meow

armored kitten

[inna-ironheart]

IM NOT YOUR FRIEND AND YOU HAVE NO SAY OVER WHAT I DO WITH MY BODY

More caps, please. Show me how much "free from other people's opinion" you are.

[terfy-goddess]

lmao ur bio is so funny

Lol I don’t see a reason why I can’t identify as a transwoman 🤷🏻‍♀️

[inna-ironheart]

“trans-trans-person” - a person who identify itself as trans while not being a trans. a good way to grab some attention, support and concessions that are usually given to the members of this group.

[electroniccdream]

[divine-matriarchy-deactivated20]

I find it so weird that more people don't realize how misogynistic the trans movement is. Here in England (not sure if its happening in other countries), the TRAs are trying to change the definition of 'woman', which is currently 'adult human female' to 'anyone who identifies as a woman'. But noooo they're not trying to change the definition of 'man'. The sex based discrimination and prioritization of biological males (trans women) in their movement is so blatant. They're exposing their own misogyny by barely including trans men in their activism. Only men profit from this.

[inna-ironheart]

i think it's the same trash happening in other "most liberal" countries, at a full scale. in, khm... more traditional and/or restrictive places such as Balkans, eastern Europe, Russia, etc., TRAs are making noise in media and social networks, while still not having any substantial legal influence.

why should males even be interested in dipping themselves into a gender thoughts and "changing the definition of man"? they have a green light for all their wishes in patriarchy, and all the problems they can face are caused by the same hierarchy and male struggle between each other (yes, they have enough arrogancy to blame women).

it's all aimed at women: to divide obedient and disobedient ones, misguide, put women into a conflict, prevent unification, etc. yes, only men profit from this.

[dogwood-dove]

IF YOU DIDN’T ALREADY KNOW

LESBIANS ARE VALID

TRANS LESBIANS ARE VALID

NONBINARY LESBIANS ARE VALID

LESBIANS WHO USE PRONOUNS OTHER THAN SHE/HER ARE VALID

IF YOU DISAGREE I WILL KICK YOU IN THE TEETH.

Thank you. 

[inna-ironheart]

but what about male lesbians? how about them?

[positivityforlesbians]

Not to be too controversial and shook plenty of people here but ... women are allowed to not want to have sex with men ever. Women are allowed to not be attracted by them and to not miss a god damn thing about it because hey, it’s who we are. We are lesbians and we are happy like that, we love women, unapologetically. And nothing will change that. 💕

[inna-ironheart]

we don’t have to “apologize”, because we aren’t guilty.

we aren't just "allowed to”, because having attraction to other women is absolutely logical.

[transphobesbian-deactivated2021]

what if... i put... “MEN DNI”... in my bio? jk... unless?

[inna-ironheart]

someone will definitely try, yelling "i'm special, give me a chance" all the way down, not to mention tims

[virgojesus]

Attention all lesbians: you cannot call yourself a lesbian anymore until you go back and ask every single person you’ve ever been attracted to what their internal sense of ‘gender identity’ is

Until then, your sexuality is pending.

Soz, I don’t make the rules.

[inna-ironheart]

addition: and, referring to kweer theories, people, who decide to board a transition train, "was born that way". so, if your ex from a very past will eventually choose another toilet door tomorrow, you're not longer a lesbian!

[inna-ironheart]

nothing political, only a big cup of tea to withstand this world a bit longer

[arminjuice-deactivated20210413]

it's sad that this is true but most straight men aren't attracted to women. they don't have the capacity to love women in their natural state – hairy women, women with healthy levels of body fat, women with stretch marks, women who don't alter their faces with makeup.

they're attracted to caricatures of women.

[inna-ironheart]

well, then it's time for trannies to come in and serve all the manly needs with their perfect caricature model.

may these brothers-in-balls play together and stop bothering women with their "attention".

[inna-ironheart]

mom: sends me an old b&w photo of Clara Zetkin and Rosa Luxemburg on a march 8th, with a text label that says: “you can have some relax from your work today thanks to them!”

me: ...and work during the rest of the year as a full-fledged human.

[moved-to-lilith-xxx-deactivated]

Pro-lifers claim to be so proud of their beliefs when it comes to abortion and yet they actively make sure that no one can comment or challenge them on those beliefs..

Why is that?

Is it because you know your “beliefs” are actually complete bullshit?

Yeah, pretty sure that’s it.

[inna-ironheart]

they aren't "pro-life", they are pro-birth, interested only in pregnancy and birthgiving.

since a baby is born, they don't care, mother will sort everything out, and if not, then she's a bad mother and a defective social unit.

children in foster care? nah, let the government help them. education? well, awesome smart professors know what to do with it. crippled babies born with a dozen of pathologies? bah, life is awesome even if it's short, be happy, kiddo! teenage girl raped and impregnated by her imbecile father? that's her family business. issues of raising ten kids single handedly when you live homeless in third world country having €1 a day? okay, okay, we'll launch some fancy supportive hashtag on the instagram.

pro-hypocrisy.

