FIGHT FOR THE FUTURE - Hate groups poisoning our movement
We’re launching something important for Pride Month.
For a long time, we’ve known that there are some less-than-scrupulous people working on tech policy. It turns out that several powerful anti-LGBTQ+ organizations have infiltrated the movement—lobbying for bills like KOSA and pretending to be experts on what keeps kids safe online.1
The Heritage Foundation, NCOSE, the Ethics and Public Policy Center, and the Eagle Forum are Religious Right groups that have been active for decades.2 They got their start opposing marriage equality and fighting abortion rights. Now, they’re trying to blacklist LGBTQ+ and abortion speech.
This Pride Month, we're asking digital rights groups to cut ties with the Religious Right. If you agree that that anti-LGBTQ+ hate groups have no place in this movement, sign our letter now.
SIGN NOW
Unfortunately, the digital rights space is small, and Heritage et al. are sneaky. We learned that some digital rights groups have collaborated with the Religious Right—whether they know it or not.
Humanpower can feel scarce in the digital rights movement, and sometimes we work with people with whom we disagree. But we have to draw a line: collaborating with hate groups is unacceptable, especially as LGBTQ+ people are being targeted by a government partially staffed by Religious Right figures.
If you can sign, thanks in advance. If you know or work with organizations who would like to be a listed signatory on the open letter, indicate that on the form and we’ll be in touch.
BAD NEWS: The House GOP and Democratic members of the Energy and Commerce Committee have been working on a package of age-verification bills and have finally struck a deal (I believe some of these are the same bills in the KIDS Act which they had passed out of committee a few months ago). Theoretically, this means that the House of Representatives could bring this package up for a vote at any time, with some reporters saying as early as this week or next week.
If this package were to pass it would still face an uphill battle as the House version of KOSA doesn't not include a duty of care provision, which the Senate wants.
However, we need to do everything to can to stop this from passing now, so it doesn't advance any further.
We must call House Leadership, our representatives, and our senators to express our opposition and we need to spread the work. If we can make noise and create pressure over how unpopular age verification is, it makes passing bills like these less enticing.
(Note: this is different from whatever deal the Senate and the White House are trying to reach over AI and age-verification)
You can use the resources linked to find more information and 5-calls to call:
All of the bad internet bills. One website.
Call Script on Page 2! Resources For Learning about KOSA Petitions: STOP KOSA Tell Congress: KOSA Will Censor the Internet But Won't Help
The leaders of the House Energy and Commerce Committee will unveil a bipartisan deal Monday on guardrails for protecting kids against online
Also noting that leaders in the push for age-verification don't like the House's version. So, if the House doesn't like the Senate version and the Senate doesn't like the House version, and no one likes Marsha Blackburn's AI package, that is a weakness/friction that can work in our favor, so PLEASE CALL TO OPPOSE:
this is an all hands on deck situation right now. the house seems to have made a bipartisan agreement, and is set to be voted into law as soon as next week. again, there's no exact date, but it's an estimate on when it'll happen.
this will be voted by the house representatives. this is a floor vote. if passed, it'll go to senate.
for the next two weeks, call your house representatives. make them oppose this as soon as possible.
Ring your representatives, your senators, etc and tell them to vote no.
<@&1414292606359179354>
<@&1440441931569299516>
House Energy and commerce committee has announced an Agreement on Bipartisan Kids’ Safety Package, which includes KOSA.
TL;DR
House and Energy agrees on kids safety package called “KIDS ACT” which includes KOSA and 16 other bills
They have secured democrat support for a once republican only package
Democrats weren’t supporting the package because it didn’t go far enough
New text would require KOSA to force companies to curb harms to young users, though the differences between the senate and house versions of KOSA might cause challenges
With the senate version requiring a duty of care, with many pointing out to be a massive push for censorship (as is the other kid safety bills)
It does include provisions of date collection of young people and a bill that would push for better privacy for young people (oh the irony)
It’s not known when the bill will go to the senate floor, but it could be as soon as next week
full text
They have agreed on a version of the KIDS (Kids Internet and Digital Safety) ACT
“Securing Democratic support for the initially Republican-only package marks a significant step toward advancing the package through the chamber.”
“Republicans on the committee in March had approved the package along party lines at the time, with Democrats ripping into provisions as not going far enough to safeguard younger users.
new kosa text
The newly revised text would tweak KOSA to require social media companies to establish policies that would curb harms to young users.”
