PR's Tumblrdome
DEAR READER
NASA
noise dept.
@theartofmadeline
Janaina Medeiros
titsay
if i look back, i am lost
hello vonnie
sheepfilms
No title available
★
祝日 / Permanent Vacation
roma★
art blog(derogatory)
h
todays bird
shark vs the universe
almost home
izzy's playlists!
seen from Türkiye
seen from Malaysia
seen from Chile
seen from Morocco
seen from Malaysia
seen from United States
seen from Malaysia
seen from Tunisia
seen from Singapore
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from Venezuela
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States
@islaamagainstirhaab
There has been an incident involving a vehicle hitting pedestrians at Finsbury Park, London, United Kingdom. A number of causalities have been reported, with one arrest so far. This is still a developing incident. Please stay indoors, check up on relatives/friends/neighbours, and report any suspicious activity to the authorities immediately.
Profile: Takfīrī-Khārijite Aḥmad Mūsā Jibrīl
In the Name of Allaah, the Most Merciful, the Ever Merciful.
All praise is due to Allaah, the Lord of all that exists, and we ask Him to raise the rank and grant safety to our Prophet, Muḥammad, to his Family, all of his Companions and their followers. As for what follows:
Takfīrī-Khārijites Aḥmad Mūsā Jibrīl and his father Mūsā ‘Abdullāh Jibrīl were convicted of a string of federal offences, including forty-two charges of conspiracy to terrorism, bank fraud, wire fraud, money laundering, failure to file income tax returns and felon-in-possession of fire-arms and ammunition, by the United States District Court (Eastern District of Michigan, South Division) in 2004 (see copy of official document here).
Aḥmad Mūsā Jibrīl was also allegedly responsible for sending a facsimile to the CNN, claiming responsibility for the Khobar Towers bombings in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia, that took place on November 13th 1995. He sent the fax under one of his known aliases, ‘Thomas Saad.’ A copy of the fax was released by the CNN; in part it reads:
The bombings in Riyadh that got the attention of the world is only the beginning of a new phase that the Saudi government will go through. […] There will be a series of bombings that will follow no matter how many lives of ours are taken or how many bodies are in prison.
Other findings (see ICSR report) suggest that approximately 52.4-55.6% of social media accounts (Facebook and Twitter) that follow Aḥmad Mūsā Jibrīl are supporters and members of so-called ISIS (داعش), generating the majority of his ‘likes’ and follows. The study also includes other pseudo-scholars, Mūsā Cerantonio and Sulaymān Nāṣir al-’Ulwān, both also popular among supporters of Khārijite factions.
In spite of these noteworthy feats of research, it is with deep regret and offence that they do contain dangerous inaccuracies concerning the doctrine of the Khārijites which they, without right, attribute to Orthodox Islām and Salafīs. Orthodox Islam necessitates adherence to the Noble Qur'ān and Prophetic traditions upon the understanding of the Companions of the Prophet Muḥammad (ṣallAllaahu ‘alayhi wa ṣallam) and the two generations that immediately followed them; not opposing their understanding and methodology in interpretation of the texts, nor allowing precedence to the opinions of others beside them. Orthodoxy, then, equates to a balanced adherence of the Islāmic faith, and is not to be confused with extremism or the ideas and opinions of men that are foreign to what is established within the texts of the Qur'ān and Prophetic narrations upon the understanding of the Companions of the Prophet Muḥammad. Those voicing this orthodoxy have never ceased inheriting the command of the Prophet (ṣallAllaahu ‘alayhi wa ṣallam) in combatting the Khārijites in every time and place without compromise, long before violent manifestations of modern-day terrorism made surface.
Please visit IslamAgainstExtremism.com and Kharijites.com.
The Sun quoted a friend of Butt (Khārijite London Bridge Attacker) as saying he called the Police about the twenty-seven year old’s extremist views which were said to have been ignited by YouTube videos.
The source, who has not been named, said he contacted Police in Barking, East London, after the Watford-born married father-of-two discussed Islāmic State-inspired terror attacks. One of Butt’s children was three, the other just months old.
