i'll stop being bitter when lovelyz get what they deserve

hwarang let me down exactly at second episode 13:18

[dankmemeuniversity]

[nuguworld]

Mijoo for THE STAR Magazine July + August Issue

[sergle]

don’t even fucking talk to me if you don’t dress like this

[remyicons]

barbie ferreira

[pururin]

[allforbts]

© A Little Braver | Do not edit.

[alllthingsbts]

5th Muster poster ©FairyJIMIN | Do not edit.

[obisanyas]

not to think abt terrible stuff but i bet joyce goes to enzos at 7 on that friday and just. sits there alone haha

[sunggyu428]

cr:  𝘾𝙃𝙀𝙍𝙄𝙎𝙃 𝙇𝙊𝙑𝙀‏

do not edit, crop, or remove watermark

[katnisseversdeen-deactivated202]

i’ve got these little things, she’s got you ♫

[bob-belcher]

[endmyreign]

[sapphleaf]

[thesquidville]

[meetthehelper]

[fandomsandfeminism]

Thought: I do NOT think that 50% of the world’s billionaires should be women. I think there shouldn’t be any billionaires at all.

[cranberrybogmummy]

So you are saying 0% of the world should be billionaires?

[fandomsandfeminism]

Yes.

[caosdth]

Why shouldn’t their be billionaires? That makes no sense.

[fandomsandfeminism]

Because the existence of billionaires is predicated on the exploitation of human labor and unsustainable environmental harm.  That level of wealth hoarding is harmful to economies, as it reduces the amount of money in circulation. No one person, no family, could ever conceivably even SPEND a billion dollars anyway, and  it is inherently immoral to accumulate wealth so narrowly while so much of the world lives in abject poverty.  

Better then to create a wealth ceiling, a point at which all wealth over a certain point  is taxed at or very near 100% to incentivize people to actually spend their money rather than hoard it, stimulating the economy and bettering the lives of far more people. Better even still to create and regulate economic systems that protect workers and the environment in a way that such extreme levels of wealth accumulation aren’t even feasible. 

[aflawedmind]

The problem with this is that it reduces the incentive to actually do fiscally well. What’s the point of starting a business if you can’t become wealthy?

[fandomsandfeminism]

There is a very real difference between “reasonably wealthy” and A BILLIONAIRE

[twodotsknowwhy]

No one is saying you shouldn’t have a nice house, we are saying that having multiple really, really ridiculously nice houses while your employees are either homeless or at serious risk of becoming homeless is immoral.

[whenandwhereienter]

I’ll never understand why this concept is hard for people. I think it’s because they can’t actually fathom how much $1 Billion is.

[fandomsandfeminism]

Seriously.

Let’s say you have a badass job. A great job. You make $100 AN HOUR. You work 10 hours a day ($1000 A DAY), 5 days a week ($5000 a week!!!), every week ($20,000 A MONTH), thats $240,000 Every Year.

It would take you 4,167 years to make a billion dollars.

[bogleech]

Yeah I think people seriously just don’t understand how big a billion is. There is literally no reason a single human could ever possibly need a billion dollars, and there is no conceivable way for a single human to “earn” a billion dollars. You can ONLY get a billion dollars by accumulating money from thousands of other laborers beneath you, all of whom deserve to share that wealth. It shouldn’t be legal to be able to decide your own salary with no limitations whatsoever. When you have the power to increase your own pay you should be REQUIRED to increase the pay of every single person you employ along with it, down to the last toilet scrubber. No exceptions. There isn’t a single ethical billionaire that ever lived and there never will be.

[memescomedy]

[necrobob]

That’s not quite true. The reporter behind the story, Daphne Caruana Galizia, was murdered.

[unfuckablebogtroll]

.

.

.

.

.

.

Bonus:

[lovelyzglobal]

190514 Muzmon Naver

[hbmmaster]

tumblr continues to be purchased by worse and worse companies until it’s finally shut down under the management of the yakuza