To the person anonymously writing slowburn office lady yuri in my DMs
I don't know why you've chosen me for this harassment campaign you've embarked on. I don't know why you feel that my DMs are a better medium for this story than, I don't know, posting them on a writing website?? Or on your own blog??? And most importantly, I don't know why you are laboring under the delusion that I can't report you just because you are sending the chapters anonymously -- I can in fact, and you would be IP banned.
I'm issuing you this ultimatum right now:
Stop sending me your slowburn office lady yuri
OR
I will report you
OR
Send me the next chapter within 24 hours, because are a fucker for where you left it off, and you have not sent a new chapter in several days. I need to know whether, when they were the only two in the office late at night after a brutal crunch week, and the stars could be seen in the sky due to a power outage on their block, and they talked about life, they actually do kiss or if that's another fakeout, of which you have done MANY.
My patience with you has worn thin. Stop sending me this story, or send me more, or I will report you.
I based a lot of Ancient China's design on legends and myths!
Hungdi is the legendary Yellow Emperor (I also gave him some Pangu Traits) and Yuandi is the also legendary Flame Emperor / Yan Emperor, these two are said to have created the "Yan-Huang".
The Yanhuang are considered to be the founders of the Chinese people and the initiators of Chinese culture!
So much so that to this day, the Chinese people still refer to themselves with the term Yan Huang Zisun (meaning "descendants of Yan and Huang").
For that motive I've decided to make the Xia Dynasty (first Chinese dynasty) the followup to them!
The Xia Dynasty started with Yu the Great , an engeneer that managed for the first time to control floods, to rappresent the floods I decided to make a derpy Xiangliu based on some dectriptions of it as a 9 headed eel! (It's a is a venomous nine-headed snake/eel monster that brings floods and destruction in Chinese mythology.)
I'll try doodle some ancient egypt next since I want them to be the protagonists of the Bronze age some what, later!
Also since they don't really have a written language and we can only speculate on the kind of language they spoke (it was porbably some sort of ancient Chinese) their eyes are just the base color for the North Asiatic languages
Hawaiʻi: Indigenous People and Colonized Land: How Do We Portray the State?
Written with the help of the wonderful @aloha-from-angel, who contributed to the Tiki Culture aspect as well as the history behind depictions of Hawaiʻi as a child.
Hawaiʻi as a Perpetual Child
The Racist History
This isnât just a coincidence in art or fandomâthe infantilisation of Hawaiâi (and other US-occupied places) is a deliberate narrative with deep imperialist roots. From the 1800s onward, Western powers, especially the United States, have consistently infantilized Hawaiâi/Native Hawaiians in literature, political cartoons, educational materials, and yes, even in fandom interpretations today.
And that infantilization has connotationsâpowerful ones.
Depicting Hawaiâi as a child doesnât just imply innocence or purity. It implies incapability. It says, âYouâre too young to govern yourself.â It says, âYou need a father figure, a strong hand, to civilize you.â That wasnât just subtextâit was policy.
In countless depictions from the early 20th century, Hawaiâi and other colonized nations were drawn as childrenâsometimes cherubic, most oftentimes unruly and disobedientâwhile America stood over them as the stern, masculine, white Uncle Sam. This wasnât about affection. This was about control. To be a child in this narrative meant being permanently incomplete, forever dependent, never allowed to mature into full personhood or sovereignty.
As historian Karen M. Evered writes in Fostering Puerto Rico:
âAt no time, however, was their obedience equated with a process of maturation; obedience simply merited a whitening of their young faces and would sometimes be depicted in terms of effeminate domesticity and emasculation. Apparently, by North American standards, these islands were to remain as âcivilizedâ children, at best, and the imperial and masculine Uncle Sam was to foster them in perpetuity.â
Thatâs it right there. Hawaiâi could obey. She could assimilate. She could be âAmericanized.â But she would never be allowed to grow up. Maturity was threatening. Autonomy was threatening. So they rewrote the story: from sovereign to orphan. From an independent nation to a foster child of the United States, loving, adoring.
And our lovely fandomâintentionally or notâkeeps replicating this story. When Hawaiâi is drawn or written as a wide-eyed, naive little girl in countryhumans, always in need of guidance or protection, always subordinate to the other âadultâ nations or even (often depicted as white) older states, itâs not just âcute.â Itâs a continuation of the same narrative used to justify colonization and occupation.Â
Consistency: Alaska, New Mexico, Arizona, and Oklahoma
HawaiÊ»i is commonly portrayed as the youngest state, a child when all the others are teens or adults. While HawaiÊ»i is the final state to join the Union, HawaiÊ»i isnât isolated in terms of the timing of her statehood.Â
Thus, we get into the states created in the 1900s: Oklahoma, New Mexico, Arizona, AND Alaska.
