Week 11: WHAT UP WHEN IT AIN’T IN THE US? - Introduction
In order to properly compare the US LGBT+ cinema to international LGBT+ cinema, we must first analyze the US’ more recent LGBT+-related releases.
We’re going back 5 years, & picking out a popular LGBT+ film for each year.
Starting with 2015: Carol (dir. Todd Haynes)
Set in 1950′s New York City, Carol chronicles the forbidden love affair between a woman caught in a divorce & a younger woman aspiring to be a photographer.
2016: Moonlight (dir. Barry Jenkins)
Winner of the elusive 2017 Best Picture Academy Award, Moonlight follows the life story of a young Black man, Chiron, who throughout the stages of his life comes to terms with his sexual identity.
2017: Call Me By Your Name (dir. Luca Guadagnino)
[Could also fall into the Italian LGBT+ cinema in part with US.]
Call Me By Your Name is about a young man on a family vacation in Italy where he meets a student interning for his father, which results in a passionate bond.
2018: Love, Simon (dir. Greg Berlanti)
Love, Simon is (another) coming of age film about a young man whose sexual identity blossoms, despite his hesitance to reveal it to his community. Based on Becky Albertalli’s “Simon vs. the Homo Sapiens Agenda” novel.
2019: Rocketman (dir. Dexter Fletcher)
Rocketman tells the colorful story of openly gay music legend Elton John.
2020 Part 1: Out (dir. Steven Hunter)
Disney+’s short film Out follows the story of a young man whose identity isn’t yet out, but magically swaps bodies (or minds?) with a dog. This is Disney’s first canonically gay animated character.
(Jesus, this is just tone-deaf.)
2020 Part 2: Love, Victor (multiple directors)
Love, Victor is a series spin-off of the film Love, Simon that came out (pun intended) two years prior. It has a similar story with the film it’s spun off from, but with a different protagonist & in TV series format.
What Up When It IS In the US?
In every single one of these above, there’s a common theme of familiarity/relatability, whether it’s through the obvious sexual identity, or race, or age. What I mean by familiarity/reliability is that it’s something the American audience can easily somewhat relate to. All, or most of these have some type of coming of age tale to further normalize the LGBT+ identity. It acknowledges has natural it is.
Another common theme for these above is that it’s led by ~traditional~ gay masculine-presenting men (or lesbian feminine-presenting women in the case of Carol). Any representation of sexual orientation above cisgender gays & lesbians is lacking. There’s barely, if at all, any bisexuals leading in US films & series. Certainly, the transgender, intersex, asexual, non-binary, & other sexual identities’ communities aren’t leading, either. In US mainstream media, what little acceptance the gay community gets is reserved only for gay masculine-presenting men or lesbian feminine-presenting women. The rest are usually just made side characters. Only cisgender LGBT+ get to be the lead in the US. Whether they’re comfortable with being labelled as such, I would say that this choice of only representing LGBT+ members who adhere to the gender binary is still pretty conservative, no matter how much they want to be labeled “progressive” just for producing this type of content. There are more colors in the rainbow than just gay & lesbian.
Mainstream LGBT+ representation in US media is watered down to make it more ‘palatable’ to the prudish American audience.
The most noticeable sub-theme of the familiarity & relatability of these above is the racial representation. Despite the US being perhaps one of the most diverse, if not the most diverse nations, our content is still dominated by white leads. We unfortunately also live in a nation where half of us voted for someone as bigoted, racist, sexist, & openly homophobic as Donald Trump. These films have to cater those audiences, too. Those conservative audiences will likely reject a piece of media if it’s led by a person of color. Imagine how they’d react if an LGBT+ person of color led a film or a series? It’s a guaranteed stupid hashtag to boycott on Twitter waiting to happen.
How we treat & portray the LGBT+ community in media is a direct reflection of our nation’s collective values.