Odelya is expecting! I HAD A SUSPICION WHEN MAROUN STARTED WEARING OVERSIZED STYLISH JACKETS IN THE LATER EPS OF THE SEASON.

if i look back, i am lost

❣ Chile in a Photography ❣
2025 on Tumblr: Trends That Defined the Year
he wasn't even looking at me and he found me
we're not kids anymore.
Show & Tell

roma★

Kiana Khansmith

No title available
PUT YOUR BEARD IN MY MOUTH
ojovivo

izzy's playlists!
Game of Thrones Daily

★
The Stonewall Inn
TVSTRANGERTHINGS
"I'm Dorothy Gale from Kansas"

No title available
sheepfilms
🪼
seen from Algeria
seen from United Kingdom

seen from Türkiye
seen from Türkiye

seen from United Kingdom
seen from United States
seen from Netherlands
seen from Russia

seen from Malaysia
seen from United States
seen from Lithuania
seen from Netherlands

seen from Malaysia
seen from Brazil
seen from T1
seen from France
seen from India

seen from Algeria
seen from Brazil
seen from Russia
@magicomsworld
Odelya is expecting! I HAD A SUSPICION WHEN MAROUN STARTED WEARING OVERSIZED STYLISH JACKETS IN THE LATER EPS OF THE SEASON.
I love it when these movies randomly pause the adventuring shenanigans to drop emotional bombs on the audience before returning to our regularly scheduled programming
My favourite moments in these movies are little ones.
In the first one, in the underground cavern under Trinity Church, Ian wants the next clue and they haven't found anything new. Ian decides to leave them trapped underground. Riley says "There must be another clue!" and Ben snaps at him "THERE ISN'T ANOTHER CLUE!". Once Ian leaves and Ben knows he's super close to the thing he's spent his whole life in search of, he stops, turns to Riley, and despite it being obvious now that that was all a ruse to get rid of Ian, he sincerely says to him "I'm sorry I yelled at you."
In the second one, through the first part of the movie, people are constantly describing Riley as Ben's assistant. (Important to note that Ben never does). When Ben is talking to FBI Agent Harvey Keitel, he mentions 'conspiracy theorists' and pulls out a copy of Riley's book. Ben BEAMS and says "You bought Riley's book!" And Harvey says "Your friend writes a book about government conspiracies and you think we don't know about it?" Your FRIEND. He got it.
Hugh talks at the beginning AND end! So rare in their bts stuff. So adorable. Plus bonus Connie Shi!? Love Violet Yee; she’s my fav detective.
Hey Nolan fan buddies! Law and Order’s fall premiere date has been dropped and it’s October 8th. At least we know WHEN we will see him again!!
rewatching s6 and the amyrory of it all makes me SICKK.
amy in amy's choice saying 'i loved rory, and i never told him' -> s6 amy constantly saying she loves him and always always choosing rory
Thanks, OP; now I'M crying.
In this instance, the judge's excuse for supporting the defence is so insane that Nolan seems to literally bite his tongue.
And runs straight over to tell Nick about it. Nick is like Hmmmm but gives Nolan no indication he's taking it seriously.
Nick gets the confirmation he needs and goes to see Nolan in his office. He tells him he was right all along and what Nick is going to do is demand a mistrial (this is where Nolan starts to get misgivings about this approach) and also he's going to press charges against everyone involved in this criminal conspiracy. Nolan tries to remind him that warring with judges is bad for business etc like Nick himself told Nolan but Nick is like yeah I was telling you, not asking. Leave it with me; peace out.
Nolan does what he feels he has to do: he visits the defence attorney at home and negotiates a deal to get the killer literally any criminal conviction at all.
Nick finds out and is LIVID. He's waiting in Nolan's office the next morning when Nolan arrives at work and reams his ass out. Nolan tells him they didn't have the cards and he couldn't let Nick throw away his career. Nick tells him he should worry about his own career. HOWEVER.
In the next scene, Nick is announcing their fair and just guilty plea from the killer and Nolan is standing with the squad. He lives to litigate another day.
This was the season finale, but the show has been renewed, so if people enjoy these mini sort of recaps that are really just an excuse to look at pictures of Hugh Dancy, I will keep doing them when the show resumes in the fall!
Nolan shows up this week as the defence attempts to exclude perfectly normal, admissable video evidence... and the judge agrees. SUS, says Nolan.
Nolan tries to convince Nick that the judge is acting suspiciously, because his ruling on the video was CRAY. Nick tells him to work with the evidence he has, not the evidence he wishes he had and sends him on his way.
So he focuses on jury selection, but when he does the perfectly routine act of dismissing clearly biased jury members, the judge calls the lawyers all up to the bench. Nolan is like ...youwhatnow?
The judge says he can't dismiss the biased jurors because they're the only while men on the jury and the defendent (a high ranking Navy officer) is a white man and it will look like they're stacking the jury. The ruling is so crazy, the defence lawyer looks surprised, but he'll take it.
Nolan is FUMING now as he goes to tell Nick that the judge is DEF on the take and he wants him to recuse himself. Nick is like "on what grounds? Because YOU think he's a prick? Pls. Don't start wars with judges. The jury decides the outcome. Go do trial. And off Nolan shuffles. But while Nolan is trialling, Nick does, in fact, start investigating the allegation.
