I’m doin the thing
hello vonnie

ellievsbear

pixel skylines

PR's Tumblrdome
Keni
No title available
No title available
DEAR READER
ojovivo
taylor price
Jules of Nature

JBB: An Artblog!
PUT YOUR BEARD IN MY MOUTH
almost home
One Nice Bug Per Day
Cosmic Funnies

if i look back, i am lost
i don't do bad sauce passes
2025 on Tumblr: Trends That Defined the Year
Cosimo Galluzzi

seen from Australia

seen from Poland
seen from Thailand

seen from United Kingdom

seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United Kingdom

seen from Singapore
seen from United States
seen from United Kingdom
seen from Australia
seen from Australia

seen from Bangladesh
seen from Morocco

seen from Saudi Arabia
seen from Russia
seen from United Kingdom

seen from Australia

seen from Finland
seen from United States
@inkmaggot
I’m doin the thing
Hi yes I’m making another gay ass autobio pls ask me about if im making progress on it IRL so I work on it more!!
I’m working on a graphic novel at my job full time these days. Here are some sketches as I work through the roughs.
I haven’t been very present on the internet but I *have* been very busy working on all sorts of things. Watch this space, I suppose? p.s. Here is a drawing of my dog.
Here is "Regret and Counterfactuals” from the Behavioral Economics for Dogs concepts comic series. From the blog post:
Regret and Counterfactuals: Our happiness depends not just on where we are, but on where we imagine we could have been. In a clever study demonstrating this phenomenon, participants watched videos from the 1992 Olympics right after athletes won a medal. And, without knowing which medal the athletes had won, participants rated how happy they looked. Bronze winners turned out to look much happier than silver winners. Why?
In TV interviews, silver medalists focused on how close they were to receiving a gold medal. But bronze winners were happier; they compared their achievement to fourth place, or not having won a medal at all. Researchers call this tendency regret and counterfactual thinking, when we imagine alternatives to past events.
A couple unused character designs from 2014.
Some panels from a promotional comic for a personal finance related startup.
Poster for the recycling & trash sorting at my job.
(You read that right, they don’t recycle paper at my building! It’s ridiculous! I know! I. Know.)
Here is #13 from the Behavioral Economics for Dogs concepts comic series. From the blog post:
Affective Forecasting: We make predictions about how events will make us feel all the time – and many of these predictions guide our life decisions. (This dog, for example, imagines how a new puppy will make him feel — and that a puppy is the wrong decision.) Yet, many of our initial predictions are inaccurate, especially when it comes to predicting the intensity and duration of our feelings.
In one study, professors who were up for tenure were asked how they would feel if they didn’t get tenure. Everyone said they would be very unhappy. A few months after the tenure decisions, the faculty who didn’t get tenure were just as happy as those who did. One explanation for affective forecasting errors is that people focus too much on what will change and how much that change will matter in everyday life.
Some select illustrations for a presentation by my boss (Dan Ariely 🤓) about factors affecting behavior & decision making.
Here is #12 from the Behavioral Economics for Dogs concepts comic series (apparently I mixed up the numbering on here, whatevs). From the blog post:
Reciprocity refers to the inclination to respond to a gift or positive action by providing something of potentially greater value in return. This is one reason why charities might send us gifts in the mail (and return address labels!) when they reach out for donations or why supermarkets sometimes offer free samples. A sense of indebtedness has been created. One study showed that wait-staff who left a small candy with the bill got more tips than wait-staff who did not leave a candy. So, if you want someone to do something for you, it might be a good idea to pre-empt your request with a favor or gift – perhaps a stick?
I work with QORDS, an overnight summer camp in NC for queer & trans youth. I recently finished up the flyer for 2018!
Our waiting lists for campers are almost full already, but we are very much so looking for camp volunteers! Please take a look at the sign up!
This one never got posted in the holiday commotion, but I made a BE for Dogs for the new year :)
Here is #10 from the Behavioral Economics for Dogs concepts comic series. From the blog post:
Goal Gradient: Have you ever been in a race? Do you find yourself giving a little extra push as the finish line approaches? If so, you’ve seen the goal gradient theory in action. Goal gradient theory suggests that people will work harder to achieve a goal as they get closer to reaching it. In the illustration above, the dog runs faster as the distance to the human shrinks.
This principle was illustrated in a study using coffee punch cards. When customers got a punch card specifying that they could get a free cup of coffee after buying 10 cups, they bought coffee more frequently as they got closer to the free cup. In a follow up study, researchers compared customers who were given a 12-punch coffee card with two “free” punches and customers who got a 10-punch coffee card with no free punches. The group with free punches bought coffee fastest (presumably because they felt they were closer to the free coffee), even though both groups technically had to buy 10 cups to get a free one.
Ran Kivetz, Oleg Urminsky, and Yuhuang Zheng (2006) The Goal-Gradient Hypothesis Resurrected: Purchase Acceleration, Illusionary Goal Progress, and Customer Retention. Journal of Marketing Research: February 2006, Vol. 43, No. 1, pp. 39-58.
A bunch of characters from a work project (theres even more not included). Canned because they decided they want to have them facing backwards instead of forwards! So it goes.
Here is #9 from the Behavioral Economics for Dogs concepts comic series. From the blog post:
Lack of Self-Control: Why do people (and pups!) give in to temptation? Lack of self-control. It’s extremely difficult to pass up on something that’s tempting in the moment when the benefit of delayed gratification is not immediately apparent. The classic self-control study started in a nursery school in the 1960s. Walter Mischel and his researchers placed a marshmallow in front of each child. The child was told that they could eat the marshmallow right now or that they could wait 15 minutes and get two marshmallows. The researchers kept track of the children in the original study and found that those who were able to resist the marshmallow performed better in a number of areas including academic success. The children with high self-control were also less likely to have negative outcomes such as jail time or certain health conditions.
Mischel found that people are able to delay gratification when they change how they think about the object or action they want to resist. For example, during the marshmallow test, one child said that he imagined the marshmallow was a cloud instead of a tasty treat. This approach might not work as well for a dog, since some dogs would probably try to eat a cloud.
Mischel, W., & Baker, N. (1975). Cognitive appraisals and transformations in delay behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 31(2), 254-261.
I’m a nerd, artist, and a crazy person so I made my own diary card for therapy because the one they give you is always trash. If anyone wants it, I comment/reblog and I’ll send you the .Ai so you can customize to your own needs.