
blake kathryn

Janaina Medeiros

Origami Around
Peter Solarz
Lint Roller? I Barely Know Her

if i look back, i am lost

❣ Chile in a Photography ❣
let's talk about Bridgerton tea, my ask is open
One Nice Bug Per Day
AnasAbdin
$LAYYYTER
Three Goblin Art
todays bird
almost home
No title available

titsay

izzy's playlists!
Mike Driver

Andulka

tannertan36

seen from Netherlands
seen from China
seen from Malaysia
seen from Japan
seen from United Kingdom

seen from United States

seen from United States
seen from United States

seen from Colombia
seen from Malaysia

seen from Japan
seen from United States
seen from Singapore
seen from United States

seen from Netherlands
seen from Türkiye
seen from Netherlands

seen from Russia

seen from Indonesia

seen from United States
@madameserpent
"Don't play with your food." 『The Mandalorian』season2
With all due respect, sometimes disrespect is due
Happy Pride 🏳️🌈✨
THE TUDORS (2007-2010) Season four, episode ten
EVE BEST as PETRA MAYLER in "The Shadow Line" ( footage thanks to @expectiations. )
The Muppets 1.07 "Pigs in a Blackout"
Poor Lilia and Jen.😂
I think this was posted before, credits to who owns this!
Long Live… the Misogynist King?
In The Private Life of Henry VIII, Henry proudly declares of his children: “Mary may grow to wisdom… but Elizabeth will never learn to rule so much as a kitchen. Ah, but the boy’s my second self.” The line perfectly captures both Tudor attitudes toward female rule and Henry’s own obsession with a male heir. Edward VI, the long-awaited prince born to Jane Seymour, represented everything Henry believed a monarch should be: male, Protestant, and the continuation of his dynasty. His daughters, by contrast, had each been declared illegitimate at different points in their lives, displaced from the succession, and politically marginalized by the very father who doubted their abilities. Yet history would dismantle Henry’s assumptions with remarkable cruelty.
Mary I, the daughter Henry believed merely “may grow to wisdom,” became England’s first crowned queen regnant after overcoming enormous political and personal obstacles. Once celebrated as the beloved Tudor princess, she was later declared illegitimate after Henry’s break from Catherine of Aragon, pressured into submission by Cromwell and Norfolk, and forced to publicly acknowledge her father as Supreme Head of the Church despite her fierce Catholic convictions.
When Edward VI attempted to exclude her from the succession in favor of Lady Jane Grey, Mary rallied support with astonishing speed and claimed the throne within days. Her reign remains deeply controversial because of the Marian persecutions and the execution of nearly 300 Protestants, earning her the lasting nickname “Bloody Mary.” Yet even her failures transformed English monarchy: Parliament formally established that a woman could rule with the same sovereign authority as a king, laying the constitutional foundation upon which Elizabeth would later build.
Elizabeth, meanwhile, became the ultimate contradiction of Henry’s dismissal. Declared illegitimate after Anne Boleyn’s execution, she survived one of the most dangerous courts in Europe through extraordinary intelligence, emotional restraint, and political caution. Under Katherine Parr’s influence she received a formidable humanist education, mastering multiple languages and developing the rhetorical brilliance that later defined her reign.
She endured imprisonment in the Tower under Mary I, suspicion during the Wyatt Rebellion, and the trauma of the Thomas Seymour scandal before finally ascending the throne in 1558. The daughter Henry claimed could not “rule so much as a kitchen” went on to govern England for forty-four years during one of the most culturally and politically influential reigns in its history. Refusing marriage to preserve her authority, Elizabeth fashioned herself into the “Virgin Queen,” stabilized the kingdom after decades of religious upheaval, and became a near-mythic symbol of English nationhood.
In the end, Henry’s “second self” died at fifteen, while the daughters he underestimated reshaped the monarchy more profoundly than he ever imagined.
margaret of anjou + tumblr text posts (part 4)
Elizabeth Woodville and gender transgression, my beloved. Mancini writing that she was the one who truly ruled the kingdom ("the queen...attracted to her party many strangers and introduced them to court, so that they alone should manage the public and private businesses of the crown, surround the king, and have bands of trainers, give or sell offices, and finally rule the king himself."). The Titulus Regius framing her as an usurping monarch whose ascension destabilized England in ways that former parliaments had only ever framed kings. Edward V specifying that the peers of realm "and the queen" would run the government during his minority, only for Buckingham to single out Elizabeth and criticize her for surpassing gendered bounds of behaviour ("it is not in the business of women but men to govern kingdoms"). Richard III directly accusing her of using sorcery to bring about "the final destruction and disinherison of ... all ... men of honour". Her marriage to Edward IV being framed as incredibly subversive, with him being "too greatly influenced" and "rule[d]" by her; with Elizabeth (and her mother) being accused of using witchcraft to compel him to marry her and make her queen; with her queenship inherently disrupting the image of the patriarchal family structure, given how involved the Woodvilles were in court and in the lives of the royal children, far more than Edward's own relatives were. The fact that, beyond all this, Elizabeth possessed institutional authority in governance in ways that no other late medieval queen of England did, by her formal appointment in royal councils, which had in former reigns comprised only of "viros" (men).
While we don't and can't know how much of this was rhetoric and how much reflected reality, I think there are two things to keep in mind. First, Edward IV was never framed as passive or incapable to contrast him to Elizabeth; instead, sources explicitly emphasized both his ability and willingness to rule, making this narrative less of a "role-reversal" and more so the case of an active and capable king allowing himself to be subordinate to his wife. This differentiates it from the narratives used for other royal pairings. Second, beyond all potential rhetoric/propaganda, the fact of the matter is that Elizabeth did hold unique institutional authority for late medieval queens of England; this is not debatable but is instead an undeniable and intrinsic part of her queenship and should be recognized far, far more than it currently is. This entire topic is an unexplored goldmine.
My hope for whoever is reading this is that your life starts making sense and coming together. I hope the good days are right around the corner for you.