Mark Rothko, (White, Black, Rust, on Brown) ,1968 , Acrylic on paper

No title available

Discoholic 🪩
Aqua Utopia|海の底で記憶を紡ぐ
Three Goblin Art
todays bird
he wasn't even looking at me and he found me

Andulka
NASA
2025 on Tumblr: Trends That Defined the Year
Claire Keane

if i look back, i am lost
taylor price
"I'm Dorothy Gale from Kansas"

Janaina Medeiros
🪼
Cosmic Funnies
Cosimo Galluzzi
ojovivo
TVSTRANGERTHINGS
No title available
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from Malaysia
seen from United States

seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from Dominican Republic
seen from Germany

seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States

seen from Ukraine

seen from United States
seen from Türkiye

seen from Italy

seen from Australia

seen from United Kingdom

seen from United States
seen from Germany
seen from Indonesia
@magrittea
Mark Rothko, (White, Black, Rust, on Brown) ,1968 , Acrylic on paper
Keith Haring (American, 1958-1990), Untitled (Diptych), 20 June 1982. Acrylic on panel, 305 x 284 cm.
What makes Rothko's art so great?
That’s a difficult question to answer for any artist, I think. And, I dislike bullshit artist statements which are an epidemic these days, so words can feel pretty used up when talking about visual art. I do think that, like any art form, when people see these famous paintings, they half forget that they were not painted to cost 40 million dollars and be talked about at cocktail parties, but generally are sincere expressions of the self by people who were compelled to share.
You might see Hopper and feel he communicates a tangible sense of loneliness in the modern world. Maybe Munch has a more dire view, but you feel the isolation in his work. Someone like Klee has a great artistic playfulness and his work, to me communicates that and feels lively. Art is popular, at least partially, because the painter gives us something relatable and compelling.
I don’t think I’d be the only person to say that Rothko communicates a quality of infinite space. The pure color zen some would argue might belong to someone like Yves Klein, but Rothko makes a good case for color as a window into the spiritual. There’s a kind of religious infinity in his best paintings. They are deep but not distracting. This allows the viewer to look and concentrate in a kind of meditative state. Friends have told me all my life that they have sat with Rothkos for long periods of time. I think it’s some version of this quality, however you want to describe it, that has made his work endure over the years. In the art that touches people they see themselves enough to bond to it.
Mark Rothko, Untitled, date unknown, probably late 60′s
Geertgen tot Sint-Jans
The Adoration of the Magi (detail)
Netherlands (c. 1480)
Oil on Panel,91.6 × 71.8 cm.
Rijksmuseum, Amsterdam
Today women will march on Washington and hundreds of sister marches taking place across the world. In the spirit of women coming together, here is one of our favorite works from the collection depicting women by a woman artist.
“In the Crowd,” 1931, Mabel Dwight
A.W. Dow Cyanotypes c.1900
Hiroshi Yoshida Rapids 1928
recent hands
Wassily Kandinsky (Russian; Expressionism, Abstract Art; 1866-1944): Sky Blue (Bleu de ciel), March 1940
René Magritte - Human Condition, 1935
Piet Mondrian, Composition in White, Black, and Red, 1936.
Mother and Child by Pierre-Auguste Renoir
Medium: oil on canvas
René Magritte – The Victory, 1939
Portrait Of Albert Paris Von Gutersloh 1918
Egon Schiele
slowly appearing
Henri Matisse
Vase of Amaryllis
(via @lonequixote)