And this is how religious people should react when someone comes out to them
No title available

❣ Chile in a Photography ❣
Three Goblin Art
"I'm Dorothy Gale from Kansas"
ojovivo
NASA
official daine visual archive
Not today Justin

pixel skylines
Fai_Ryy
will byers stan first human second
Mike Driver
Cosimo Galluzzi
art blog(derogatory)
Xuebing Du
we're not kids anymore.
Aqua Utopia|海の底で記憶を紡ぐ
h
almost home
I'd rather be in outer space 🛸

seen from United States

seen from United States

seen from United States

seen from United States

seen from United States
seen from Honduras

seen from Australia
seen from Poland
seen from United States

seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States

seen from United States

seen from United States
seen from United States

seen from United States

seen from Canada
seen from United States
@justahighlyfunctionalsociopath
And this is how religious people should react when someone comes out to them
Dear 2017,
hogwarts houses
damn..
MY GOD
Why aren’t we talking about Dylan sprouse have you SEEN his tweets?
GUYS SERIOUSLY
G U Y S
we could have had a singing career.
I can’t handle this
“For a man (Donald Trump) to be able to publicly refer to a woman as a fat pig, that makes me teary. And for people to applaud, that is absolutely fucking insanity to me.
My grandmother would have smacked my teeth out of my head if I had referred to a woman as a fat pig. And I cannot understand how people can clap for that. It’s absolutely collective insanity.
If one of my sons – I am getting furious just thinking about it – if one of my sons said that in a public place, they couldn’t even live in my house anymore.”
– Will Smith, news.com.au
I’ve written before about how theatre can teach trust, empathy, compassion, peaceful conflict resolution, deeper cognitive thinking, delayed gratification, create community and understanding. The men in Rehabilitation Through the Arts have far fewer disciplinary infractions inside the facility and a dramatically lower recidivism rate upon release than the general population. I often wish I could take the guys to the theatre. You may be able to imagine that a fair number of these men had no access to the arts as children. (That’s a separate post.) We make do with production photos and the occasional “adapted for television.” Until the cast of Hamilton beautifully and powerfully performed their opening number from the stage of the Richard Rodgers Theatre for the Grammy ceremony, and then performed at the White House. Until Lin-Manuel Miranda free-styled in the Rose Garden with President Obama. Which I promptly burned onto a DVD and waited for clearance to bring into the facility. Tonight we watched Lin-Manuel perform a piece from his ‘concept album’ at the 2009 White House Poetry Jam, and we talked about how that audience received his work. We talked about what happens when people laugh and you’re serious, about the decision to stand one’s ground and follow one’s purpose, which is a hot topic in our rehearsal room as we get closer to sharing our months of work with the population of the prison. “He gets more confident as he goes.” Some of the men are worried that the population won’t understand Shakespeare; some are worried that they will laugh at the serious parts. Tonight, one of the elders in our circle says, “We have to tell the story.” We watch a Broadway show in the Big House. Well, four minutes of it. We watch the Grammy performance of “Alexander Hamilton.” Heads nod to the beat; some of the men snap along. “Can we watch it again?” We can. We talk about how Hamilton is performed on a bare stage, just like we’ll perform Twelfth Night. “No one laughed when he said his name this time.” We talk about how Miranda uses language, leverages rhetoric to find each character’s voice, just as Shakespeare did. We talk about working for six years on something you believe in, and we speculated about the long, uncertain nights somewhere in the middle of year three, year four. The men know more than the rest of us can imagine about long, uncertain nights in the middle of a very long bid to survive. I attempt to describe the beautiful specificity of the physical and vocal choices that Daveed Diggs, Okieriete Onaodowan, and Anthony Ramos make to differentiate Lafayette from Jefferson, Mulligan from Madison, Laurens from Philip Hamilton; we’ve been working on character walks. We watch the cast perform “My Shot” at the White House; we woop. We joyfully behold the son of Puerto Rican parents and the first African American President freestyle in the Rose Garden. We cheer. (One or two of us might tear up, but we don’t need to discuss that.) These gorgeous, thoughtful, wounded men rarely see themselves represented in the world. As they fight to become the men they want to be, they still mostly see themselves in the narrative as junkies, dealers, thugs or the latest Black man brutally gunned down in the streets by the police. According to an Opportunity Agenda study, “negative mass media portrayals were strongly linked with lower life expectations among black men.” (Who lives? Who dies? Who tells your story?) But tonight, in the midst of our shared creative endeavor, they saw themselves smack in the center of the narrative of creation, possibility, pursuit, and achievement. Representation unabashedly made me weep tonight as I watched a few of the men lean in. Representation matters. Representation is beautiful. And I am not willing to wait for it.