“Still, differences between the House and Senate version of KOSA remain, signaling challenges to get the legislation to President Donald Trump’s desk.
The Senate bill would create a legal obligation for tech companies to exercise reasonable care when designing their platforms to prevent harms to minors, otherwise known as a duty of care.
Lead co-sponsor Sen. Marsha Blackburn (R-Tenn.) is separately negotiating a deal with the White House on a legislative package that would include her version of KOSA, along with preemption of state regulations on AI, in addition to other provisions.”
“The House package would also override state laws that do not meet the federal standards, establishing a floor, while still allowing states to enact stricter regulations related to youth online safety.
other stuff added
The package was broadened to include a provision, championed by Pallone, that would address data brokers’ collection and use of data from minors,
as well as a bill that would improve privacy settings for teens, known as the Children and Teens’ Online Privacy Protection Act.”
what’s included
“The bill includes portions of:
o The SCREEN Act
o The Kids Online Safety Act (KOSA)
o The Safe Messaging for Kids Act
o The SPY KIDS Act
o The Safer GAMING Act
o The SAFE Bots Act
o The Children and Teens’ Online Privacy Protection Act (COPPA 2.0)
o Data Broker Disclosures
o The Safe Social Media Act
o The No Fentanyl on Social Media Act
o The Assessing Safety Tools for Parents and Minors Act
o The Promoting a Safe Internet for Minors Act
o The AWARE Act
o The Kids Internet and Safety Partnership Act”
The Committee on Energy and Commerce is the oldest standing legislative committee in the U.S. House of Representatives and is vested with th
House lawmakers have reached a bipartisan deal on a legislative package intended to strengthen online safety and privacy protections for chi
To any US citizen who is against KOSA but unsure of what to do: these people will send a letter on your behalf and will also provide instructions on what to say in a call to your lawmakers to voice disapproval of the bill.
We've been able to at least push this bill back to the drawing board before and we can do it again.
https://www.stopkosa.com/
YES, YOU CAN DO SOMETHING ABOUT DISCORD'S AGE VERIFICATION
But while cancelling Nitro and boycotting Discord CAN be a form of protest, it sadly may not be effective on its own.
Why? Bc their hands are tied due to the recent trend in age verification bills worldwide.
All of the bad internet bills. One website.
This site helps send emails to your lawmakers to oppose certain Internet bills in the US, many of which would push age verification if passed
HOWEVER, calling your lawmakers on the phone is most effective.
If you're not in the US, you can still help by spreading the word.
The only way to prevent age verification (On Discord and ALL other social media platforms) is to prevent the bills that are forcing it. Look at the site for more info
Update, just to clear things up:
This is not a petition to stop Discord specifically.
This is to point out the root cause of age verification policies.
Discord is complying in advance, but if these bills pass, EVERY platform will have to make age verification features.
If these bills pass, Discord actually won't have a choice.
Protesting Discord's policies and preventing these bills are both important. We are saying "no" to Discord's complying in advance, while tackling the core of the situation.
THE GOVERMENT IS USING A MINOR IN THE MOST DESPICABLE WAY TO PUSH MASS SERVAILENCE!
I HAVE NO WORRDS FOR THIS BUT THESE,.. WE NEED TO SHUT THESE AI IDIOTS DOWN PERMENANTLY! THEY CLAIM TO PROTECT CHILDREN BUT ITS THESE POLITIONS THAT ALLOWED THESE AI COMPANIES TO CONTINUE AND NOW WE HAVE TO GIVE UP OUR FREEDOM, OUR RESOURCES, OUR CHILDRENS LIVES, SO THEY CAN PUSH MASS SERVAILENCE! WE CANNOT STAND FOR THIS WE WILL NOT STAND FOR THIS! WE WON'T STAND FOR THIS!
Even if you don’t live there, if you still live somewhere in the states, please, listen up.
“The MA legislature and governor just proposed dangerous social media surveillance legislation that would require everyone in the state, including adults, to upload a government ID or submit to a face scan to create a social media account. If something like this passes here, it will spread to other states faster than activists can fight back.
