Reblogging with the whole chain copied here and nuking all of his comments just to get them off of my story.
10burgers left the following comment on Stuck Inside With Nothing To Do (But Each Other) :
Oof. Typical Trump hating bullshit From someone who doesn’t understand anything about COVID. Hard pass, kid.
I replied with the following and deleted his comment:
Fuck off, you fascist bootlicker.
(admittedly, this was my mistake; I should have just deleted it and not said anything)
Lmao typical trump hating bullshit from someone who doesn’t understand anything. And, in fact, someone who doesn’t understand what the word fascist means.
I replied again (I know, I know, idiot me, don’t mud-wrestle with a pig and all that) and deleted his comment afterwards:
Damn straight I hate your corrupt fascist overlord. Don't you have an indoor mask-free rally to attend, bootlicker?
I think it’s hilarious you censor me. So desperate to silence me because I’m right lmao. So, you find out what fascist means yet? Doesn’t look like it. And there’s another statement proving you know nothing about COVID, mobby.
My reply (after which I didn’t delete his latest comment because of the cry of “censorship!” and wanting to let the Abuse Team see it)
Censor: Noun:
an official who examines books, films, news, etc. that are about to be published and suppresses any parts that are considered obscene, politically unacceptable, or a threat to security.
I am not a government official, and I don't consider you to be politically unacceptable--just a revolting person who I don't want near me for my own safety.
Fascism (/ˈfæʃɪzəm/) is a form of far-right, authoritarian ultranationalism characterized by dictatorial power, forcible suppression of opposition and strong regimentation of society and of the economy.
Or in other words, what Trump and his lickspittle Bill Barr are, especially with Barr's threats of jailing protestors exercising their First Amendment Rights under sedition charges.
Now, I am going to ask politely, even though I know you will ignore it. Please leave me alone. I do not want to interact with you, I do not want to have anything to do with you, and further interactions will be reported to the Abuse Team for harassment.
It’s sad that you intentionally looked for a different definition.
Lmao so we’ve established Trump isn’t a fascist? Considering “peaceful” protestors are rioting? Which is, in fact, illegal?
Agreed. I will be reporting all of your comments and this story to the Abuse Team. You are intentionally spreading falsified and incorrect information, and you are displaying bias against a group of people based on their belief system.
I’d recommend ceasing your hypocrisy and stop hating on perfectly good people who only want rioters to stop killing people.
And that's what I mean by predictable.
And I know that you're not going to believe these, but I'll post them anyway:
https://thehill.com/homenews/state-watch/515082-over-90-percent-of-protests-this-summer-were-peaceful-report-shows
https://time.com/5886348/report-peaceful-protests/
https://myfox8.com/news/about-93-of-racial-justice-protests-in-the-us-have-been-peaceful-a-new-report-finds/
So yeah, I know you're going to ignore all of those, but there you go.
Ha. No. I'm establishing boundaries. You're ignoring them. Now please do as I requested in that story description and leave me alone.
Cops are instigating the violence nearly all of the time, according to the reports. And they're killing people.
I can think of much worse things to worship than being anti-fascist. Like Trump's boots.
Now please leave me alone. I've already reported you--and I know, you've reported me for telling you to go away and deleting your bile, because it's your opinion that you can say anything you want, but I can't, and I have to just sit and take it. Sorry, no, I have rights too.
And that’s what I mean by intentionally taking a specific dictionary definition for the noun version of the verb I used. This is sad.
I think it’s lovely how you posted 3 very biased articles. How about you look up the victims that the rioters killed? David Dorn? Italia Kelly? Patrick Underwood? There’s three to make it easy.
Lol nah. According to the Archive’s rules, creating a hostile environment is against the harassment rules. You did that with your story description. I’m just responding, like you wanted.
Hey look, you’re projecting again.
Riots are rioting all of the time. And they’re killing people. Cops are doing the right thing and stopping it, fascist bootlicker.
Don’t even know who Breitbart and OAN are.
Considering you’re worshipping murder and a fascist regime under Antifa? Nah.
Sorry, bud, but you don’t have the right to be hostile and rude to people based on things you don’t understand. No one does. You broke the rules.
At that point, I just deleted that last response and turned on comment moderation.
And he had to leave one last dig:
My point proven fantastically lmao. Hope the abuse team removes your account for your rule breaking.
So, yeah. Just don’t interact. Just block and delete and move on. Because it’s their belief. Their religion, supporting Trump, and no facts, no observable reality, no nothing is going to convince them otherwise.
There’s a comment I’ve seen, that the essence of the conservative mindset is that “there must be in-groups who the law protects but does not bind, alongside outgroups who the law binds but does not protect.” And that is what we’re seeing here. He expects the rules to protect him and bind me.