Finding a Classicist in a Liberal
The Victorian Poetry class keeps my blood boil on a frigid Monday morning.
The woods decay, the woods decay and fall,
The vapours week their burthen to the ground,
Man comes and tills the field and lies beneath,
And after many a summer dies the swan.
Me only cruel immortality
Consumes: I wither slowly in thine arms,
...
The opening lines of Tennysonâs âTithonusâ grab my heart immediately: the calm, reflective lyric in the first four lines, almost Wordsworthian, only to be followed by a yearning voice of a soul, parched by his desire to die yet unable to do so.
How can one not be humbled by a genius poet like Tennyson? How can one not be blown away?
Sometimes I feel that being a classicist in literature and the arts inevitably makes one conservative, almost reactionary. If the best and the most glorious have already existed, only to dwarf whatever we have in this age and day, how can we not long for the past and possibly seek its restoration? In other words, if truth is already witnessed in the past, what benefits can future progress bring about?
I donât consider myself a classicist (mainly due to deficiency of intellect but also perhaps out of personal volition), but I can see its appeal. It is why T. S. Eliot claims himself a âclassical in literature, royalist in politics, and Anglo-Catholic in religion.â His lifelong effort in modern literature seeks to add to and integrate with the literary tradition, rather than to rebel against it. And it is also clearly reflected in his politics.
I often wonder how liberal intellectuals (not liberal ideologues) grapple with this dilemma: the recognition of equality for all and the notion that some sort of hierarchy should be maintained in the normative world in order to provide aesthetic or moral guidance. How do we ensure that people have their utmost freedom to like either Shakespearean plays or âFifty Shades of Greyâ, but in the meantime also instill a sense of value as which is more superior to the other? This may not matter to everyone. But to the learned class devoted to seek higher meanings in life, total equality and hierarchy seem to be in conflict every now and then.
I scribbled down similar thoughts about a month ago:
Being a liberal is not the same as being a relativist. The decree of âegaliteâ extends to the political, social and economic realms in so far as rights and access are concerned. Participants in the intellectual realm all, covertly or otherwise, worship and seek to establish some kin of pedigree, which the modern liberalism - especially when manifest in the political and social context - seeks to demolish. While the decree of free market preaches the psalm of no barrier to entry, barrier is all there is to define intellectualism.
But this is a topic to be expounded in more depth for another day.
Sorry I digressed. I only meant to say that I love my poetry class this semester. Itâs snowing gently outside right now, wet and large snowflakes. My room is lit with yellow lights. Iâm overcome by sense of peace and calm :)