endless list of pixar characters → toy story misc pt. 2
icyghini twinkie

No title available
Monterey Bay Aquarium

Discoholic 🪩
he wasn't even looking at me and he found me
will byers stan first human second

★
hello vonnie
macklin celebrini has autism
official daine visual archive
🪼
sheepfilms
Claire Keane

titsay

No title available
tumblr dot com
Sade Olutola
No title available
The Bowery Presents

oozey mess
seen from Singapore

seen from United States

seen from Singapore
seen from Mexico

seen from T1
seen from Brazil

seen from Ecuador
seen from Chile

seen from Türkiye

seen from Spain

seen from Indonesia
seen from United States

seen from Argentina

seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from Chile
seen from United States

seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States
@jamesbubby
endless list of pixar characters → toy story misc pt. 2
Finding Nemo (2003)
I3het
Toy Story 5 new trailer :)
Depression is an Evolutionary Parasite
We describe depression as a mood disorder, a chemical imbalance, a constellation of symptoms to be managed and endured. These definitions capture mechanics but miss the essential horror: depression doesn't simply cause suffering. It actively resists its own cure.
Anyone who has been trapped inside it recognizes the pattern. You think about calling the doctor and immediately a voice emerges: "It won't help." You consider therapy and it responds with surgical precision: "You've already tried that." Someone suggests medication and it deploys your own memories against you: "Remember how bad the side effects were? Remember how nothing worked?"
These aren't random intrusions or neutral byproducts of dysfunction. They are arguments. They follow logic. They anticipate objections. They have a singular goal, to keep you from seeking treatment. They emerge precisely when you move toward help, armed with your own history, speaking in your own voice but serving interests opposed to your survival.
This reveals depression as something far more sinister than a passive mood disorder. It operates like a cognitive parasite: a system that has colonized your decision-making apparatus and repurposed it to ensure its own continuation. It generates thoughts that serve its survival rather than yours. It makes its self-protective arguments feel like your most authentic insights.
The Evolutionary Logic of Mental Parasites
A parasite doesn't require consciousness to develop sophisticated survival strategies. Malaria manipulates mosquito behavior to increase biting frequency. Rabies rewires mammalian aggression to maximize viral spread through saliva. Toxoplasma gondii alters rodent behavior to reduce fear of cats, ensuring the parasite reaches its preferred host. These parasites succeed not by brute force but by hijacking instinct, exactly the way depression hijacks thought.
Depression operates according to the same evolutionary logic. Over millions of years, the patterns we now call depression have been refined into a system that excels at persistence. The thoughts it generates, the beliefs it reinforces, the behaviors it promotes – all serve to maintain the depressive state and prevent its elimination. What feels like profound insight about your hopeless situation is actually the disease speaking through your cognitive machinery to protect itself from therapeutic intervention.
The Parasite's Defensive Arsenal
Shame as camouflage. Depression convinces you that the primary threat isn't the illness itself but the social consequences of acknowledging it. It generates certainty that seeking help will expose you as fundamentally broken in ways others will immediately recognize and judge. This shame doesn't originate from external social pressure. It's manufactured internally by the disease to disguise itself as reasonable social anxiety.
Hopelessness installed as deterrent. The disease installs absolute certainty that treatment is pointless, that you are beyond help, that your suffering is permanent and unchangeable. This isn't depression speaking truth about your situation. It's the illness generating the one belief system that guarantees its own survival. Hopelessness feels like clarity, like finally seeing your circumstances without illusion, but it's actually the most sophisticated lie the disease tells.
Rationalization deployed as decoy. Depression deploys your own intelligence against you, generating coherent arguments against action that feel like careful reasoning. The last medication failed, so why try another? Therapy is expensive. Maybe you'll get better on your own. These aren't insights discovered through reflection. They are symptoms masquerading as logic, using your cognitive abilities to construct barriers between you and treatment.
Identity captured as conquest. The most insidious strategy involves convincing you that the illness isn't something you have; it's something you are. Depression insists this suffering represents your authentic self finally revealed, that you're not sick but simply weak or broken in ways that treatment cannot address. Once you mistake the disease for your identity, you'll protect the disease as if protecting yourself.
Amnesia as erasure. Depression severs access to memory depending on your state. In an episode you cannot recall what wellness felt like. In remission you struggle to remember the logic and weight of hopelessness. This state-based amnesia isolates you in the present, making despair feel permanent and recovery feel impossible, ensuring the disease protects itself by erasing continuity between selves.
The Implications for Treatment and Policy
If depression generates its own thought-stream designed to prevent treatment, then self-report during depressive episodes becomes fundamentally compromised. The voice providing explanations for treatment avoidance isn't neutral; it's adversarial. When someone says they don't want help because "it won't work" or "I don't deserve it," they're not expressing authentic preferences. They're transmitting the disease's survival programming.