He told BBC’s Asian Network the Jihādī had become radicalised after watching clips of US hate preacher Aḥmad Mūsā Jibrīl. He said: “He used to listen to a lot of (Aḥmad) Mūsā Jibrīl. I have heard some of this stuff and it is very radical. I am surprised this stuff is still on YouTube and is easily accessible.”
(source: The Huffington Post)
US hate preacher who ‘inspired’ London terror attackers is convicted fraudster
An American hate preacher whose online videos are believed to have radicalised one of the London Bridge attackers has reportedly fled his home in Michigan.
According to MailOnline, Ahmad Musa Jibril is convicted fraudster (see article here) who once posed for photos as a mujaheddin - a “holy warrior.” The news website said has not been seen at his home in Dearborn, Michigan - though he did leave his sandals behind.
His mother and sister, who live nearby, have also not been seen in the area, the MailOnline reported.
The 46-year-old has never been jailed for terrorism but is a convicted fraudster who admires Osama Bin Laden and has told his followers to kill non-Muslims.
When he was sentenced for fraud in 2005, prosecutors said he preached Islamic extremism from his front room and owned a “small arsenal” of weapons.
Jibril’s extremist material is believed to have inspired Khuram Butt and his accomplices to carry out the London Bridge attack, which left eight dead and injured many others.
(Source: The UK Telegraph)
Spineless London Bridge Attacker (Khārijite Dog Khurram Butt) was openly refuted by Salafīs while he was calling people to his warped, vile ideology!
I have created a Twitter Moment compiling numerous statements of Salafī scholars, students, callers and authors on extremism and modern-day terrorist factions (so-called Dā’ish, Ḥay’āt Taḥrīr ash-Shām, Al-Qā’idah, Boko Ḥarām, Ash-Shabāb, Ḥizb at-Taḥrīr, Muslim Brotherhood, et al.). I will update it regularly. You may view it here.
London Bridge 🙀👀
It’s all mad fī hādhihil ard
To my followers and those who see this:
Please assist me in reporting this tumblr account here (steps: this content is gross or hateful > malicious speech > copy & paste url ibnhvrb.tumblr.com and briefly describe it with what I have wrote) to the @staff and to the United Kingdom Home Office counter-terrorism unit here. He is an open supporter of terrorist insurgencies including al-Qaeda, so-called ISIS and ideologues of extremism and modern-day terrorism. He has since applauded and attempted to justify the attacks in Manchester Arena and now the incidents taking place in London.
I am sick and tired of this.
The Justice of Islām: What Terrorists and Islām Haters Wish You Did Not Know About the Justice and Benevolence Commanded by Islām.
There has been an incident in Manchester, United Kingdom, that is being treated as a terrorist attack that left at least nineteen confirmed deaths and fifty suffering injuries. Please stay at home, be vigilant, and report any suspicious activity to the local authorities. My thoughts are with you all.
Please click this link to see the full article.
Salafī scholar, Shaikh Ṣāliḥ as-Ṣuḥaymī, in his article titled (آية المنافق) “Sign of the Hypocrite” (Aug. 2009), stated about the Khawārij:
[…] Secondly, to place the dots on the letters (i.e. completing the affair and making it perfect) by naming the people of this ideology with the names appropriate to them, for they are Khawārij (terrorist renegades), in fact, they are more evil than the Khawārij of old, because in addition to their Khārijism and their deviant ideology, they added the application of Machiavellian philosophy, which is that the ends justify the means. So it is not sufficient that the preachers (sermon-givers) and writers wander around the sanctuary, or that they suffice with just making hints, or mere rejection (on its own). Rather, it is necessary to expose the lords of this ideology, and explain the legislative ruling upon them, in clarification of the true realities, and out of warning the Ummah in general and the youth in particular, from being deceived by this ideology which is taken by its people from visitations on the internet, or from the verdicts of the foolish who crouch in the caves on mountains…
Essentially, this means to avoid ambiguity in one’s speech and to join the dots and connect the lines and state what is plain and clear, to describe contemporary Khārijites with exactly what they deserve of labels and descriptions. It is required from Muslims and in particular the people of the Sunnah, that they name, expose, and refute the originators, instigators and propagators of those ideologies which are founded upon this broad Khārijite way of thinking and to wage war against every individual, group or faction that spreads the thought of Sayyid Quṭb or an-Nabaḥānī (both fountains of misguidance and extremism), or who promotes their ideologies through propaganda for their writings, or who has been instrumental in carrying these ideas to the Muslims at large, betraying them and misguiding them in their Religion.
