nine to five, five to nine!

owning my own un-okayness// i love musicals and ace attorney// truthseeker + premium🔥// my venting tag is #MANLY struggles// banner art by me but gif by @sevan3levan

[mang0chees3]

hi guys my name is Magnus/Nick/Hickory (or Any name that starts with M!!). I am REALLY into Ace Attorney. i have junior fandoms like One Piece and The Good Place!! I like broadway and classic literature

TAG GUIDE

• proud father of one

• I am a Kazuma fictkin and Ryuunosuke yumeshipper!!! crazy i know

• my pfp is my son💗 thank you next (next) thank you next (next) thank you next

• currently working on my "ace attorney: corbin wright" project... corbin is phoenix wright's father.. lalalalala (you could dm me for more info)

TEETH HEADCANON/ANALOGY/THEORY BLOG: @teethpilled

REBLOG BLOG: @reblognus (please dont follow, you will get hundreds of the same post on your feed)

ACE ATTORNEY OCS BLOG: @thegrandaceattorney

FICTKIN BLOG: @thenightgrowsmoredim

MYSTERY KINDER EGG SURPRISE JOY THAT IS NOT ONE OF MY BLOGS BUT SNUCK INTO THE INTRO: @theunpossible

NICK CARRAWAY RP BLOG: @mistookformeaning

I am a text-poster!! I usually post my comedy on main blog.

My main interest is Ace Attorney (running for 6 years, crazy shit)

I also like Broadway musicals and classical literature

•My f(l)ags

Clitted male, Unlabeled, Arospec, Autospec

•My socials!!

Pinterest: mang0chees3 Discord: headsetvows

Strawpage: mang0chees3.straw.page

X: mang0chees3

DNI: Basic dni idfk I block however I want

Follow @guitarcalluses her side is @ilovejohncale she's my longest online friend and closest

amazing userboxes by @mxinnee

these beautiful stamps were made by thisdastampdoesnotexist!!

Thats all you need to know!!

bye guys

[mang0chees3]

im currently making a new notebook cover for a notebook i ripped the cover off of so uhhhh its gonna be ryuunosuke and png covered

[mang0chees3]

Does that mean you want to go to Australia?

-🤝

i think ive flown over multiple countries handshake anon i think australia would be my last option

dont you have girls to kiss handshake anon

[thetyrannytranny]

@mang0chees3 did you know I have free will and can just like tag you if I want to

[mang0chees3]

Free will is generally understood as the capacity or ability of people to (a) choose between different possible courses of action, (b) exercise control over their actions in a way that is necessary for moral responsibility, or (c) be the ultimate source or originator of their actions. There are different theories as to its nature, and these aspects are often emphasized differently depending on philosophical tradition, with debates focusing on whether and how such freedom can coexist with physical determinism, divine foreknowledge, and other constraints.

Free will is closely linked to the concepts of moral responsibility and moral desert, praise, culpability, and other judgements that can logically apply only to actions that are freely chosen. It is also connected with the concepts of advice, persuasion, deliberation, and prohibition. Traditionally, only actions that are freely willed are seen as deserving credit or blame. Whether free will exists and the implications of whether it exists or not constitute some of the longest-running debates of philosophy.

Some philosophers and thinkers conceive of free will as the capacity to make choices undetermined by past events. However, determinism suggests that the natural world is governed by cause-and-effect relationships, and only one course of events is possible, which is inconsistent with a libertarian model of free will. Ancient Greek philosophy identified this issue, which remains a major focus of philosophical debate to this day. The view that posits free will as incompatible with determinism is called incompatibilism and encompasses both metaphysical libertarianism (the claim that determinism is false and thus free will is at least possible) and hard determinism or hard incompatibilism (the claim that determinism is true and thus free will is not possible). Another incompatibilist position is illusionism or hard incompatibilism, which holds not only determinism but also indeterminism (randomness) to be incompatible with free will and thus free will to be impossible regardless of the metaphysical truth of determinism.