“He struggled and kept his guard up”: Hamilton in the Big House (plainKate.com) [x]
(via thefederalistfreestyle)
A Strangely Wonderful Trailer…
Well it’s finally here folks, the trailer for Doctor Strange, and by the Ancient One is it glorious! Ever since I was a young teenager and started reading comics, more than any other characters, the one that really drew me, the one that really captured my imagination, was Doctor Stephen Strange. I mean this guy was just so different from any other character that was out there. Sure DC has it’s mystics, but I was never as drawn to DC as I was Marvel, and it was always the weird and crazy stuff that attracted me. I took pride in checking out the more obscure things that people didn’t take as much mind to. I was hyped about Guardians of the Galaxy before the first trailer even hit because I was actually familiar with those comics, and they weren’t even my favourites, the good Doctor was, and still is.
Going into this trailer, you can imagine that my favouritism over the character might have presented a certain bias, and I’ll admit, yes on my initial viewing on Jimmy Kimmel Live, my inner fanboy came out, and that bias certainly showed, but this is a trailer review, which means multiple viewing, meticulous analysis of each frame of footage being presented in under three minutes of trailer time, plus it’s only the first trailer, thus a teaser, which means only a fraction of what they want to show us has been pieced together, mostly from things they shot early on in production like the way most movies do it; after all, shooting only wrapped completely last week, we can’t expect them to have everything through post-production yet.
To be fair, I’d been on the hype train since it left the station of movie announcement back in 2014, along with what would eventually be revealed to be an incomplete line-up for Phase 3. Ever since then, from announcing a director, to each of the major casting choices, to the concept art, to the first reveals of him in costume, to the on-set shots, to the comic book store drop in at the end of filming that went viral, it’s all been super exciting for me. Finally, after all the little nuggets of information that have been building up this movie over the past two years, although really for me, it was more like thirteen years, we finally got our first real glimpse at what we will be able to expect from this movie and what it has to offer in terms of story, character study, and as a window of the worlds if you will, into this new layer of the world we’ve all come to know and love that is the Marvel Cinematic Universe.
Well, as this trailer does a clear point of highlighting through multiple scenes, this is an origin story, which quite frankly is actually not all that strange. You see I could tell you several things that I saw in the trailer that felt like the pages of the comics coming to life, but most people watching this trailer are going to be general audience goers, and much like in the days before all this MCU stuff got started, most of them didn’t know who Iron Man or Captain America were, or they heard of them but knew very little about them. Doctor Strange is very much in a similar camp now for a lot of those people, so spelling out that this is an origin story, selling audiences on that first is a very smart choice. We get that through the shot at the beginning, and several other shots cut throughout the first half of the trailer, highlight that he was a surgeon, he got in a car accident, and he lost the proper use of his hands, and so now he’s searching the far reaches of the globe to find any means to get his craft back, only to discover that that part of his life is over, and now his true calling begins. That’s the biggest take away of what this trailer spells out for us in terms of story.