I have an op-ed out in today's Boston Globe explaining why this legislation would hurt kids and help Trump attack LGBTQ youth and undocumented folks. You can read it here (no paywall) https://archive.ph/rAK4P
If you're in MA, please send this to your state senators and the governor! They need to read it! You can also use this tool to easily call the key lawmakers who will be making decisions about this: https://www.stoponlineidchecks.org/ma “
- Fight For the Future Signal chat
I encourage reading EFF’s article linked below as it goes into the greater details of the legislation aside from this, but key notes:
• Forces everyone (not just kids) to upload a government ID or submit to a facial recognition scan to create a social media account or post online, even on educational sites like Wikipedia
• Force parents to send even more sensitive information to Big Tech companies to “verify” custody in order for a minor to create an account (think: sending a birth certificate to Mark Zuckerberg to let your teen create an account)
• Allow unsupportive parents to lock queer and trans youth off the Internet, restricting access to life-saving community and information with zero recourse
• Expand the Trump admin’s surveillance capabilities, making it easier for them to persecute people organizing protests, monitoring ICE, and criticizing the administration
• Cost Massachusetts tax payers enormously, as the legislation is clearly unconstitutional and would face legal challenges.
• Specifically harm undocumented folks who use social media to warn communities about ICE activity and raise money for family members
• Fine smaller and non-profit tech platforms like Mastodon and Bluesky out of business, further expanding the monopolies of Big Tech platforms
It is one of many of the worst pieces of digital surveillance legislation right now in the states.
If you’re in MA, please call and write to your state senators and governor through EFF’s article below, and if you’re not, either spread the word or call them too, but, don’t give them your ZIP code so they don’t know where you are.
why can't these parents actually take responsibility and teach their kids about online safety instead of blaming it on the internet?,like I noticed that the blame game is common these days & it makes my blood boil
Yeah the internet is far from perfect but adding these awful age verification bills or banning it,will only isolate kids in abusive,hostile households.
In a way Their rewarding the bad people by introducing these stupid laws.
It makes my blood boil, too. I also think there is a government aspect to this as well! 🌐😒
I swear if we start holding these bad parents accountable, this would immediately stop.
That's why I encourage you to be honest with parents and tell them what they are doing will not help kids and state the facts of the situation.
They are not realizing this will push kids further onto unsafe platforms or sites, causing actual problems (Like it already is doing.) Especially with predators and bad things that they claim to want to protect the kids against.
I also think this is a government issue, too.
I think that the government is using these scare tactics to get our information, to silence us, and to push their own narrative. All of these laws would strip away our privacy online for good, proving my points. It's almost like they are trying to push for authoritarianism and fascism in the name of safety. That is VERY dangerous!
im being good and calling my representatives to oppose KOSA and I have a shitty script, use it anyway, you can easily connect with their offices through stopkosa.org, calling is supposed to be helpful, please aid me in my fight to annoy these people
My name is (legal name) I am a (state) constituent, (zip code) and I am calling to urge you to oppose the Kids Online Safety Act.
Even though there have been significant promising changes to the bill, KOSA still fails to address the root issues related to kid’s safety online, and furthermore puts everyone at risk. While I support efforts to protect children online, this bill overreaches in ways that will harm the right to privacy and freedom of speech.
We’ve already seen how poorly this kind of policy plays out abroad. The United Kingdom passed a similar law, the Online Safety Act, which has since faced immense public backlash. A petition calling for its repeal has already surpassed its goal by more than four hundred thousand signatures. The U.S. has an even larger population, if this kind of law sparks that level of concern in the UK, we can expect far greater unrest here.
KOSA would require online platforms to verify the ages of their users, forcing us to hand over sensitive personal information, like government-issued IDs, just to access everyday websites. This kind of data collection creates massive security risks. This information could be exploited for unprecendented levels of identity theft, fraud, and surveillance.
As an adult, I should not be forced to compromise my privacy or safety to use the internet. Age-verification mandates like those in KOSA set a dangerous precedent and open the door to widespread monitoring and censorship under the guise of child protection.
There are better ways to help kids stay safe online without sacrificing the rights and privacy of millions of adults while allowing for the exposure of such sensitive data to malicious hackers.
Please oppose the Kids Online Safety Act. Thank you for your time.
To any US citizen who is against KOSA but unsure of what to do: these people will send a letter on your behalf and will also provide instructions on what to say in a call to your lawmakers to voice disapproval of the bill.