In contrast, compatibilists hold that free will is compatible with determinism. Some compatibilist philosophers (i.e., hard compatibilists) even hold that determinism is actually necessary for the existence of free will and agency, on the grounds that choice involves preference for one course of action over another, requiring a sense of how choices will turn out. Different compatibilists offer very different definitions of what "free will" means and consequently find different types of constraints to be relevant to the issue. Classical compatibilists considered free will nothing more than freedom of action, considering one free of will if, had one counterfactually wanted to do otherwise, one could have done otherwise without physical impediment. Many contemporary compatibilists instead identify free will as a psychological capacity, such as to direct one's behavior in a way that is responsive to reason or potentially sanctionable. There are still further different conceptions of free will, each with its own concerns, sharing only the common feature of not finding the possibility of physical determinism a threat to the possibility of free will.

[thetyrannytranny]

Apostles did he really just copy paste a definition of free will on my post???

[mang0chees3]

homeboys did she really just call on the disciples of jesus??? am i going to DIE

[thetyrannytranny]

I call everyone apostles

[mang0chees3]

okay guys i am NOT going to die. we are all apostles in this house

[thetyrannytranny]

@mang0chees3 did you know I have free will and can just like tag you if I want to

[mang0chees3]

Free will is generally understood as the capacity or ability of people to (a) choose between different possible courses of action, (b) exercise control over their actions in a way that is necessary for moral responsibility, or (c) be the ultimate source or originator of their actions. There are different theories as to its nature, and these aspects are often emphasized differently depending on philosophical tradition, with debates focusing on whether and how such freedom can coexist with physical determinism, divine foreknowledge, and other constraints.

Free will is closely linked to the concepts of moral responsibility and moral desert, praise, culpability, and other judgements that can logically apply only to actions that are freely chosen. It is also connected with the concepts of advice, persuasion, deliberation, and prohibition. Traditionally, only actions that are freely willed are seen as deserving credit or blame. Whether free will exists and the implications of whether it exists or not constitute some of the longest-running debates of philosophy.

Some philosophers and thinkers conceive of free will as the capacity to make choices undetermined by past events. However, determinism suggests that the natural world is governed by cause-and-effect relationships, and only one course of events is possible, which is inconsistent with a libertarian model of free will. Ancient Greek philosophy identified this issue, which remains a major focus of philosophical debate to this day. The view that posits free will as incompatible with determinism is called incompatibilism and encompasses both metaphysical libertarianism (the claim that determinism is false and thus free will is at least possible) and hard determinism or hard incompatibilism (the claim that determinism is true and thus free will is not possible). Another incompatibilist position is illusionism or hard incompatibilism, which holds not only determinism but also indeterminism (randomness) to be incompatible with free will and thus free will to be impossible regardless of the metaphysical truth of determinism.

In contrast, compatibilists hold that free will is compatible with determinism. Some compatibilist philosophers (i.e., hard compatibilists) even hold that determinism is actually necessary for the existence of free will and agency, on the grounds that choice involves preference for one course of action over another, requiring a sense of how choices will turn out. Different compatibilists offer very different definitions of what "free will" means and consequently find different types of constraints to be relevant to the issue. Classical compatibilists considered free will nothing more than freedom of action, considering one free of will if, had one counterfactually wanted to do otherwise, one could have done otherwise without physical impediment. Many contemporary compatibilists instead identify free will as a psychological capacity, such as to direct one's behavior in a way that is responsive to reason or potentially sanctionable. There are still further different conceptions of free will, each with its own concerns, sharing only the common feature of not finding the possibility of physical determinism a threat to the possibility of free will.

[thetyrannytranny]

Apostles did he really just copy paste a definition of free will on my post???

[mang0chees3]

homeboys did she really just call on the disciples of jesus??? am i going to DIE

[thetyrannytranny]

@mang0chees3 did you know I have free will and can just like tag you if I want to

[mang0chees3]

Free will is generally understood as the capacity or ability of people to (a) choose between different possible courses of action, (b) exercise control over their actions in a way that is necessary for moral responsibility, or (c) be the ultimate source or originator of their actions. There are different theories as to its nature, and these aspects are often emphasized differently depending on philosophical tradition, with debates focusing on whether and how such freedom can coexist with physical determinism, divine foreknowledge, and other constraints.