The Origins of 20th Century Extremists and Terrorists:
The extremism we see today has its ideological foundations in the writings of four “thinkers” － Sayyid Quṭb, Abu A'lā Mawdūdī, Ḥasan al-Banna and Taqī ad-Dīn an-Nabaḥānī. All of these four men were affected by Marxist Communist Socialist methodologies, and in some cases (an-Nabaḥānī, Quṭb) they took wholesale from Lenin and clothed their ideas in Islāmic garb (see here for details) － they only differed in minor practicalities, so for example, Quṭb advocated a violent revolution engineered by an elite group and an-Nabaḥānī advocated a generalised revolution brought about through the activities of a disciplined elite political party. Today we have scores of groups, parties and sects which are off-shoots these groups and they have understandings of Jihād tainted by that Marxist Communist revolutionary ideology － they believe revolutions are the way to topple all current (apostate) states and governments and replace them with an Islamic governance, as they claim. This is not what any of the Messengers came with and this clashes with the revealed texts. The underlying assumption made by these people in their ideologies is that all nations today are apostate nations － some of them were explicit in stating this like Quṭb and an-Nabaḥānī － and others were indirect in portraying that. Upon this foundation, these Khārijites emerged during the early part of the second half of the twentieth century and slowly spread to different Muslim lands. The evils and atrocities of these people plagued Muslim lands before even reaching the lands of the non-Muslims. A crucial thing to note here is that this evil ideology is old and ancient and it has not arisen due to the foreign policy of any non-Muslim nation － a false argument often used to justify or explain why these extremists do what they do. Rather, this ideology pre-dates by centuries upon centuries whatever geo-political strategies are being implemented in the Muslim lands today and whilst these geo-political strategies have allowed the argument to be made that the extremists are motivated by the foreign policy of non-Muslim nations, they cannot in any way, be used justify the actual existence of this extreme and vile ideology which provides the backbone for these extremist and terrorist activities. If the foreign policy of non-Muslim nations was the cause, then surely, all the Muslims would be involved in extremist and terrorist activities. But that is not the case. Rather, it is only those poisoned with that evil ideology found in the books of Sayyid Quṭb and an-Nabaḥānī and others from whom these types of evil actions arise.
For this reason, the orthodox Scholars of Sunnī, Salafī Islām have － throughout the centuries and ages － waged a war against these extremists, and if one were to survey the books of the Salafī scholars from ancient times to this day of ours, he would find them replete with warnings and refutations against this evil band of foolish-minded, ignorant mischief-makers.
Beautiful artistry @krd.signz in Arabic Calligraphy and Design. A lovely service and customer care, co-operating upon brotherhood. This is for everyone and may be used freely. The world must know. Orthodox Islām (Salafiyyah) is free from Terrorism.
As for the deceitful individual running by the name ‘AbooNoor,’ then the reasons as to why he is on the list are as follows:
Mixing with clear Takfīrīs and Ḥizbīs.
Recommending blogs of Takfīrīs.
Knowingly stealing content from Salafī authors/translators and redistributing it without any credit to them (see: /stolen).
Suspicious posts that are deleted minutes later.
Promoting of Muḥammad Ṣāliḥ al-Munajjid.
Copy & Pasting from IslamQA (authored by Muḥammad Ṣāliḥ al-Munajjid).
