Becoming Elizabeth + Men's fashion Request by anon
almost home

❣ Chile in a Photography ❣
NASA
taylor price

izzy's playlists!

Kaledo Art

#extradirty
Sweet Seals For You, Always

No title available

pixel skylines

tannertan36
Not today Justin
2025 on Tumblr: Trends That Defined the Year
DEAR READER
RMH

@theartofmadeline
tumblr dot com
he wasn't even looking at me and he found me
Peter Solarz
No title available

seen from United States

seen from United States
seen from United States

seen from United States
seen from France
seen from United States

seen from France

seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from South Africa
seen from United States
seen from United States

seen from Türkiye
seen from United States
seen from United States

seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States

seen from United States
@kingedwardvi
Becoming Elizabeth + Men's fashion Request by anon
One more… Whoa! Is that Jude Law as Henry VIII?! Looking great! Better than I had hoped tbh.
Will we see Edward and Jane, I wonder?
Jessica Raine as Katherine Parr
Becoming Elizabeth 1.03 (2022)
Jane Seymour, Queen of England, announces the birth of her son, the future English king Edward VI, at St Edward’s Day (12 October)
“Right trusty and well beloved, we greet you well, and for as much as by the inestimable goodness and grace of Almighty God, we be delivered and brought in childbed of a Prince, conceived in most lawful matrimony between my lord the King's Majesty and us, doubting not but that for the love and affection which you bear unto us and to the commonwealth of this realm, the knowledge thereof should be joyous and glad tidings unto you, we have thought good to certify you of the same, to the intent you might not only render unto God condign thanks and prayers for so great a benefit but also pray for the long continuance and preservation of the same here in this life to the honor of God, joy and pleasure of my lord the King and us, and the universal weal, quiet and tranquility of this whole realm.
Given under our signet at my lord's manor of Hampton Court the 12th day of October.”
“Of all the wives of Henry VIII, the one most often misunderstood, if not largely ignored, is Katherine Parr. Her story, as usually told – when told at all – lacks the romance of 'sex-bombs' Anne Boleyn or Catherine Howard; the heroic fortitude of Catherine of Aragon; the political intrigue surrounding the lives of Jane Seymour and Anne of Cleves. Wife number six is famous for 'surviving'. She was the twice-widowed, matronly bluestocking who patiently, submissively (and boringly?) tended the sick, aged, irascible king through the painful last years of his life and then disappeared from the 'front page' of history. The truth, however, is much more complicated. For my money Katherine was the cleverest, most devout and – yes – passionate of Henry VIII's bedfellows.” (Derek Wilson)
Indeed, he did make Henry Grey into a fool. I think the producers did on purpose since over the centuries the Greys are often the scapegoat for the fate of Lady Jane.
“Since we have received nothing from our first parents wherein we may glory”, Edward wrote in a telling statement of how he had come to view the tyranny and excesses of Henry VIII’s reign, “I am compelled, reverend father, since I have been called, by Divine Goodness and your agency and ministry, to this connection in Christ and a partaking of the gospel, daily to give thanks to God for his infinite and unbounded (though underserved) bounty towards me.”
—Edward VI, King of England (1547-1553), to reformer Martin Bruce. In: SKIDMORE, C. “Edward VI: The Lost King of England”.
KATHERINE PARR & EDWARD VI BECOMING ELIZABETH (2022-)
Curiously enough, I’ve only recently watched “Becoming Elizabeth” as I’ve concomitantly read Edward VI’s biography.
It is hardly a surprise to observe there were great differences between the show and the book, specially concerning Katheryn Parr and Thomas Seymour’s own relationship.
Admittedly, though I know little of this matter myself, came across the excerpt below which gave me a lot to think about. For those who are little familiar with the first Dowager Queen of England in an almost a century (the last being Queen Elizabeth Wideville), the following content might actually come a surprise—or not.
What matters here is to promote not only a healthy discussion about their union, but showing that whereas Katheryn did love the man, she was not his first option to marry and she was not a “fool” completely blinded by her affection for him: she hesitated at first, unwilling to remarry in at least two years before becoming Lady Seymour out of respect for the king of England. However, Lord Thomas was a persuasive man, writing as far as a poem to claim the dowager queen’s heart—and he eventually succeeded it, as we are seeing next.
