Attention All Bernie Sanders DronesâŠ
That goes for all you little geniuses like ironicplanecrashesâ, sosungalittleclodofclayâ, politicallyincorrectbullshit, malevolantwolf, lutairâ and any other of you who copied and pasted one of the many liberal mouthpiece articles defending Bernieâs fabricated budget. (Examples: Huffington Post, USUncut, the Nation, Washington Post & Politico.)
Letâs just get this out of the way. Â That Politico article offers absolutely zero information refuting the WSJ article. Â None. Â It is just includes quotes from Bernie saying the WSJ article âsignificantly exaggeratedâ his costs, specifically regarding âhealthcare savings.â
Iâd also like to share my favorite quote straight from the horses mouth in that same article:
âSecond point, which they really didnât get into, is: We are going to demand that the wealthiest people and the largest corporations in this country do start paying their fair share of taxes.â
âDemand.â The sheer tyrannical authoritarianism you progressives let slide when it is packaged into class warfare demagoguery is incogitable.  Then again, leftism is all about force.  In this case, forcing the wealthiest individuals to cough up even more moneyâŠeven though they pay the majority of the taxes already.
Now, letâs take a look at what the WSJ outlines as far as Sandersâ budget is concerned:
$15 trillion for government monopolized healthcare
$1.2 trillion more to our bankrupt social security program
$1 trillion more to âour crumblingâ infrastructure
$750 billion to expand public high school to grades 13-17, aka âfree public collegeâ (A program which funding Iâve already debunked.)
$319 billion to give a new welfare entitlement for worker paid leave on top of what they probably already have.
$29 billion to fund our bygone and nearly extinct pension system
$5.5 billion to create make-believe shovel-ready jobs for youth who canât get a job because he just raised the minimum wage to $15 an hour.
Also unknown costs for childcare and preschool are coming down the pipe.
The claim by the WSJ is that this program will increase the federal budget by 33% to about $68 trillion over ten years.  Iâm sure Bernie has real concerns about our current budget deficits and insurmountable amount of debt butâŠwhat is that?  Oh, he never brings that up?  He has no real solution to solve our debt crisis?  Well, never mind then.
Now, the real dispute comes from Gerald Friedman, professor of economics at the University of Massachusetts-Amherst, which the WSJ actually quoted regarding his analysis of Rep. John Conyerâs similar âmedicare for allâ plan.  Thatâs because Bernie doesnât even have a real plan.  This is all his goodie âwishlistâ type talk heâs selling ignorant liberals on.  The leftist professorâs argument is that by eliminating the private healthcare system we will magically save $5 trillion over 10 years in administrative waste, lower costs and lower inflation.  Iâd simply ask from the deemed professor is where is his proof?  His analysis just throws out a number representing waste based on 2004 study comparing Canada to the US healthcare system.  He states that both private and public employers along with workers and even retirees will no longer have to pay for healthcare so it would be a net savingsâŠbut is that true? One universal rule about âfree stuffâ is that someone always pays.
What heâs really saying is that we will not see any direct costs associated with healthcare spending but rather the cost will be spread out to everyone collectively.  Weâre all still paying but now the younger healthy folks are going to be paying more for the sickly older folks.  Thatâs how this game works.  The esteemed professor even goes on to say, âa single-payer plan would create dynamic gains by freeing American businesses to compete without the burden of an inefficient and wasteful health insurance system.â  Is that so?  So, weâre going to replace the hundreds of âinefficientâ insurance agencies with just one gigantic inefficient insurance agency - the federal government.  That sounds foolproof.  But most importantly, weâre all going to magically become a âhealthier populationâ thanks to shifting the cost from the individual to the collective.  That makes perfect sense professor.  Sound logic.
No, Iâm afraid that Prof. Gerald Friedmanâs open letter only did more harm to the universally terrible idea of single-payer healthcare rather than refute anything. Â Bernie Sanders doesnât even understand that it is the same heavy-handed government regulations and programs that have continuously increased the cost and inefficiency of our private healthcare system. Â By first allowing the government to make the rules about healthcare then allowing them to also dictate exactly how theyâre going to pay for it all, youâve essentially handed over complete control of your entire healthcare process to the government; and if you do not like the service you are receiving, like at the DMV or water department, too bad. Â You are stuck with one shitty company for the rest of your life. Â I pity you if you ever have serious health problems. Â When youâre sick and upset about the lousy level of service you are receiving but cannot get another insurance provider, thank yourself for begging for monopoly control of your well being.
That is why the free market is always there to lend a hand. If you want to reduce prices and boost patient care performance, then you need to start thinking outside the box. Â There are plenty of really good ideas out there on how to improve healthcare that require only simple tweaks like allowing everyone to control their own spending through tax-free healthcare spending accounts, opening up restrictions on interstate insurance, and eliminating unnecessary mandatory services like pregnancy coverage for men.
Folks, itâs time to unbuckle your seat belts and jump off the crazy train which is the Bernie Sanders Express. Â His ideas are not only over a hundred years old but they have been proven to be horrible mistakes time and time again. Â Vote with your brain next year; not with what makes you feel good.