In terms of visuals, while it is a little reminiscent of a few things we’ve seen before (a few moments drew me back to Inception), this movie is clearly taking that and ramping it up to a whole other level, as we see that all of this is not a dream, but essentially reality, ours, other ones, ones parallel to our own, and it’s really trippy and I love it! Where the magic and the mystical and the inter-dimensional is all brand new territory for Marvel Studios in terms of really addressing it head on within the plot of a movie, not only is the story of Stephen Strange a perfect place to start from the sheer level of crazy amounts of magic, mysticism and whatnot that we’re going to see in this film, but also because we’re going to see it all through the eyes of a sceptic. A man of conviction to science and analysis; who trusts what he can experience with all of his senses. As he remark about in the trailer, he doesn’t “believe in the fairy tales about chakras or energies, or the power of belief” (a little rhetorical there Stevie). Many of the moviegoing audience members seeing this film will be entering it having seen some really grounded things, and yet have been able to be on board for some really crazy shit too (Thor, Guardians of the Galaxy, and Ant-Man), because they too were grounded in spite of their bizarre and outlandish premises. This trailer tells me that this movie will be no different.
We got a few shots of the main cast, Benedict Cumberbatch being highlighted the most of course, a quick shot of Rachel McAdams to pretty much just show that she’s in the movie, and our first glimpse of our still mysterious villain played by Mads Mikkelsen, and his sorcery. However, with the next most amount of screen time in the trailer, we got our first real glimpse of Tilda Swinton in the role of the Ancient One, who for those unaware, is Earth’s current sorcerer supreme, a role we can likely expect will be passed down to Stephen before the end of the film.
We see a couple shots of Chiwetel Ejifor as Baron Mordo, as well as a voiceover at the beginning of the trailer, “Stephen Strange, might I offer you some advice? Forget everything that you think you know.” That not only was some insight into a moment of the film, but it was also a call to the audience to forget everything they think they know about the MCU. While Captain America: Civil War is going to be changing the familiar landscape of what we’ve come to know from the mainline story of the MCU, into a new one for our progress forward into Phase 3, Doctor Strange is going to be changing the way we even think about the MCU as a whole. Thor opened our eyes to other realms out among the starts, Guardians of the Galaxy showed us just how vast it truly is out among those starts, and Ant-Man showed us that even in our own backyard, the smaller you get, the bigger the possibilities. Now Doctor Strange will be opening us up to a whole knew aspect that we haven’t even conceived of yet within the MCU.
I have watched plenty of trailers in my time. I have enjoyed all the fan discussions that have ensued from the various MCU trailers we’ve seen over the years. I can honestly say, even putting bias aside, because let’s face it, if this first trailer didn’t deliver, a hardcore fan like myself would be putting up a stink about it; without a shadow of a doubt, from hearing the eerie opening music, to Strange being forcibly astral projected, to the weird Inception-esque shot of New York, to the money shot of him walking up the steps within his Sanctum Sanctorum to top floor, where we see him in his full sorcerer’s garb, and the shot of the Window of the Worlds… This trailer has hyped me up for this movie, more than any other trailer for any other MCU movie. Not only does it satisfy my inner fanboy who’s been begging for this movie to be made for more than a decade, but it satisfies the movie goer in me, who wants a truly satisfying movie, and by god, this trailer truly delivers in capturing a look and feel of the movie, that reassures me, that both of those sides will be 100% satisfied; and this is only the teaser. Good lord, if this is just the beginning, I can only imagine what’s more to come.
Only 205 days from the initial trailer release before we will finally get to see what I can only expect to be a cinematic masterpiece. Doctor Strange everyone, coming to a theatre near you on November 4, 2016. Mark your calendars now!
Me after watching every Marvel trailer or movie
What is the evolutionary benefit or purpose of having periods? Why can’t women just get pregnant without the menstrual cycle?
Suzanne Sadedin, Ph.D. in evolutionary biology from Monash University
I’m so glad you asked. Seriously. The answer to this question is one of the most illuminating and disturbing stories in human evolutionary biology, and almost nobody knows about it. And so, O my friends, gather close, and hear the extraordinary tale of:
HOW THE WOMAN GOT HER PERIOD
Contrary to popular belief, most mammals do not menstruate. In fact, it’s a feature exclusive to the higher primates and certain bats*. What’s more, modern women menstruate vastly more than any other animal. And it’s bloody stupid (sorry). A shameful waste of nutrients, disabling, and a dead giveaway to any nearby predators. To understand why we do it, you must first understand that you have been lied to, throughout your life, about the most intimate relationship you will ever experience: the mother-fetus bond.
