
izzy's playlists!
Stranger Things
Cosimo Galluzzi

Discoholic 🪩
Fai_Ryy

★

bliss lane
TVSTRANGERTHINGS
The Bowery Presents

PR's Tumblrdome
RMH
🪼

#extradirty
Game of Thrones Daily
h
official daine visual archive
Mike Driver

JVL
The Stonewall Inn

Product Placement
seen from Saudi Arabia
seen from Saudi Arabia
seen from Germany

seen from Saudi Arabia
seen from Saudi Arabia
seen from United States
seen from Türkiye
seen from Ukraine
seen from Bangladesh
seen from Canada
seen from Ireland
seen from Hungary
seen from United States

seen from Türkiye
seen from United States

seen from United Kingdom
seen from United States
seen from Türkiye
seen from United States

seen from United States
@marspumpkin
ok I got my larp ready for the big game this saturday
…What if I told you historical gothic lesbian supernatural ghost crossdressing enemies/lovers fight to the death manipulation webcomic…what then? What then…
feel like i just did three lines of gothic yuri cocaine
She's right and she should say it
There actually are a lot of genuinely submissive men, but they're submissive to OTHER MEN. It's rare for men to submit to women, but they constantly submit to their male authority figures like bosses, politicians, etc.
and you'll soon find that these "submissive" men are actually just as in control as the "dominant" man. just tell your "submissive" boyfriend you no longer want to fulfill his submissive fantasies.
in the end, whose fantasies are you fulfilling? still his. he is still in control, he is still telling YOU what to do, it's just that he's controlling from what appears to be a submissive position.
this is just the male dominance hierarchy in play. he's lower then other men in the heirarchy and he know's it, but he would never let himself be lower than a woman.
When Marxists critique the capitalist system, they say (truthfully) that all workers are exploited by it and coerced into working by the ruling class, despite them enjoying their jobs or not, and that it is a natural prerequisite of the capitalist system due to its structure. This is rarely seen (and only seen by the capitalist) as infantilizing the worker or taking away the agency of the proletariat, simply making an observation of their circumstance.
However when feminists, similarly critiquing the patriarchal system, say that all women are exploited by it and coerced to do certain things by their equivalent ruling/oppressive class, despite them enjoying these things or not, and that this coercion is a natural prerequisite of the patriarchal system due to its structure, this is seen by other apparent feminists as infantilizing women and taking away all women's agency, not simply making an observation of their circumstance.
What is the material difference here? That you want it to be untrue or offensive in some way, so it serves to make you feel better about the world and your life within it?
Part of the chasm stems from the fact that modern feminism has been turned into an individual movement, focused on individual whims rather than collective necessity. Another part of it comes from the fact that unlike Marxism, where the oppressor is the oligarch, the bourgeoisie, and the ruling class, all figures whom the majority of the proletariat scarcely make direct contact with, for feminism the oppressor is in women's beds, classrooms, at the head of their dinner tables and shoulder-to-shoulder with them at work.
These factors make it difficult for women to truly interrogate their lives through the lens of feminist theory since application of these thoughts (like any thorough political movement) requires dedication and discipline which are not easy to come by or maintain when you are:
A. Oppressed by the patriarchal (and other) system(s)
And
B. Told that feminism and other movements like it are inherently focused on your wants, not the needs of a collective. This makes it easy to default to thinking everything not specifically focused on your whims is incorrect or offensive.
Oh My God Bruh
the thing about “andrew hussie returns to homestuck to write a cartoon pilot produced by vivziepop with toby fox voicing john egbert” is like. it’s so far-fetched i wouldn’t even make that joke. because it would be too ridiculous for me to even find funny. and it’s not a joke. it’s literally happening right now.
while you’re here, consider donating to my friend hamza
I feel like something happened.
🪩: "it's party time!"
🚬: "isn't it always party time with you?"
AU where everything is the same except Harry is inexplicably a sentient vespa.
I know I know, this guy gets too much play, so many characters need their time in the spotlight, I'll get there one AU at a time
BTW I have commissions open if ya wanna take a gander. If you're not seeing an option you want, let me know! I'll add it.
Tips are appreciated, I'm a freelancin' lady now and anything helps!
Support Vellumoth
am i sorry ? who knows.
My favorite moment in the entire game
destiel bloggers really be tagging posts like
#screaming crying throwing up #AGSSHDJDSHDJFJ #😭😭😭😭😭😭😭😭😭😭😭😫😫😫😫😫😫😫😫😭😭😭😭😭😭😭 #EATING GLASS #i need to lie on the floor for ten to fourteen business days DON'T TOUCH ME #destiel #deanandcas #otp: i was here #otp: profound bond #spn episode 6x20 #spn the man who would be king #destiel amv #lordhuronnatural #userdesitelnumber1
this has probably been done before???