So, let's lay out some dates. Oklahoma was the first state of the 20th century to be granted statehood, on November 16, 1907. Following Oklahoma were New Mexico and Arizona, only a few weeks apart, January 6 and February 14 of 1912, respectively. Lastly, we have Alaska and HawaiÊ»i, also admitted only a few months apart (so close, in fact, that HawaiÊ»iâs people were under the perception that they were going to be the 49th state, not the 50th), on January 3 and August 21 of 1959, respectively.Â
Therefore, if HawaiÊ»i was born at statehood, she and Alaska should be nearly twinsâboth children born months apart. However, the dynamic is that of a child and a teenager when it comes to HawaiÊ»i and Alaska, which makes no sense if they are meant to be the same age. This is the inconsistency, the constant portrayal of HawaiÊ»i as a child while portraying all those of a similar age as teenagers.Â
Therefore, the logic isnât that HawaiÊ»i is the youngest because, clearly, age isnât a factor, making it more of a justification than a reasoning.Â
I know that some portray Alaska as the Alaska Territory, which was purchased by the USA on October 18, 1867, thus providing a reason for their age gap. But if you are going to portray Alaska as the territory because he was purchased by the USA, then you should portray Hawaiʻi as the territory because Hawaiʻi was something prior to its annexation by the United States: The Kingdom of Hawaiʻi (and the Republic of Hawaiʻi, being the government in place after the overthrow). Therefore, portraying Alaska as the territory to make him older, but not making Hawaiʻi the territory, despite the fact that it would still provide an age gap that makes Alaska older for those who want it, is yet another inconsistency that seems centered around always having Hawaiʻi as the youngest.
Letâs say you have HawaiÊ»i being born when the Territory of HawaiÊ»i was created. Then, the portrayal of HawaiÊ»i makes even less sense, as she would have been born on April 30, 1900. However, that does not make her the youngest territory, as the Territory of Alaska was technically created on August 24, 1912, having previously been a district. Additionally, the United States Virgin Islands (formerly the Danish West Indies) would have been born on March 31, 1917, if that were the USVIâs birthdate, which is when they were purchased by the Americans.
Therefore, many portrayals of HawaiÊ»i as the youngest are flawed, as they appear to prioritize making HawaiÊ»i the youngest rather than ensuring the ages of the other states align with the aging scale used for HawaiÊ»i. In effect, HawaiÊ»i is not a part of the United Statesâ consistency but, instead, an outlier, so she can be portrayed as people want to portray her, not in an accurate sense.Â
It does not mean that you cannot have HawaiÊ»i as a child, but that you should at least be consistent about the methods that you are using. You need to hold all the states to the same standards. Whether that is birth at statehood, birth when the territory was created, or birth when they existed as something else first outside of the United States, you need to be consistent. Not just for sensical reasons, but because when you arenât, itâs confusing to the reader and runs the risk of falling into the racist stereotypes discussed before.
Tiki Culture as HawaiÊ»iâs Personality
To fully understand what exactly is wrong with many depictions of Hawaiâiâs personality in the fandom, there has to be just a little bit of history laid down first. For instance, what exactly is Tiki Culture, and where did it originate?
To sum it up, Tiki Culture is capitalismâs version of what Hawaiian culture is. It mixes elements of multiple island cultures, often with little regard for where they came from. (See: Grass skirts. They are not Hawaiian! Theyâre Tahitian!) But after all, the Tiki Boom was in the 1950s, so we canât have that without just a smidgen of racism!
