❣ Chile in a Photography ❣
RMH
YOU ARE THE REASON
Janaina Medeiros
Game of Thrones Daily
Aqua Utopia｜海の底で記憶を紡ぐ
taylor price
we're not kids anymore.
blake kathryn
PUT YOUR BEARD IN MY MOUTH
sheepfilms
@theartofmadeline
Not today Justin
oozey mess
No title available
AnasAbdin
wallacepolsom
PR's Tumblrdome
let's talk about Bridgerton tea, my ask is open
Today's Document
seen from Norway
seen from Singapore
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from Malaysia
seen from United States
seen from Norway
seen from Germany
seen from United States
seen from Finland
seen from United States
seen from Türkiye
seen from United States
seen from Finland
seen from Switzerland
seen from United States
seen from Belarus
seen from Russia
seen from Norway
seen from United States
@matthew12131415
Logical Fallacies: Guess That Fallacy! (Say What? Part II)
apologies for sending this extremely late skdfksks
on loyal partner: ad hominem
on the dolomite sand: post hoc ergo propter hoc?
on laing leaf: circular reason
on da polis: black-or-white or false dilemma
on the boypren: slippery slope
Make them guess that fallacy
Here are some logical fallacies:
Logical fallacy 1:
We are better off opening up the economy and risk spreading the virus than going back on lockdown and have no economic activity at all.
Logical fallacy 2:
My OFW neighbor who recently came home tested positive for the corona virus, and so it’s probably best to not have OFWs come home to avoid the risk of them spreading the virus.
Logical fallacy 3:
Why are we bothering to criticize the artificial beach in Manila Bay when we continue to get thousands of COVID positive individuals.
Logical fallacy 4:
Since the whole school year is gonna be online, we won’t learn anything all throughout the year. :(
Logical fallacy 5:
We have been on lockdown for so long because the Filipino people aren’t disciplined enough!
1. false equivalency; you can still have economic activity despite the lockdown (e.g., proliferation of shopee)
2. circular reasoning; the premises are tautological
3. red herring; both can be addressed but the issue at-hand is not tackled (i.e., artificial beach)
4. slippery slope (could also be false equivalency) - assumes the online learning is automatically detrimental / learning can only happen through physical classes
5. probably overgeneralization? it assumes filipinos are inherently undisciplined.
Guess the Fallacy!! :)
9/23/2020
1. Either we all convert to renewable sources of energy or we continue using non-renewable energy and die because of global warming.
2. I am never going to drink alcohol. I don’t want to be an alcoholic and die of liver failure.
3. I saw a Facebook thread in which multiple guys said that they would break up with a girl if she was sexually abused. They said that it was the girl’s fault for putting herself in that situation. Therefore, all men are trash.
4. Person 1: You should learn to stand up for yourself more and stop being a pushover
Person 2: Look who’s talking
5. I read that the beef industry is the leading cause of methane and a large contributor to global warming. I guess the only way to stop climate change is to become vegan then.
1. false dilemma
2. slippery slope
3. overgeneralization
4. tu quoque
5. straw man fallacy
Bruh...what?
Guess what fallacies these are:
“Ang Dolomites ay nourishment to aid plant growth sabi ng DENR while ang “Yellowmites” naman ay proven kanser sa Pilipinas.”
*makes valid point* “Eh di ikaw na matalino”
“Di mo ba nakikita na mas mayaman tayo ng panahon ni Marcos? Isang piso, isang dolyar! Di ka kasi nag-aaral. God bless nalang.”
what’s up, saba con kyle?
1. Appeal to ignorance + overgeneralization = appeal to ignorance because the person assumes it already as true; that is, whatever the DENR says can never be wrong/verifiable as true; overgeneralization because it assumes that everyone who supports the Liberal Party is detrimental to society, when several cases show otherwise. I just recalled the lecture I had in Math 10 about logic, that the opposite of all (dilawans are cancerous) is some are not (cancerous).
2. AD HOMINEM. does not address the argument.
3. Slippery slope. it assumes that the equal purchasing power of the peso to dollar means that every Filipino is significantly rich.
Logical Fallacies: (3) Say What?