Quoting many passages by Shaikh al-Islām Ibn Taymiyyah (d.728Ḥ), usually snipped from IslamQA or other unqualified websites (even wikipedia), often translated terribly and out of its intended context, and with no explanation or supplement from a Salafī scholar to aid the reader in understanding them correctly.
‘AbooNoor’ recommends to his thousands of (mainly unsuspecting) followers to follow a Takfīrī Khārijite that supports so-called IS:
It must be stressed that suspicious activities of this nature carried out by ‘AbooNoor’ and others are often deleted very quickly (so that people like myself do not catch on), but since they have a large follower-base, those few minutes to express their unfiltered views and alliances (that are otherwise hidden via. dissimulation) are enough. This has been an oft-repeated theme.
The Khārijites: Historical Roots Of Modern-Day Extremism and Terrorism.
It is common knowledge to the scholars of the Muslims and their students that so-called IS, Boko Ḥarām, al-Qāʿidah and others are simply another manifestation of the recurring appearance of this group that was explicitly mentioned by the Prophet of al-Islām. Their appearance was prophesied by the Prophet (may Allaah raise his rank and grant him safety) in a large number of traditions and they indeed appeared less than 30 years after him in 36Ḥ, around the year 657CE. Because this faction was intended as a trial and tribulation for Muslims in various times and ages, the Prophet (may Allaah raise his rank and grant him safety) spoke extensively about them, their traits, activities and their great danger upon Islām and the Muslims. The traditions in this regard are well-known and famous and have come through large-scale transmission right from the dawn of Islām. In this treatise we look at the historical events behind the emergence of this group and its subversive, destructive activities.
Some objective, truthful non-Muslim researchers (see CEP report: ISIS and Al-Qaeda, Linked by Roots in Muslim Brotherhood, Discuss Alliance) are slowly becoming aware that the ideology of so-called IS, Al-Qaeda and other terrorist insurgencies framed as services of “jihād” are not rooted in ‘Waḥabbī’/Salafī doctrine but much so in the contrary:
Modern-day terrorism directly stems from the so-called Muslim Brotherhood and its ideologues, most noticeably Sayyid Quṭb.
Phil Paine, a non-Muslim writer and self-described scholar observes, after reading Sayyid Quṭb’s ‘Milestones’ for the first time:
The first thing one notices about Quṭb’s ideological thought is how little it has to do with the traditions of al-Islām, or the needs of people in Islāmic countries. It is profoundly European in inspiration, and its chief models are Hitler, Marx and Lenin － Lenin is by far the strongest influence.
Whole passages look like they were simply copied out from his (i.e. Lenin’s) works and then a pseudo-Islāmic terminology inserted, “revolutionary vanguard” becoming “Islāmic vanguard,” and so on...
As Marxist mumbo-jumbo justified the telling of any lie, the betrayal of any value, the commitment of any atrocity, in the name of an implacable destiny, so too, does Milestones.
Quṭb was by no means alone. In the 1920s and 1930s, the Muslim Brotherhood and other precursors of today’s Jihādist movements were profoundly influenced by Marxism and Nazism. Before WWII, Hitler was the greater influence, but with his defeat, Communism became the principal inspiration. In fact. Quṭb himself was a delegate to the Communist International, its principle liaison with the Muslim Brotherhood. (R. R. Reily, ‘The Roots of Islamist Ideology.’)
Quṭb draws on the Ash’arite tradition, as well as on his Marxist and Nazi sources. But today’s totalitarian Islamism is not an attempt to restore the glories of Islām. Far from it; it draws its inspiration from the deviations from classical Islām that destroyed those glories.
Ustāḍ Abū Iyāḍ Amad Rafīq, Salafī Publications, comments on the observations made by Phil Paine (see: Abū Iyāḍ Amjad Rafīq, 2010, ‘The Rise of Jihādist Extremism in the West － An Analysis of Extremist Ideologies and the Most Notable Figureheads of Radicalisation,’ Salafī Publications.):
It is interesting to see how learned, well-read and well-versed individuals in political philosophies can immediately recognise, after reading just a single book, ‘Milestones,’ the true and real origins of Quṭb’s ideology. The writer also had knowledge and understanding to recognise Quṭb’s Ash’arite leanings. Quṭb, like Ḥaṣan al-Banna and Taqī ad-Dīn an-Nabaḥānī all come from the Ash’arite tradition. Sectarian motivations and agendas have led those of a Ṣūfī persuasion to ascribe, spuriously, these figures and their ideologies to Salafism.