The fascination with Hawaiian culture started off when the first âdiscoverersâ landed all the way back in the 1700s. It was a scientific curiosity, but no one had figured out how to make money on it yet. By the annexation of Hawaiâi in 1898, the curiosity within the United States had dulled to welcome ideals of assimilation and cultural genocide.Â
But alas, by that time, someone had figured out how to make money. The hula, which was shunned and even banned under Puritan missionaries in the 19th century, was used as a circus act and was part of living museums in the United States as early as the 1880s. These were gross approximations of what the hula really was and were played up for the sexual factor.Â
Remember the sensual side of this; itâs unfortunately very important to where Tiki culture comes from, and why it rose to the prominence it is today, and why it affects portrayals of Hawaiâi now in fandom.Â
When the turn of the century rolled around, and thousands upon thousands of Navy men infested Hawaiâiâs harbors, many of them were drawn in by the allure of brown-skinned women, especially ones they deemed âexotic.â As with all things, when someone is told it is wrong to want something, they desire it more. This was especially true for the often (though period typical) racist population of the US Navy, who would show repulsion to the very idea of having a majority non-white territory and yet would often have illicit relations and even settle down to marry Hawaiian women.Â
In the 1940s, when WW2 made Hawaiâi a near-mandatory stop for any young private in the Navy, the allure and escapism of Hawaiâi took root in young menâs minds. They bought pinups of dark-skinned women, fooled around with native girls, and, most of all, took these ideals home with them and spread the very inherently sexual idea of paradise home. By the time the war was over, Hawaiâi had been firmly cemented as a sexy, wonderful paradise perfect for young white men.Â
The 50s and especially the 60s brought need for escapism once again, with the Cold War and McCarthy Era looming over the United States. Nuclear apocalypse seemed imminent, and many American men worked 9-5 jobs and were expected to neither complain nor try to ditch this conformity. Many men desired the allure of a peaceful, tropical paradise that was exotic enough to be exciting but whitewashed to fit the standards of the time. In comes Hollywoodâs Hawaiian obsession.Â
Now, the Hawaiâi tourism industry not only encouraged the Tiki fantasy but also played into it. Exotic fantasies of Hawaiâi sold it to white tourists who could leave home without leaving âAmericaâ. Many would end up buying large chunks of land in a place where Native Hawaiians were unable to even survive.
At the heart of the Tiki Fantasy is an idealized, highly sanitized version of Hawaiâi. This version is where Hawaiâi is reduced to sceneryâsomething tropical, exotic, and filled with the promise of relaxation, palm trees, and endless sunshine. But this is where the harm lies. Pop culture, in borrowing from Tiki Culture, often oversimplifies Hawaiâiâs history and culture, erasing the richness and complexity of her identity, while simultaneously perpetuating a narrative that strips away her autonomy and voice.Â
Tiki Culture, in its origin, was about selling a fantasyâa concept so divorced from the reality of Hawaiâiâs history, struggles, and ongoing fight for sovereignty. When you see Hawaiâi depicted as a carefree, laid-back, "exotic" personality in the fandom, you're seeing a direct product of that escapist fantasy, one that distances the modern understanding of Hawaiâi from the pain, political turmoil, and cultural erasure her people have endured for centuries.
Lilo & Stitch and Moana, though both beloved childhood movies of mine, are unfortunately prime examples of how Tiki Culture gets rebranded and repackaged for a modern audience. These films do borrow elements from Indigenous cultures and, in many ways, make meaningful strides toward respectful representationâLilo & Stitch especially hits close to home with its portrayal of Ê»ohana, grief, and social instability. But the problem isnât in the storytelling. Itâs in the marketing. Itâs in the way these films are consumed and commodified.
Take Lilo & Stitch, for instance. Despite being a titular character, Lilo is constantly pushed to the background in favor of cuter, more âmarketableâ characters like Stitchâand worse, characters like Angel, a literal seductress Stitch-genderbend from the spin-off series. Angel is everywhere in merchandise: sparkly, pink, flirtatious, a perfect hetrosexual partner for the freaking alien that shouldnât have the biological need to reproduce.Â
Meanwhile, Liloâa complex, grieving Native Hawaiian girl navigating trauma of losing her parents, loneliness, and social servicesâis erased. Nani, who works multiple jobs just to keep her family together, is also ignored. This isnât accidental. This is capitalism choosing fantasy over reality. Itâs the Tiki aesthetic rearing its head againâturning real, brown-skinned island girls into accessories or background noise while promoting sanitized, sexualized, and easily consumable versions of âHawaiianâ identity.
Even Moana, which was developed with extensive cultural consultation, is not free from this. Though the film represents a blend of Polynesian cultures rather than just Hawaiian, the way itâs marketed leans into that same tired escapist fantasyâitâs all curated for a Western gaze that wants just enough âauthenticityâ to feel cultured, but not so much that it becomes uncomfortable. Moanaâs story, while empowering, is still framed within the limits of whatâs palatable to Disneyâs global audience.
It all adds up to a pattern: even when the media tries to do better, the system it operates in still recycles the core of Tiki Culture. It waters down identity. It romanticizes trauma. It erases Native girls in favor of mascots and mascots of mascots. And in fandom spaces like countryhumans, this distortion continuesâcharacters based on Hawaiâi are too often shaped by this commodified lens, not the real legacy of survival, resistance, and culture that defines her people.