Free will is closely linked to the concepts of moral responsibility and moral desert, praise, culpability, and other judgements that can logically apply only to actions that are freely chosen. It is also connected with the concepts of advice, persuasion, deliberation, and prohibition. Traditionally, only actions that are freely willed are seen as deserving credit or blame. Whether free will exists and the implications of whether it exists or not constitute some of the longest-running debates of philosophy.

Some philosophers and thinkers conceive of free will as the capacity to make choices undetermined by past events. However, determinism suggests that the natural world is governed by cause-and-effect relationships, and only one course of events is possible, which is inconsistent with a libertarian model of free will. Ancient Greek philosophy identified this issue, which remains a major focus of philosophical debate to this day. The view that posits free will as incompatible with determinism is called incompatibilism and encompasses both metaphysical libertarianism (the claim that determinism is false and thus free will is at least possible) and hard determinism or hard incompatibilism (the claim that determinism is true and thus free will is not possible). Another incompatibilist position is illusionism or hard incompatibilism, which holds not only determinism but also indeterminism (randomness) to be incompatible with free will and thus free will to be impossible regardless of the metaphysical truth of determinism.

In contrast, compatibilists hold that free will is compatible with determinism. Some compatibilist philosophers (i.e., hard compatibilists) even hold that determinism is actually necessary for the existence of free will and agency, on the grounds that choice involves preference for one course of action over another, requiring a sense of how choices will turn out. Different compatibilists offer very different definitions of what "free will" means and consequently find different types of constraints to be relevant to the issue. Classical compatibilists considered free will nothing more than freedom of action, considering one free of will if, had one counterfactually wanted to do otherwise, one could have done otherwise without physical impediment. Many contemporary compatibilists instead identify free will as a psychological capacity, such as to direct one's behavior in a way that is responsive to reason or potentially sanctionable. There are still further different conceptions of free will, each with its own concerns, sharing only the common feature of not finding the possibility of physical determinism a threat to the possibility of free will.

[mang0chees3]

I might send you to another country, but also that depends does Australia count as another country or another continent?

-🤝

thats not a country or continent it's a whole new word where onions fly

[mang0chees3]

smile for the camera

[skeebeedeethesequel]

Visit Original Link

waow 💕💕💕💕 this blessed my ears😍😍🥰😍🥰🥳 this should be the new trending music🤗

[mang0chees3]

HELLO MY NARUMITSU MIIS STARTED DATING THE SAME DAY PHOENIX FELL IN LOVE WITH MILES

[mang0chees3]

i wanna be an ancient greek noble where people use fans to cool me off and instead of grapes i get fed tamarind jira pani

[mang0chees3]

Would you shake my hand?

-🤝

would you send me to another country? that's the REAL question

[mang0chees3]

I CANT DO THIS I HATE CORPORATE I HATE HAVING TO PROVE THAT IM HUMAN EVERYTIME I TRY TO USE A WEBSITE IM GOING TO RUN AWAY TO BECOME A STUNT DOUBLE

[mang0chees3]

im sorry but i genuinely can't STAND when people who make jokes about gender like it's meaningless and fake

rant warning underneath

gender means EVERYTHING. the concept of gender as meaningless is harmful for both trans and cis people

"gender is a fake concept" gender is a DEADLY concept and we all need to acknowledge it for the pain and pleasure it gave us. people have killed, died, loved and felt comfort because of gender. gender DYSPHORIA exists as well!

gender isnt competition. it can't be about who is the better one or 'haha! i have less genders than you and i am not as woke haha hehe' stop that.

gender isn't sex, gender isn't pronouns. i don't care if you have a penis, delilah. you are a GIRL!! BECAUSE YOU SAID SO YOURSELF DELILAH.

if you don't have a gender, that's awesome! you do you! but that still means gender has a meaning to you. it means that gender can be everything and nothing. you can feel comfort without gender just as much as people who feel comfort in the gender they have.

gender can be objects, things, ideals, anything you want. society depends on gender. WE depend on gender. treat it with thought and care.

[mang0chees3]

genuinely freaky ass vacation house my family owns because why do alk the toilets have dehydrated piss coloured water even the flush water is the same colour

[mang0chees3]

narumitsu ita bag cumming soon👀👀👀

[mang0chees3]

can you guys tell i like narumitsu