Mary Abbotts

ENG 101

[maryabbotts101]

#14

This course appealed to me since it focused not just on writing, but also on the writing process. I enjoyed how we discussed our writing processes and discovered new methods to better them. I honestly can't think of any way to make this course better. As I already stated, I enjoyed that it focused on the writing process because my past English classes did not. I also like the tasks and believed they were beneficial in helping me improve as a writer. I particularly like the infographic because it was my first time creating one on the computer, and I believe it is a valuable talent to possess.

[ethangraff279]

#13

We have covered a lot of important strategies to improve our writing process. These include finding reliable sources, peer reviewing, making outlines, having multiple first draft, and more. all of these strategies can be used in other classes as well.

I have used peer reviewing and having multiple first drafts in other classes. Mainly if have used this in my honors 110 class and my intro to religion class.  

[maryabbotts101]

I agree that those are all important strategies that can be incorporated into anything outside of this class. I also use peer review in a lot of my other classes. Peer review is very effective and gives you reassurance about your confidence in writing while also giving pointers to make it better. 

[maryabbotts101]

post #13

I can translate my writing process to almost every other class that I have outside of this class. Wether I am taking notes or writing a paper, I can exercise my writing skills. These skills can be incorporated in group projects and also essays. Specifically, making a rough draft and making sure your sources are credible is very important. Also, making a poster or ad for a specific topic will be easier and less stressful to do because of our experience with making an infographic. Infographics are visual and informative just like propaganda posters for history class. These skills are very useful in a lot of ways. 

[maryabbotts101]

post #12

In my opinion, the rhetorical analysis was the most challenging assignment this semester. It was hard to write because I was not particularly interested in the article I had chosen so the lack of interest made it hard to focus and fully understand my topic. I honestly do not think my writing has improved. I just try to do my best when it comes to writing and just accept the outcome of the grade that I get. 

[maryabbotts101]

post #11

My primary claim is that America made the wrong choice and we need a Green Revolution. The original argument of the article was about the native tribes not being able to build their hemp industries. Both arguments are about the hemp economies and how they are affecting the economies. The argument in the article is more broad and focuses on all of the benefits of hemp and why they want to build the industry. 

[maryabbotts101]

post #10

It is extremely important to evaluate a source because if you are writing a research paper you want to back up your statements with facts that are reliable and trustworthy. With that being said, it would look bad if the facts you used in a research paper were not true. The most important thing I learned is that if the source is credible then it is most likely reliable. Therefore, this changes the way you read an article because before you read it you should check if it is reliable before looking at the information they provided. Unfortunately, lots of articles on the web will somehow be found as bias in some way, that is unavoidable. Also, articles on the web can be misleading and that is why you shouldn’t trust the source unless it is credible. 

[kylebuddblog]

#9

The thesis or main argument from my article in project 2 was that fossil fuels like nitrogen gas from fracking need to stop being used. The author uses logos as her evidence. A lot of facts about the problems of using fossil fuels are given throughout the passage. The evidence listed was informative; however, I wish she made meaningful connections to society throughout the paper to make the reader want to get involved. I believe that giving a specific example of how fracking impacted a family or business in a negative way would make the paper a lot better.

[maryabbotts101]

This is such an important argument. There needs to be a limit to fracking. Especially, if it is effecting the environment. I agree with you that an example would be more efficient to understanding how it impacts the society. 

[maryabbotts101]

post #9

The article that I read from project 2 had a main argument of native tribes using hemp industries to further their income and the lack of their resources to succeed with this. 

You can explore further on about why hemp industries are booming at the moment. Could also look at what native tribes are doing to help keep their tribe sustained. 

[ethangraff279]

#8

I found this image when I searched climate change in google. The audience is everyday people. The purpose of this image is to show people what will happen to our planet if we do nothing to stop climate change. I’d say the main rhetorical appeal being used in this image is pathos. It uses pathos by striking fear into the viewer because it shows how much climate change can change our planet for the worst. This image also uses contrast and alignment. It uses contrast by showing the two different ways the Earth can end up. It uses alignment by having half the image what the earth can look like if we find a way to fix climate change and the other half shows what will happen if we don’t. I think the fact that it is half and half of what the two outcomes are shows how easily the planet could turn to one side.

[maryabbotts101]

Hey ethan! This is a good infographic! By looking at it, I get that the earth is being effected by global warming and that it is an important issue. I agree that it uses pathos to persuade the audience through the left side of image. If it had a couple facts or maybe even a title it could be even better. 

