Hi ko I am trying to understand this thing that you guys are pointing to but I have some questions.
First of all why does awareness look like a person's awareness. I mean if it's all one which is that/awareness then when I am not aware of a thing does that thing not exist. Of course not. Let's say I am aware right now. And all I experience is being a tangible person in this room. I am not aware of central park in NY does that mean it isn't. No it's there..something is going on there. And if I'm awareness and everything is within awareness than why I'm not aware of what's happening in other part of world.
You may say that I am identifying with this body mind but no I totally understand that this body and mind is within me/awareness as well as everything but then why I only aware of this. And when I sleep I as awareness is aware of nothing so nothing exists. But does that mean that when I sleep you do not exist of course you do. So why does it all look like a person's pov??
My other question is that you and being it is on twt have talked about the effect of mind. Like how it labels one thing more real than another but from awareness pov everything just is. There is nothing like one is real than another. Everything is not real. The only reality is that. Does that mean that mind exist and labels things. But mind is another thought like other thoughts (im not sure but i thing you said it somewhere that ego/mind/body are just thoughts/illusion). Then if it does not exist how can it label things. But mind exist. You have your own mind that how you can answer questions n stuff. I have my own mind. So mind exist of not.
I'm sorry for yapping too much. And making this ask long 🥲🫠 thanks.
It seems like the confusion is coming from trying to understand “awareness” as if it’s a person’s awareness — as if it has boundaries, perspective, and a limited range. That’s not what anyone’s pointing to.
Awareness isn’t something “you” have, like a flashlight pointing out at the world. The very idea that there’s “you here” and “Central Park over there” already assumes the separation that’s in question. That whole framework (person, distance, perception, limitation) appears within awareness — not the other way around.
When you ask, “Why can’t I see Central Park right now?” you’re still thinking like the idea of a person/character. But that “I” and the thought about “Central Park” both arise within the same undivided beingness. It’s not about trying to see the whole movie screen at once. It’s noticing you are the screen, not the Idea of a character playing out scenes on it.
Same with the “mind” question — you’re treating “mind” like an entity or thing that exists independently, but what you call mind is a stream of thoughts, impressions, sensations — all of which arise and dissolve. “The mind exists” is just another thought. You don’t need to fight with that, just notice that none of it sticks. That which knows the thought is not a thought. That’s the whole pointer.
It’s okay if it’s messy. That’s just the phase of turning things over. But you won’t think your way into clarity — you’ll just exhaust the need to think about it at all.
想破头都想不明白的东西，不是靠想的。What you can’t figure out by overthinking was never meant to be figured out by thinking.
in other words, some things can't be understood by overthinking—they're beyond thought.
izzy806
kianamaiart
turnnoffyourmind
jbbartram-illu
tangentwithtanner
gummygunk
origamiaround