“Katherine moved into her dower house at Chelsea - away from the eyes at court, it was the ideal setting for Seymour to pay secret visits by night. Letters were sent and received, their contents, upon Katherine's urging, were quickly burnt: 'Your letter being finished ... I remembered your commandment to me’, Seymour wrote, ‘wherewith I threw it into the fire, be minding to keep your requests and desires’, yet the survival of both their letters suggest that neither was quite so willing to part with these tokens of love and affection.
Katherine confided her feelings to her friend Lady Paget, who urged marriage. But Katherine was hesitant. She wished 'it had been her fate to have him for a husband' but she was mindful of her position as queen. She had even kept the affair secret from her sister Anne who, when Katherine finally revealed the news, 'did not a little rejoice'.
As a growing number of friends discovered the secret of the affair, it became increasingly difficult to keep it hidden and rumours soon abounded. Meeting Seymour in St James's Park, Princess Elizabeth's servant Katherine Ashley challenged him over his marriage plans. Seymour boasted 'he would prove to have the queen', to which Ashley retorted that she thought this 'was past proof as I had heard he was already married to her'.
Ashley was right, for sometime between mid May and the beginning of June the couple had wed in secret, with one commentator believing the marriage had taken place as early as thirty-four days after Henry's death.
If this was true, then Katherine was playing a dangerous game - if she had become pregnant, there would have been no certainty that the child was Seymour's or Henry's. Katherine remained unwilling to commit herself, having doubts to the last.
She claimed she was his 'loving wife in her heart' but was determined 'never to marry, and break it when I have done, if I live two years'. Nevertheless, Seymour got his way. News of their marriage could not stay secret for long.
'I wish the world was as well pleased with our meaning as lam well assured [of ] the goodness of God's’, Katherine had lamented, 'but the world is so wicked that it cannot be contented with good things’. Instead she suggested that they find support for their union amongst the most powerful members of the council and court.
Seymour tested Princess Mary's reaction. It was not good. Mary considered it 'strange news', writing that if Katherine was keen, there was little she could do. In any case, 'being a maid' she was 'nothing cunning' about 'wooing matters'.
Instead, Mary appealed to her dead father's memory: if Katherine was not willing, certainly she would not 'persuade her to forget the loss of him, who is as yet very ripe in mine own remembrance’. Privately Mary was horrified at the prospect, and blamed Katherine for the affair. She possibly even appealed to Elizabeth to discourage the queen, but her half-sister, not wishing to stir up trouble, told her that they lacked any influence at court and should suffer with patience what was impossible to prevent.
Seymour would have to look elsewhere for support and he knew precisely whom to turn to. His confidence rested in the fact that he had managed to remain in regular contact with Edward through John Fowler, a Gentleman of the Privy Chamber, whom Seymour gave a bribe of £10 (£3,000) shortly after the coronation and before long was in his regular pay. Despite being almost continually in the presence of other gentlemen of the chamber, Fowler was soon able to converse with Edward and soon struck up a close friendship with the king, speaking to him alone.
It was not long before Seymour was calling in the favours. At the end of February he had met with Fowler over a drink and asked whether Edward had mentioned him - and in particular whether the king had ever wondered why he had remained unmarried. Would Edward be happy for him to marry? And who should he take as his bride?
Without asking too many questions, Fowler approached Edward a few days later, somewhat unsubtly repeating Seymour's queries. Edward's first reply was to suggest Anne of Cleves, but then, giving the matter more serious attention, answered that he thought Mary to be the best choice, if only 'to change her opinions'.
When Seymour heard, he laughed. 'I pray you, Mr Fowler, if you may soon, ask his Grace if he could be contented I should marry the Queen.’ He also wanted to know if Edward would write a letter on his behalf in support of the marriage.
