1. Roylskopp: https://profoundmysteries.royksopp.com/
What is the websites main purpose?
The sites main purpose is to promote and build hype for the bands new album release
Is its appearance and functionality appropriate to the purpose?
The appearance and functionality of the site is heavily based on being an explorative experience for the user. The homepage is interactive and very visual with a symbol you can play with (the bands logo for the album) It compliments its context as it is intentionally mysterious, the unreleased songs from the album are blurred out (a count down to build excitement), inviting the user to revisit the site as they the songs are released. However an everyday user may think there is an error in the loading of images on site. The site exists for hardcore fans of the band, a way to experience and immerse yourself in their music and world.
Is it easy to use? Is it effective in achieving its purpose?
Elements can be challenging, ie. the visually design heavy homepage, an older demographic may be confused as to where to navigate to. There is very little text overall and a menu guide is only present at the footer of the page, it is all visual and reliant on look and click features. However, this seems to be on purpose, the mysterious and surrealistic nature of the site is appropriate to building excitement to the release of the album.
What design elements are significant in the design – e.g. layout, colour, text, graphics, images, and various other media. Analyse its use – how does it help achieve its main purpose? Does it aid in any functionality?
The site is very visual, the homepage’s 3-D interactive feature (which also plays a song) is a big component to introducing the feel of the site and the music of the band. It compliments the surrealistic nature of the site and band’s album artwork, a serious of objects which one cannot quite place, almost Dali like. The site utilises a very simple grid layout for the images along the top, all of which appear to be the artwork for each song on the album. When hovered over they reveal a clickable link which leads to a music video for that song, again emphasising the interactive element of the site. It is effective in creating intrigue and excitement for the release of the album. Everything is focused on being a little mysterious (appropriate for the album name)
What is the context of the site? What genre category does the site sit in? (e.g. is it a commerce site?News? Entertainment?) Analyse the sites position within the context. (e.g. what else is achieving the same goal?
I would place the site in the entertainment/artistic field with an element of e-commerce as ultimately they are also selling their new album, which is present on the page where there are clickable links to pre-order. But I think building excitement of the release seems to be the focus, and it is essentially one elaborate advert. I would compare to other bands sites such as Swedish House mafia https://swedishhousemafia.com/ who are also EDM, their site is similarly very clean, design heavy, visual with very little text and a mysterious feel throughout. It relies on an interactive element, but perhaps achieves it in a more sleek way?
2. Parklife: https://parklife.uk.com/
What is the websites main purpose?
The site excites to promote a music festival, sell tickets and be informational about the event
Is its appearance and functionality appropriate to the purpose?
A feast for the eyes, it is a very colourful, fun, engaging and illustration heavy site filled with lots of chaotic and psychedelic energy. This seems super on brand for a music festival which is in turn a chaotic and fun experience with a little crazy thrown in. It seems focussed on a youthful demographic, an older audience might find the site overwhelming.
Is it easy to use? Is it effective in achieving its purpose?
Yes, all the information you would require about the festival is clear and present on the homepage, from the line up, dates and clickable links to buy tickets. The only element that could be confusing is the over reliance on graphic imagery within important sectors, ie the clickable illustrated icons for the VIP section could be confusing to navigate as you might not immediately understand the context of them, perhaps some simplified text below would aid this.
What design elements are significant in the design – e.g. layout, colour, text, graphics, images, and various other media. Analyse its use – how does it help achieve its main purpose? Does it aid in any functionality?
The site is design heavy and incredibly reliant on its use of illustration, colour and visual language. Every pocket of the site has been made to compliment the feel of the site, with neon colours and illustrations splattered everywhere. It is effective in creating excitement and ooo’s and aaa’s for the event. The design successfully captures the feel of a festival and in turn grabs the right demographic.
What is the context of the site? What genre category does the site sit in? (e.g. is it a commerce site?News? Entertainment?) Analyse the sites position within the context. (e.g. what else is achieving the same goal?)
The site functions as an e-commerce site, ultimately there to sell tickets and build excitement for the festival. I would compare it other festivals such as Latitude festival https://www.latitudefestival.com/ which has the same goal, but a very different feel to the site. Latitude’s site is very clean, easy to navigate and less chaotic overall, a more relaxing experience...but maybe doesn’t capture the festival ‘feel’ the same way that Parklife does.
3. The Beatles: https://www.thebeatles.com/
What is the websites main purpose?
Stepping into a different direction, The Beatles site exists as more of a fan hub, entertainment based site. A place to go to find out more about your favourite band and delve into the nitty gritty details of their lives and the discography of the band.
Is its appearance and functionality appropriate to the purpose?