We've been able to at least push this bill back to the drawing board before and we can do it again.
https://www.stopkosa.com/
YES, YOU CAN DO SOMETHING ABOUT DISCORD'S AGE VERIFICATION
But while cancelling Nitro and boycotting Discord CAN be a form of protest, it sadly may not be effective on its own.
Why? Bc their hands are tied due to the recent trend in age verification bills worldwide.
All of the bad internet bills. One website.
This site helps send emails to your lawmakers to oppose certain Internet bills in the US, many of which would push age verification if passed
HOWEVER, calling your lawmakers on the phone is most effective.
If you're not in the US, you can still help by spreading the word.
The only way to prevent age verification (On Discord and ALL other social media platforms) is to prevent the bills that are forcing it. Look at the site for more info
Update, just to clear things up:
This is not a petition to stop Discord specifically.
This is to point out the root cause of age verification policies.
Discord is complying in advance, but if these bills pass, EVERY platform will have to make age verification features.
If these bills pass, Discord actually won't have a choice.
Protesting Discord's policies and preventing these bills are both important. We are saying "no" to Discord's complying in advance, while tackling the core of the situation.
YES, YOU CAN DO SOMETHING ABOUT DISCORD'S AGE VERIFICATION
But while cancelling Nitro and boycotting Discord CAN be a form of protest, it sadly may not be effective on its own.
Why? Bc their hands are tied due to the recent trend in age verification bills worldwide.
All of the bad internet bills. One website.
This site helps send emails to your lawmakers to oppose certain Internet bills in the US, many of which would push age verification if passed
HOWEVER, calling your lawmakers on the phone is most effective.
If you're not in the US, you can still help by spreading the word.
The only way to prevent age verification (On Discord and ALL other social media platforms) is to prevent the bills that are forcing it. Look at the site for more info
Update, just to clear things up:
This is not a petition to stop Discord specifically.
This is to point out the root cause of age verification policies.
Discord is complying in advance, but if these bills pass, EVERY platform will have to make age verification features.
If these bills pass, Discord actually won't have a choice.
Protesting Discord's policies and preventing these bills are both important. We are saying "no" to Discord's complying in advance, while tackling the core of the situation.
It drives me crazy how so many people are just...ok with banning kids from social media and actively ignore what we tell them.
I don't think any people who support it are going to see this since like, this is tumblr, but imagine that you can't vote and need to have someone else give their permission for you to go somewhere, just like, go to any place, and your opinions are constantly devalued and you're not taken seriously by the people around you, your freinds might not have that much free time to do anything together and there are basically no public spaces where you can spend time. So your outlet becomes social media. After all, it's the only place where you can really find communities and express your opinions. Now imagine that that one place is now suddenly evil and addictive and every person in the government thinks you shouldn't have access to it because their great grandchildren look at their Instagarmies and TikityToks too much and they just need to get off their damn phones!!
So now, if it gets banned, you would have basically no means of communicating your opinions to the outside world (and yes, the internet is part of the 'real world'), you would be ignored in any serious political action setting because of your age and then all you could do to express any opinions you have would be going to protests. But those happen infrequently, you would have to get permission from your parents, and you can't say anything longer than what can fit on a sign. Every community or fandom that you were in would be gone from your life and you might not have any freinds with the same interests.
The people who support these bans don't care about kids.
Banning social media would be a band-aid solution to the problems of rising depression and anxiety in teens (just speaking personally, my mental health has greatly decreased after learning about these proposed bans and the idea of not having any other way to be perceived besides my physical body because of this has caused me to develop some body image issues.) and if these platforms are as addicting as people say it would still let them hurt adult users.
If you support banning kids from social media genuinely fuck you.
to add on: a lot of the reason why we use our phones is because otherwise, there really aren’t that many other things to do. I can probably list the amount of fun kid activities that are accessible to everyone near me on one hand.
And here’s one of the more important parts: I don’t like sharing this but basically my parents aren’t exactly… the best. If I didn’t learn about what toxic parenting (and parental abuse) looks like from YouTube (back when I didn’t boycott YouTube), god knows what could have happened to me. Banning the internet from tens of hundreds of probably even thousands of kids like me, who unlike me, do not know that how they’re being treated isn’t normal, would severely endanger them. And yes, schools do teach and/or talk about this topic, but none go truly in depth (unless you were to be say, studying the subject of child abuse and the aftereffects and what not). If I didn’t happen to look at videos discussing toxic parenting and how it psychologically affects you, I probably would be in way worse of a mental state than I am now. Matter of fact, I’d probably be dead.