Only an American: The Lack of the Hawaiian Kingdom
One concerning trait found in most of these portrayals of HawaiÊ»i is that she is consistently portrayed as American, with no mention of the Kingdom of HawaiÊ»i or the events in which the Hawaiian Kingdom was involved.Â
While a personification of the State of HawaiÊ»i can be born at statehood, the neglect of the Hawaiian Kingdom is a concerning aspect of the portrayal of HawaiÊ»i, as it overlooks a significant aspect of Hawaiian history, and also reinforces the narrative that HawaiÊ»i was always American. That, along with historical revisionism aimed at making the overthrow of the Hawaiian kingdom and the illegal annexation appear legitimate and legal, renders this removal of the Hawaiian kingdom from the narrative concerning it.Â
Now, this is not to accuse anyone lacking this element of history of historical revisionism or racist beliefs, but rather to point out that everyone exists in the context in which they were born, and the context of HawaiÊ»i, the kingdom, is incredibly important. The territory and the state are not born as just Americans, they are not born into an isolated environment, they are born out of the repercussions of what happened to the Hawaiian Kingdom and even if they arenât the kingdom, what happened to the kingdom is incredibly important to how they came to be and how their early life would be like.
You cannot ignore the kingdom because Hawaiian history, from the overthrow to the present, is haunted by what happened to the kingdom. It would be as if you wrote America being born in 1776 but never acknowledged his colonial history and acted like it never existed. It doesnât make sense to do that because you neglect so much of American history and the buildup to how the country came to be. When you neglect the Hawaiian Kingdom, you neglect the history that shaped the state's identity.
To have American Hawaiʻi, you need the Kingdom of Hawaiʻi. One cannot exist without the other, and even the beginning has a history.
Pearl Harbor and Statehood: Why Does Hawaiʻi Remember It?
One of the most puzzling things about HawaiÊ»iâs common fanon depiction is the fact that she is always portrayed as a personal victim of Pearl Harbor. While not untrue, the puzzling element is the fact that the people who write these portrayals tend to have their HawaiÊ»i be born as an American state.Â
But HawaiÊ»iâs statehood was in 1959, and the attack on Pearl Harbor was in 1941. So, how on Earth is HawaiÊ»i a victim of Pearl Harbor when she wouldnât have existed then? There is nothing wrong with having HawaiÊ»i being born as the state, nor with making her a victim of Pearl Harborâit was an attack on a territory that held very pro-Japanese sentiments on the eve of the attack. But you cannot have both of these portrayalsâit is completely impossible because the State of HawaiÊ»i didnât exist during the attack on Pearl Harbor.
If you plan to use either of these portrayals, you should be aware of the timeline. Ultimately, the reason I believe this happens even when HawaiÊ»i is born as the state is that most people know nothing of Hawaiian history outside of the attack on Pearl Harbor, and instead of researching Hawaiian history post-statehood, they assume that the attack on Pearl Harbor is good enough to be the only historical event they mention, and didn't realize that the times did not line up at all.Â
I do not think it is malicious in its entirety. I merely think it is a long-held misconception by people who did not put enough research into their HawaiÊ»i depiction. But if you are going to mention historical events and make them A MASSIVE PART OF THAT PERSONâS PERSONALITY, you need to check and make sure that the timelines line up.Â
Conclusion
All in all, the most common portrayal of HawaiÊ»i in statehumans books is half-hearted at best and a continuation of a long-standing racist stereotype at worst. The reasons behind these are rooted in the long-standing beliefs held about HawaiÊ»i, but are ultimately harmful in how they have damaged the portrayal, and in turn, peopleâs perception.
The lack of consistency in when HawaiÊ»i was born and how old that would make her physically is strange and often makes the personification feel less like thatâa personification and a characterâand more like a one-note prop only there to act as a device to another characterâs personality and arc, mainly to Alaska or America.
HawaiÊ»i is a beautiful nation with a very interesting history (see: HawaiÊ»i pisses off the German Empire by trying to become an empire of their own, literally ANYTHING to do with the Empire of Japan and Hawaiâi, and the time the King of NiÊ»ihau a me Kauai manipulated a bunch of Russians) and there is so much fun and life you can embed into these characters.Â
Itâs disheartening to see that so few people put in the effort to create a character that's both fun and compelling. It only weakens the writing and the story as a whole.Â
There are many ways to portray a personification of Hawaiʻi. As long as you avoid falling into these racist stereotypes and maintain consistency in age and timeline, I encourage you to explore Hawaiian history and build a character you can be proud of.
Okay so I THINK I finally managed to get Greenlandâs tattoos about right, but itâs so hard to find any information on Greenlandic culture online, it was especially hard to find any good examples of Greenlandic tattoos because the only actual diagrams I could track down were of the ones on the mummies from north Greenland but she herself should have ones characteristic of south Greenland
If Iâm way off and somehow someone who actually knows what Theyâre talking about is seeing this PLEASE TELL ME Iâm doing my best but there is just nothing online
also once again I spent ages on a background that you canât actually see in the final image so Iâm just gonna tack on the version without Greenland