And so trial he does. And then the defence gets up and brings up an old, irrelevant allegation from the witness' past and off everyone goes to Chambers to argue about it.
Which we will see in Part 2.
I have three monitors on my desk. The left one shows the order book. The middle one shows Truth Social. The right one shows the investigation queue.
On April 21st, the left screen moved first.
I am a Senior Surveillance Analyst at a commodities exchange. I have held this position for nineteen years. My job is to monitor trading activity for suspicious patterns and generate compliance reports. I am employee of the quarter. I have a mug.
At 19:54 GMT on April 21st, someone placed 4,260 sell orders on Brent crude futures. They did this during post-settlement. The window after the market closes when daily volume is typically in the dozens. Sometimes single digits. Sometimes I watch the screen and nothing happens for forty minutes and I think about whether my daughter is happy.
On April 21st, someone placed $430 million in directional bets in 120 seconds during that window. One hundred and twenty seconds. I timed it on my watch because the system clock rounds to the nearest minute and I have found, in nineteen years, that precision matters to no one but me.
At 20:10 GMT, the President posted on Truth Social that he was extending the Iran ceasefire.
Brent dropped from $100.91 to $96.83.
I flagged the trade. I flag a lot of trades. I want to tell you what happens to my flags.
My flags go into a system called TRACE. Trade Review and Compliance Evaluation. I did not name it. The system generates a report. The report goes to a committee. The committee has a name I am not allowed to share but I can tell you it meets quarterly and the conference room has a credenza with bottled water that is sparkling because someone once put still water in the room and a managing director sent an email about it that was longer than most of my surveillance reports.
The committee reviews my flags. The committee has reviewed all of my flags. Here is the complete record of actions taken on my flags in 2026:
Reviewed.
That's it. "Reviewed" is a status. In compliance, a status is the absence of an action that has been given a name so it looks like one.
Let me show you my flags.
March 9th. Someone bet millions on oil falling at 18:29 GMT. Forty-seven minutes later, a CBS reporter posted that the President said the Iran war was "very complete, pretty much." Oil dropped 25%. Forty-seven minutes. I flagged it.
March 23rd. Someone sold 5,100 lots of Brent and WTI crude futures between 10:49 and 10:50 GMT. Fourteen minutes later, the President posted on Truth Social about a "COMPLETE AND TOTAL RESOLUTION" to hostilities. Oil dropped 11%. Over 13,000 contracts traded in sixty seconds after the post. Fourteen minutes. I flagged it.
April 7th. Someone established a $950 million short position in oil futures at 19:45 GMT. Three hours later, the President declared a two-week ceasefire. Nine hundred and fifty million dollars. I flagged it.
April 17th. Someone placed $760 million in bearish bets twenty minutes before Iran's foreign minister confirmed the Strait of Hormuz would reopen. Seven hundred and sixty million. I flagged it.
April 21st. The $430 million. Fifteen minutes. I flagged it.
That is $2.1 billion in directional oil bets in April alone. Every one of them landed on the correct side of a presidential announcement. Every one of them was placed in a window so narrow you could measure it in bathroom breaks. I flagged every single one.
The CFTC chair told a Congressional committee that his organization has "zero tolerance" for fraud and insider trading. I wrote that quote on a Post-it note and stuck it to my right monitor. The one that shows the investigation queue. The investigation queue has not moved since March.
Zero tolerance. Zero staff. Zero budget. Zero prosecutions under the STOCK Act since it was signed in 2012.
Fourteen years. The law has existed for fourteen years and has been enforced zero times. In compliance, we call that a compliance rate of one hundred percent. No cases filed means no cases lost. You cannot fail an audit you never conduct. We call that excellence.
Last month the White House sent an internal email to staff. I was not on the distribution list but I have read reporting on it and I need you to sit with what I am about to say. The email instructed White House staff not to use insider information to place bets on prediction markets.
The White House had to send a memo telling its own employees not to insider-trade.
I want you to read that sentence again. Not because the instruction was unclear. Because the instruction was necessary. Because someone in the building looked at the same pattern I have been flagging for months on my three monitors and decided the appropriate response was an email.
The President's son sits on the advisory board of Kalshi. He is an investor in Polymarket. Both are prediction markets. Both saw accounts created days before U.S. military action.
One account. I cannot stop thinking about this account. It was called "Burdensome-Mix." It was created in December. On January 2nd, it placed $32,500 on Venezuela's president being removed from power. On January 3rd, Maduro was seized by U.S. special forces. Burdensome-Mix collected $436,000. Then it changed its username. Then it disappeared.
One account is a coincidence. But there were six.
