The only way to conquer your fears is to dream about them.
- Myself & fellow friend Dimitrios TomTom III

izzy's playlists!
Fai_Ryy
Misplaced Lens Cap

oozey mess
PUT YOUR BEARD IN MY MOUTH

bliss lane
NASA
🩵 avery cochrane 🩵
occasionally subtle
Lint Roller? I Barely Know Her

Love Begins
official daine visual archive
𓃗

PR's Tumblrdome
No title available

@theartofmadeline
No title available
sheepfilms
No title available
Claire Keane
seen from United Kingdom

seen from Indonesia
seen from United States

seen from United States
seen from Türkiye
seen from Singapore
seen from France

seen from Russia

seen from United States
seen from South Africa
seen from Austria
seen from United States
seen from United States

seen from United States
seen from Germany
seen from China
seen from France
seen from United States
seen from Panama

seen from Türkiye
@lordsavethequeen-blog
The only way to conquer your fears is to dream about them.
- Myself & fellow friend Dimitrios TomTom III
Sorry for double post - but this picture was too funny
TOOK A WHILE!
Fact or Fiction?
Crying and ejaculating release the same hormones in terms of muscle tension.
Marvel vs. DC
READ THIS IF YOU WANNA JOIN THE DEBATE NO MATTER WHO YOU ARE!
This isn't a post as much as it is a debate or a thought gathering. I know most of you who read this will be on Facebook therefore it is fine to answer on Facebook. I will post the results if I see that a significant amount of debate occured (I sure do hope it does though!). As you can tell by the title, it is Marvel vs DC. This debate has been going on from years on end. I don't care if you know nothing about superheroes, I respect (as if) every contribution to this post. You can give me a reason why Marvel or DC is better like the artists, the storylines, the spinoffs, the characters; or you can be just as simple as marking down who your favorite superhero is if you don't know much about the two enterprises! I will be glad to hear/see/read the results!
Off to you my mates! Cheers
Scientific Rant
So the other day I was sitting down enjoying a generous dose of vegetables and onions at my newly favorited food joint on campus: Cultures. I was with my fellow classmates and friends Vickramjit and Marc-Antoine (if you didn't laugh, it means you didn't notice that this was a multicultural lunch at a place called cultures; come on guys, you really gotta start catching my jokes). Funnies aside, we were having a well lit conversation about evolution vs creationism. Now don't me wrong, I am not saying I believe that one of these theories is better than the other, but we definitely know which one is the most plausible.
Instead of argue my points and try to get my knowledge accross as I so often seem to do, I will rebutt (is that the verb for rebutal?) the points that this not so young man brought up after overhearing our conversation and trying to stick in his views.
He initially caught us when we were leaving because that was obviously the last chance he had. He stopped us by saying how he would like to believe in evolution, and he does, but there is something before that must have happened which he is assuming is creation. I will list a few of his key comments and then rebutt them in the butt:
- A cell is a very complex structure. It's as if a city was just built spontaneously and we all know how unprobable that is.
- If everything happened in order, then fossils would be here to prove it and we have no fossils that act as intermediate stages. For example, you have a bird and you have a fish, but there is nothing in between like a birdfish or anything.
- Something or someone must have put these creatures here on Earth.
I only listed three because three is such a sacred and religious number and I wanted to somewhat have decency for religion. I am somewhat a believer in a God and I do believe parts of the Bible and whatnot, but there are some aspects of it that I unfortunately cannot believe due to my knowledge of science. A famous astronomer and biologist once said that it is unfortunate that people don't know the truth about the Earth and the creation of it and they still believe that God put Adam and Eve on Earth. They just need to be educated. Not that I don't want people to believe in religion, but I do think knowledge is one of the most sacred things a man can have. And so here I go!
Let's begin with my weakest argument: Something/one must have put these creatures here on Earth. Alright, I have no evidence to disprove this theory and that is why religion is a very delicate topic. There is nearly no way of disproving any theory in religion since they are all possible, just not plausible. Here is what I do have to say though. If God put Adam and Eve on this planet (or any other creature), why restrict it to Earth? Through the years we have come to the conclusion that there actually are other habitable celestial bodies in our OWN solar system. Why would God have chosen Earth? If you want to go with the whole Earth is ideal talk, then fine, but there are at least two other bodies in the solar system that can easily support life, one of them a very close neighbour to Earth. I am not God, therefore I do not know what choices he makes, but I would assume that if he were to create humans, he would try to make a few species and sprinkle them around. Maybe he didn't because he knew we could evolve and he didn't want us to discover life anywhere else for our own survival, but then again, he wouldn't have made us live in a solar system that is gonna die out eventually (unless he has this whole like I CAN TELL THE FUTURE vibe going on and he knows what path we are following).
