I really, really want to have faith in the show that the hypocrisy that Stolas has exhibited multiple times now will be addressed in a narratively satisfying way but I simply cannot with what the show has shown me so far.
To me, if you were planning on this Big Confrontation, you'd build up moments throughout the earlier episodes. Show Blitzo trying to interject with different things that challenge his understanding, and him shutting Blitzo down, show Verosika questioning things about their relationship and Stolas not being able to answer. Have the other party goers ask why Stolas is there, and sort of give each other a side-eye when Stolas talks about the stuff he did (without realizing how its making him look), before going back to Shitting On Blitzo a second later. It doesn't need to take that much time up, just little things that plant the seeds for a much bigger confrontation later down the line.
As it is, even if that confrontation does happen in a way that makes sense for the episode, it, like a lot of other things in this show, isn't going to have the proper build-up for it to feel satisfying to the audience! It's going to be just as rushed as any other plotline and that's going to be a real bummer because it really needed the time to be fleshed out.
That's why the whole "It's not over yet!" Argument never really worked for me, because you can tell in other shows if that's where an arcs supposed to go, now its a different thing if its executed well, or if it matched audience expectations, but a lot of time, if a conflict is planned, but its going to be addressed later you can tell by the way the way the characters interact beforehand. It also lets the audience build it up as a Flaw they have, which they can confront and lead to character growth! The lack of that shows, to me, that they aren't planning on dealing with it properly.
Like imagine, (as a hypothetical scenario), a certain character displayed bigoted opinions to other characters, in which no other characters acknowledge as being bigoted, or push back against at all. And then you say, "Well, the show isn't over, so we can't criticize this character yet!" Okay??? But we can though?? At least discuss the characters actions?? A good writer would want you to do that? But if none of the other characters so much as bring it up, it would still be fair to go "Alright so X character seems pretty bigoted, right?" Why's it suddenly not fair to do that to Stolas' character?
Show me the outline for the eventual growth that character experiences, then I'll buy the "They're going to address that down the road," but until then I'm just going to be gesturing at him like ???? What's up with all this??