Six accounts were created on Polymarket in February. All bet on U.S. strikes on Iran by the 28th. When the President confirmed the strikes, the six accounts collected $1.2 million between them. Five of the six never placed another bet. The sixth went on to correctly predict the ceasefire date and made another $163,000.
My surveillance system logged all of this. My system logs everything. My system does not have opinions and neither do I. I generate reports. The reports go to committees. The committees meet quarterly. Between meetings, the windows get shorter and the bets get larger.
March 9th: 47 minutes. March 23rd: 14 minutes. April 17th: 20 minutes. April 21st: 15 minutes.
The window is compressing. In March, you had time to make coffee between the trade and the announcement. By April, you had time to send a text. By summer, at this rate, the trade and the announcement will be the same event.
The spokesman said any implication that administration officials are engaged in insider trading is "baseless and irresponsible reporting."
Then the White House sent the email again.
I have been in compliance for nineteen years. I have seen insider trading run out of strip mall offices by men who could not spell "derivative." I have seen pump-and-dump schemes coordinated over WhatsApp by people who used their real names. I have seen a man try to manipulate soybean futures from a Panera Bread.
I have never seen $2.1 billion in perfectly timed trades across five presidential announcements in a single month go uninvestigated.
But I have also never seen a compliance system work this beautifully. Every trade flagged. Every report filed. Every committee briefed. Every quarterly meeting attended. Bottled water: sparkling. Minutes: distributed.
Zero prosecutions.
As long as the flags go up and the cases don't, my performance review says I am meeting expectations.
I am meeting expectations. The system is meeting expectations. The $2.1 billion is meeting expectations. The fourteen-year-old law with zero prosecutions is meeting expectations.
The left screen moves. The middle screen moves. The right screen stays perfectly, immaculately still.
In my field, we call this price discovery.
Fucking harrowing.
Baxter, on his way out for the night, finds Nolan still working and also drinking. Baxter: I didn't know you kept a bottle in here. Nolan: It came with the office.
Nolan is having a moral dilemma, because he thinks the defendant's story sounds like it COULD be plausible. But if he's just a really good liar, they'd be letting a cold blooded killer walk free, denying justice to the victim and his family. Baxter tells him if he really thinks the guy might not have done it, to dismiss the case. Nolan says the problem is he's just not sure. Nick says "Then you have to do what you have to do."
So he does what he's gotta do.
And he won the case but he's not sure how he feels about it.
Some viewers think this season's ups and downs and moral dilemmas eating Nolan are signalling that they're preparing to write Nolan out. I can tell you that I wouldn't be watching anymore in that case! But I'm not going to worry about that unless someone official announces it. And they HAVE officially announced that the show has been renewed, so for the moment, we have something to look forward to after the season finale next week.
What do you think?
Nolan shows up in the interrogation room this week and he tells them to get more evidence.
More evidence: acquired. So now we're talking strategy.
Argument in the judge's chambers. He rules against both the defence's motion and the prosecution's motion, so here we go.
In court, doing court things.
Trying to get a coffee between sessions and the accused's wife rolls up to them like WHY DON'T YOU BELIEVE MY HUSBAND'S STORY?? And they never say this but, like, ma'am? Everybody says they didn't do it or that if they did it was justified.
More trial. It's going pretty okay.
A chat about the accused's testimony. Nolan is beginning to question whether their version is the correct one.
Tune in for part 2 for the exciting conclusion!
Nolan put on the Light Grey Suit and absolutely destroys the victim's dad on the stand, because he figured out why the guy is testifying for the defence. Because his incessant social media posting to his 13 million followers is the reason that the killer knew where to find his daughter, unless the temperamental ex did it. So he's pushing the narrative that makes it not his fault. He'd rather let his daughter's killer go free than admit he made a stupid and fatal mistake. Prick.
Sam and Nolan go to talk to the temperamental ex because they want him to testify and he's like ... hell no, i will plead the fifth bc NO. But the next day Nolan serves him to testify with immunity, so he CAN'T use the fifth. Too bad, dude!
After the testimony, Nolan gets a phone call. The ex that hit the victim before admitted the real reason he was incensed to the point of hitting her that time. He and Sam go to Baxter.
Nolan is reluctant to tell the court that the ex beat the victim up once because she was supposed to be watching his daughter and she went on a cocaine bender instead. It seems like something that will be sensationalized and ruin the husband's nice memories of her. Sam also doesn't like it, because it seems like making an excuse for someone to physically abuse a partner. Baxter tells them to use it so the jury has context for why that behaviour could have been a one time things as the ex says it was.