Isn’t pregnancy beautiful? Look at any book about it. There’s the future mother, one hand resting gently on her belly. Her eyes misty with love and wonder. You sense she will do anything to nurture and protect this baby. And when you flip open the book, you read about more about this glorious symbiosis, the absolute altruism of female physiology designing a perfect environment for the growth of her child.
If you’ve actually been pregnant, you might know that the real story has some wrinkles. Those moments of sheer unadulterated altruism exist, but they’re interspersed with weeks or months of overwhelming nausea, exhaustion, crippling backache, incontinence, blood pressure issues and anxiety that you’ll be among the 15% of women who experience life-threatening complications.
From the perspective of most mammals, this is just crazy. Most mammals sail through pregnancy quite cheerfully, dodging predators and catching prey, even if they’re delivering litters of 12. So what makes us so special? The answer lies in our bizarre placenta. In most mammals, the placenta, which is part of the fetus, just interfaces with the surface of the mother’s blood vessels, allowing nutrients to cross to the little darling. Marsupials don’t even let their fetuses get to the blood: they merely secrete a sort of milk through the uterine wall. Only a few mammalian groups, including primates and mice, have evolved what is known as a “hemochorial” placenta, and ours is possibly the nastiest of all.
Inside the uterus we have a thick layer of endometrial tissue, which contains only tiny blood vessels. The endometrium seals off our main blood supply from the newly implanted embryo. The growing placenta literally burrows through this layer, rips into arterial walls and re-wires them to channel blood straight to the hungry embryo. It delves deep into the surrounding tissues, razes them and pumps the arteries full of hormones so they expand into the space created. It paralyzes these arteries so the mother cannot even constrict them.
What this means is that the growing fetus now has direct, unrestricted access to its mother’s blood supply. It can manufacture hormones and use them to manipulate her. It can, for instance, increase her blood sugar, dilate her arteries, and inflate her blood pressure to provide itself with more nutrients. And it does. Some fetal cells find their way through the placenta and into the mother’s bloodstream. They will grow in her blood and organs, and even in her brain, for the rest of her life, making her a genetic chimera**.
This might seem rather disrespectful. In fact, it’s sibling rivalry at its evolutionary best. You see, mother and fetus have quite distinct evolutionary interests. The mother ‘wants’ to dedicate approximately equal resources to all her surviving children, including possible future children, and none to those who will die. The fetus ‘wants’ to survive, and take as much as it can get. (The quotes are to indicate that this isn’t about what they consciously want, but about what evolution tends to optimize.)
There’s also a third player here – the father, whose interests align still less with the mother’s because her other offspring may not be his. Through a process called genomic imprinting, certain fetal genes inherited from the father can activate in the placenta. These genes ruthlessly promote the welfare of the offspring at the mother’s expense.
How did we come to acquire this ravenous hemochorial placenta which gives our fetuses and their fathers such unusual power? Whilst we can see some trend toward increasingly invasive placentae within primates, the full answer is lost in the mists of time. Uteri do not fossilize well.
The consequences, however, are clear. Normal mammalian pregnancy is a well-ordered affair because the mother is a despot. Her offspring live or die at her will; she controls their nutrient supply, and she can expel or reabsorb them any time. Human pregnancy, on the other hand, is run by committee – and not just any committee, but one whose members often have very different, competing interests and share only partial information. It’s a tug-of-war that not infrequently deteriorates to a tussle and, occasionally, to outright warfare. Many potentially lethal disorders, such as ectopic pregnancy, gestational diabetes, and pre-eclampsia can be traced to mis-steps in this intimate game.
What does all this have to do with menstruation? We’re getting there.
From a female perspective, pregnancy is always a huge investment. Even more so if her species has a hemochorial placenta. Once that placenta is in place, she not only loses full control of her own hormones, she also risks hemorrhage when it comes out. So it makes sense that females want to screen embryos very, very carefully. Going through pregnancy with a weak, inviable or even sub-par fetus isn’t worth it.