As you can see, my first rebutal wasn't glorious, but my others are more thought out. Fossilization and finding fossils of intermediate breeds? I don't know where this guy is getting his facts but we have clearly spotted changes in dated fossils of the same species. This indicates that we are clearly evolving in one way or another. Another problem here is, everything disintegrates. I do not merely mean the whole nuclear clock going off and carbon's half-life science talk. I mean bones will turn to dust eventually, so we can't obviously trace back fossils unless animals were smart enough to mumify themselves...
The problem here is that we have so many different species that walk the Earth, sorry for the expression. Some may say that the differences between each creature is so grave that it can't be "natural". Some animals have backbones and some don't (this was one of my arguer's points). That is a huge difference. I understand that it is rare that so many species can evolve just from specs of dust but it is possible, which leads me to my last rebutal.
The complexity of a city? Have you seen what we know about the universe? Yes these are very big objects and they are generally not complex but there is still a level of, how may I call this, CRAZINESS going on when everything is formed. Just looking at stars, which is a bunch of shit burning, we have more than 10 different kinds of ways a star can burn, form and gather. Planets look completely different in our solar system, let alone other galaxies. There is a huge difference and complexity behind every body encountered so far, and the fact that a living cell or organism is so complex means nothing. Luck does exist and you would assume after billions of years of existing, some cells were able to form and split and recreate themselves.
Heat is one of the most magical things in the universe because it can make so many different reactions occur. After tons of years, some atoms and molecules are bound to come together and form bigger, badder and better molecules which in turn combine with others. Yes a cell is complex, but it is very likely for these cells to form. Scientifically, every atom has a bonding energy and feels "friendly" with other atoms. They combine together and form cells. From there on, they just keep building and building. At some point, natural selection occurs where the better cells survive and the others don't. This is also the obvious reason why creatures are so different. Animals didn't all just get planted. They initially all evolve from the same concept and differnet mutations occur throughout the way. A rat gets bigger and becomes a pig with time. A pig gets bigger and becomes a cow. A cow feels fat so he tries to lose weight but just ends up getting a long skinny neck and becoming a giraffe. You can have hours of fun trying to see how an animal formed and most hypotheses can be true, and this is because we cannot date as back as the formation of certain species.
The fact is these chemical reactions clearly occured and we can recreate them aswell. We can actually create life ourselves and we are not God. There are unlikelihoods to arise, but after billions of years in such a ginormous location, I think it's safe to say that life is very probable and clearly evolutionary. I don't want to put down those creationists or anything, but I just strongly can see how evolution DID happen and it will keep happening and milleniums from now we might have completely different creatures. The point of the matter is some people are unaware of how science goes by and the technology we have reached to be able to prove what the universe is capable of. If we have reached such a point where man can gather enough material to create miniature black holes, it's safe to say that the creation of life wasn't THAT lucky. People need to be aware of what has happened on our planet, because that is all we have...
We cannot tell you if there is life anywhere else just yet, but astronomers are more than positive that this is the case. Saying humans are the only life here would be selfish, especially since our conditions weren't even that perfect for creation of life. Other planets in the universe have it better than us and probably have way cooler shit than we do and we just don't want to be jealous.
Point is that where we're living now, we have to understand how we got here or else we'll never be able to see where we're going to end up.