It presents itself in a very simple, clean format. Easy to navigate with clear language and good layout. This would appeal to the older demographic who are most likely to be the target audience. Keeping the site simple allows all to easily find what they are looking for without too much focus on the aesthetics of the site. It does however still compliment the band, as black and white colours are focus points which are appropriate for the bands logo and look and feel.
Is it easy to use? Is it effective in achieving its purpose?
Yes, the menu along the top is very easy to navigate through, it is clear in its objectives and allows for a fuss free browse with structured grid layouts. The design overall lets The Beatles music speak for itself, it doesn’t heavily rely on creating ‘hype’ as they are already an established band with fans who navigate to the site for a specific purpose...to learn more. The only criticism I would have is the main body of text on the homepage could be more streamlined, it is very heavy/bold with large text that takes up a big portion of the page. It isn’t easy on the eyes and elements of it could be adjusted. A large image of the band stretching the width of the page as intro would have perhaps been nicer as an intro for the fans. The homepage also feels very ‘scrolly’ too much content that again could be streamlined for a better user experience.
What design elements are significant in the design – e.g. layout, colour, text, graphics, images, and various other media. Analyse its use – how does it help achieve its main purpose? Does it aid in any functionality?
The grid layout seems to be my main take-away, with text, media and images second. An element that I liked was the ability to search by song (A-Z) on the site to delve into the world of The Beatles. This element is very user friendly and when clicked on gives you insight to the creation of the music. Overall the site achieves its purpose in being an almost museum for the band, an archive of their work and a place to go to fan-boy/girl over them...just like beatlemania. (perhaps they could have played into the beatlemania era further for a fun element for the feel of the site?) I would have also liked to see more focus on imagery as their are so many fantastic photographs of the band.
What is the context of the site? What genre category does the site sit in? (e.g. is it a commerce site?News? Entertainment?) Analyse the sites position within the context. (e.g. what else is achieving the same goal?)
I would place it in entertainment an e-commerce as it is also functions as a site to sell band merch and highlight the ‘Get Back’ documentary. Unlike Roylskopp it doesn’t need to focus on building hype and excitement as it has an audience already that will seek out the site and products, they don’t have new releases, it will always function as memorabilia. I would compare the site to other older bands such as The Kinks https://www.thekinks.info/latest/lola/?returnpage=/ whose site I think is a little more fun and interactive, but maybe not as extensive or informative as The Beatles site as there isn’t as much to discover on there.
4. Magnetic Magazine: https://www.magneticmag.com/
What is the websites main purpose?
The last site is online magazine focused on being an EDM music hub for fans of the genre. It functions as a place to go to dive into the EDM culture and community. You will find articles, a podcast, news and events as well as a section on sustainability (thought this seemed a little random as I wasn’t sure how it related to the theme of the site?) and travel/camping for festivals.
Is its appearance and functionality appropriate to the purpose?
It is a very sleek and stylish site with grid layouts and a structured look, a black and white colour palette is used, appropriate to the genre. Text is heavy on the site, which is expected as it is first and foremost a magazine.
Is it easy to use? Is it effective in achieving its purpose?
Yes, the top menu is easy to navigate through (similar in style to The Beatles site) It also utilises a drop down burger menu, a welcome additional for mobile users. I could be wrong, but certain styles of the site make me feel it might be powered by WIX. The ads can be a little aggressive at times, with them scrolling down the page with you and interrupting the flow of the site. But ads are expected on any news site. (you can remove them by subscribing to the site for a fee, an element that could be promoted further) I like the additional image on the header promoting the podcast, but feel this could and should be on the menu list too as it seems to be key feature of the site, and isn’t present on the burger menu or header menu. Overall the site does achieve its purpose and is reflective of its genre and target market.
What design elements are significant in the design – e.g. layout, colour, text, graphics, images, and various other media. Analyse its use – how does it help achieve its main purpose? Does it aid in any functionality?
Layout is key here, the grid structure is clearly used and it is effective and easy to navigate through. Heavy text is used as headlines (although personally I feel elements of this could be streamlined a little) photographic imagery is present which is used to highlight articles. The imagery all feels coherent with that home-grown environment bringing each element together ie. most images feel very urban. Each article is given a yellow heading to highlight the field it falls into and some are clickable to give you further relatable articles. I feel the layout of the articles themselves are a little boring, everything is just in one large scrollable list and isn’t as reflective of the look of the rest of the site.
What is the context of the site? What genre category does the site sit in? (e.g. is it a commerce site?News? Entertainment?) Analyse the sites position within the context. (e.g. what else is achieving the same goal?)
It is an entertainment, news site, a hub for all things EDM, a place to immersive yourself in a culture that you are passionate about. I would compare to sites such as edm.com which actually has a very similar layout and feel to it, down to the grids, text formatting and imagery, but perhaps with a slightly better flow to it.