In his commentary on the Qur’ān, ‘az-Ẓilāl,’ Quṭb promulgates a creed based entirely upon the core foundations of the Ash’arite creed. This includes his figurative interpretations of Allaah’s Attributes, and likewise of the Throne, claiming the Speech of Allaah, the Qur’ān, is a created entity, and the negation of the Actions of Allaah with the argument that they would necessitate newly created events in Allaah’s Essence and other such hallmarks of the Ash’arite creed.
It is also readily apparent from an-Nabaḥānī’s books that he was also nurtured upon the Ash’arite creed. The formulation of their political methodologies was based upon prior ideological cultivation upon Marxism, Leninism or Ba’thism, and they had little to do with what is referred to as ‘Waḥabbism’ or ‘Salafism.’
Uneducated journalists and inexperienced academics link Quṭb to Salafism － this link is in reality non-existent. As for Marxist sources, then Quṭb was formerly a communist and some of his communist ideology came through later in his writings such as advocating general revolutions and the confiscation and redistribution of wealth, with the argument that it is fundamentally the right of the society as a whole.
Representatives of so-called IS, namely Abū Bakr al-Bagḍādī, and al-Qaeda, namely Aymān az-Ẓawāḥirī, were former members of the so-called Muslim Brotherhood.
Almost every Salafī scholar under the Sun condemn and warn against the teachings of Sayyid Quṭb and other contemporary figureheads (incl. organisations) harbouring this destructive ideology ever since it reared its ugly head; these scholars of al-Islām, co-operating with the Govt. of Saudi Arabia, banned the writings of Sayyid Quṭb, Abū A’lā Mawdūdī, Yūsuf al-Qardāwī and other contemporary figureheads of the so-called Muslim Brotherhood from the Kingdom; PhD tier exams at Imām Sa’ūd University asks of its students to highlight the deviations of Sayyid Quṭb and takfīrism. In fact, websites IslamAgainstExtremism.com, ProphetMuhammad.name, Wahabbis.com, TheMadkhalis.com, Kharijites.com, Ikhwanis.com, Nabahani.com, SayyidQutb.com, Takfiris.com are all dedicated to shedding light on this matter to an English-reading audience.
This summons the question why we still find some Muslims defensive, fence-sitting and even being confrontational on issues related to ideologues of modern-day terrorism and their carriers, and the answer unfortunately returns to compound ignorance, hatred towards Salafīs, and political aspirations.
This rings even truer when we bring up the almost unspoken narrative regarding terrorist insurgency factions such as TTP (Teḥrīk-i-Tālibān) that operate within various provinces of Pakistan and Afghanistan which is indicative as to why these terrorists are so often confounded to be Sunnīs enacting violence upon minority sects. The Tālibān, like other factions, are not Sunnī － they ascribe themselves to Ahl as-Sunnati wal-Jamā’ah so as to capitalise on its legitimacy and the mass misnomer in the same manner so-called IS does with Salafism (note: Sunnī and Salafī are synonymous but only if the ascriptions hold true); in reality, they are a heretic militant, Khārijite faction that is inherently Deobanḍī (not Sunnī) in creed. So we find some that may condemn so-called IS, but are attached to other terrorist factions and extremist figureheads; they criticise one another merely on surface level differences because they share the same origins underneath.