Crying Wolf
We all know and love to accuse people of crying wolf? Why? Human nature loves to show-off and when you go to the aid of someone who didn't really need it, you feel compelled to call them out on it. You would think the winner that comes out of this situation is the crier. This is untrue.
The person who answers the cry not only demonstrates the capability to help, but also has the pleasure of bringing someone partially down for having cried wolf. On the facade, that is what seems to be the case; unfortunately, we live in a society where ignorance reigns and people never look past the big picture.
How is crying wolf fun? Well it's a small prank to tease a buddy, but it's one of those pranks that is neither THAT funny nor lasts THAT long. You cannot dwell on the humor that arises from crying wolf.
What people neglect is that crying wolf doesn't mean the person faked being in danger. It means the person pretended there was a wolf. If the world consisted of only wolves then it would be understandable to commonly make this joke; but it isn't. Crying wolf is often a cry for help that one is too scared to even cry about. So to mask the pain, we cry for an imaginary fear to try to numb the pain we so desperately are trying to avoid.
A fair amount of times, this is the case; one cries wolf because he or she is afraid to cry to reality. Reality never ceases to scare people, therefore we mask our fear with others. Sensitivity escapes the mind and so does ration. But why be rational when we can just gloat? Why care about others when we can care about ourselves?
Since I've been MIA for so long, I'll let my readers into a little secret...
Thoughts of a Living Agnostic
I'll start off by saying welcome back to myself after a treacherous (took me a minute to find out how to spell that word) lapse and disappearance. I want to apologize to many of few followers about how I have not been in the best condition to blog due to a little sickness I had and my very badly organized schedule.
On that note, I'm back now and I will start with a more serious thought than my usual cosmo-modern-post-sexual-anti-derogatory posts. This little rant will be about personality and history and experience and everything having to do with the dreadful thought which is IDENTITY.
Who are we? What makes us who we are? No, this isn't a question to God as to "WHY ARE WE HERE GOD, WHERE ARE WE GOING?" although many of the points I might bring up do have a certain religionous aspect to them, but none directly affiliated. What makes a person who they really are?
We start off my examining the obvious and easy part: genes. People get a pocketfull of genes (saw what I did there?) when they are born, some scribed with looks, some with senses, others with thoughts and a fair amount on personality. Personality IS genetic is what I've thought to myself. Over the decades of years I've been alive, I have come to realize multiple similarities between my parents and I when it comes to a various array of personality traits, ranging from intelligence to humor to even genorosity and such. Some may argue that personality is a very complex matter that cannot be merely transmitted by genes, but many of evidence suggest that there is a clear link between sperm, egg and the way you beat your wife at nights.
From genes, people argue that personality is a question of environment, of what a person goes through as a baby, kid, adolescent, adult that all help shape him into the man he eventually is known to be. My thoughts are that we should seperate a big part of what most call personality from a notion that is beyond it. Personality is a process of thought, where you think about who you are, you have a general outline of what kind of person you want to be for a day or throughout mundane events, but it is not what guides a person to save someone from an oncoming bus or a pack of werewolves. I would call this section of our brain: the Temporary. The Temporary [T], to me, is a set of codes inscribed in our mind that we tend to never discover except in very rare events. Due to my prior example, you may be thinking T had to do with life and death situations, but it doesn't. T can range from a large number of events that most people, like I said previously, just never go through. I'm going to leave this part vague, because T is the very concentrated section of ourselves that doesn't appear too relevant in most people's identities, but sometimes it contributes a lot.
What contributes I would say the most to me is experience. You cannot define experience if you've never experienced yourself. The definition of the word is in the word itself. Ergo, the person you are is the person you become. Life happens so fast for most of the time and we usually do not have time to take our personality into account. Like I said, personality to me is a thought process. It's a what kind of person do I want to be globally, but how many people know you for more than 5 hours? They don't get to know your personality, they get to know your experience.