So I will repeat what the original poster said: Banning social media from kids is a bandaid solution at best, and will without a doubt, worsen the current mental health crisis. Barring kids from social media isn’t going to fix the mental health issues of the current generation, because a lot of our mental health issues (in the US at least) stem from some form of social, economic, systemic, or political inequality. And solving those problems take way more than banning the internet. I agree that kids should be careful on the internet, and as someone who taught herself how to stay safe on the internet (ie: don’t say where you live, your name, stuff like that), I also agree that people should definitely teach their kids to be more careful on the internet. HOWEVER, teaching kids basic internet safety is not the same as banning the internet for kids entirely.
So repeat this with me: BANNING THE INTERNET IS NOT A SOLUTION. WHAT WE NEED TO DO IS FIX THE BROKEN SYSTEM WE HAVE.
It drives me crazy how so many people are just...ok with banning kids from social media and actively ignore what we tell them.
I don't think any people who support it are going to see this since like, this is tumblr, but imagine that you can't vote and need to have someone else give their permission for you to go somewhere, just like, go to any place, and your opinions are constantly devalued and you're not taken seriously by the people around you, your freinds might not have that much free time to do anything together and there are basically no public spaces where you can spend time. So your outlet becomes social media. After all, it's the only place where you can really find communities and express your opinions. Now imagine that that one place is now suddenly evil and addictive and every person in the government thinks you shouldn't have access to it because their great grandchildren look at their Instagarmies and TikityToks too much and they just need to get off their damn phones!!
So now, if it gets banned, you would have basically no means of communicating your opinions to the outside world (and yes, the internet is part of the 'real world'), you would be ignored in any serious political action setting because of your age and then all you could do to express any opinions you have would be going to protests. But those happen infrequently, you would have to get permission from your parents, and you can't say anything longer than what can fit on a sign. Every community or fandom that you were in would be gone from your life and you might not have any freinds with the same interests.
The people who support these bans don't care about kids.
Banning social media would be a band-aid solution to the problems of rising depression and anxiety in teens (just speaking personally, my mental health has greatly decreased after learning about these proposed bans and the idea of not having any other way to be perceived besides my physical body because of this has caused me to develop some body image issues.) and if these platforms are as addicting as people say it would still let them hurt adult users.
If you support banning kids from social media genuinely fuck you.
to add on: a lot of the reason why we use our phones is because otherwise, there really aren’t that many other things to do. I can probably list the amount of fun kid activities that are accessible to everyone near me on one hand.
And here’s one of the more important parts: I don’t like sharing this but basically my parents aren’t exactly… the best. If I didn’t learn about what toxic parenting (and parental abuse) looks like from YouTube (back when I didn’t boycott YouTube), god knows what could have happened to me. Banning the internet from tens of hundreds of probably even thousands of kids like me, who unlike me, do not know that how they’re being treated isn’t normal, would severely endanger them. And yes, schools do teach and/or talk about this topic, but none go truly in depth (unless you were to be say, studying the subject of child abuse and the aftereffects and what not). If I didn’t happen to look at videos discussing toxic parenting and how it psychologically affects you, I probably would be in way worse of a mental state than I am now. Matter of fact, I’d probably be dead.
So I will repeat what the original poster said: Banning social media from kids is a bandaid solution at best, and will without a doubt, worsen the current mental health crisis. Barring kids from social media isn’t going to fix the mental health issues of the current generation, because a lot of our mental health issues (in the US at least) stem from some form of social, economic, systemic, or political inequality. And solving those problems take way more than banning the internet. I agree that kids should be careful on the internet, and as someone who taught herself how to stay safe on the internet (ie: don’t say where you live, your name, stuff like that), I also agree that people should definitely teach their kids to be more careful on the internet. HOWEVER, teaching kids basic internet safety is not the same as banning the internet for kids entirely.
So repeat this with me: BANNING THE INTERNET IS NOT A SOLUTION. WHAT WE NEED TO DO IS FIX THE BROKEN SYSTEM WE HAVE.
President Stefani introduced his mass internet identity verification bill..
In short,he wants all sites you visit like Wikipedia,AO3 and Spotfy to identify yourself with Digital IDs to protect the children and teenagers from cyber bullying and grooming.Let me remind you that he is determined to pass this pile of shit in less than 3 months.