i will personally never understand that thing people do when theyre like "i thought this was a good piece of art until i realised its fetish/pornographic" like why does art lose value if the artist was a little horny when they made it. why is that so scary. im sure a lot of the old masters were doing portraits of their lovers slightly bricked up & theyre still displayed in museums. why is sexual arousal not an acceptable source of inspiration when like every other emotion is. well i mean i know why sadly but i do not like it so i'll continue to complain about it
if michaelangelo can paint 644 cock and balls on the sistine chapel u can swallow a few close ups of feet or whatever
I must say it. some of those renaissance painters were pretty horny about Jesus.
It’s cause thanks to a combination of sex negativity and sexism, “this feels like fetish content” is considered more legitimate criticism than “this writer treats women as objects”.




