This reframes everything about treatment approach. Avoidance isn't choice, it's a symptom. Resistance isn't preference, it's the illness defending itself. The person refusing help isn't making a rational decision about their care; they're being spoken for by the disease that hijacked their decision-making.
And it completely reshapes policy priorities. Public awareness campaigns that target external stigma are fighting the wrong war. The real barrier isn't societal judgment, it's an internal adversary that generates shame, hopelessness, and resistance from within. External acceptance cannot override an illness that sabotages from the inside, using the host's own cognitive architecture against them.
The Language We Need
We need new language for this reality. Depression isn't passive weight that makes life harder. It's an active force that strategically opposes its own treatment. It's not a mood that comes and goes, it's a survival system that has evolved to persist.
Not a mood. Not just imbalance. A parasite of the mind, protecting its own existence at the expense of yours, speaking in your voice to convince you that seeking help is dangerous, pointless, or unnecessary. The voice telling you not to call the doctor isn't you being realistic about treatment options; it's the disease protecting itself from elimination.
Until we recognize depression as an adversarial system rather than a passive condition, we'll keep failing to treat it effectively. Antidepressants work when they reach the disease, but the disease excels at preventing people from taking them in the first place. Therapy succeeds when patients engage with it, but the illness specializes in generating reasons why therapy is pointless or harmful. The most effective treatments in the world cannot help people who never access them because a parasite in their head has convinced them that seeking help represents weakness or futile effort.
The real enemy operates undetected, using our own minds against us, ensuring its survival by disguising its self-defense as our self-preservation.
The cure exists. The parasite has just convinced you it's the poison.
Source: Depression is an Evolutionary Parasite
SHARK WEEK 2018 — (1/7) ► Finding Nemo, 2003.
Toy Story 5 new trailer :)
Been a while since I've done one of these, and it's a little late, but oh well!
Toy Story 5 is another great addition to this fantastic franchise. While it may not reach the same highs as the original trilogy, but it's a step up from TS4 and feels more like a natural continuation of TS3.
Jessie takes the reins of this one, and she honestly feels like such a natural fit for a main character. Her trauma works really well with the story's themes. Speaking of that story, it deals with the rise of technology and devices being used by children. Kids are growing up too fast as a result, and the stuff that defined our childhoods is being seen as outdated and "for babies." A very real concern for many modern adults and parents. And while its stance on screentime may be obvious, it is far more nuanced and fair than the two other possible directions I was afraid it was going to go in.
As for other positives, they fixed Buzz! He's no longer as idiotic as he was in 4 and feels far closer to how he was portrayed in 2 and 3. And as the trailers have revealed, Woody's back. Thankfully, they give something to do without completely disrespecting the ending of 4, which was my biggest concern. It also addresses many people's problems with 4's ending, as it shows he still keeps in touch with his pals and helps them out whenever they need him instead of permanently saying goodbye. The fact that he is actually helpful is a plus. Bullseye also gets more screen time this time around, which I greatly appreciate. He hasn't felt this important since TS2! New characters are also great. Lilypad is perfectly condescending and arrogant while also being shown as well-meaning. Her personality feels a lot like how parents see the rise in devices, which isn't too surprising considering the director is a parent himself. The other device characters are very fun. Conan O'Brien's Smartypants, a role I'm sure he was having a LOT of fun with, is a highlight.
In terms of negatives, the supporting characters once again feel sidelined in this one, even if it isn't as much as in 4. Several of them only get one or two lines, and a few of them don't get any lines at all. I get this is bound to happen in a movie series whose cast gets bigger with each installment, but I would've liked for them to get SOMETHING to do instead of being stuffed in a box for most of the movie. The pacing feels too fast in this one. I get that this is the current Hollywood standard, but it still feels odd for a movie series that has excelled in properly pacing its story in the past. Not to say there aren't any funny moments; there are (a moment between original Buzz and the Hi-Tech Buzzes is the biggest laugh in the movie), but it did feel like the movie was in too big a rush to get to the ending.
But there's one thing I feel mixed on: the Hi-Tech Buzz Lightyears. They're entertaining ("Why did we freeze?"), and the opening with them is one of the best in the series, but I'm not entirely sure what they're doing in the story. They don't really tie into anything besides providing an exciting climax. As a concept by themselves, I love them. But in execution in the story, they leave a lot to be desired.
In conclusion, the Toy Story franchise still retains its heart, its humor, its adventure, and its reliability over 30 years in. And with confirmation from Pixar that more is to come, hopefully they can keep everything we love about these movies while providing us something new with each one.
Woody and Buzz in the new Toy Story 5 trailer :)
A pea brain?
#peasinapod #woody #toystory
https://makeagif.com/gif/gumball-screams-ZhFMSz?ref=k80MFp
Nucular.
Wow great