I'm an old man (Boomer/Gen X) math ed prof from Michigan. I thought I got on tumblr after my daughter to see what it was about, but she says not. I believe her. This tumblr is for any and all math related content. My original posts are mostly GeoGebra math art.
My Blogs
The original blog is for longer form writing. Need to post there more.
A blog for sharing my math interests on the web, to post new materials for elementary, secondary and teacher ed, and vent mathematical steam
Main side tumblr for all my geeky interests. Comics, sci fi, movies, music, art, ...
My infrequent math comic blog. Mathober is a boon for content there.
Political ravings
Super niche Doctor Doom fan blog
My religious blog (mostly art centered since I'm not leading bible studies anymore).
Rare dabblings or, more frequently, poems I like,
Old pic but mostly accurate. Find me also on Twitter or more likely now Bluesky.
The Leiden Declaration is not just for mathematicians
Recently some leading mathematicians have been studying the use, impact, and risks of using artificial intelligence in mathematical research and institutions.
They have now published the Leiden Declaration to articulate their concerns and to make recommendations.
I learned about this today from the New York Times, and you can learn a lot by reading their article. But you can learn more by reading the Declaration.
I feel that the Declaration is directly relevant not only to the mathematical community, but also, in reality, to all of us who regard thinking as an integral part of what we do. And that, in the end, is really all of us.
I strongly suggest that you study the Declaration and adopt its recommendations.
Here is my own take on the recommendations...
Provide disclosure and references for your own uses of artificial intelligence.
Invest all the work needed to rigorously vet any result that you have obtained through artificial intelligence.
Shoot down any crap work that you have identified. Don't make it personal, but don't be gentle.
Uphold the highest values of your chosen field of work. Both science and the arts are things that we do just out of curiosity, or to express ourselves, or because we just have to. In other words, these activities are ends in themselves. They are among the highest and most wonderful things that we, as a species, have done. Forcefully combat efforts to prioritize commercial, political, and military uses of artificial intelligence over more important reasons to use it.
Do everything you can to ensure that everyone who could benefit from using artificial intelligence, can use it. In a democratic world, anyone with a smartphone or computer should be able to find, afford, and use all the compute they need.
I have become convinced, through my own use of artificial intelligence for music composition and software development, that it has enormous, world-changing potential to amplify the scope, speed, and even depth of what scientists, artists, and indeed all of us can do.
Don't let selfish interests hoard or abuse this power.
Among the potential threats that the Leiden Declaration authors articulate are accuracy and reliability: Journal editors are already complaining about a flood of plausible seeming A.I.- generated papers and proofs that have turned out to be incorrect, and in ways that are difficult for mathematicians to discern.
Perhaps most pointedly, the authors raise the question of whether the many A.I. companies tackling mathematics — major players such as OpenAI, Google DeepMind and Anthropic, or start-ups such as Harmonic, Math, Inc. and Axiom Math — are keeping the field’s best interests in mind. “Technology companies’ involvement in research,” they write, “raises the risk that research questions are prioritized and incentivized because of their amenability to A.I. methods and models, rather than their deeper significance to understanding.” In turn, they point out, this disadvantages researchers who choose not to use the technology, and those who do not have access to it.
and...
OCHIGAME Mathematics is a rich form of cultural expression with an ancient history, and I am not worried that any technology will ever render it obsolete. Its most precious aspects, such as the collective quest to understand beautifully intricate ideas, and to explore the limits of the human imagination, cannot ever be automated. What I am worried about is that a handful of corporations are mobilizing their vast financial resources to impose an impoverished view of mathematics so forcefully — at a moment when scientific research is already under political attack — that they may well end up destroying the social institutions that allow mathematics to flourish. What could be futile about resisting that?
i read an interview with a mathematician recently where she talks about the commonalities between math and literature and the idea that playfulness is a key part of doing both of those things. there’s a lot of fun to be had in turning a concept over and over, finding novel ways to look at it or combine it with other things, and i think that idea of playfulness also applies to analysis + critique. looking at a story through different lenses to see what new insights you can gain, reading intertexts and learning about the context in which it was created. finding a new bit of theory and saying hey wait a minute, i can use this to talk about [insert favourite media here]! it’s fun!
Posted in Mathematical Tiles and Tessellations on FB by Kerry Lindner. "Templated the exits in photoshop, printed and inked a tile by hand, scanned and assembled in photoshop."
