JJBA: Golden Days @kitsu-iraka - Tumblr Blog

Posts

iguanastevens

What to do when you don’t like a fic: a step by step guide

Step 1:

reiner-is-back-bitches

Amazing tutorial I recommend to everyone!

maybeitstimetoearnmybluebead

And the sequel, what to do if there is an entire rating/warning/character/ship/tag you don’t like and don’t want to read…

arrowsbane

Heck yes. Remember your laws of fandom people. Don’t like it, don’t read it. Check your tags. No kink shaming - your kink is not my kink. Ship and let ship! 🚢

hajnarus

#jjba #jojo #jotaro kujo #jojo no kimyou na bouken #noriaki kakyoin #jjba polnareff #fem kakyoin

hajnarus

nyeh

#jjba #jojo #Jotaro Kujo #Jolyne Kujo #Josuke Higashikata #Okuyasu Nijimura #Koichi Hirose #Rohan Kishibe

memeasaurus-promptus

Please Reblog This If It’s Okay To:

Send questions about yourself

Ask questions to/about your characters

Ask about your headcanons

Send questions about your works (fanfics, art, music, RPs, etc)

Ask about popular ships/headcanons

Ask about plot ideas you’ve had but haven’t acted upon yet (snippets of AUs, a scenario you wish to write/draw but haven’t gotten to yet)

Questions about other ships/headcanons that aren’t as popular or are rarepairs

Questions or comments about favorite tropes, headcanons, characters, foods, weather, or anything else you are okay in answering!

porunareff

JOJO World event will give you the possibility to have a virtual roleplay with Rohan Kishibe

That’s right, if the one-shots, OVAs and live action series haven’t satisfied you and you just can’t get enough of the trash mangaka, you’re in luck!

The upcoming JoJo amusement center JOJO World has announced that one of the available attractions for visitors is called “Let’s go to the Mangaka’s House” (much like the manga chapter in which Rohan was first introduced).

In this interactive attraction, you will be invited by Rohan to tell a story in the hopes of having it be turned into a manga. You’ll be able to answer some of his questions by speaking into the monitor where he is and depending on your answers you’ll get one of multiple possible endings to this roleplay.

This :･ﾟ✧experience✧･ﾟ: will be priced at ¥1100 and costumers will then receive the Dark Pink Boy notebook as a souvenir.

#JoJo's Bizarre Adventure #jjba #Rohan Kishibe #Jojo no Kimyou na Bouken #jojo

zizigy

Florist/Tattoo Artist Josuhan AU for Valentines!

#Josuhan #Rohan Kishibe #Josuke Higashikata

fritturadiparanza

Chillin’ twitter

#josuhan #josuke x rohan #rohan kishibe #josuke higashitaka #jjba

immoramore

Rohan and that famose flowers he'd got from Josuke :)

#rohan kishibe

the-final-sif

I try to stay away from a lot of fandom discourse, but since I’ve been seeing this on my dash again and in tags, I feel the need to make a statement on this, particularly for any young fans who follow me that might get drawn into this mindset.

Stay away from purity culture. Warn your friends away from it too, if you see them starting to fall for it. It’s very easy to get drawn into it

Almost always, it starts with one of three roots, pedophilia, incest and/or abuse. Usually it’s pedophilia. Funnily enough, that’s also what congress usually uses to try to justify passing bills that undermine online privacy & security. Because it’s an easy, extreme target, and when people attempt to argue against it, it’s nice and easy to say “Oh so you like pedophilia” rather then actually engaging with their argument.

The logic goes like this, although there’s many forms of it.

“Pedophilia is bad.” -> Obviously, you agree with this. You’re a reasonable person, and the idea that anyone would do something like that to a child is horrible. This is a normal human reaction.

“Because pedophilia is bad, all fictional explorations of it must be equally bad.” -> Here you might hesitate, but it adds up, doesn’t it? The thought of pedophilia in any context probably gives you a bad feeling, that makes you inclined to go along with this logic.

“Anyone who creates content with a fictional exploration of pedophilia is also bad.” -> Maybe you pause here, or maybe you don’t. But still, it adds up, it’s a very easy flow. After all, we’ve decided that that is Bad, so why would anyone Good want to create something like that?

“Since people who create content with a fictional exploration of pedophilia are just as bad as people who engage in pedophilia in real life, it’s okay to harm them.” -> Here’s where you might pause again. The argument might not win you over entirely, you might not be willing to do harm yourself, but you may be a lot more willing to turn a blind eye to harm being done to someone. Or to consider it ‘justified’.

The pattern now repeats for anything else that’s considered “morally impure”, and “pedophilia” is expanded and expanded, often to ridiculous points, such as merely shipping two underage characters. “Abuse” becomes any ship that the person pushing doesn’t like, for any reason. And so on and so forth.

This is the foundation of “anti” culture, and it’s important to be aware of it so you can catch this false equivocation. Fictional explorations of something, are not the same as the thing itself. Fictional explorations are fiction. The characters are not real people. There is no actual harm being done. Equating fake harm and real harm is a dangerous, slippery slope, which leads us to fundamentally flawed ideas of moral purity. It’s a form of controlling people & making them feel guilty for their very thoughts, rather than holding people accountable for their actions.

A very handy trick for when you encounter this sort of argument, is to replace whatever the selected purity term is with murder. After all, we can all agree that murder is bad, but at the same time, we understand that a murder in a book =/= a murder in real life.

Let’s see that argument again, shall we?

“Murder is bad”

“Because murder is bad, all fictional explorations of it must be equally bad.”

“Anyone who creates content with a fictional exploration of murder is also bad.”

“Since people who create fictional explorations of murder are just as bad as the people who commit murder in real life, it’s okay to harm them.”

Hopefully, it’s now easy to see why the above argument is fundamentally flawed.

Keep your eye out for purity culture in your fandom spaces, and when you see it, refuse to engage with it. Warn your friends if you see them falling into the same traps, although try to be kind about it; this is a very easy thought pattern to fall into. I don’t recommend trying to argue/debate anti’s. The attention only feeds them. Block them instead. Don’t let people control or shame you for what you create or consume, and don’t control or shame others for what they create or consume.

Also, as a note, let me be clear about something. If you are uncomfortable with any of the above discussed things, or anything in general in fiction (ie, underage ships, murder, incest, abuse, penguins, needles, etc), that’s perfectly fine (it’s also called a squick, for those that haven’t heard that term before). Absolutely control your fandom experience by blocking people, filtering tags, unfollowing, etc. However, just because you are uncomfortable with something, does not give you the right to control other people. Other people have no right to control what content you create or consume, and you have no right to do that to them either.

Okay?