Lodi Fallacy ᵃˡˡ ᶦᵐᵃᵍᵉˢ ᵃⁿᵈ ᵉˣᵃᵐᵖˡᵉˢ ᵃʳᵉ ᵐᵉᵃⁿᵗ ᶠᵒʳ ᵃᶜᵃᵈᵉᵐᶦᶜ ᵃⁿᵈ ᵉⁿᵗᵉʳᵗᵃᶦⁿᵐᵉⁿᵗ ᵖᵘʳᵖᵒˢᵉˢ ᵃⁿᵈ ᵈᵒ ⁿᵒᵗ ʷᶦˢʰ ᵗᵒ ᶦⁿᶠʳᶦⁿᵍᵉ ᵒⁿ ᵃⁿʸ ᶠᵒʳᵐ ᵒᶠ ᵛᶦᵒˡᵃᵗᶦᵒⁿ ᵒⁿ ʰᵘᵐᵃⁿ ᵖᵉʳᶜᵉᵖᵗᶦᵒⁿ ᵃⁿᵈ ᵖʳᵉᶠᵉʳᵉⁿᶜᵉ ᵒⁿᵉ ˡᵒᵛᵉ
circular reasoning | the conclusion of lang leaf’s writing prowess is already assumed in the premise
Logical Fallacies: (2) Say What?
Taga-gobyerno ako Fallacy ᵃˡˡ ᶦᵐᵃᵍᵉˢ ᵃⁿᵈ ᵉˣᵃᵐᵖˡᵉˢ ᵃʳᵉ ᵐᵉᵃⁿᵗ ᶠᵒʳ ᵃᶜᵃᵈᵉᵐᶦᶜ ᵃⁿᵈ ᵉⁿᵗᵉʳᵗᵃᶦⁿᵐᵉⁿᵗ ᵖᵘʳᵖᵒˢᵉˢ ᵃⁿᵈ ᵈᵒ ⁿᵒᵗ ʷᶦˢʰ ᵗᵒ ᶦⁿᶠʳᶦⁿᵍᵉ ᵒⁿ ᵃⁿʸ ᶠᵒʳᵐ ᵒᶠ ᵛᶦᵒˡᵃᵗᶦᵒⁿ ᵒⁿ ʰᵘᵐᵃⁿ ᵖᵉʳᶜᵉᵖᵗᶦᵒⁿ ᵃⁿᵈ ᵖʳᵉᶠᵉʳᵉⁿᶜᵉ ᵒⁿᵉ ˡᵒᵛᵉ
appeal to ignorance | not enough information is available with the environmental benefits of dumping white sand in manila bay
also hasty generalization
Logical Fallacies: (1) Say What?
Watermelon fallacy
ᵃˡˡ ᶦᵐᵃᵍᵉˢ ᵃⁿᵈ ᵉˣᵃᵐᵖˡᵉˢ ᵃʳᵉ ᵐᵉᵃⁿᵗ ᶠᵒʳ ᵃᶜᵃᵈᵉᵐᶦᶜ ᵃⁿᵈ ᵉⁿᵗᵉʳᵗᵃᶦⁿᵐᵉⁿᵗ ᵖᵘʳᵖᵒˢᵉˢ ᵃⁿᵈ ᵈᵒ ⁿᵒᵗ ʷᶦˢʰ ᵗᵒ ᶦⁿᶠʳᶦⁿᵍᵉ ᵒⁿ ᵃⁿʸ ᶠᵒʳᵐ ᵒᶠ ᵛᶦᵒˡᵃᵗᶦᵒⁿ ᵒⁿ ʰᵘᵐᵃⁿ ᵖᵉʳᶜᵉᵖᵗᶦᵒⁿ ᵃⁿᵈ ᵖʳᵉᶠᵉʳᵉⁿᶜᵉ ᵒⁿᵉ ˡᵒᵛᵉ
ad hominem | loyalty is not assessed through the significant other’s character, but through the clothing he/she/they wears
can be even hasty generalization | they partner has to explain how clothing affects loyalty
Try to figure out what fallacy this is!
1. “My god. I hate drugs. And I have to kill people because I hate drugs.” - President Duterte
2. Me: Ma, masakit ulo ko. My mom: Kakakompyuter mo yan!
3. Literally no one: Zuko: It’s either I find the Avatar or live out the rest of my days without honor!!!
1. circular reasoning but idk how huhu
2. appeal to ignorance because the mom isn’t well-versed in diagnosing the headache
3. false dilemma
