NKTLDK/FILM ENTRY #5
So āNozomi Killed the Last Divine Kibouā is done. Post-production work is complete. The only thing thing left is some papers that need to be signed for liability and right to use image yaddy yaddy yadda ireallyneedtogetsomeoneelsetodothepaperworkformeeventually-type things that I dread but itās part of the game so Iām gonna game it but something Iāve been experimenting with is the use of test audience to gauge reactions.
The hardest thing for me is to view the project objectively. I know every single nuance designed into the film. I know the story inside out, from character motivation to their often unsaid backstory, there is literally no one who knows this movie better than I do and thats simply cause the majority of the design of the project was by me. I wonāt say entirety though, each actor brings their own interpretation of their role and the story and their acting is the end result of that. Theyāll ask you what you think of a take and I look at it objectively and simply judge whether it works or not. They may feel like they couldāve done better but thatās simply the nature of art. Thereās a lot of things about this one I feel couldāve been done better but oh well. Some of the actors and crew members have viewed the final project*. Even though I value their opinions of the short film, I donāt rely on them in the entirety because like me, they simply know too much so thatās where the test audiences come from.
Once again I called on a wide variety of people of people to view it. Some are the type thatād call themselves cinephiles, others think Avengers is the best movie ever and everyone in between. My goal was to create a project that has some artistic basis but at the same time wide reach. Someone who has mastered that is Christopher Nolan. His movies are very approachable and creative but itās not obsessed with being so artistic that it loses viewers. Itās probably why he is one of the few directors today whose name alone will sell movie tickets, itās why heās able to get such massive funding for his original projects when every other studio is trying to play it safe with sequels and remakes that already have a following. I wanted to do just that. Itās a samurai/ninja type action movie and honestly who doesnāt like that?!
It is artsy. Itās black and white. Iām pretty sure I revealed it in a previous post but itās a product of technical error than a creative decision which is actually the most common thing people who donāt do art donāt know about art. Iām ok with it. The story is a lot more vague than I wanted it to be. This is due to certain scenes not running as long as I hoped and cutting down lines. A lot of expository lines were cut and my biggest worry was that it may have been too much. I donāt want people to watch it and think āokā¦ā in a legit way, I hope that is arouses question and thought but about the themes and messages involved, not the entirety of the movie itself. I donāt want it to be another nonsensical art movie and I just label it āabstractā. Lines were cut, some were forgotten and I overviewed it. Filming is over so I have to work with what I got. Itās not exactly the project I imagined when I was writing the script and designing the process but itās close enough. Thatās just the process but does it stay true to what it was about. I ramble sometimes (everyone who reads this blog knows) and my ADD mind makes it hard to follow, I donāt want this movie to be a visual rambling. Once again the test audience is the only way I know if itās successful.
The idea is that they give me honest feedback and if enough complaints were made about a certain aspect of the movie, than that aspect is a weakness. I then determine if I can fix it or not. What I showed was the most polished version of the movie. The actor and crew feedback definitely had some common points of criticism and there were small changes made here and there and suggestions were implemented. What weāll call the control group saw was what I felt was ready to be pushed out as a final product. Asking whether itās good or not is a terrible question in my opinion. Number one even if you put out the worst thing, people will say itās good not to crush your feeling. Which is good cause it just means people arenāt that terrible but as a way to systematically try to evaluate the project itās awful. The most important pieces of information to me was the specific feedback.
Firstly I asked everyone āDid they get it?ā and the answers were interesting. Some people got the gist of the story but were lost in the specifics. Others implemented their own assumptions to fill in those lost spaces. Others didnāt even care for the specifics and just understood it for the bigger picture. Everyone seems to get the general idea of the movie which is a relief because I really tried to create something that was little on expositions and more on a mood. Of course the story has to be understood to attain the right mood I was going for so the fact that as minimalistic the movie is at times, it worked in that aspect.
Because a lot of the plot based elements of the story didnāt have proper exposition, I didnāt know if the non-linear storytelling method would be confusing. I tried to ante up on visual storytelling with this one but Iām still very unexperienced when it comes to proper cinematic storytelling. I work hard and study it because itās what I love to do but itās all theory until you give it form. This is where things got kind of weird. It seems that some people got certain key story elements and others didnāt but itās not consistent in what they got and what they didnāt get. Like the first half of the movie was confusing to some but to others the last half. Both parties were right on their assumptions when I asked them so I know the information was there but it seemed like there is a lot of ambiguity in the story where no one is able to catch all of it. I donāt think anyone understood all the elements. Even weirder is that it doesnāt seem to matter somehow? In my personal understanding of the project, I thought that all of what I construed as the basic points of the movie would have to be understood for it to be enjoyable and feel like a coherent story but that doesnāt seem to be the case. The basic idea/message/theme is well understood and any ambiguity doesnāt seem like a let down as far as the control group perceived but just another mystery in an already rather vague story. Which is unexpected.
There were changes made to the short due to the control groupās feedback which kind of gives me a bit more confidence in the group and myself as a filmmaker. There wasnāt any common point of criticism or trend that warranted anymore change so thatās that. Itās done. This week I really need to get the paperwork done and thatās the biggest hassle. Some people might get mad that they got they got filmed but have zero screen time.. but it is what it is. They got compensated. The next project has started but it might happen slow or quick, I donāt know.
*Most of the actors and crew havenāt seen the test screen even though itās online because Iād rather them experience it in the proper theatre format than some computer screen.









