similar dark moments for the virtues of democracy—the Trail of Tears, the Dred Scott decision, McCarthyism, the Japanese-American internment camps—to name a few. I am confident that many of our actions since 9/11 will one day be viewed in a similar light.
As the late Howard Zinn once said, “There is not a flag large enough to cover the shame of killing innocent people.”
I understand that my actions violated the law, and I regret if my actions hurt anyone or harmed the United States. It was never my intention to hurt anyone. I only wanted to help people. When I chose to disclose classified information, I did so out of a love for my country and a sense of duty to others.
If you deny my request for a pardon, I will serve my time knowing that sometimes you have to pay a heavy price to live in a free society. I will gladly pay that price if it means we could have country that is truly conceived in liberty and dedicated to the proposition that all women and men are created equal.
— Statement by Bradley Manning read after his sentencing, by his lawyer David Coombs
Antoine D’Agata - Ice (published 2012)
“…Pictures and texts in a disturbing testimony, showing the commitment of a photographer documenting drug-generated fictions…until he loses control.
In December 2007, Antoine D’Agata arrived in Phnom Penh and fell in love with Ka, a Vietnamese prostitute and drug dealer. In January 2008, they began to share a small and dirty flat downtown. Here started the oblivion.
Addiction to methamphetamines took over the photographic work and the frontiers between fiction and reality started to melt. This is where Ice came from. The horror that permeates the pages is not so much the ‘journey to the end of the night’ of a photographer as it is the violent filth and hypocrisy of a system that grinds the flesh of those who were refused speech.”
when i was younger and stupid and in the (glass) closet i was dating the son of a pharmacologist. this man had made millions developing medications. he was fond of me and privately told me i was too funny and smart to be dating boys.
he also said that it was incredibly unlikely that sexism will ever be resolved in the medical field. that the majority of medications i will ever take - even some of which are "for women" - will not be clinically tested on my body.
the problem, he said, was in getting any human clinical trial approved. to test on a body with a uterus - any body, even elderly patients or those who have been sterilized - was often nigh-impossible, because the concern was that the test patient may, at any point, become pregnant. once/if the patient became pregnant, the study would not be about "the effects of New Medication on the body." instead, the trial would fail - the results would be "the effects of New Medication on a developing fetus/pregnant patient."
it was massively easier, he said, to just test without accounting for a uterus. that's how he phrased it - accounting for a uterus.
at the time, i remember him talking about the ethical implications of testing on a developing fetus; how such testing could theoretically bankrupt a company if a lawsuit was filed. he talked about informed consent and about how long it took for any legislation to be passed about this - that in 1993; the year i was born, it finally became illegal to outright exclude women and minorities from clinical trials.
i remember him shrugging. "that's not to say it doesn't happen," he said. my ears were ringing.
i was thinking about how every time i have been rushed to the ER, the first thing they have asked me is if i am pregnant. when i broke my wrist at 16 years old - despite never having had sex - they made me wait three hours for the test to come back negative before they gave me pain meds. the possibility of a child haunts my health.
how many people have died on the table because they were waiting for the pregnancy test before treatment. how many people have died on the table because they were pregnant, and the only thing we care about is the fetus.
it is hard to explain to other people, but it feels like some kind of strange ghost. our entire lives, we are supposed to "save" our bodies for our future partners. but really we are just saving the body for the future child, aren't we? that hovering future-almost that cartwheels around in a miasma. you can't get your tubes tied, what if you change your mind? think of the child you must have, eventually.
who cares about you and your actual safety. think about what you could be carrying.
Christians just vibing and doing their thing: AUGH!!! OGGHH I'M being attacked!!
we seriously need to stop conceding to the personhood trap when it comes to abortion rights. is a fetus a person? thats a spiritual question. i dont care about the answer. should another person dictate what someone can do with their body? simple answer: no.
like if a fetus isnt a person it has no right to my body and if a fetus IS a peson it also has no right to my body because there is no other context in which we are required to put ourselves at risk of physical harm to preserve another persons safety or even life.
you dont have to save someone from drowning even if youre a strong swimmer. even in death youre not required to donate organs and that could save several people. you can kill someone if you truly believe your safety is at risk. we dont mandate preservation of life over autonomy in any of these circumstances.
many states have Stand Your Ground laws to bolster second amendment rights, which give you the legal right to shoot dead another human being who has come into your house and put you in fear of your life.
