
izzy's playlists!

Discoholic 🪩

❣ Chile in a Photography ❣
"I'm Dorothy Gale from Kansas"

Product Placement
Claire Keane
taylor price
Keni
No title available

tannertan36
Monterey Bay Aquarium
The Stonewall Inn

PR's Tumblrdome
Jules of Nature

Origami Around
2025 on Tumblr: Trends That Defined the Year
official daine visual archive
noise dept.
trying on a metaphor

blake kathryn
seen from United States
seen from Australia

seen from France

seen from Ecuador

seen from Bangladesh
seen from United States
seen from Bangladesh
seen from Ecuador
seen from Ecuador
seen from Ecuador
seen from United States
seen from United States

seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States
@interludeher
the definition of angelic
Flowers by Irving Penn (1980)
the world's prettiest samsung ambassador has returned
'pansies in a green vase,' wilson davis ellis, american c. 1954.
One of the heaviest misconceptions we grow up with and one that becomes a deep well of frustration in adulthood, is the idea that 'in the end, Good defeats Evil'. As you age and learn the inner workings of the world, you notice the impossibility of that statement. Evil is far more resourceful, for it is not limited by moral codes or 'red lines'. To Evil, everything is permissible; it holds nothing sacred and knows no conscience.
Good, however, is defined by the lines it cannot cross. There are deeds that cannot be committed without sacrificing the very qualities that make Good 'good'. Once those lines are blurred, little remains to differentiate the two. Thus, the arsenal of Evil is inherently richer.
'In the end, Good does not defeat Evil'. Yet, this does not mean Evil stands victorious. In the end, it is Evil that defeats Evil. This is a lesson I am learning through Professor's writings: it was foolish to think the Fellowship (and all that was good in Middle Earth) could have defeated Sauron through strength alone. As we saw, it wasn't Frodo or Sam who destroyed the Ring; it was the greed and malice the Ring breathed into its 'slaves' that brought its own demise. But this was only possible because of the very goodness of many. The mercy shown by Bilbo and Frodo toward Gollum stayed the hand of fate just long enough for Evil to trip over its own feet. Had Good acted 'resourcefully' and killed Gollum when they had the chance, they would have removed the very instrument of Evil’s self-destruction. This does not mean we wait idly; the Fellowship did everything 'humanly' (hah) possible to reach the Cracks of Doom, but it was the inherent rot within Evil that finally finished the task.
It is terribly painful to admit that, in this world, Good is not as 'powerful' as Evil in the way we typically measure strength. A significant part of me shall never accept this and will continue to fight against it with every fiber of my being. It seems a cruel joke that Good must win by the self-destruction of its enemy, while Evil wins by design. But if the only way to gain that 'power' is to become as ruthless as the Shadow, then the price is too high. I will continue to rage against this imbalance, even as I try to hold onto the mercy that infuriatingly is our only real hope.
i wanna be WOOED this decade, fully and unrealistically WOOED