Through my small efforts in combatting hundreds of Khārijites on this micro-blogging site, rendering their deceptive operations to be defunct, bringing their suspicious activities in front of otherwise unsuspecting Muslims, and rightfully informing the authorities of these criminals, whether they hurl their contaminated tripe merely on an ideological level or show support for terrorist insurgencies, it has always been followed with a band of naive reductionists that chime in and say, “but, brother, we must not think bad about people,” (we hold negative thoughts and even assumptions for individuals that misguide and harm), “advise them privately,” (advising in private is not required for those that cause open harm), “show us the evidence” (a last ditch response that we should keep in mind with the ḥizbīs who try to spread doubts such as “did he really say this,” then move onto “why are you hunting for mistakes” or “but they do not say that they support IS,” among many more). In reality, they have with them false, innovated principles which hinder them from accepting the truth and become sympathisers of people of falsehood, fence-sitters (even subjecting issues of our Religion to foolish “banter,” “LOL” and memes), having no jealousy for the ‘aqīdah, and ultimately display betrayal of the Sunnah and its people in statements, actions, al-walā’ and al-barā’.
The following screen-shot is an excellent (disturbing) wake up call of what I have to work with:
How to report online material promoting terrorism or extremism (for UK):
JazakAllāhu khair. The following is how one can report Cyber Security Incidents specific to terrorism (ex. Threats to critical infrastructure, businesses and provincial / territorial / municipal governments online, as well as other incriminating or suspicious activity) in Canada through the Canadian Cyber Incident Response Centre (CCIRC), this is a part of counter-terrorism services.
Email: [email protected]
Link: https://www.publicsafety.gc.ca/cnt/ntnl-scrt/cbr-scrt/rprt-en.aspx#a05
Politics Is From al-Islām
Politics and other social sciences are from our Religion (al-Islām) and they are not worldly sciences that can be learnt from anyone.
Learn it here:
Uṣūl as-Sunnah (part 16): First class on Islāmic Politics.
Uṣūl as-Sunnah (part 17): Second class on Islāmic Politics.
Uṣūl as-Sunnah (part 18): Third class on Islāmic Politics.
Uṣūl as-Sunnah (part 19): Fourth class on Islāmic Politics.
Introduction by our teacher and beloved brother, Abul-’Abbās Mūsā Richardson (slight paraphrasing/additions for easier reading and understanding):
[…] For this sixteenth session, in explanation of the foundational primer in creed (’aqīdah, عقيدة) that is Uṣūl as-Sunnah (Foundations of the Creed, أصول السنة) by al-Imām Abī ‘Abd-illāh Aḥmad Ibn Muḥammad Ibn Ḥanbal ash-Shaibānī (Aḥmad Ibn Ḥanbal d.241Ḥ) with the explanation of our beloved scholar of today, Shaikh Rabī’ Ibn Ḥādī Ibn ‘Umair al-Madkhalī.
We are in the topic of the position of the Muslims, the rank-in-file Muslims, as it relates to their leaders, their rulers. It is one of the most essential topics under as-Ṣiyāṣah ash-Sharī’ah (Islamic Politics, السياسة الشريعة), and a very important note needs to be clear here: al-Islām is a complete Religion that covers all aspects of life (e.g. how our children go to school, how we engage our spouses with intimacy, how we interact with our businesses, how we interact with our neighbours, Muslims or non-Muslims, on every level). How we interact with our rulers is so clearly a matter of our Religion, that it is so sad that we see so many Muslims believe that as-ṣiyāṣah (politics, السياسة) is a dunyawī (worldly, دنيويّ) matter, (saying), “it is like Mathematics or Geography － you can take its foundations from anybody.”
We find one of the main proponents of this twisted corruption of the Islāmic stance on politics is Yasir Qadhi. Beware. He claims politics is not from al-Islām and that it is a worldly thing that can be learnt from anyone, and thus, he enrolled at Yale University to study ‘Religion & Politics’ under Tony Blair in a seminary, and he tries to say that it was not religion, “it was just politics.” However, we need to understand that politics is from this Religion. You will not find a book of fiqh in the library of any Muslim, any book of fiqh that is jāmi’ (جامع) which begins with chapters on taḥārah (purification, طهارة), ibādāt (acts of worship, عبادات) and so on, then at the very last chapters (of the books of fiqh), we find chapters on ad-ḍiyāt (blood money, الديات), al-aqdiyah (court verdicts, قَضَاء؛ الأقضية), aḥkām (rulings, الأحكام), governance, ṣiyāṣah, leadership, etc. It is from Islāmic fiqh － do not separate it from Islāmic fiqh because you want to do what you want.