[maryabbotts101]

post #8

I found this image off of google. The audience for this infographic would be environmental activists and just ordinary citizens who need to be aware of what is going on with the earth we live on. The contrast of colors is important because the orange really stands out from the green. The font is very tiny and a lot to take in so that is not the best. This image employs rhetorical appeals such as logos by using facts throughout the image. This infographic reflects the understanding the effects of global warming and the ways of prevention. 

[maryabbotts101]

post #6

When I think about a time that my paper was peer reviewed I remember usually only getting positive feedback. This is great but also does not help. Some people are great at peer reviews but others are not much help at all. Some suggestions that were most helpful for me was to connect the thesis to the body paragraphs and make sure it all flows together. This really helps me focus on each paragraph at a time. The least helpful suggestion that I have received was to just submit my rough draft and hope for the best. That could sometimes work out but its always best to revise it before you submit. 

[kylebuddblog]

Post 5

My article uses ethos pathos and logos throughout the passage. They use logos by giving a lot of facts about how fracking is dangerous but can also be useful if done correctly. They then use pathos by saying how fracking can contaminate a water supply and effect thousands at a time. Finally they use ethos by saying if we know fracking is bad and can be dangerous why are we still doing it. They then go on to say that we need to find a safer form of energy. I do believe they emphasized logos because they gave a lot of facts on fracking which informs the reader.

[maryabbotts101]

Hey Kyle! Your article sounds interesting to read. Your post was very good. This post's logo examples remind me of my own article. Also, your author's approach of making a personal connection with the audience is extremely similar to mine.

[maryabbotts101]

post #5

In the article I read about Reviving traditional hemp economies it used the rhetorical appeals throughout the article. The article used logos by explaining and giving statistics about the economy and the information about the benefits the natives might receive. It used pathos by connecting to the reader on an emotional level by telling us how the native people have been taken advantage of and are not taken seriously. The author used ethos by her being an activist for sustainable tribal economies. With that being said she has strong opinions and feelings towards this certain topic. I would say logos is used more in this article. The author uses a few statistics, mostly facts, and some other quantitative data. I think the use of logos was successful. It effectively backs the authors argument and further shows that native people are being treated poorly and when it comes to the hemp industry, that is their chance to have high paying jobs. 

[justinblogg]

Writing Prompt #4

Rhetoric is all about persuasive writing. There are three different types of this writing to help try to convince the reader of something. They are Ethos, Pathos, and Logos. Ethos is credibility, Pathos is emotion, and Logos is logic. I feel like Rhetoric has a negative connotation because most people disagree with the writing and can cause conflict. Rhetorical analysis would be helpful when trying to understand what the author is talking about and how they are trying to persuade you.

[maryabbotts101]

I agree with you about rhetoric having a negative connotation. This makes sense because like you said, it can cause conflict and most are written as an argumentative. This can cause conflict for the people who disagree or feel strongly about the opposing side. 

[maryabbotts101]

post #4

Rhetorical analysis’ are used when you want to make your views convincing and attractive to your readers or audience. These are useful because they are targeted for the people that it draws attention to. I associate rhetoric with school, therefore it has a negative connotation. Also, persuasion has the potential to lead to people being misled or deceived. A rhetorical analysis would be useful in determining whether the author of a book is misleading people or if the material is believable and reliable. It assists readers in determining the accuracy of the content they have just read. 

[brynnaekelly]

Tumblr #3

The pre-writing process for me on project one is to start writing my thoughts out. I have always hated getting started with a paper and throwing my thoughts and ideas on paper. brain-storming and organizing would have been helpful at times but I tend to go over the paper to make sure it flows and makes sense.

[maryabbotts101]

I totally agree with you. I hate getting started with a paper, I struggle so much. Brain storming tends to help when you can’t get started but that can also be hard. I always find myself overanalyzing what I have wrote because Its always hard to tell if it just flows in my head or if it actually flows and makes sense to others.

[maryabbotts101]

post #3

When I look back at Project One I am relieved that it is over because it was hard to get started. Once I started writing it all came together. My pre-writing process took a lot of brainstorming. It was hard to decide what to include in my letter and differentiate between what was necessary or not. After I wrote my full letter I had people read over it for me and give me feedback. After receiving feedback, I had to revise a few things and then I felt more confident about submitting it. Having peers read my letter and giving me their opinions was very useful to me to hear others ideas and thoughts about what I wrote. I definitely have things I need to improve on for project two. One thing I need to improve on is making my writing flow better as I am writing instead of always having to go back and fix it at the end.