Nolan is pondering the situation when Sam comes in to his office and tells him that it's not cool to use that information because there is NO EXCUSE for someone to hit their partner. NONE. EVER. This touches on the whole situation with her sister and the man that killed her and I think Nolan is reluctant to give her another related issues to be pissed off at him about.
He questions the witness again but doesn't bring up that information. Sam looks pleased with him but the jury ends up hung.
Baxter comes to his office and tells him he dropped the ball on this case. He's not paid to do the comfortable thing or the noble thing; he's paid to WIN. When he lost the case with Sam's sister's killer, she also accused him of doing the "noble" thing instead of the winning move, even though the winning move in that case was illegal. But she's also the one that wanted him to do the noble thing here.
At the end of the day, I think he likes winning cases but he likes winning because it means getting justice for victims and prosecuting murders, for him, is a noble profession. At the end of the episode, as I said to @mzmarple , he looks like he's going to go home and drink whiskey in the dark while listening to Audioslave. That's GenX therapy.
Last week, Nolan had an emergency appendectomy and Sam ran the show and got lots of praise and encouragement from Baxter. Now Nolan is back and they have an accused that confessed in interrogation, whose DNA was found on the victim, who is a pretty sure bet to put away.
However, the defendant has a really sharp attorney (I have really enjoyed that actress since way back in the late 80s and a little movie called Batteries Not Included) and she wants the judge - Judge Hines! My favourite of the judges! - to exclude both the confession and the DNA. Judge Hines agrees that the confession was extracted in a manipulative way and excludes it, but agrees with Nolan about the DNA and allows it. Nolan and Jess need to have it out about some of her interrogation techniques, man.
A little meeting with the victim's husband and parents. The husband and the father have a go at each other and Nolan and Sam ask him to go outside.
We love the walking counsel/judge discussions. The defence wants to introduce alternate suspects that have been eliminated credibly from the investigation already and it deeply offends Nolan's sense of justice, but the judge allows it. Nolan is NOT happy. Judge Hines practically dares him to say something about the ruling and he looks like he wants to, but he thinks better of it and walks away.
Letting the team know about the whole alternate suspects thing. They'll have to dig in and see what they can do to demonstrate the alt's innocence.
Next, in court, the defence calls the victim's father as a witness. Nolan asks for court to be adjourned to give them time to prepare because he wasn't on the witness list and the judge agrees.
Nolan and Sam call the victim's father in to ask him DUDE WTF about testifying for the defence. WHY? He won't tell them anything beyond having to do what HE feels is right. He's played, btw, by the always entertaining Eric Stoltz and I was quite happy to see him pop up here, even though his character is a scumbag.
In part two, Nolan decides what to do about this.
1x02 // 2x03 // 2x04
Please. You were more than just a kid. You saw everything.
Malcolmmmmmmm ;.;
Round 4 / Match 4
Which television season do you prefer?
Doctor Who (season 4)
Prodigal Son (season 1)
Come on now, everybodyyyy i love the Doctor and Donna but Malcolm Bright is my true love forever so give him some voooootes!
If you're tired of seeing "proship" under artists' "won't draw" notes, look no further! I will draw your rare and/or weird ship for you! I don't care what you like.
You can even keep comms private if you'd like! Get a commission HERE at my KoFi! Chibi and non-chibi styles available!
Gil, please, I need a case. What you need is a leave of absence.
One of my fav scenes in the series and the one I would choose if I had to explain Malcolm Bright to someone by showing them only one (1) scene from the entire series.
Baxter tells Nolan they're making a deal with the killer. This is Nolan's reaction because SIR, we have him dead to rights, why would we EVEN??
It turns out that the killer will trade the artifact for less prison time. A win for the community and a win for justice too, right, because the killer will still go to jail!
NO. Nolan doesn't agree. An innocent man lost his life and this object is just a THING. But of course there ARE about two million Catholics in NYC..... Baxter is very offended by Nolan describing his blatantly political deal as a blatantly political deal. Nolan tells him "I don't believe what you're saying and I don't think you do either." "I'm done," Baxter tells Nolan. "Make the deal."
Now the artifact is back at the museum and while Nick is up front with the Cardinal getting handshakes and thanks on TV, Nolan is standing nearby and sees the victim's family in the audience.
They spot him, too. They come charging up to demand to know why the recovery of this object was deemed more important than punishing their loved one's killer. Nolan has to just spew Baxter's talking points. They are not convinced.
The victim's wife says "Do YOU even believe the words coming out of your mouth?" and storms off. And, of course, he doesn't. But he does usually end up being the one taking shit for things Baxter (Or McCoy before him) ordered him to do despite his vehement arguments against them. And then he just stands there looking pretty sad about it all.