It was at this time that Seymour, without Fowler's knowledge, began to visit Edward in private. It was not long before he had persuaded him to write a letter to Katherine, dated 25 June. Despite Edward writing to Katherine at the end of May urging her to 'continue to love my father', now the king seemingly endorsed her relationship with Seymour, since the letter ingeniously made their marriage appear as Edward's personal request to Katherine.
Moreover, it gave specific assurance that Edward would safeguard Katherine against any reaction from Somerset, who the couple knew would be furious at their secret union: 'Wherefore ye shall not need to fear any grief to come, or to suspect lack of aid in need; seeing that he, being mine uncle, is so good in nature that he will not be troublesome ... if any grief shall befall, I shall be a sufficient succour.'
The entire letter was no doubt composed by Seymour, who probably dictated it to the king.(…) When news of his brother's marriage leaked out, Somerset was furious. Edward's blessing made Somerset all the more enraged, and the king was not immune from the brunt of his anger, noting in his journal that 'the Lord Protector was much offended’.
But it was his wife Anne, the Duchess of Somerset, who took the greatest offence to the union. Described as 'a woman for many imperfections intolerable, and for pride monstrous, subtle and violent' who held Somerset under her sway 'by persuasions cunningly intermixed with tears', she detested Katherine.”
SKIDMORE, C. “Edward VI: The Lost King of England”.
“I would not have you to think that this mine honest goodwill towards you to proceed of any sudden motion or passion.” For her mind “had been fully bent the other time I was at liberty to marry you before any man I know.”
—Katheryn Parr, Dowager Queen of England, in a letter to Thomas Seymour, Lord Admiral of England and Baron Sudeley.
This excerpt is found in “Edward VI: The Lost King of England”.
•Edward VI’s relationship with his father, King Henry VIII.•
We are more than aware that Henry VIII’s relationship with his daughters, queens Mary I and Elizabeth I, were turbulent, affecting not only their queenships but their own relationship. However, what is not often discussed is the impact Henry VIII’s relationship with his son Edward left on him.
More than often we think that, because Edward was his father’s favourite child, he earned his attention more often. However, this is not true. Henry VIII rarely saw his “precious” and noble son, over whom he expected to carry on the Tudor dynasty. This is too much a pressure to rely on a child, even so to one born in royalty. Edward played a double effort to outstand his peers in education and not rarely did he try to make his regal father proud. The future young king also wrote him letters—letters that were not answered because his father was often away to write him back. We are also told that, through his education, he was not only instructed to emule Henry VIII’s virtues, but also to avoid his vices. Overall, this is a boy trying to earn his absent father’s praises, trying to look at his image in order to be not good, but excellent in every subject—whether being in Latin or in other fields of life.
Skidmore, thus, presents how this relationship impacted deeply in Edward VI’s years before king, an impact that left unseen scars as we come to know whenever we study Mary I and Elizabeth I’s lives and their respective reigns. As we see on the following excerpts of his biography of Edward VI:
“But it was the ever-dominant figure of his father who left him truly awestruck. Whilst Henry had been absent on campaign in France, Edward worried whether to write, lest he disturb him with his 'boyish letters'. Eventually he summoned the courage, writing how he hoped his letter would bring Henry refreshment after his weary campaign, 'For, seeing you are a loving and kind father to me ... I hope I shall prove to you a most dutiful son’. A week later he wrote again, this time wishing peace, 'because I should hope to visit you sooner, and because you would have rest and recreation'.
All these were no doubt genuine expressions of a son's love starved of affection by his absent father. He was anxious, he told Henry, 'to be assured that you are safe and well; for, though I have some reliance on the hearing of the ear, yet I have more confidence in my own eyes'.
Henry did not reply, but wrote to Katherine instead to relay the news of his successful siege at Boulogne, adding, 'I am too busy to write more but send blessings to all my children’. When Henry finally returned from France, Edward wrote to his father overjoyed: 'I have heard that I am to visit your majesty ... I now obtain my second wish. My first wish was, that you and your kingdom might have peace; and secondly, that I might see you. These done, I shall be happy.’