Let me elaborate! When an events occurs and you do not have time to think about it, you have a so called reaction. This reaction is what I mean by experience. When you see someone you know in the wild, depending on how well you know them, you may say hi or you may not. Over a period of time, you pick out the type of people you can say hello to and the rest you try to ignore or casually walk by. This begins with a reaction, and the thought process follows the reaction. Ergo, you did not have time to think about what you did, but as a person, you DID it.
Stringing all these moments together, you develop a process. You now know what to do in split second decisions ranging from saying hello to someone, to reacting when you see someone cry or to even think. We create a pattern for ourselves to live by. We have experienced a lot of events and now have reflexes in certain situations. We don't think, we just do. Our brain loves patterns and loves remembering (which is one of the reasons we dream). Therefore, unconsciously our brain stimulates us to do things we've already done because to us, repeating something is how we learn to live. When you dream, a high percentage of the time you dwell on the past or foresee the future. If not, you try to remodel your past life. Why? Because your brain unconsciously thinks about the small quick choices you've made and tries to string a pattern in you, a person in you that 95% of the population knows you to be.
This is where it becomes confusing; many people mistake the kind of person they are because of a set of choices they've made. They dwell on the past and rethink the choices they've made, usually the bad ones. This is also a gigantic factor of a person's identity: the way you react about your own decisions and events in your life. Humans spend countless hours thinking whether it's conscious or not. The person that comes out of those thoughts is another part of your identity.
Sometimes thoughts can be too strong for somebody to deal with, therefore we have a fallback. Another word I like to call fallback is inspiration. We go about our lives dealing with stressful or depressing events with a number of things that can numb the "pain". Initially a good fallback is friends and family, but after a while, problems become too complicated and/or personal to share with friends and family. Sometimes friends aren't even there because friends aren't ALWAYS there. That's a jolly myth people go about to constantly feel secure: a fallback illusion.**
The next level of identity a person gains starts coming later in life. This is where fallback illusions and depression kick in. It is also the filter of everything you've lived through and when you start understanding reality. An unfortunate flaw in creation is that almost nothing lasts forever, and so even things you believed in, relied on and inspired yourself by start to fade away. This is what sets each person apart. Our reaction to loss, disapointment, reality.
Although no ending to this post, there is an idea. Everyone is different and every dimension is not similarly defined for all. What I mean by this is that the timeframe for becoming a person varies. Some people gain their identity early on, they know who they are because they lost who they weren't. These people grow up to become the people we idolize, the people that inspire and the people that make us believe. While some people "live" early, others don't. This is the cause of half-broken dreams, altered realities, fear and midlife crises.
Concluding, my overall goal is to understand or at least help sprout discussion on how people are not defined momentarily. The struggle for identity is a relentless battle that only few prevail over. Even in times of belief, people will doubt because our mind is programmed to understand and almost nothing can be understood if not lost. To know is to ignore and to believe is to forget.
**A fallback illusion can be characterized two ways. It can be a fallback that you think is there but it isn't, like for example a dream, a lie or an expectation. It can also be more commonly characterized by a temporary fallback. Example: an insignificant friend, drugs, alcohol, etc.
While writing this post I was listening to a few songs. Music is one of my most important fallbacks and a number of song titles that came up were partly relevant to this topic. Since I am open to interpretation (or as some may call it, bullshit), I will not take away any song titles that came up while I wrote, even the songs that I skipped through or muted.
Setlist for this post:
Broken strings
Better Alone
Move (if you wanna)
Crack House
August
The Bomb
Relax, Take it easy
Don't Rain on my Parade
We Dance on
Don't Hold Back
Stronger
Love Lockdown
Help me
Dear Diary
Tonight, I picked up two of my friends with no real intentions. We then proceeded to see how far down Gouin we could go. On the way we saw a fox. We accidentally ended up in Ottawa. I had to break my diet to have an onion ring poutine. I then met up with a young lady using animal calls. I was finally gifted with a free shawarma sandwich and went home. Tonight was a good night.