It is like saying ṣalāḥ (prayer, صلاة) is not really from al-Islām “because you can go and learn it from anyone － you can go to the Jews, learn how to pray from them, and it is okay.” No one would accept this, but he (i.e. Yasir Qadhi and others like him) took it from the back of fiqh topics where no one is looking (ṣiyāṣah ash-shar’īah) and he said, “let us excuse this from the discussions of Islāmic evidences and everything, and let us learn from the non-Muslims and their systems of politics: let us learn about voting; let us learn about rallies, demos. and sit-ins; let us learn about chanting in the streets; let us learn these systems of change and political processes, and let us apply them because it is for the modern society.”
If you tried this with any other chapter from al-Islām, Muslims would refuse, clearly, so why are they so convinced with this approach? It is because of ignorance of the Religion, because someone can say to them that politics is not an Islāmic science or discipline, it is “just a dunyawī thing and you can take that dunyawī thing from anyone.” So he deceives, tricks and takes them away from the Book, the Sunnah and the commands of the Messenger of Allaah (ṣallAllaahu ‘alayhi wa ṣallam).
Yes, Salafīs call to Tawḥīd and the Sunnah, and they warn against extremism and modern-day terrorism (incl. the various ideologues and terrorist insurgency factions). Every day. Problem? Send it to our complaint department: 🗑 - it’s a trash can.
May Allāh reward the brothers at City Centre Da’wah, based in Birmingham UK, for their efforts in disseminating the correct information about Islām, pure, unadulterated, as it was revealed to our beloved Messenger of Allāh (ﷻ) and the noble Salaf, in different locations throughout the United Kingdom. May He keep them sincere and steadfast upon the truth, Ameen.
Please visit the Twitter page of the City Centre Da’wah team for more information, and while you are there be sure to check out the Twitter accounts of their various branches in London, Oxford, Manchester, the East Midlands, and Wales.
West London City Centre Da’wah
East London City Centre Da’wah
Oxford City Centre Da’wah
Manchester City Centre Da’wah
East Midlands City Centre Da’wah
Wales City Centre Da’wah
Please keep our beloved Shaykh Sālih Al Luhaydān (حفظه الله), from the Mashāykh of Riyādh KSA, in your sincere ad’īyah as he is unwell / his health has not been the same for some time now.
May Allāh, the Responsive, heal the noble Shaykh, grant him a full recovery from his illness, and bless him with good health. May the Most Merciful preserve the living scholars of our time and grant them the highest of places in Jannah, Allāhumma Ameen.
It is reported that Abū Muslim Al-Khawlānī (Allāh have mercy on him) said:
“The example of the scholars on earth is that of the stars in the sky: when they appear, the people are guided (they navigate using the stars), but when they disappear, the people get confused and lost.”
[Al-Bayhaqī, Al-Madkhal ilā Al-Sunan Al-Kubrā #287. Shared from Sayings of the Salaf. Translated by Owais Al-Hāshimī]
(Source: Twitter account of Shaykh Sālih Al Luhaydān)
One simple but effective (practical) aid for the average person in identifying and sifting out extremist Islamist literature is if it contains dialogue concerning issues of jihād that are not in the context of established military apparatuses under legitimate Muslim countries (e.g. Government of the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia, the Islamic Republic of Pakistan, the Republic of Maldives, et al.).
Jihād is not established by militias, guerillas and terrorist insurgency groups that self-claim swathes of land from existing countries as their own, that raid cities and villages, that blow themselves up with suicide-vests, that use car-bombs, that retreat to mountainous enclaves and snipe potshots at their targets, that murder non-combatants, the elderly, the women and children.