There is no evidence that Henry ever bothered to reply, but in the only expression of affection he knew, he continued to lavish his son with expensive presents, which Edward gratefully acknowledged, writing: 'You have treated me so kindly, like a most loving father, and one who would wish me always to act rightly. I also thank you that you have given me great and costly gifts, as chains, rings, jewelled buttons, neck-chains, and breast-pins, and necklaces, garments, and very many other things; in which things and gifts is conspicuous your fatherly affection towards me; for, if you did not love me, you would not give me these fine gifts of jewellery.’
Henry's magnificent tastes were fashioning Edward's own lifestyle. The prince had grown up surrounded by splendour and beauty; the walls of his rooms were hung with Flemish tapestries depicting classical and biblical scenes that Henry had confiscated from Cardinal Wolsey; he ate only from the finest quality cutlery, set with precious stones (...). His clothes were fashioned only from the best materials - delicate cloths of gold embroidered with silver that sparkled with pearls, emeralds, diamonds and rubies, so much so that one French observer later recalled how when Edward moved through the court, entire rooms sparkled. Even the buttons of his clothes were made from solid gold and his caps were garnished with diamonds and sapphires, but perhaps his most prized possession was a dagger of gold that he wore hung from a rope of pearls, its sheath garnished with dia-monds, rubies and emeralds, with a large speckled green stone embedded in the hilt.
It is probably this dagger that Edward holds in a portrait painted at Ashridge around 1546. Standing between a windowsill and an ornate classical styled column, Edward's puffed up poise is as entirely contrived as that of his father's. One can almost imagine the artist directing the prince to hold his shoulders high and breathe deeply, staring straight at the easel. To create the effect, the many layers of Edward's clothes seem too large for him, heavy and burdensome.
But the symbolism of the picture rides above the implausibility of the situation, for its message is that Edward will inherit Henry's mantle as king to continue the Tudor dynasty. No more clearly is this highlighted than in the position of Edward's left hand, directing the viewer's attention to his modest but nevertheless prominent codpiece, a symbol of his increasing virility and power as he approached adolescence and adulthood.
In fact, few could have realized then that within a year Edward would have taken his father's place as king. In August 1546 Henry decided that Edward, not quite nine years old, should perform his first official duty, receiving the French Admiral on his arrival for a state visit at Hampton Court. It was to be his first royal rite of passage and Edward's induction into the ceremonial life at court.
He prepared assiduously, nervously writing to Katherine - did the Admiral understand Latin? 'For, if he does, I should wish to learn further what I may say to him’. Above all, he did not want to let his father down.
He had prayed to God, he told Katherine, that he would be able to satisfy his expectations.”
SKIDMORE, C. “Edward VI: The Lost King of England”.
“For the next few years, Edward’s household led an itinerant journey through some of the many smaller royal palaces and hunting lodges that Henry possessed on the outskirts of London. It was a life devoted to leisure and enjoyment. On his removal to Hunsdon around Easter 1540, Lady Bryan wrote to Cromwell informing him as she was accostumed to, of Edward’s progress:
‘My Lord Prince’s grace is in good health and merry… his grace danced and played so wantonly that he could not stand still and was full of pretty toys as ever I saw child in my life’.
Mary continued her visits, spoiling her brother with presents. Elizabeth was less generous, demonstrating a early habit for thrift for which she would become readily noted, but her gifts were no less thoughtful, for each year she sent her brother a cambric shirt that she had made herself.”
“Edward VI: The Lost Tudor King of England”, Chris Skidmore.
“We verily believe, and so do you we dare to say, that he mind no hurt; if in government he hath not so discreetly used himself as your opinions he might have done, we think the extremity in such a case is not to be acquired at his hand. Yet it lieth in us to remit it. For he is our uncle whom you know we love.”
—Edward VI (tenure: 1547-1553), in a letter written to his council during the opposition leaded by the Earl of Warwick and the Duke of Somerset. This letter may have been oriented by William Paget and Archbishop Thomas Cranmer.
“I will say with certain intention that I will see my laws strictly obeyed, and those who break them shall be watched and denounced.”
—Edward VI, King of England (1547-1553), to his sister lady Mary (1516-1558).