A lot of leftist accounts are suspiciously quiet on the section 504 lawsuit, proposed medicaid cuts, and the "make America healthy again" executive order.
I know other leftists are not the enemy but if we don't have able bodied allies and general population support, there's no hope of pushing back against these ableist policies. These big accounts ignoring a massive minority at risk is scary. The current admin is the problem but there's no hope of a solution without allyship.
We need visibility. We need allies.
Also if you have seen leftist accounts discussing disability issues, please let me know their handle so others can follow them!
The suit challenges a Biden administration decision that considered "gender dysphoria" a disability and goes even farther in questioning ass
"(*The 504 plan) *That law has turned out to be hugely important in education, offering an even broader definition of students with special needs than the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act.
Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton sued the Biden administration in September 2024, saying that it was āabusing executive actionā to sidestep the law. Under the Biden administration the Section 504 definition of disabilityĀ was expanded to recognize that āgender dysphoria . . . may be considered a physical or mental impairment.ā
The state was suing, Paxton said, "because HHS has no authority to unilaterally rewrite statutory definitions and classify 'gender dysphoria' as a disability."
The suit spends over 30 pages objecting to the addition of gender dysphoria to the Section 504 definition. It argues against the ruleās understanding of gender dysphoria. It argues against the characterization of Olmstead, a 1999 case that found persons with mental disabilities have the right to live outside of institutions. It argues that the new definition conflicts with the Americans with Disabilities Act. It asserts many negative impacts for each of the states that have joined the suit, including, in many cases, challenges with Medicaid compliance.
Then, on page 37, as it reached its third of four counts, the lawsuit switches gears, arguing not for an excision of the new language, but the elimination of Section 504 entirely. The suit argues that Section 504 is ācoercive, untethered to the federal interest in disability, and unfairly retroactiveā and therefore unconstitutional.
When confronted with protestors, the communications director for the Iowa Attorney Generalās office told Michaela Ramm of the Des Moines Register, āThe Iowans who were fed lies to show up at our office today in freezing temperatures deserve the truth, and the truth is that no oneās 504 plan is being changed or removed.ā
But the language of the lawsuit is clear. The fourth item under āDemand for Reliefā says āDeclare Section 504, 29 U.S.C. Ā§ 794, unconstitutional.ā
Itās followed by: āIssue permanent injunctive relief against Defendants enjoining them from enforcing Section 504.ā
Everything is at stake.
It argues against the characterization of Olmstead, a 1999 case that found persons with mental disabilities have the right to live outside of institutions.
Let me translate that
Without that right
If you have ANYWHERE on record that you have had one tiny little depressive episode ... or have anxiety ... or anyhing ... a learning disability ...
You can be locked up, against your will
FOREVER
Of course I'm reminded of my mother in law and Joe Biden forcing the Reagan administration to not pass the law that would have kept all disabled children - ALL disabilities - in institutions back in 1980.
Oh, right, if you haven't heard: RFK's already calling for camps for those of us with mental health issues. MAKE SOME GODDAMN NOISE ABOUT THIS. DO NOT LET THEM DO THIS, DAMN YOU.