if i can blow the head off an adult human man i don't want in my livingroom, why can't i remove an embryo from my uterus? the embryo is pretty much guaranteed to land me in the hospital, while the adult trespasser could probably be chased off alive with a warning shot.
and if we're being real, most women who weren't upper class have always been working. besides all the domestic labour, they were often also working at whatever the family business was (farms, laundries, shops, restaurants, gas stations, etc.; and not just family businesses either) it's just that their labour was not compensated and acknowledged and there were usually no official records of it which leads to more poverty down the line when they eventually have to retire. like those "why did feminists fight for my right to work i hate labour" posts are awful in general but even more so when you consider that their grandmothers and great grandmothers and so on were likely working all their lives
sometimes I think about how rattlesnakes are starting to adapt to bite immediately instead of using their rattle as a warning, because this defense mechanism that says "im here! im frightened! don't come close or ill bite you" has instead ilicited a reaction of "oh fuck a rattlesnake, i should kill it"
so of course every snake that has the instinct to warn humans of its presence gets killed, and only the snakes that bite first and dont make themselves known get to survive. a human who's been bitten is too worried about his swelling ankle to decapitate a snake with a shovel.
it's a good example of how humans make the world more dangerous for ourselves by believing that we have mastery and ownership of it. we think we have the power and importance to control the life around us down to the snakes and insects, but every animal fights for life. and no animal thinks that any human is more important than it's own life.
Not to be that guy, but this was debunked. Rattlesnakes are not adapting to bite silently. This post is only encouraging more fear towards rattlesnakes which is incredibly irresponsible.
https://rattlesnakesolutions.com/snakeblog/science-and-education/are-rattlesnakes-evolving-to-rattle-less-or-losing-their-rattles/
NEVER regurgitate animal information without putting it to the test. There ARE humans who do bad things and hurt animals. But, we ourselves are still an animal. Pushing rumors like this still is a way of validating that humans are some curse on Earth. We are not. We are part of this ecosystem and making our entire species out to be separate from nature still puts us as "above" everything else.
We are not the lone factor in animal changes because we aren't some evil god ruling the land. If you want to have that conversation, you need to address which humans (billionaires) are actually the problem.
Rattlesnakes do not always rattle. You should never assume they will rattle. Most of the time, rattlesnakes just run away unless you really scare them. Thinking a rattlesnake will always rattle is like thinking a dog will always growl before biting. It's irresponsible thinking that leads to rumors like this that push the narrative of humans not belonging to this world.
Please stop this narrative that humanity is a sickness and actually research which changes in nature we've influenced and which changes are simply natural. Animals are not always dominated by our hand and we've been capable of helping animals just as much as some people have harmed them.
Anyway, please practice safety when hiking. Do not assume these beautiful snakes will rattle. Watch where you step, always be alert for any wild animals, and remember that when you walk the earth respectfully you simply are walking home.
Respectfully, I disagree with this take. To be clear, there is a lack of supportive evidence that rattlesnakes are losing their ability to rattle due to human influence. This is does not mean the claim that we are influencing rattlesnake behavior is debunked.
In many areas over the US, we are seeing some populations of rattlesnakes with atrophied tail tips and rattles that fall off. There could be numerous reasons why the rattle is not serving these populations of snakes anymore, but we cannot assume a lack of fault in our actions.
It is however incredibly reasonable to assume that, in much the same way we have influence over the size of fish in the river and the size and antler growth of the deer we hunt, and how our vehicles influence the wing length of birds for maneuverability, we are also contributing to the evolution of all of the animals around us. Some are changing in ways not entirely perceptible to us. When we remove an animal with specific characteristics from a gene pool, we shape the resulting generations accordingly.
While rattlesnakes are indeed not perfect alarm systems for their own bite and young rattlers have even less impulse control, we are constantly pruning out the ones that forewarn us from the gene pool. And @busket is right, when we are bitten, we are often so preoccupied with the bite that the snake gets away. We are witnessing a driver of evolutionary change in action.
It's important to also keep in mind that as we are creating islands with our land development, changes in behavior can be more pronounced in populations that are isolated from one another. It is also possible that rattlesnakes may turn instead to flight as a defense mechanism instead. Or they will simply cease to be in urbanized areas as seems the case for much of life.