[radicalromanov]

lesbian: i like only women.

man: okay, so i identify as a woman now so you must like me, right?

lesbian: no no, i’m into female bodies, i like women’s genitalia, not men’s.

man: well since i identify as a woman, that makes my body a woman, so now you must suck on my girldick

lesbian: no, i still don’t want you, i like VAGINAS.

man: TERF!!!!!!! GENITAL ESSENTIALIST! VAGINA FETISHIST!!!!

[inna-ironheart]

man: mfff... mfff... slurp-slurp! mfff...

older woman: son!? is that a DICK at your BACK DOOR?!?

man: no problem, mom! she’s a woman! and it’s a girldick!

older woman: ah, fine, son, just don’t become a faggot, okay?

[inna-ironheart]

termbusters.

sexual orientation –

the direction of one's sexual interest toward members of the same, opposite, or both sexes, especially a direction seen to be dictated by physiologic rather than sociologic forces. replaces sexual preference in most contemporary uses.

(the american heritage stedman's medical dictionary)

gender –

either of the two sexes (male and female), especially when considered with reference to social and cultural differences rather than biological ones. the term is also used more broadly to denote a range of identities that do not correspond to established ideas of male and female.

(oxford’s free english dictionary)

fetish –

a form of sexual desire in which gratification is linked to an abnormal degree to a particular object, item of clothing, part of the body, etc.

(oxford’s free english dictionary)

...so let’s summarize...

the “sexual orientation” term points to the “sex” as a biological trait. it has hothing to do with socially established ideas of male and female (masculine / feminine).

the “fetish” term, however, is dedicated to clothing (as a part of social gender model), and therefore will be suitable for the rest of social paraphernalia such as behavioral patterns, interests and so on.

so anyone attracted to a gender role rather than a biological trait should be defined as bisexuals (since person of any sex could put on any social role if not restricted by other factors) with a gender fetish.

...even more conclustions...

people whose appearance and behavior are close to gender role, that is corresponding to the opposite sex at the social scheme of attaching different roles (behavioral patterns, exterior, clothing, etc.)  to different sexes, are committing a treacherous deceit when making any advances toward homosexuals of opposite sex while keeping their one in secret, hoping that old and deep-rooted social conformities will help them. and it’s disgusting and inexcusably. eeew.

hovewer, when it cames to same-sex relations, people that are heavily disguised as a different gender at the same social scheme, still can attract someone of their sex. it happens rarely, but it’s still technically homosexual.

[inna-ironheart]

Hi, I wanted to inquire about your views on trans people and why you think the way your do; I saw one of your posts while scrolling through the feminism tag. Why do you view trans men as women, for example. I mean no harm, I am just interested in the answer as a trans man myself

i mean no harm too, because i see how vastly and worldwide people are being misguided by genderists’ traps like “if you don’t fit to one box, choose another and disguise yourself as it’s members”. but speaking that out is a way to blocklist - people are so confused that even don’t want to hear about other options, while accepting “your [insert your problem here] is caused by stupid nature that put you in the wrong gender” answer that’s being represented as ultimate.

hey, it’s not a nature to blame for squeezing people into the gender boxes, it’s society! nature is only involved in giving them one of two reproductive roles so they can stand their own in a matters of population growth! but when one hand of genderism is pushing people to the “ultimate answer” mentioned above, other one diligently replaces a concept of “sex” (which is designed by nature) by concept of “gender” (which is designed by patriarchal society and therefore malicious).

social traits, privileges and behavioral models isn’t innate.

and it’s no wonder why females reject a second-rate, obedient and decorative role that’s being offered to them, because all strong traits leading to success in anything was given to opposite model. it have nothing to do with biology, but still here comes the genderism with his terms and disinformation, and these women are encouraged to disguise themselves as men. divide and conquer, keep the obedient ones at bay, differ them from dangerous ones and put them all in a confrontation with each other. while successful males don’t even wasting their time on a gender thoughts.

i don’t care about men, they can put on their skirts, high heels, fishnets, play with each other etc. - nothing of this will make them female. maybe “feminine” by their own standards, but not female and don’t even “look like female”, because it’s always be something around “look like a perfect feminine gender role representative”, and it’s no way to ever be somehow connected to the biological sex. that’s the difference.

but all this activity that put women against each other, dehumanization and decrease to a bunch of soical traits and paraphernalia, and all the other misogynistic crap related to genderism - that makes me angry. i hate it.

i hate a system, not women who became victims of this deception.

[inna-ironheart]

a friend: if i had a daughter, i could name her Angela. that's so... awww... *makes her voice deep* Angela-a-a!..

me: if you had a son, he could name himself "Angela" too!

[inna-ironheart]

every time i scroll through something tagged as "lgbt" or "queer", i'm getting more and more convinced that "good ol' rainbow days" are long gone.

major part of this worldwide gbtquiappasdfghjk freak show looks like:

males: hey! watch me! i can fuck with whoever i want! i can even put on a skirt and a fishnets and force people to call me a "woman" if i decide to!

females: it sucks to be treated like a property and a sexdoll. i'll better disguise myself as a male or choose some blah-blah-gender with a fancy flag.

that smells like classic "divide and conquer" patriarchal stuff.