LUNARCRAWLER

[lunar-crawler]

PINNED POST

PERSONAL BLOG, MY SITE HAS THINGS OF MORE SUBSTANCE. I PERSONALLY THINK DNI LISTS ARE MOSTLY USELESS, THE BLOCK BUTTON IS MORE USEFUL. DO AS YOU WISH.

I AM NOT TIED TO ANY SPECIFIC FANDOM HERE, ANYTHING GOES.

NOTABLY, I AM A MINOR.

"scrawling.md" IS MY TEXT POST TAG

"symlink" IS THE REBLOG TAG

"scribbles.png" RARELY USED ART TAG

MY SITE!

[artistformerlyknownasbutttrumpet]

i was training a young person at work, and she referred to sexual assault as "SA" out loud, and i immediately was like, "no, it's sexual assault, call it what it is," bc idgaf if the algorithm overlords have taught y'all that you should fear direct language, how tf do any of you expect to ever address real issues with any amount of seriousness if you can't even say the words? imagine an advocate looking a sexual assault survivor in the eyes and asking "did he grape you?" it's absolutely fucking absurd, but these young interns and new hires are coming into an environment where we deal with survivors of all different kinds of abuse, and they're coming with the mindset that the words are as bad as the actions, and that makes them shitty at the job and look juvenile af

i HATE self-censorship for a lot of reasons, but being in crisis work makes it even more frustrating. who are you censoring for? like i am being so fr, WHO are you censoring for? have you even thought it through? people who have been raped know that they have been raped. if someone attempts suicide or is grieving someone who did, saying "sewer slide" isn't going to protect them from any of the feelings. a murder victim's family isn't going to feel better bc you said "unalived" instead of murdered. if anything, it's just extremely invalidating and othering. it's saying "what happened to you is so bad that i won't even say the word," which is NOT trauma-informed care. you are not protecting survivors/victims when you self-censor. the ONLY things you protect when you self-censor are the puritanical ideologies that are being encouraged by rich fascists who want your money and obedience

say the fucking words, guys. just say the goddamn words before i go insane!!!

[lunar-crawler]

Bacteria

WHAT??? WHAT? WHAT? YOURE SCARING ME.

[medievaljournalist]

i just checked my status effects for the first time in a while how long have i been Doomed for

[a-silly-poll-side-blog-yay]

you just teleported to the last game you played how is it going? {you're plot involved}

good

bad

great

awful

dead

I don't play games/results

Remaining time: 22 hours 45 minutes

Soma 😔

[lastoneout]

I love when people try to gotcha me on my stance that all sports should be gender integrated with "even American football???" because I can instantly come back with "oh lmao, no, I don't think ANYONE should play American football at all, it's way too dangerous" like nice try but I know no amount of testosterone is going to protect you from the profound, life ruining health issues caused by getting repeated severe concussions over the course of several years. No one should play this sport.

[lastoneout]

Like do you really think muscle mass or gender/sex can protect you from CTE?? You think men are naturally more resistant to concussions?? Because idk how else you square this sport being too dangerous for cis women and people afab but perfectly safe for cis men and people amab. Having a testosterone dominant endocrine system isn't gonna do shit in the face of traumatic brain injury. Be serious. This sport should not exist.

[lastoneout]

Honestly it's pretty weird to me that people dismiss the harm football players go through as fine because they're men, especially when so many players are black men. Always remember the argument that women are weaker than men is also an argument that men are stronger than women and can withstand more injury and abuse which isn't true, and absolutely ties into eugenicist beliefs about black bodies while obscuring their suffering as not existing because they're men and football is only dangerous for women, so how could they be hurt?

Systems can exploit men too, especially non-white or otherwise marginalized men who also deserve to be defended and liberated from said system's devaluation of their humanity and mistreatment.

[lastoneout]

@lunammoon over here saying what I tried to way more eloquently, thank you o7 no one should be subjected to the Hell Spiral 3000!!!!

[karvina]

[naharie]

Hot take, maybe, but I think that the same way it is very wrong to generalize traits across all women it is equally wrong to generalize traits across all men.

That's not me favoring men. All but one of the men who have been closer to me have been deeply problematic in many ways. What I am saying is that generalize a statement across the whole of any subgroup of the human populace is something that just shouldn't be done unless we can prove it to be true in every instance.

If you are ready to attack someone for a statement such as "all women should be submissive" or "women shouldn't be in politics" or such, but do not care in the slightest when people say "men rape" or "men want to control women" then there is a very real problem with you.

Those people who want to protect gays, lesbians, trans people, and more, and will fight back against misogyny and against claims such as "'trans' people are just confused" or "she just thinks she's a lesbian because she's had some bad experiences with men" but are willing to single any particular group or groups out, whether that be men or otherwise, have abandoned the path and are no longer truly fighting for equality.

And if you interpret this as me saying we should continue to uphold the patriarchy and keep the subset of men who are quite provably evil in power, then you are egregiously misreading the post and ignoring my point.

[napoleononthebellerophon]

i dont think its a "sin" to "destroy and betray yourself for nothing" because there's no such thing as sin, there's no such thing as yourself and there's no such thing as nothing. and destruction and betrayal are subjective. you're most likely totally fine.

[unbloodiedmartyr]

i gotta say i really do love a character who is both profoundly haunted by guilt over their past actions to the point of considering themself irredeemable and deserving of punishment for them and at the same time is completely incognisant of some of the worst things they've done or just considers them nbd, especially when they can't even comprehend why theyve drawn the lines the way theyve done so.

[unification]

*torturing you* dude trust me, something really cool happens. you just have to reflect on it for a bit. i'm doing this because i want you to reach your full potential okay?

[dyktvideogamesfx]

Visit Original Link

Do you know this SFX? #1560

I know where it's from

It sounds familiar

I've never heard this

Voting ended onJul 20

[valtsv]

i don't really have strong feelings about anything at all i just practice complaining recreationally in case i someday get a chance to enter the big leagues and express a desire or perhaps even a need

[ravenlynclemens]

some lisa stuff

[ptr-sqloint]

on your knees - is not a place of honour

[transgender-dumpster-princess]

Is it a bad thing to hit a rough patch and develop an insatiable bloodlust?

[apunknamedshae]

Normal. Healthy, even. Enrichment for young women.

[thej0ry]

What would you do if you were scrolling through recommended tumblr posts and one was from someone you don't know and it was just a picture of your dad captioned "fucking hate this guy" and it had hundreds of notes

[meshugenist]

reblog it