Dear Diary
Today I set Mcgill on fire, twice. I then proceeded to beat these two wimps at jorkyball. Today was a good day.
To be impossible is to be
- Myself
Beauty is the opposite of unique.
- Myself
Chewing
I usually start my text posts by my inspirations for those who haven't noticed, so this is that. I was taking a pill a few minutes ago because my head was hurting way too much for comfort. This is probably due to the fact that I played a sport today for the first time in around 9000 hours. The whole blood flow thing was weird and so it was having difficulty flowing around, thus my head missing out on a lot of it. For that reason, I got a headache and needed to pop a pill by swallowing it. Now for the body!
Everyone, from birth, has the "reflex" or swallowing. Although most people don't use that reflex as often as they should, we still all have it and we do use it usually for eating. One of the lesser reasons we use swallowing is for eating. We put food in our mouths, we chew and then we swallow. So now for the usual breakdown I go for. I know my readers get tired of hearing about me talking evolution and everything, but that's technically the basis of everything (sorry for you non-Darwinists). Swallowing has become a way bigger deal than it should be. I for one had a huge swallowing dilemma a year ago when it came to pills. I was rarely able to swallow a pill, and the only reason I changed is because I sucked in my retardation and actually just swallowed as people say you have to do (The couple months of painkiller addiction also helped).
So here is my question: Why do we go through such a pre-swallowing process. Personal example: before I swallow a pill, I have to let it in my mouth a bit before I get the ideal position. Other example: A lot of people chew their food before swallowing. This is where my problem arose; people chew too much. We have teeth yes I understand, but, traced back, we only need them to rip the meet off our prey's bodies since knives aren't really a natural part of a human. So now what got us into chewing so much?
We definitely overchew, and that overchewing is caused by us being tiny little bitches with what we eat. Ok, maybe that's a little too intense, but when did this overchewing start? Nowadays, they say the more you chew your food, the easier it is to digest. This is true, but our stomach's used to be strong enough to destroy any kind of ingestions. You think in prehistoric times we would chew our food a lot and care about wittle tummies? I don't think so... So why change our habits?
We have taken chewing to such a further level than we should have, and now people who don't have time to chew are suffering. People out there are losing the ability to swallow. For goodness sake, you think we can't swallow a spoonfull of rice? Yet we're so set on chewing it first. A tiny raisin? We can swallow that easier than a pill. But we don't, all because of our evolution and our weakening stomach's.
Now like most of my posts, I don't really do the research behind my thoughts and I usually end with theories or questions for my readers to answer or think about, most of which don't because you're as lazy as I am and just hope that my posts are funny. So this time I am doing something different. No research, no questions, no theories, just a suggestion.
People should start swallowing things more!
I feel like this video is discriminating... Notably to epileptic people because there is no way in hell they can watch this
Bright Sides
Ok, so what everyone always does is remember someone for the negative aspect of their lives. Worst part of that is, people always go: "OH! DON'T THINK ABOUT THE BAD THINGS, FOCUS ON THE GOOD". But isn't that ironic that people say that yet don't even follow their own worldwide advice. So why do it?
Everybody is insecure about themelves, and so they try to find the negative in people to try to make themselves feel better. See there is a flaw in that, because there are so many things wrong with that.
What I think is the most wrong about this is that the worst people get ZERO credit. Yes, people have done some horrible things, but not EVERYONE is bad. You guys have said it before I'm sure, and everyone says it once in a while. Try to find the good in people, even in their flaws. On that note, we should use some people in good contexts or at least to make clear good similes or comparisons.
Here are a few comparison I think are valid to use:
- My eraser is such a Hitler. It wants to eliminate the mistakes.
- I'm hornier than the devil.
- I wish I could be as calm as Michael J Fox.
- I love kids, as much a Michael Jackson did.
- You can only turn left on this street, no rights. Just like Rosa Parks
- Some sports just aren't fun when you make them complicated. Like playing soccer with two balls! Soccer should remain a Lance Armstrong sport.
- I wish I could help people like Magic Johnson.
Find the good in the bad.