I understand the message you are trying to convey, that we are not the evil upon the land that we paint ourselves as, but it is important to remind ourselves that humans have a long history of eradicating entire species of animal -- and subsequently suffering from the fallout of their absence. It is well within our means to influence the behavior of wild populations of animals through systematic culling.
The more we are mindful of the potential snowballing effect our actions can have upon the future generations of animals, the more we can take care not to create further problems for everyone in the ecosystem.
If you need further convincing of our affect on animal evolution worldwide, consider watching this video by Anton Petrov, it is quite relevant to the conversation.
In all honesty I was really rooting for the rapture in the hopes that the theists would finally fuck off and leave us alone.
Too bad Christians are too stupid to build rocket ships, otherwise they'd have raptured themselves by now.
The way I see it, women are falling for propaganda all over the world. It is considered by many for it to be their destiny to procreate and raise a child. Their life will have no meaning without children. This is not by accident but by conditioning. This is seen in every commercial that heightens the emotional aspect of taking care of a baby. Picturesque images of the nuclear family. It's everywhere, subtle but incessant reminders that babies make you feel good and children are precious and desirable.
Raising children is a service provided by an individual to its society and it should be treated as such. Our society has long taken handouts of free labor from women due to their own eagerness to fulfill the imagined roles that they have been conditioned to believe in.
Essentially we have an entire group of people sacrificing their entire lives without any monetary compensation to perpetuate the human race. Creating life does not build wealth. In fact, in these times, creating life results more often in an everlasting dependency. We see this in the housing crisis. Parents are housing their children well into their old age.
We will continue to drop in numbers until women can either be manipulated into believing again that their sole duty is to bear children, or we start rethinking childcare as a whole as a payable service to our country. Because our government is unwilling to consider this option, be prepared for a higher influx of propaganda that emphasizes the individual's responsibility of giving birth.
normalise saying ''what the fuck is wrong with you'' to mean people
stop making this post cute. it's blunt and violent. it's about humiliating needlessly cruel people not about bickering with loved ones.
Sharing space is nothing new. Sharing bathrooms is nothing new. The reactionary outrage is so manufactured.
The parking lot? As in the gender neutral parking lot? As in a place where you have no privacy?
These are the bathrooms at the airport in question:
As you can see, complete privacy for all waste-expulsion activities. You only encounter other people around the sink.
This just proves a point that I’ve repeatedly noticed and it’s that every time a bathroom goes gender neutral it gets about a hundred percent safer.
I distinctly remember coming back from college to find that they’d converted the two of the bathrooms into all-gender restrooms. Among the changes were doors that went all the way up and down, a locking mechanism within the door, and actual door handles. Even the single-occupancy bathroom got a wall for extra privacy.
In contrast, I remember the women’s bathrooms in my old school. They were broken as shit. Some doors needed to be held by a friend, some doors you held with your foot from inside. The wheelchair-accessible bathroom straight up did not have a door at all. And yet we all pretended this was okay because hey, the womanly honor code. You think that shit would have flown if there were two gender-neutral restrooms?
All I’m saying is that if I were fleeing a predator or wanted to be absolutely sure I was private, which one would be the better option? The one that assumes that a “no penises allowed” sign will be enough? Or the one that actually, physically protects me?
Also, nongender restrooms are better for parents. My brother and I grew up raised by my mom. While nothing ever happened to him going into the bathroom alone, not even like a poop accident that he would have needed help cleaning up with, my mom certainly got anxious sending a seven-year-old into the men’s room unaccompanied. A nongender restroom means that parents of small children can worry less about their kids.
Gender neutral bathrooms are The Shit. I love the privacy. Like as someone who gets menstruation related intestinal issues, the ability to just have an actual fucking door, and some goddam privacy is awesome. Gender neutral bathrooms benefit everyone. And back to the parents/caretakers of children thing, imagine if you’re a dude who’s out with a fairly young daughter or niece, what the hell do you do if there’s no family or gender neutral washroom? Use the womens’ and deal with the weird looks and/or comments, or chance it with the guys bathroom? Gender neutral bathrooms solve dozens of problems at once, including partially eliminating a need for family washrooms, as a gender neutral bathroom with change tables would take care of all that.
ALSO, this addresses the CONTINUING issue of changing tables only being in women's bathrooms, which honestly in 2025 is just fucking embarrassing.
Fix the problem in its entirety by not making us use stalls like cattle!