That’s where the endometrium comes in. You’ve probably read about how the endometrium is this snuggly, welcoming environment just waiting to enfold the delicate young embryo in its nurturing embrace. In fact, it’s quite the reverse. Researchers, bless their curious little hearts, have tried to implant embryos all over the bodies of mice. The single most difficult place for them to grow was – the endometrium.
Far from offering a nurturing embrace, the endometrium is a lethal testing-ground which only the toughest embryos survive. The longer the female can delay that placenta reaching her bloodstream, the longer she has to decide if she wants to dispose of this embryo without significant cost. The embryo, in contrast, wants to implant its placenta as quickly as possible, both to obtain access to its mother’s rich blood, and to increase her stake in its survival. For this reason, the endometrium got thicker and tougher – and the fetal placenta got correspondingly more aggressive.
But this development posed a further problem: what to do when the embryo died or was stuck half-alive in the uterus? The blood supply to the endometrial surface must be restricted, or the embryo would simply attach the placenta there. But restricting the blood supply makes the tissue weakly responsive to hormonal signals from the mother – and potentially more responsive to signals from nearby embryos, who naturally would like to persuade the endometrium to be more friendly. In addition, this makes it vulnerable to infection, especially when it already contains dead and dying tissues.
The solution, for higher primates, was to slough off the whole superficial endometrium – dying embryos and all – after every ovulation that didn’t result in a healthy pregnancy. It’s not exactly brilliant, but it works, and most importantly, it’s easily achieved by making some alterations to a chemical pathway normally used by the fetus during pregnancy. In other words, it’s just the kind of effect natural selection is renowned for: odd, hackish solutions that work to solve proximate problems. It’s not quite as bad as it seems, because in nature, women would experience periods quite rarely – probably no more than a few tens of times in their lives between lactational amenorrhea and pregnancies***.
We don’t really know how our hyper-aggressive placenta is linked to the other traits that combine to make humanity unique. But these traits did emerge together somehow, and that means in some sense the ancients were perhaps right. When we metaphorically ‘ate the fruit of knowledge’ – when we began our journey toward science and technology that would separate us from innocent animals and also lead to our peculiar sense of sexual morality – perhaps that was the same time the unique suffering of menstruation, pregnancy and childbirth was inflicted on women. All thanks to the evolution of the hemochorial placenta.
https://www.quora.com/what-is-the-evolutionary-benefit-or-purpose-of-having-periods
science rules
@beaglebitch @graymindlove Science.
the more you know
Imagine your OTP
Originally posted by hypnotjcs
Saw Stephen Fry live last week, and he told us this story: Just after the first Harry Potter book had been released, he was offered the role of narrating it for audiobooks. He hadn’t read it, and was simply told it was a children’s book, so figured it would be an easy afternoons work. When he met JK Rowling, she mentioned that she was writing a sequel. Stephen replied very condescendingly “good for you”.
A few years down the line, the books are selling well, and he is doing the recording for the Prisoner of Azkaban, when he runs into the phrase “Harry pocketed it”. Stephen could not say this line. It always came out as “Harry pocketeded it”, unless he said it ridiculously slowly. They tried time and time again to get it right, but to no avail. Eventually, he called up JK and asked if he could say “Harry put it in his pocket” instead. She thought for a moment then said “no”, and hung up.
The phrase “Harry pocketed it” appeared in the next four books.
Raggedy man… Goodnight.
A person can get pregnant using 5 simultaneous methods of birth control and I will support their choice to abort.
A person can get pregnant by having unprotected sex with 5 people in the same day I will support their choice to abort.
A person can get pregnant by being raped and I will support their choice to abort.
A person can get pregnant every two months and get 6 abortions every year and I will ALWAYS support their choice to abort.
I will never judge them because it’s their fucking life and choice and body and it’s super shitty to judge another person for making choices that do not relate to me or my life in any way. That is what pro-choice means.
(ETA: and if you are still trying to make excuses in order to find the extenuating circumstances in which you should be able to judge them or that should prevent them from getting abortions, you aren’t not as pro-choice as you think you are)